Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659511 > unrolled thread

Einstein isn't Einstein

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Einstein isn't Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-12 13:20 -0800
    Re: Einstein isn't Einstein clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-12-12 22:14 +0000
      Re: Einstein isn't Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-13 00:17 -0800
        Re: Einstein isn't Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-13 07:37 -0800
          Re: Einstein isn't Einstein clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-12-13 22:33 +0000
            Re: Einstein isn't Einstein The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-14 01:25 -0800

#659511 — Einstein isn't Einstein

Let me put it this way since
most of yous don't understand..

Einstein, ain't no Einstein.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#659516

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 21:20:54 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:

> Let me put it this way since
> most of yous don't understand..
>
> Einstein, ain't no Einstein.
>
Well, his IQ wasn't 167, I'll give you that. Maybe 16.7.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#659523

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 21:20:54 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > Let me put it this way since
> > most of yous don't understand..
> >
> > Einstein, ain't no Einstein.
> >
> Well, his IQ wasn't 167, I'll give you that. Maybe 16.7.


My handle reads 'The Starmaker'. It's another word for The Imagemaker.


Einstein is a brand. It's an Image. 

For example, who was the smartest person in Einstein's time?

The Image that was sold was Einstein. But he wasn't the smartest
person in his time. That is just The Image that was sold, and still sold
to this day.


Einstein, ain't no Einstein.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#659530

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 21:20:54 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > > Let me put it this way since
> > > most of yous don't understand..
> > >
> > > Einstein, ain't no Einstein.
> > >
> > Well, his IQ wasn't 167, I'll give you that. Maybe 16.7.
> 
> My handle reads 'The Starmaker'. It's another word for The Imagemaker.
> 
> Einstein is a brand. It's an Image.
> 
> For example, who was the smartest person in Einstein's time?
> 
> The Image that was sold was Einstein. But he wasn't the smartest
> person in his time. That is just The Image that was sold, and still sold
> to this day.
> 
> Einstein, ain't no Einstein.


i mean, at what point in time did Einstein became the smartest person in
the world? the day he was born??

when he made cover of Time magazine???

when they dropped the 2 atomic bombs on Japan????


how about the day after he died?


It's just an Image.

an Image created by others..

a Star.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#659540

On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:37:38 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:

> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 21:20:54 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> > Let me put it this way since
>>> > most of yous don't understand..
>>> >
>>> > Einstein, ain't no Einstein.
>>> >
>>> Well, his IQ wasn't 167, I'll give you that. Maybe 16.7.
>>
>> My handle reads 'The Starmaker'. It's another word for The Imagemaker.
>>
>> Einstein is a brand. It's an Image.
>>
>> For example, who was the smartest person in Einstein's time?
>>
>> The Image that was sold was Einstein. But he wasn't the smartest
>> person in his time. That is just The Image that was sold, and still sold
>> to this day.
>>
>> Einstein, ain't no Einstein.
>
>
> i mean, at what point in time did Einstein became the smartest person in
> the world? the day he was born??
>
> when he made cover of Time magazine???
>
> when they dropped the 2 atomic bombs on Japan????
>
>
> how about the day after he died?
>
>
> It's just an Image.
>
> an Image created by others..
>
> a Star.
>
>
>
He became a genius when he discarded the ether and kept the LT, when the
only purpose of the LT is to save the ether from the null result?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#659543

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 15:37:38 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 21:20:54 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Let me put it this way since
> >>> > most of yous don't understand..
> >>> >
> >>> > Einstein, ain't no Einstein.
> >>> >
> >>> Well, his IQ wasn't 167, I'll give you that. Maybe 16.7.
> >>
> >> My handle reads 'The Starmaker'. It's another word for The Imagemaker.
> >>
> >> Einstein is a brand. It's an Image.
> >>
> >> For example, who was the smartest person in Einstein's time?
> >>
> >> The Image that was sold was Einstein. But he wasn't the smartest
> >> person in his time. That is just The Image that was sold, and still sold
> >> to this day.
> >>
> >> Einstein, ain't no Einstein.
> >
> >
> > i mean, at what point in time did Einstein became the smartest person in
> > the world? the day he was born??
> >
> > when he made cover of Time magazine???
> >
> > when they dropped the 2 atomic bombs on Japan????
> >
> >
> > how about the day after he died?
> >
> >
> > It's just an Image.
> >
> > an Image created by others..
> >
> > a Star.
> >
> >
> >
> He became a genius when he discarded the ether and kept the LT, when the
> only purpose of the LT is to save the ether from the null result?


Well it certaintly wasn't the year 1905 on the relativity paper...
there is no mention of Gravity even once in any shape of form mentioned
in his paper.

But there is one mentioned of his 1905 paper:

https://www.transcend.org/tms/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/einstein7.jpg










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web