Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #660731 > unrolled thread
| Started by | clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-01-23 12:35 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-01-25 13:04 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 70 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 12:35 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-23 10:05 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-23 12:34 -0600
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 21:47 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 22:20 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-23 14:24 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 21:40 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 22:11 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 16:39 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-25 21:05 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 21:11 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-25 21:15 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 21:23 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-01-27 11:13 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-25 22:50 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 22:10 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-25 23:25 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 22:30 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-26 07:47 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-26 14:42 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-26 21:02 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-26 14:34 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-26 23:46 -0600
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-02-01 23:28 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-02 08:34 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-02-02 11:39 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-02 11:13 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-02-02 21:30 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-03 02:38 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-02 13:41 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-25 14:56 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-26 14:31 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 02:33 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 18:58 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-25 21:14 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 21:23 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-25 21:39 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 21:47 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-26 14:33 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 21:44 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-23 21:35 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 05:45 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-23 22:08 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-23 22:47 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 12:12 -0600
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 21:30 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 22:05 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 12:04 -0600
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-24 10:31 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 12:53 -0600
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-24 12:43 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-26 15:16 -0600
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-27 11:02 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 18:05 -0600
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 22:26 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 22:28 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-23 22:40 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-23 15:06 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 04:26 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 04:25 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-24 21:51 +0000
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-24 14:46 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-24 09:06 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 12:14 -0600
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-25 07:53 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-24 10:29 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 12:55 -0600
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-25 07:54 +0100
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-25 09:44 -0800
Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious Baubles? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 13:04 -0600
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-23 21:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <679326BF.7FC4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660742 |
LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > > > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > >> > >> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. > >> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain > >> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The > >> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a > >> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing > >> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as > >> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly > >> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, > >> slavish, and avoidable. > > > > > > They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks > > monopoly'. > > > > (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) > > > > You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. > > > > > > The cabal decides what they want you to think. > > > > > > How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. > > > > > > > I'm on it! Now that you are "on it", I just want to know who side you are on... How many planets are there in our solar system? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-24 05:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cf098bfee88f1ffa920c24929074e594@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660757 |
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 5:35:59 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >> >> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: >> >>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>>> >>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. >>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain >>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The >>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a >>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing >>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as >>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly >>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, >>>> slavish, and avoidable. >>> >>> >>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks >>> monopoly'. >>> >>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) >>> >>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. >>> >>> >>> The cabal decides what they want you to think. >>> >>> >>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. >>> >>> >>> >> I'm on it! > > > Now that you are "on it", I just want to know who side you are on... > > > How many planets are there in our solar system? You know me. I wouldn't really take sides.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-23 22:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67932E46.1D57@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660758 |
LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 5:35:59 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > > > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > >>>> > >>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. > >>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain > >>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The > >>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a > >>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing > >>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as > >>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly > >>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, > >>>> slavish, and avoidable. > >>> > >>> > >>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks > >>> monopoly'. > >>> > >>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) > >>> > >>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. > >>> > >>> > >>> The cabal decides what they want you to think. > >>> > >>> > >>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> I'm on it! > > > > > > Now that you are "on it", I just want to know who side you are on... > > > > > > How many planets are there in our solar system? > You know me. I wouldn't really take sides. Is it 8 or 9? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-23 22:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67933796.B28@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660758 |
LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 5:35:59 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > > > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > >>>> > >>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. > >>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain > >>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The > >>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a > >>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing > >>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as > >>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly > >>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, > >>>> slavish, and avoidable. > >>> > >>> > >>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks > >>> monopoly'. > >>> > >>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) > >>> > >>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. > >>> > >>> > >>> The cabal decides what they want you to think. > >>> > >>> > >>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> I'm on it! > > > > > > Now that you are "on it", I just want to know who side you are on... > > > > > > How many planets are there in our solar system? > You know me. I wouldn't really take sides. Not taking sides is in fact taking sides with the prevailing vote...8. That is the number of how many planets You believe there in our solar system. You have uncritically and thoughtlessly embrace this idea without a second thought that there are 8 planets in out solor system. This is very pathetic, slavish, and avoidable of you. Shame on you, Clark. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-24 12:12 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vn0l5r$dta4$3@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660760 |
On 1/24/25 12:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >> >> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 5:35:59 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: >> >>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >>>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. >>>>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain >>>>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The >>>>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a >>>>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing >>>>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as >>>>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly >>>>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, >>>>>> slavish, and avoidable. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks >>>>> monopoly'. >>>>> >>>>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) >>>>> >>>>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The cabal decides what they want you to think. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I'm on it! >>> >>> >>> Now that you are "on it", I just want to know who side you are on... >>> >>> >>> How many planets are there in our solar system? >> You know me. I wouldn't really take sides. > > Not taking sides is in fact taking sides with the prevailing vote...8. > > > That is the number of how many planets You believe there in our solar > system. > > > You have uncritically and thoughtlessly embrace this idea without a > second thought that > there are 8 planets in out solor system. This is very pathetic, slavish, > and avoidable of you. > > Shame on you, Clark. > > > > > > > > > > Could be that he's standing on his own pure stomach gas cause he doesn't believe Earth is a planet at all. Sun _does_ orbit around Earth, even within each 24 hour period. The evidence is right there to see!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-24 21:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dae3065fc8047293a98b9c2e340810a4@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660757 |
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 5:35:59 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >> >> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: >> >>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>>> >>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. >>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain >>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The >>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a >>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing >>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as >>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly >>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, >>>> slavish, and avoidable. >>> >>> >>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks >>> monopoly'. >>> >>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) >>> >>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. >>> >>> >>> The cabal decides what they want you to think. >>> >>> >>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. >>> >>> >>> >> I'm on it! > > > Now that you are "on it", I just want to know who side you are on... > > > How many planets are there in our solar system? I would point out that the idea that universities prioritize teaching what sells tuition over teaching good science is not a conspiracy theory. It's just a profitable thing to do when people want to purchase prestige instead of knowledge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-23 22:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e22059e4596dc65c3d5637ffd377d659@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660733 |
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >> >> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. >> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain >> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The >> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a >> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing >> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as >> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly >> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, >> slavish, and avoidable. > > > They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks > monopoly'. > > (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) > > You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. > > > The cabal decides what they want you to think. > > > How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. > > > Of course, it is not a conspiracy theory to understand that universities are prestige mills selling prestige for tuition. This is proven by the fact that their marketing has persuaded people to pay fortunes to be taught ignorant fallacies as sophisticated science. The idea that space expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of propounding conspiracy theory?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-24 12:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vn0kmi$dta4$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660743 |
On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > The idea that space > expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What > kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of > propounding conspiracy theory? Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact. But it is not a place for mentally handicapped.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-24 10:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6793DC7A.2AB6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660773 |
Physfitfreak wrote: > > On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > > The idea that space > > expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What > > kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of > > propounding conspiracy theory? > > Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the > sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact. > But it is not a place for mentally handicapped. How many freaks fit in fhysics???? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-24 12:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vn0njn$dta4$5@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660777 |
On 1/24/25 12:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Physfitfreak wrote: >> >> On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>> The idea that space >>> expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What >>> kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of >>> propounding conspiracy theory? >> >> Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the >> sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact. >> But it is not a place for mentally handicapped. > > > How many freaks fit in fhysics???? > > > There's only one freak in sci.physics. Me. I'm so much into physical fitness that I've become a freak about it. You bozos who grab your little two pound dumbbells and "jog" for an exercise do not know shit about exercise. Got out of your den and walk 10 miles this afternoon. That's a start.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-24 12:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6793FB75.4F01@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660779 |
Physfitfreak wrote: > > On 1/24/25 12:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Physfitfreak wrote: > >> > >> On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > >>> The idea that space > >>> expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What > >>> kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of > >>> propounding conspiracy theory? > >> > >> Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the > >> sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact. > >> But it is not a place for mentally handicapped. > > > > > > How many freaks fit in fhysics???? > > > > > > > > There's only one freak in sci.physics. Me. I'm so much into physical > fitness that I've become a freak about it. > > You bozos who grab your little two pound dumbbells and "jog" for an > exercise do not know shit about exercise. > > Got out of your den and walk 10 miles this afternoon. That's a start. Don't tell any girl you post in a Physics newsgroup...she gonna think you talk Gym. (and don't say dumbbell in front of her...) she might stab you with a kitchen knife.. YOU FUCKING DUMBBELL WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING???? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 15:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vn68mn$goe5$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660783 |
On 1/24/25 2:43 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Physfitfreak wrote: >> >> On 1/24/25 12:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Physfitfreak wrote: >>>> >>>> On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>>>> The idea that space >>>>> expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What >>>>> kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of >>>>> propounding conspiracy theory? >>>> >>>> Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the >>>> sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact. >>>> But it is not a place for mentally handicapped. >>> >>> >>> How many freaks fit in fhysics???? >>> >>> >>> >> >> There's only one freak in sci.physics. Me. I'm so much into physical >> fitness that I've become a freak about it. >> >> You bozos who grab your little two pound dumbbells and "jog" for an >> exercise do not know shit about exercise. >> >> Got out of your den and walk 10 miles this afternoon. That's a start. > > > Don't tell any girl you post in a Physics newsgroup...she gonna think > you talk Gym. > > > (and don't say dumbbell in front of her...) > > > she might stab you with a kitchen knife.. > > > YOU FUCKING DUMBBELL WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING???? > > > > > Why, is there another meaning to dumbbell? Don't cute women take their cute pink little dumbbells and jog outside to feel exercised?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-27 11:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6797D834.6816@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660832 |
Physfitfreak wrote: > > On 1/24/25 2:43 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Physfitfreak wrote: > >> > >> On 1/24/25 12:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Physfitfreak wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 1/23/25 4:05 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > >>>>> The idea that space > >>>>> expands or curves is a case of extraordinarily deceptive marketing. What > >>>>> kind of fool would defend this deceitfulness by accusing the critic of > >>>>> propounding conspiracy theory? > >>>> > >>>> Keep this crap inside relativity forum, and that means out of the > >>>> sci.physics. We may treat this place as a lounge, which it is in fact. > >>>> But it is not a place for mentally handicapped. > >>> > >>> > >>> How many freaks fit in fhysics???? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> There's only one freak in sci.physics. Me. I'm so much into physical > >> fitness that I've become a freak about it. > >> > >> You bozos who grab your little two pound dumbbells and "jog" for an > >> exercise do not know shit about exercise. > >> > >> Got out of your den and walk 10 miles this afternoon. That's a start. > > > > > > Don't tell any girl you post in a Physics newsgroup...she gonna think > > you talk Gym. > > > > > > (and don't say dumbbell in front of her...) > > > > > > she might stab you with a kitchen knife.. > > > > > > YOU FUCKING DUMBBELL WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING???? > > > > > > > > > > > > Why, is there another meaning to dumbbell? Don't cute women take their > cute pink little dumbbells and jog outside to feel exercised? Tell those "cute pink little dumbbells" you see and say "You are suchs a cute pink little dumbbell." don't forget to duck... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-27 18:05 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vn970m$j8f1$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660841 |
On 1/27/25 1:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Tell those "cute pink little dumbbells" you see and say "You are suchs a > cute pink little dumbbell." > > > don't forget to duck... DeepSeek says: the term dumbbell is outdated in modern slang. So you must be old fart then. The Chinks think so anyway.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-23 22:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <39596b92c115bb8b817caaf7e89aee94@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660733 |
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >> >> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. >> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain >> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The >> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a >> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing >> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as >> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly >> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, >> slavish, and avoidable. > > > They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks > monopoly'. > > (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) > > You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. > > > The cabal decides what they want you to think. > > > How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. > > > There is a double standard when claims of having proved parallel lines do not meet are regarded as ridiculous, while implicitly assuming they do is viewed as brilliant. This proves that some absurdly stupid ideas have been marketed so slickly as to put them over on almost everybody to the profit of universities and big science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-23 22:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <f46db816e2229b64e0d994cd24ca22ef@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660733 |
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >> >> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. >> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain >> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The >> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a >> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing >> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as >> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly >> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, >> slavish, and avoidable. > > > They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks > monopoly'. > > (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) > > You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. > > > The cabal decides what they want you to think. > > > How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. > > > Would you like to step outside for a minute?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-23 22:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d54b808a499972969474a571b9635661@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660733 |
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >> >> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. >> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain >> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The >> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a >> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing >> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as >> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly >> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, >> slavish, and avoidable. > > > They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks > monopoly'. > > (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) > > You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. > > > The cabal decides what they want you to think. > > > How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. > > > People are so scientifically ignorant that they can be taxed for vast research grants on the pretext that space expands and is curved.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-23 15:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8lua6l-7qei1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #660751 |
In sci.physics LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > >> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>> >>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. >>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain >>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The >>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a >>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing >>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as >>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly >>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, >>> slavish, and avoidable. >> >> >> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks >> monopoly'. >> >> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) >> >> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. >> >> >> The cabal decides what they want you to think. >> >> >> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. >> >> >> > People are so scientifically ignorant that they can be taxed for vast > research grants on the pretext that space expands and is curved. Apparently, all the experiments and math are beyond your comprhension.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-24 04:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <754a3625ce498f9d626330e3567a1d18@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660753 |
Do you think the experiments have proven that parallel lines meet? They would have to meet for space to curve. You are not addressing the issue, which is not the experiments but the derivation. Experiments cannot prove the derivation is sound. I have shown it is not sound and cannot predict. The Einstein equation merely differs from the Newtonian by changing the "2" into a "4." The problem is that it is a non-Euclidean curved space. That is fiction.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-24 04:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e89f10f5b5eaac5674ecdd1f60417cd5@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660753 |
test
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web