Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #661595 > unrolled thread

Re: What Made My Day Today :-)

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 14:42 -0600
    Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 15:48 -0500
      Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 14:52 -0600
        Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 16:04 -0500
          Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-03-01 22:41 +0100
            Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 17:15 -0500
              Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-03-02 07:39 +0100
                Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 14:01 -0500
                Re: What Made My Day Today :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-02 22:21 +0000
                  Re: What Made My Day Today :-) David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> - 2025-03-02 22:55 +0000
                    Re: What Made My Day Today :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-02 23:17 +0000
                      Re: What Made My Day Today :-) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 15:21 -0800
                        Re: What Made My Day Today :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-03 00:07 +0000
            Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-02 03:24 +0000
        Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-02 03:22 +0000
        Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-02 11:31 +0100
          Re: What Made My Day Today :-) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-02 11:03 -0800
            Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-03 09:40 +0100
      Re: What Made My Day Today :-) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-01 18:19 -0500
        Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 19:11 -0500
          Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 18:30 -0600
            Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 18:52 -0600
          Re: What Made My Day Today :-) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-02 12:13 -0500
            Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 13:48 -0500
              Re: What Made My Day Today :-) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-02 16:03 -0500
                Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 16:14 -0500
                  Re: What Made My Day Today :-) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-02 16:41 -0500
                  Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-03-02 22:47 +0100
                    Re: What Made My Day Today :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-02 22:10 +0000
                    Re: What Made My Day Today :-) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-02 15:11 -0800
                    Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 19:56 -0500
                      Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-03-03 06:25 +0100
                        Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 08:43 -0500
                          Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-03-03 15:53 +0100
                            Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 15:44 -0500
                              Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-03-03 23:28 +0100
                            Re: What Made My Day Today :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-03 22:51 +0000
                              Re: What Made My Day Today :-) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 15:11 -0800
                                Re: What Made My Day Today :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-04 04:43 +0000
      Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> - 2025-03-02 03:35 -0500
    Re: What Made My Day Today :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-03-02 13:05 +0000
    Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 23:27 -0600
      Re: What Made My Day Today :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 22:52 -0600
        Re: What Made My Day Today :-) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 20:59 -0800

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#661613

On 3/1/25 6:11 PM, Joel wrote:
> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 3/1/25 15:48, Joel wrote:
>>> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> - I gained some respect for Zelensky since yesterday.
>>>>
>>>> The guy must be someone to recon with. I thought he was just a crook. He
>>>> didn't take bullshit from present U.S. administration. He reacted very
>>>> realistically and did what any sane man can, discussing with essentially
>>>> Nazi idiots.
>>>>
>>>> That matter was felt all over Europe as well, and they all backed
>>>> Zelensky's side. Kudos for Zelensky.
>>>
>>> Yeah but you know what, Trump has a point.
>>
>> Not really.  This was a shakedown attempt by Trump.
> 
> 
> No, my friend, take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us
> a chance to solve this.
> 


He may be _led_ to do that, and I hope he will. But this requires work 
from other parties involved before seeing results.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661614

On 3/1/25 6:30 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 3/1/25 6:11 PM, Joel wrote:
>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>> On 3/1/25 15:48, Joel wrote:
>>>> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> - I gained some respect for Zelensky since yesterday.
>>>>>
>>>>> The guy must be someone to recon with. I thought he was just a 
>>>>> crook. He
>>>>> didn't take bullshit from present U.S. administration. He reacted very
>>>>> realistically and did what any sane man can, discussing with 
>>>>> essentially
>>>>> Nazi idiots.
>>>>>
>>>>> That matter was felt all over Europe as well, and they all backed
>>>>> Zelensky's side. Kudos for Zelensky.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah but you know what, Trump has a point.
>>>
>>> Not really.  This was a shakedown attempt by Trump.
>>
>>
>> No, my friend, take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us
>> a chance to solve this.
>>
> 
> 
> He may be _led_ to do that, and I hope he will. But this requires work 
> from other parties involved before seeing results.
> 
> 


He really fucked yesterday's chances up because his behavior could not 
get adjusted by others in a live stream.

Modifications from others are required in leading him in the right 
direction. And it is not promising that he has only gathered yes men and 
shallow characters around himself in this administration. You will pay 
for that!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661629

On 3/1/25 19:11, Joel wrote:
> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 3/1/25 15:48, Joel wrote:
>>> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> - I gained some respect for Zelensky since yesterday.
>>>>
>>>> The guy must be someone to recon with. I thought he was just a crook. He
>>>> didn't take bullshit from present U.S. administration. He reacted very
>>>> realistically and did what any sane man can, discussing with essentially
>>>> Nazi idiots.
>>>>
>>>> That matter was felt all over Europe as well, and they all backed
>>>> Zelensky's side. Kudos for Zelensky.
>>>
>>> Yeah but you know what, Trump has a point.
>>
>> Not really.  This was a shakedown attempt by Trump.
> 
> 
> No, my friend, take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us
> a chance to solve this.

But why should I take your word for any of this?

Increasing the bullying of a victim doesn't ever stop the bullying.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661634

-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>On 3/1/25 19:11, Joel wrote:
>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>> On 3/1/25 15:48, Joel wrote:
>>>> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> - I gained some respect for Zelensky since yesterday.
>>>>>
>>>>> The guy must be someone to recon with. I thought he was just a crook. He
>>>>> didn't take bullshit from present U.S. administration. He reacted very
>>>>> realistically and did what any sane man can, discussing with essentially
>>>>> Nazi idiots.
>>>>>
>>>>> That matter was felt all over Europe as well, and they all backed
>>>>> Zelensky's side. Kudos for Zelensky.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah but you know what, Trump has a point.
>>>
>>> Not really.  This was a shakedown attempt by Trump.
>> 
>> No, my friend, take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us
>> a chance to solve this.
>
>But why should I take your word for any of this?
>
>Increasing the bullying of a victim doesn't ever stop the bullying.


We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine bravely
fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy Putin, fair
as it may not seem.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661639

On 3/2/25 13:48, Joel wrote:
> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 3/1/25 19:11, Joel wrote:
>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/1/25 15:48, Joel wrote:
>>>>> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> - I gained some respect for Zelensky since yesterday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The guy must be someone to recon with. I thought he was just a crook. He
>>>>>> didn't take bullshit from present U.S. administration. He reacted very
>>>>>> realistically and did what any sane man can, discussing with essentially
>>>>>> Nazi idiots.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That matter was felt all over Europe as well, and they all backed
>>>>>> Zelensky's side. Kudos for Zelensky.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah but you know what, Trump has a point.
>>>>
>>>> Not really.  This was a shakedown attempt by Trump.
>>>
>>> No, my friend, take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us
>>> a chance to solve this.
>>
>> But why should I take your word for any of this?
>>
>> Increasing the bullying of a victim doesn't ever stop the bullying.
> 
> 
> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine bravely
> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy Putin, fair
> as it may not seem.

No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and we've 
been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we made to 
Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated to give 
back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace 
bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow being nuked.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661640

-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:

>>>> take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us
>>>> a chance to solve this.
>>>
>>> But why should I take your word for any of this?
>>>
>>> Increasing the bullying of a victim doesn't ever stop the bullying.
>> 
>> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine bravely
>> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy Putin, fair
>> as it may not seem.
>
>No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and we've 
>been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we made to 
>Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated to give 
>back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace 
>bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow being nuked.


You're wanting World War III to happen, then?  Because that's what
you're implying with that logic.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661641

On 3/2/25 16:14, Joel wrote:
> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>> take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us
>>>>> a chance to solve this.
>>>>
>>>> But why should I take your word for any of this?
>>>>
>>>> Increasing the bullying of a victim doesn't ever stop the bullying.
>>>
>>> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine bravely
>>> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy Putin, fair
>>> as it may not seem.
>>
>> No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and we've
>> been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we made to
>> Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated to give
>> back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace
>> bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow being nuked.
> 
> 
> You're wanting World War III to happen, then?  Because that's what
> you're implying with that logic.

No, not saying that I "want" that.  I'm merely noting that when you're 
doomed to die anyway, nuking the other SOB takes them down with you.

If that starts a larger exchange (or not) is no longer relevant to you 
because you're already dead:  its the principle of MAD as a deterrent, 
and my observation is that MAD only works when both sides have nukes.

So if you really want peace, solution is give Ukraine back their nukes.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661642

W dniu 02.03.2025 o 22:14, Joel pisze:
> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>> take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us
>>>>> a chance to solve this.
>>>>
>>>> But why should I take your word for any of this?
>>>>
>>>> Increasing the bullying of a victim doesn't ever stop the bullying.
>>>
>>> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine bravely
>>> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy Putin, fair
>>> as it may not seem.
>>
>> No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and we've
>> been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we made to
>> Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated to give
>> back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace
>> bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow being nuked.
> 
> 
> You're wanting World War III to happen, then?  Because that's what
> you're implying with that logic.

If that piece of shit wanted Alaska - would you
give it for the purpose of  avoiding the  war?
How about California?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661644

What fools these apes be!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661648

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> 
> W dniu 02.03.2025 o 22:14, Joel pisze:
> > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>>> take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us
> >>>>> a chance to solve this.
> >>>>
> >>>> But why should I take your word for any of this?
> >>>>
> >>>> Increasing the bullying of a victim doesn't ever stop the bullying.
> >>>
> >>> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine bravely
> >>> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy Putin, fair
> >>> as it may not seem.
> >>
> >> No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and we've
> >> been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we made to
> >> Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated to give
> >> back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace
> >> bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow being nuked.
> >
> >
> > You're wanting World War III to happen, then?  Because that's what
> > you're implying with that logic.
> 
> If that piece of shit wanted Alaska - would you
> give it for the purpose of  avoiding the  war?
> How about California?

How about Cuba? 


How about Mexico?


How about Canada?


How about Brooklyn??


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661654

Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>W dniu 02.03.2025 o 22:14, Joel pisze:
>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us
>>>>>> a chance to solve this.
>>>>>
>>>>> But why should I take your word for any of this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Increasing the bullying of a victim doesn't ever stop the bullying.
>>>>
>>>> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine bravely
>>>> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy Putin, fair
>>>> as it may not seem.
>>>
>>> No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and we've
>>> been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we made to
>>> Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated to give
>>> back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace
>>> bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow being nuked.
>> 
>> You're wanting World War III to happen, then?  Because that's what
>> you're implying with that logic.
>
>If that piece of shit wanted Alaska - would you
>give it for the purpose of  avoiding the  war?
>How about California?


We have thanks to the election a way to satisfy Putin without giving
up anything.  That's why I'm suddenly joining with DJT.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661657

W dniu 03.03.2025 o 01:56, Joel pisze:
> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>> W dniu 02.03.2025 o 22:14, Joel pisze:
>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us
>>>>>>> a chance to solve this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But why should I take your word for any of this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Increasing the bullying of a victim doesn't ever stop the bullying.
>>>>>
>>>>> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine bravely
>>>>> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy Putin, fair
>>>>> as it may not seem.
>>>>
>>>> No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and we've
>>>> been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we made to
>>>> Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated to give
>>>> back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace
>>>> bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow being nuked.
>>>
>>> You're wanting World War III to happen, then?  Because that's what
>>> you're implying with that logic.
>>
>> If that piece of shit wanted Alaska - would you
>> give it for the purpose of  avoiding the  war?
>> How about California?
> 
> 
> We have thanks to the election a way to satisfy Putin without giving
> up anything. 

And you can even get your share in the plunder of
Ukraine; what a great leader.



  That's why I'm suddenly joining with DJT.
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661660

Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>W dniu 03.03.2025 o 01:56, Joel pisze:
>> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>> W dniu 02.03.2025 o 22:14, Joel pisze:
>>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine bravely
>>>>>> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy Putin, fair
>>>>>> as it may not seem.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and we've
>>>>> been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we made to
>>>>> Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated to give
>>>>> back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace
>>>>> bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow being nuked.
>>>>
>>>> You're wanting World War III to happen, then?  Because that's what
>>>> you're implying with that logic.
>>>
>>> If that piece of shit wanted Alaska - would you
>>> give it for the purpose of  avoiding the  war?
>>> How about California?
>> 
>> We have thanks to the election a way to satisfy Putin without giving
>> up anything. 
>
>And you can even get your share in the plunder of
>Ukraine; what a great leader.


Incorrect, I would undo any of that.  But we still need Trump, trust
me, I wouldn't say this for no reason.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661661

W dniu 03.03.2025 o 14:43, Joel pisze:
> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>> W dniu 03.03.2025 o 01:56, Joel pisze:
>>> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>> W dniu 02.03.2025 o 22:14, Joel pisze:
>>>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine bravely
>>>>>>> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy Putin, fair
>>>>>>> as it may not seem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and we've
>>>>>> been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we made to
>>>>>> Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated to give
>>>>>> back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace
>>>>>> bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow being nuked.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're wanting World War III to happen, then?  Because that's what
>>>>> you're implying with that logic.
>>>>
>>>> If that piece of shit wanted Alaska - would you
>>>> give it for the purpose of  avoiding the  war?
>>>> How about California?
>>>
>>> We have thanks to the election a way to satisfy Putin without giving
>>> up anything.
>>
>> And you can even get your share in the plunder of
>> Ukraine; what a great leader.
> 
> 
> Incorrect, I would undo any of that. 

No you wouldn't.

> But we still need Trump, trust
> me, I wouldn't say this for no reason.

Fuck him and fuck your reasons. You may
have elected him - your choice; I don't
have any respect for that choice - and
that's my choice.



> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661668

Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>W dniu 03.03.2025 o 14:43, Joel pisze:
>>>> We have thanks to the election a way to satisfy Putin without giving
>>>> up anything.
>>>
>>> And you can even get your share in the plunder of
>>> Ukraine; what a great leader.
>> 
>> Incorrect, I would undo any of that. 
>
>No you wouldn't.
>
>> But we still need Trump, trust
>> me, I wouldn't say this for no reason.
>
>Fuck him and fuck your reasons. You may
>have elected him - your choice; I don't
>have any respect for that choice - and
>that's my choice.


I voted for H. Clinton, Biden and Harris, three times against DJT, but
now I'm saying he won the 2024 election.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661671

W dniu 03.03.2025 o 21:44, Joel pisze:
> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>> W dniu 03.03.2025 o 14:43, Joel pisze:
>>>>> We have thanks to the election a way to satisfy Putin without giving
>>>>> up anything.
>>>>
>>>> And you can even get your share in the plunder of
>>>> Ukraine; what a great leader.
>>>
>>> Incorrect, I would undo any of that.
>>
>> No you wouldn't.
>>
>>> But we still need Trump, trust
>>> me, I wouldn't say this for no reason.
>>
>> Fuck him and fuck your reasons. You may
>> have elected him - your choice; I don't
>> have any respect for that choice - and
>> that's my choice.
> 
> 
> I voted for H. Clinton, Biden and Harris, three times against DJT, but
> now I'm saying he won the 2024 election.

He surely did.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661672

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 14:53:48 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

> W dniu 03.03.2025 o 14:43, Joel pisze:
>> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>> W dniu 03.03.2025 o 01:56, Joel pisze:
>>>> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>> W dniu 02.03.2025 o 22:14, Joel pisze:
>>>>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine bravely
>>>>>>>> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy Putin, fair
>>>>>>>> as it may not seem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and we've
>>>>>>> been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we made to
>>>>>>> Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated to give
>>>>>>> back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace
>>>>>>> bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow being nuked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're wanting World War III to happen, then?  Because that's what
>>>>>> you're implying with that logic.
>>>>>
>>>>> If that piece of shit wanted Alaska - would you
>>>>> give it for the purpose of  avoiding the  war?
>>>>> How about California?
>>>>
>>>> We have thanks to the election a way to satisfy Putin without giving
>>>> up anything.
>>>
>>> And you can even get your share in the plunder of
>>> Ukraine; what a great leader.
>>
>>
>> Incorrect, I would undo any of that.
>
> No you wouldn't.
>
>> But we still need Trump, trust
>> me, I wouldn't say this for no reason.
>
> Fuck him and fuck your reasons. You may
> have elected him - your choice; I don't
> have any respect for that choice - and
> that's my choice.

Unfortunately not voting for Trump meant voting for a puppet pulled by
unseen forces acting without responsibility.

What fools these apes be! They are screaming for WW3 as they screamed
for WW2 to happen.

Woof-woof woof woof woof woof woof-woof

Bertietaylor
>
>
>
>>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661673

On 3/3/2025 2:51 PM, Bertietaylor wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 14:53:48 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> 
>> W dniu 03.03.2025 o 14:43, Joel pisze:
>>> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>> W dniu 03.03.2025 o 01:56, Joel pisze:
>>>>> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>> W dniu 02.03.2025 o 22:14, Joel pisze:
>>>>>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine 
>>>>>>>>> bravely
>>>>>>>>> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy 
>>>>>>>>> Putin, fair
>>>>>>>>> as it may not seem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and 
>>>>>>>> we've
>>>>>>>> been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we 
>>>>>>>> made to
>>>>>>>> Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated 
>>>>>>>> to give
>>>>>>>> back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace
>>>>>>>> bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow 
>>>>>>>> being nuked.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're wanting World War III to happen, then?  Because that's what
>>>>>>> you're implying with that logic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If that piece of shit wanted Alaska - would you
>>>>>> give it for the purpose of  avoiding the  war?
>>>>>> How about California?
>>>>>
>>>>> We have thanks to the election a way to satisfy Putin without giving
>>>>> up anything.
>>>>
>>>> And you can even get your share in the plunder of
>>>> Ukraine; what a great leader.
>>>
>>>
>>> Incorrect, I would undo any of that.
>>
>> No you wouldn't.
>>
>>> But we still need Trump, trust
>>> me, I wouldn't say this for no reason.
>>
>> Fuck him and fuck your reasons. You may
>> have elected him - your choice; I don't
>> have any respect for that choice - and
>> that's my choice.
> 
> Unfortunately not voting for Trump meant voting for a puppet pulled by
> unseen forces acting without responsibility.
> 
> What fools these apes be! They are screaming for WW3 as they screamed
> for WW2 to happen.
> 
> Woof-woof woof woof woof woof woof-woof

It's as if some people want to go back the the good ol' days! It's a Duck!

https://youtu.be/zrzMhU_4m-g

Yikes!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661676

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 23:11:27 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

> On 3/3/2025 2:51 PM, Bertietaylor wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 14:53:48 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>>> W dniu 03.03.2025 o 14:43, Joel pisze:
>>>> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>> W dniu 03.03.2025 o 01:56, Joel pisze:
>>>>>> Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>> W dniu 02.03.2025 o 22:14, Joel pisze:
>>>>>>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line.  Ukraine
>>>>>>>>>> bravely
>>>>>>>>>> fought it for us but it hasn't worked.  We have to satisfy
>>>>>>>>>> Putin, fair
>>>>>>>>>> as it may not seem.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, we've not lost the war with Russia.  We've barely tried, and
>>>>>>>>> we've
>>>>>>>>> been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we
>>>>>>>>> made to
>>>>>>>>> Ukraine.  If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated
>>>>>>>>> to give
>>>>>>>>> back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes.  Pragmatically, the peace
>>>>>>>>> bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow
>>>>>>>>> being nuked.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're wanting World War III to happen, then?  Because that's what
>>>>>>>> you're implying with that logic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If that piece of shit wanted Alaska - would you
>>>>>>> give it for the purpose of  avoiding the  war?
>>>>>>> How about California?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have thanks to the election a way to satisfy Putin without giving
>>>>>> up anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> And you can even get your share in the plunder of
>>>>> Ukraine; what a great leader.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Incorrect, I would undo any of that.
>>>
>>> No you wouldn't.
>>>
>>>> But we still need Trump, trust
>>>> me, I wouldn't say this for no reason.
>>>
>>> Fuck him and fuck your reasons. You may
>>> have elected him - your choice; I don't
>>> have any respect for that choice - and
>>> that's my choice.
>>
>> Unfortunately not voting for Trump meant voting for a puppet pulled by
>> unseen forces acting without responsibility.
>>
>> What fools these apes be! They are screaming for WW3 as they screamed
>> for WW2 to happen.
>>
>> Woof-woof woof woof woof woof woof-woof
>
> It's as if some people want to go back the the good ol' days! It's a
> Duck!

Better new days is better, with Arindam's new physics.
>
> https://youtu.be/zrzMhU_4m-g
>
> Yikes!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661620

Joel wrote:
> With DJT as president, and me working with him
> and Sec. Rubio, Sen. Graham and anyone who has the status, Putin will
> finally lay off.
> 
 >
Did you tell Trump you like men to fuck you in the ass?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web