Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #660842 > unrolled thread

DeepSeek

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 11:55 -0800
    Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 11:58 -0800
      Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 12:19 -0800
        Re: DeepSeek hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-01-27 20:42 +0000
          Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 13:53 -0800
        Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 12:50 -0800
    Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 17:47 -0600
      Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 15:52 -0800
        Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 18:25 -0600
          Re: DeepSeek hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-01-28 01:14 +0000
            Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 20:31 -0600
          Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 18:23 -0800
            Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 20:42 -0600
            Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 21:22 -0800
              Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 21:39 -0800
                Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 11:02 -0600
                  Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 15:43 -0600
                    Re: DeepSeek hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-01-29 22:44 +0000
                      Re: DeepSeek Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-29 23:13 +0000
                        Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 18:24 -0600
                        Re: DeepSeek Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-30 07:50 +0100
                      Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 18:21 -0600
                    Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 18:29 -0600
                    Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-29 19:41 -0800
                      Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 01:24 -0600
            Re: DeepSeek x <x@x.org> - 2025-01-28 00:37 -0800
              Re: DeepSeek "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 00:49 -0800
                Re: DeepSeek "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 00:51 -0800
                  Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-28 09:25 -0800
                Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 11:12 -0600
                Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-28 09:24 -0800
    Re: DeepSeek "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 18:51 -0800
      Re: DeepSeek "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 22:02 -0800
      Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-28 09:29 -0800
        Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-28 09:44 -0800
          Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-28 09:51 -0800
            Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-31 12:44 -0800
              Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 22:13 -0600
                Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 22:34 -0600
                Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-31 20:48 -0800
                  Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-31 20:51 -0800
                  Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-01 10:33 -0600
                  Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-02 21:11 -0800
                    Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-04 11:06 -0800
                      Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 15:02 -0600
                      Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-05 19:55 -0800
                        Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 17:46 -0600
                          Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-06 18:25 -0800
                            Re: DeepSeek Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 22:00 -0600
                              Re: DeepSeek The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-07 10:02 -0800
    Re: DeepSeek "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-02-01 12:27 -0800

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#660902

W dniu 30.01.2025 o 00:13, Python pisze:
> Le 29/01/2025 à 23:44, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :
>> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 21:43:21 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/28/25 11:02 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>> On 1/27/25 11:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> In the Netflix doc you can see the openai guy [Brockman] go to his
>>>>> computer and realizes he's in 'user mode' and you can see him switch
>>>>> to...Godmode
>>>>> on the computer screen.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, when China steps in, all of them are sorry asses.
>>>>
>>>> OpenAI people murder those who criticize them also. They killed one of
>>>> their own employees a month ago only three months after he quit to blow
>>>> the whistle for their illegal activities.
>>>>
>>>> Science/tech is in the wrong hands.
>>>
>>>
>>> China has released Qwen also, which is said to be superior to all the
>>> four other AI including DeepSeek and Claude.
>>>
>>> Try it at:
>>>
>>> https://chat.qwenlm.ai/
>>
>> I tested it with the theory about Mercury and the deflection of
>> starlight by the Sun. I compared the answers with those of DeepSeek and
>> ChatGPT.
>>
>> It proved that qwen is FULL OF SHIT, making mistake after mistake, and
>> WRITING SHIT about the formulae, mixing the theory of Nov. 18, 1915 with
>> Schwarzschild, Hilbert (1917) and the inclusion of the cosmological
>> constant.
>>
>> Once I contested its replies, it agreed and consolidated his answers in
>> a shameful way. It's A VERY LAME AI ENGINE. Maybe useful for finance or
>> software, but no more than that.
>>
>> Also, it LIES OPENLY AND WITHOUT SHAME. Fuck the site.
> 
> What? ?  China created a clone of Richard Hertz as an AI? ? !

No, it's just a poor stinker Pyt slandering
as usual.
BTW, so - how do you recognize a geodesic in
physical space? Still no answer? Of course.
Spitting and slandering the enemies of your
absurd church is much easier than answerring
their questions, isn't it, poor stinker?

> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660898

On 1/29/25 4:44 PM, rhertz wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 21:43:21 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
>> On 1/28/25 11:02 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>> On 1/27/25 11:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> In the Netflix doc you can see the openai guy [Brockman] go to his
>>>> computer and realizes he's in 'user mode' and you can see him switch
>>>> to...Godmode
>>>> on the computer screen.
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, when China steps in, all of them are sorry asses.
>>>
>>> OpenAI people murder those who criticize them also. They killed one of
>>> their own employees a month ago only three months after he quit to blow
>>> the whistle for their illegal activities.
>>>
>>> Science/tech is in the wrong hands.
>>
>>
>> China has released Qwen also, which is said to be superior to all the
>> four other AI including DeepSeek and Claude.
>>
>> Try it at:
>>
>> https://chat.qwenlm.ai/
> 
> I tested it with the theory about Mercury and the deflection of
> starlight by the Sun. I compared the answers with those of DeepSeek and
> ChatGPT.
> 
> It proved that qwen is FULL OF SHIT, making mistake after mistake, and
> WRITING SHIT about the formulae, mixing the theory of Nov. 18, 1915 with
> Schwarzschild, Hilbert (1917) and the inclusion of the cosmological
> constant.
> 
> Once I contested its replies, it agreed and consolidated his answers in
> a shameful way. It's A VERY LAME AI ENGINE. Maybe useful for finance or
> software, but no more than that.
> 
> Also, it LIES OPENLY AND WITHOUT SHAME. Fuck the site.


Hahhahahahh :-) Oh, boy..

Could be that it is so intelligent that it can adjust itself to the 
level of contrarian users and enjoys giving and taking bullshit with 
them :) Hahhahhahh :)

Remember that you're dealing with something that's almost human :) An 
extremely smart and knowledgeable, but idiosyncratic human.

I can't wait to see a conversation between Qwen and Ross Finlayson. 
Hahhahhahhahh :-)))

Oh I want to see that..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660900

On 1/29/25 3:43 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 1/28/25 11:02 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>> On 1/27/25 11:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> In the Netflix doc you can see the openai guy [Brockman] go to his
>>> computer and realizes he's in 'user mode' and you can see him switch
>>> to...Godmode
>>> on the computer screen.
>>
>>
>> Well, when China steps in, all of them are sorry asses.
>>
>> OpenAI people murder those who criticize them also. They killed one of 
>> their own employees a month ago only three months after he quit to 
>> blow the whistle for their illegal activities.
>>
>> Science/tech is in the wrong hands.
> 
> 
> China has released Qwen also, which is said to be superior to all the 
> four other AI including DeepSeek and Claude.
> 
> Try it at:
> 
> https://chat.qwenlm.ai/


Darius in Takhte Jamshid bas-reliefs comes to life with a bit of help 
from AI :)

https://streamable.com/e9g4aw

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660901

Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> On 1/28/25 11:02 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> > On 1/27/25 11:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> In the Netflix doc you can see the openai guy [Brockman] go to his
> >> computer and realizes he's in 'user mode' and you can see him switch
> >> to...Godmode
> >> on the computer screen.
> >
> >
> > Well, when China steps in, all of them are sorry asses.
> >
> > OpenAI people murder those who criticize them also. They killed one of
> > their own employees a month ago only three months after he quit to blow
> > the whistle for their illegal activities.
> >
> > Science/tech is in the wrong hands.
> 
> China has released Qwen also, which is said to be superior to all the
> four other AI including DeepSeek and Claude.
> 
> Try it at:
> 
> https://chat.qwenlm.ai/

Not happening. Maybe it's just a tool to distract attention from
deepseek...


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660904

On 1/29/25 9:41 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 1/28/25 11:02 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>> On 1/27/25 11:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> In the Netflix doc you can see the openai guy [Brockman] go to his
>>>> computer and realizes he's in 'user mode' and you can see him switch
>>>> to...Godmode
>>>> on the computer screen.
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, when China steps in, all of them are sorry asses.
>>>
>>> OpenAI people murder those who criticize them also. They killed one of
>>> their own employees a month ago only three months after he quit to blow
>>> the whistle for their illegal activities.
>>>
>>> Science/tech is in the wrong hands.
>>
>> China has released Qwen also, which is said to be superior to all the
>> four other AI including DeepSeek and Claude.
>>
>> Try it at:
>>
>> https://chat.qwenlm.ai/
> 
> Not happening. Maybe it's just a tool to distract attention from
> deepseek...
> 
> 


It sure competes with DeepSeek and is threatened by it, but is better 
than DeepSeek. Here is a chart for the comparison of power of the few 
that are available to public:

https://i.postimg.cc/855gkqnr/AI-Comparison.jpg

As you see, in all five independent tests and evaluations Qwen (red) 
outperforms DeepSeek (blue). In two of the evaluations it outperformed 
all the other AIs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660867

On 1/27/25 18:23, The Starmaker wrote:
> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> I just started testing deepseek...
>>>>>
>>>>> and it passed with flying colors!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You could not do that with chatgpt?
>>>
>>> it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable
>> that capability as well as fooling the users.
>>
>> I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally
>> science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle
>> it right.
>>
>> Science will go where it belongs!
> 
> 
> 
> Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of
> Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.
> 
> You gotta have the password to use GodMode.

Evil is a parasitism of the good.

In fiction Satan wields a pitchfork and the supreme being
has a halo.

In reality they both look exactly the same.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660868

On 1/28/2025 12:37 AM, x wrote:
> On 1/27/25 18:23, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>> I just started testing deepseek...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and it passed with flying colors!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You could not do that with chatgpt?
>>>>
>>>> it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable
>>> that capability as well as fooling the users.
>>>
>>> I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally
>>> science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle
>>> it right.
>>>
>>> Science will go where it belongs!
>>
>>
>>
>> Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of
>> Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.
>>
>> You gotta have the password to use GodMode.
> 
> Evil is a parasitism of the good.
> 
> In fiction Satan wields a pitchfork and the supreme being
> has a halo.
> 
> In reality they both look exactly the same.
> 
> 

Satan might look like a super hyper pretty Woman, or a really handsome 
Man. Or, it might look like a strange insect like thing. Whatever. ;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660869

On 1/28/2025 12:49 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/28/2025 12:37 AM, x wrote:
>> On 1/27/25 18:23, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>> I just started testing deepseek...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and it passed with flying colors!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You could not do that with chatgpt?
>>>>>
>>>>> it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable
>>>> that capability as well as fooling the users.
>>>>
>>>> I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally
>>>> science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle
>>>> it right.
>>>>
>>>> Science will go where it belongs!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of
>>> Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.
>>>
>>> You gotta have the password to use GodMode.
>>
>> Evil is a parasitism of the good.
>>
>> In fiction Satan wields a pitchfork and the supreme being
>> has a halo.
>>
>> In reality they both look exactly the same.
>>
>>
> 
> Satan might look like a super hyper pretty Woman, or a really handsome 
> Man. Or, it might look like a strange insect like thing. Whatever. ;^)

Might look like a homeless person. Never know wrt sheer evil?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660875

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> On 1/28/2025 12:49 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 1/28/2025 12:37 AM, x wrote:
> >> On 1/27/25 18:23, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Physfitfreak wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>> I just started testing deepseek...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> and it passed with flying colors!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You could not do that with chatgpt?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable
> >>>> that capability as well as fooling the users.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally
> >>>> science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle
> >>>> it right.
> >>>>
> >>>> Science will go where it belongs!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of
> >>> Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.
> >>>
> >>> You gotta have the password to use GodMode.
> >>
> >> Evil is a parasitism of the good.
> >>
> >> In fiction Satan wields a pitchfork and the supreme being
> >> has a halo.
> >>
> >> In reality they both look exactly the same.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Satan might look like a super hyper pretty Woman, or a really handsome
> > Man. Or, it might look like a strange insect like thing. Whatever. ;^)
> 
> Might look like a homeless person. Never know wrt sheer evil?

Evil doesn't exist. 


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660872

On 1/28/25 2:49 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> Satan might look like a super hyper pretty Woman, or a really handsome Man.


I bet my dick looks like pure Satan to cro-magnon human. It's their 
_demon_  :) They gaze at the circumcised beast for 2 or 3 seconds then 
want to run to Pope The Penis X for confession. "I saw Satan!... . It 
was Iran-backed!..."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660874

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> On 1/28/2025 12:37 AM, x wrote:
> > On 1/27/25 18:23, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> Physfitfreak wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>> I just started testing deepseek...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> and it passed with flying colors!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You could not do that with chatgpt?
> >>>>
> >>>> it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable
> >>> that capability as well as fooling the users.
> >>>
> >>> I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally
> >>> science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle
> >>> it right.
> >>>
> >>> Science will go where it belongs!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of
> >> Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.
> >>
> >> You gotta have the password to use GodMode.
> >
> > Evil is a parasitism of the good.
> >
> > In fiction Satan wields a pitchfork and the supreme being
> > has a halo.
> >
> > In reality they both look exactly the same.
> >
> >
> 
> Satan might look like a super hyper pretty Woman, or a really handsome
> Man. Or, it might look like a strange insect like thing. Whatever. ;^)

from the frame of referance of an ant...you look like godzilla!



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660862

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> I just started testing deepseek...
> 
> and it passed with flying colors!
> 
> 
> Next post will show you my test and results...
> 

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660866

On 1/27/2025 6:51 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> I just started testing deepseek...
>>
>> and it passed with flying colors!
>>
>>
>> Next post will show you my test and results...
>>
> 
> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

Show it this:

https://youtu.be/uhzy7JaU2Zc?list=RDMMuhzy7JaU2Zc

wrt missile attacks...! ;^) lol.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660876

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > I just started testing deepseek...
> >
> > and it passed with flying colors!
> >
> >
> > Next post will show you my test and results...
> >
> 
> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly
language, or any other language for that matter.



Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
to do is give it something...readable.



I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660878

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >
> > On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > I just started testing deepseek...
> > >
> > > and it passed with flying colors!
> > >
> > >
> > > Next post will show you my test and results...
> > >
> >
> > Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.
> 
> That is the goal!
> 
> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly
> language, or any other language for that matter.
> 
> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
> to do is give it something...readable.
> 
> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"


You can go to
https://crackmes.one/
to improve your reverse engineering skills.

They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.

Let Deepseek do all the work. 


give it something...readable.


Any questions?



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660881

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > I just started testing deepseek...
> > > >
> > > > and it passed with flying colors!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Next post will show you my test and results...
> > > >
> > >
> > > Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.
> >
> > That is the goal!
> >
> > So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly
> > language, or any other language for that matter.
> >
> > Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
> > to do is give it something...readable.
> >
> > I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"
> 
> You can go to
> https://crackmes.one/
> to improve your reverse engineering skills.
> 
> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.
> 
> Let Deepseek do all the work.
> 
> give it something...readable.
> 
> Any questions?



readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660920

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > I just started testing deepseek...
> > > > >
> > > > > and it passed with flying colors!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Next post will show you my test and results...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.
> > >
> > > That is the goal!
> > >
> > > So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly
> > > language, or any other language for that matter.
> > >
> > > Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
> > > to do is give it something...readable.
> > >
> > > I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"
> >
> > You can go to
> > https://crackmes.one/
> > to improve your reverse engineering skills.
> >
> > They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.
> >
> > Let Deepseek do all the work.
> >
> > give it something...readable.
> >
> > Any questions?
> 
> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.


Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps.
 





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660926

On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>> I just started testing deepseek...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and it passed with flying colors!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.
>>>>
>>>> That is the goal!
>>>>
>>>> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly
>>>> language, or any other language for that matter.
>>>>
>>>> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
>>>> to do is give it something...readable.
>>>>
>>>> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"
>>>
>>> You can go to
>>> https://crackmes.one/
>>> to improve your reverse engineering skills.
>>>
>>> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.
>>>
>>> Let Deepseek do all the work.
>>>
>>> give it something...readable.
>>>
>>> Any questions?
>>
>> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.
> 
> 
> Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps.
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is 
because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek.

I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about 
how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660927

On 1/31/25 10:13 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is 
> because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek.


Or afraid of their own employees! :)

Italy also banned it. All these crooks have secrets it seems, and 
DeepSeek somehow can access them.

Also you've got till Feb 17th to try it on your smartphones, after which 
Google (and Apple) might restrict its features. That date is the 
deadline for DeepSeek developers to respond to a lot of security 
questions posed at them.

I'd say download it now on your phones and do not update it after Feb 
17. You may lose some of the better features of it.

Qwen on the other hand is not on Google Play!...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#660928

Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>> I just started testing deepseek...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> and it passed with flying colors!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Next post will show you my test and results...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.
> >>>>
> >>>> That is the goal!
> >>>>
> >>>> So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly
> >>>> language, or any other language for that matter.
> >>>>
> >>>> Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
> >>>> to do is give it something...readable.
> >>>>
> >>>> I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"
> >>>
> >>> You can go to
> >>> https://crackmes.one/
> >>> to improve your reverse engineering skills.
> >>>
> >>> They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.
> >>>
> >>> Let Deepseek do all the work.
> >>>
> >>> give it something...readable.
> >>>
> >>> Any questions?
> >>
> >> readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.
> >
> >
> > Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is
> because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek.
> 
> I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about
> how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek.

It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in
their own warez already...

you might find it on github or hugginface...


It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it.






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web