Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #655860 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-08-12 17:35 +0000 |
| Last post | 2024-09-03 17:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 105 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-12 17:35 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 19:39 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 21:06 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-12 20:25 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 23:16 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-13 12:45 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 12:46 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 16:15 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-13 16:37 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 16:50 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-13 19:54 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 21:20 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 21:25 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 22:01 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 22:12 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 22:42 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 23:07 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-13 21:48 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-14 09:40 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-14 17:15 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-14 11:06 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-14 16:00 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-14 22:49 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-15 09:43 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 18:45 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-15 10:29 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 19:34 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 11:42 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 10:45 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 10:55 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 22:20 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-15 10:25 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-15 17:34 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 11:47 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 22:10 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-17 10:50 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-17 13:08 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-18 11:11 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-18 12:06 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-19 10:27 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-19 10:52 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-19 11:51 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-20 17:22 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-22 00:32 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 22:16 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-14 21:53 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-14 22:04 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 20:27 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-15 11:42 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-14 06:25 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Mubarak Schitov <uaka@acikt.ru> - 2024-08-14 05:47 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 12:25 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 14:36 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 12:54 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 14:59 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-15 13:18 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 15:08 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 13:24 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-14 14:39 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 17:37 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-14 18:11 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-14 20:29 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-14 19:20 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-14 12:24 -0700
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-14 21:50 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-14 22:36 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 06:50 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Belgov Turpaev <eesssu@unuvpat.ru> - 2024-08-15 10:58 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 20:44 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-15 12:46 +0300
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-15 12:10 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 14:29 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-15 14:52 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 16:58 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 17:16 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-15 13:02 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 15:15 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-15 13:44 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 17:31 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 17:37 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 18:04 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 18:26 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 19:46 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-15 18:05 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 20:27 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-16 15:10 +0300
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-16 12:38 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-17 11:14 +0300
Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-15 21:12 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-15 21:22 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 21:31 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-14 19:54 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 20:47 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-14 19:34 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 17:43 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-15 12:22 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 17:29 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-15 08:13 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-15 12:33 +0300
Re: Space-time interval (2) Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-15 11:24 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 13:49 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-17 11:18 +0300
Re: Space-time interval (2) guido wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2024-08-14 21:01 +0200
Re: Space-time interval (2) film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-09-02 17:02 +0000
Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-03 17:13 -0700
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 11:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66BCF210.24C2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #655942 |
gharnagel wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:40:44 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > and another thing Hachel > > > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > > your hallucinations. > > > > Rocks don't have laws. > > > > yous seeing things > > > > or reading into rocks > > > > yous might have laws, but > > rocks don't have laws. > > > > you see what you made me do, now i gotta go > > out and buy some french fries! > > I have looked and looked and looked, and all > I can see is rocks ... in your head :-)) you should have the same amount I have, am i wrong? Now, if I have more rocks than you have...then you're having...hallucinations. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 16:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66BD36F3.5F7E@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #655941 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > and another thing Hachel > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > your hallucinations. > > Rocks don't have laws. > > yous seeing things > > or reading into rocks > > yous might have laws, but > rocks don't have laws. In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 22:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66BD96E8.17A4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #655976 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > and another thing Hachel > > > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > > your hallucinations. > > > > Rocks don't have laws. > > > > yous seeing things > > > > or reading into rocks > > > > yous might have laws, but > > rocks don't have laws. > > In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. For a lack of a better word...they are simply your...concoctions. The laws of physics are your laws, not nature's. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-15 09:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66BE3016.5915@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #655978 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > and another thing Hachel > > > > > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > > > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > > > > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > > > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > > > > your hallucinations. > > > > > > Rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > yous seeing things > > > > > > or reading into rocks > > > > > > yous might have laws, but > > > rocks don't have laws. > > > > In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > > For a lack of a better word...they are simply your...concoctions. > > The laws of physics are your laws, not nature's. In other words, there are no laws of physics...'out there'. There is not even any Science...'out there'! These are just hallucinations yous people are having. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-15 18:45 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <v9lbac$trev$20@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #656008 |
Le 15/08/2024 à 18:43, The Starmaker a écrit : > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >>>> and another thing Hachel >>>> >>>> (i have nothing against...French Science) >>>> >>>> but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... >>>> >>>> all i see out there is...rocks. >>>> >>>> Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? >>>> >>>> I have looked, and looked, and looked... >>>> >>>> all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything >>>> where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. >>>> >>>> your hallucinations. >>>> >>>> Rocks don't have laws. >>>> >>>> yous seeing things >>>> >>>> or reading into rocks >>>> >>>> yous might have laws, but >>>> rocks don't have laws. >>> >>> In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. >> >> For a lack of a better word...they are simply your...concoctions. >> >> The laws of physics are your laws, not nature's. > > > In other words, there are no laws of physics...'out there'. > > > There is not even any Science...'out there'! > > > > These are just hallucinations yous people are having. Sure. And you computer is made of cheese.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-15 10:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66BE3AEE.7CE9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656009 |
Python wrote: > > Le 15/08/2024 à 18:43, The Starmaker a écrit : > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> > >>>> and another thing Hachel > >>>> > >>>> (i have nothing against...French Science) > >>>> > >>>> but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > >>>> > >>>> all i see out there is...rocks. > >>>> > >>>> Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > >>>> > >>>> I have looked, and looked, and looked... > >>>> > >>>> all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > >>>> where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > >>>> > >>>> your hallucinations. > >>>> > >>>> Rocks don't have laws. > >>>> > >>>> yous seeing things > >>>> > >>>> or reading into rocks > >>>> > >>>> yous might have laws, but > >>>> rocks don't have laws. > >>> > >>> In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > >> > >> For a lack of a better word...they are simply your...concoctions. > >> > >> The laws of physics are your laws, not nature's. > > > > > > In other words, there are no laws of physics...'out there'. > > > > > > There is not even any Science...'out there'! > > > > > > > > These are just hallucinations yous people are having. > > Sure. And you computer is made of cheese. I don't know if you have the 'ability' to understand this but, a computer is just...'an extention of your mind.' -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-15 19:34 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <v9le7m$trev$24@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #656011 |
Le 15/08/2024 à 19:29, The Starmaker a écrit : > Python wrote: >> >> Le 15/08/2024 à 18:43, The Starmaker a écrit : >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> and another thing Hachel >>>>>> >>>>>> (i have nothing against...French Science) >>>>>> >>>>>> but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... >>>>>> >>>>>> all i see out there is...rocks. >>>>>> >>>>>> Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? >>>>>> >>>>>> I have looked, and looked, and looked... >>>>>> >>>>>> all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything >>>>>> where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. >>>>>> >>>>>> your hallucinations. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocks don't have laws. >>>>>> >>>>>> yous seeing things >>>>>> >>>>>> or reading into rocks >>>>>> >>>>>> yous might have laws, but >>>>>> rocks don't have laws. >>>>> >>>>> In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. >>>> >>>> For a lack of a better word...they are simply your...concoctions. >>>> >>>> The laws of physics are your laws, not nature's. >>> >>> >>> In other words, there are no laws of physics...'out there'. >>> >>> >>> There is not even any Science...'out there'! >>> >>> >>> >>> These are just hallucinations yous people are having. >> >> Sure. And you computer is made of cheese. > > > I don't know if you have the 'ability' to understand this but, a > computer is just...'an extention of your mind.' I wouldn't buy a computer that is an extension of my mind, let alone your mind. Mine is made of plastic, copper, silicon and a few more elements.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-16 11:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66BF9DA4.4EC9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656012 |
Python wrote: > > Le 15/08/2024 à 19:29, The Starmaker a écrit : > > Python wrote: > >> > >> Le 15/08/2024 à 18:43, The Starmaker a écrit : > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> and another thing Hachel > >>>>>> > >>>>>> (i have nothing against...French Science) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> all i see out there is...rocks. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have looked, and looked, and looked... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > >>>>>> where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> your hallucinations. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Rocks don't have laws. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> yous seeing things > >>>>>> > >>>>>> or reading into rocks > >>>>>> > >>>>>> yous might have laws, but > >>>>>> rocks don't have laws. > >>>>> > >>>>> In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > >>>> > >>>> For a lack of a better word...they are simply your...concoctions. > >>>> > >>>> The laws of physics are your laws, not nature's. > >>> > >>> > >>> In other words, there are no laws of physics...'out there'. > >>> > >>> > >>> There is not even any Science...'out there'! > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> These are just hallucinations yous people are having. > >> > >> Sure. And you computer is made of cheese. > > > > > > I don't know if you have the 'ability' to understand this but, a > > computer is just...'an extention of your mind.' > > I wouldn't buy a computer that is an extension of my mind, let > alone your mind. Mine is made of plastic, copper, silicon and > a few more elements. and what is 'information' made out of???? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-16 10:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66BF9020.408A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656009 |
Python wrote: > > Le 15/08/2024 à 18:43, The Starmaker a écrit : > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> > >>>> and another thing Hachel > >>>> > >>>> (i have nothing against...French Science) > >>>> > >>>> but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > >>>> > >>>> all i see out there is...rocks. > >>>> > >>>> Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > >>>> > >>>> I have looked, and looked, and looked... > >>>> > >>>> all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > >>>> where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > >>>> > >>>> your hallucinations. > >>>> > >>>> Rocks don't have laws. > >>>> > >>>> yous seeing things > >>>> > >>>> or reading into rocks > >>>> > >>>> yous might have laws, but > >>>> rocks don't have laws. > >>> > >>> In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > >> > >> For a lack of a better word...they are simply your...concoctions. > >> > >> The laws of physics are your laws, not nature's. > > > > > > In other words, there are no laws of physics...'out there'. > > > > > > There is not even any Science...'out there'! > > > > > > > > These are just hallucinations yous people are having. > > Sure. And you computer is made of cheese. I just checked my computer...it is not made of cheese. I see a lot of plastic, metal, but no cheese. Is there anything in a computer that you can 'perceive' besides cheese??? I can touch the plastic....but how do you touch...information? Maybe, i need ...more cheese! EXTRA CHEESE PLEASE!!!! DON'T FORGET THE ANCHOVIES!! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-16 10:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66BF927C.7138@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656043 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Python wrote: > > > > Le 15/08/2024 à 18:43, The Starmaker a écrit : > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > >> > > >> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> > > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> and another thing Hachel > > >>>> > > >>>> (i have nothing against...French Science) > > >>>> > > >>>> but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > >>>> > > >>>> all i see out there is...rocks. > > >>>> > > >>>> Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > >>>> > > >>>> I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > >>>> > > >>>> all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > >>>> where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > >>>> > > >>>> your hallucinations. > > >>>> > > >>>> Rocks don't have laws. > > >>>> > > >>>> yous seeing things > > >>>> > > >>>> or reading into rocks > > >>>> > > >>>> yous might have laws, but > > >>>> rocks don't have laws. > > >>> > > >>> In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > > >> > > >> For a lack of a better word...they are simply your...concoctions. > > >> > > >> The laws of physics are your laws, not nature's. > > > > > > > > > In other words, there are no laws of physics...'out there'. > > > > > > > > > There is not even any Science...'out there'! > > > > > > > > > > > > These are just hallucinations yous people are having. > > > > Sure. And you computer is made of cheese. > > I just checked my computer...it is not made of cheese. I see a lot of > plastic, metal, but no cheese. > > Is there anything in a computer that you can 'perceive' besides > cheese??? > > I can touch the plastic....but how do you touch...information? > > Maybe, i need ...more cheese! > > EXTRA CHEESE PLEASE!!!! > > DON'T FORGET THE ANCHOVIES!! Now I gotta look on the Moon, look under the rocks to see if i find any...information under the rock. if i find green cheese... nope nothing Come on, help me. Where 'out there' can i find these things you call 'laws of physics'???? it's gotta be under some rock somewhere?!?!? Wait a minute! ONLY YOU GUYS CAN SEE IT???? what kind of kool aid are yous guys drinking???? hallucinations! Lusy in the sky with diamonds... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-16 22:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66C0331E.12CA@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656044 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Python wrote: > > > > > > Le 15/08/2024 à 18:43, The Starmaker a écrit : > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > >> > > > >> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> and another thing Hachel > > > >>>> > > > >>>> (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > >>>> > > > >>>> all i see out there is...rocks. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > >>>> > > > >>>> all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > > >>>> where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> your hallucinations. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Rocks don't have laws. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> yous seeing things > > > >>>> > > > >>>> or reading into rocks > > > >>>> > > > >>>> yous might have laws, but > > > >>>> rocks don't have laws. > > > >>> > > > >>> In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > > > >> > > > >> For a lack of a better word...they are simply your...concoctions. > > > >> > > > >> The laws of physics are your laws, not nature's. > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, there are no laws of physics...'out there'. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is not even any Science...'out there'! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > These are just hallucinations yous people are having. > > > > > > Sure. And you computer is made of cheese. > > > > I just checked my computer...it is not made of cheese. I see a lot of > > plastic, metal, but no cheese. > > > > Is there anything in a computer that you can 'perceive' besides > > cheese??? > > > > I can touch the plastic....but how do you touch...information? > > > > Maybe, i need ...more cheese! > > > > EXTRA CHEESE PLEASE!!!! > > > > DON'T FORGET THE ANCHOVIES!! > > Now I gotta look on the Moon, look under the rocks to see if i find > any...information under the rock. > > if i find green cheese... > > nope > nothing > > Come on, help me. Where 'out there' can i find these things you call > 'laws of physics'???? it's gotta be under some rock somewhere?!?!? > > Wait a minute! ONLY YOU GUYS CAN SEE IT???? > > what kind of kool aid are yous guys drinking???? > > hallucinations! > > Lucy in the sky with diamonds... okay, i'm going to tear apart my harddrive just so i can see what 'information' looks like.... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-15 10:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66BE39F6.28B1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656008 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > and another thing Hachel > > > > > > > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > > > > > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > > > > > > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > > > > > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > > > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > > > > > > your hallucinations. > > > > > > > > Rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > > > yous seeing things > > > > > > > > or reading into rocks > > > > > > > > yous might have laws, but > > > > rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > > > > For a lack of a better word...they are simply your...concoctions. > > > > The laws of physics are your laws, not nature's. > > In other words, there are no laws of physics...'out there'. > > There is not even any Science...'out there'! > > These are just hallucinations yous people are having. and PLEASE, don't even start with 'the universe is mathematical', don't even go there! There is not even any Math...'out there', no place out there where it exist! hallucinations projections. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-15 17:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2e2fec0f5a33458e014509d00e8f7cea@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #656010 |
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 17:25:10 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: > > and PLEASE, don't even start with 'the universe is mathematical', > don't even go there! > > There is not even any Math...'out there', no place out there where it > exist! > > hallucinations > > projections. It's all ... The Matrix
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-16 11:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66BF9ED8.683D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #655976 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > and another thing Hachel > > > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > > your hallucinations. > > > > Rocks don't have laws. > > > > yous seeing things > > > > or reading into rocks > > > > yous might have laws, but > > rocks don't have laws. > > In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. and if yous believe that the 'laws of physics' exist...'out there', where is this...'out there'??? Where is this...'out there'? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-16 22:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66C030D2.64E8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656047 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > and another thing Hachel > > > > > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > > > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > > > > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > > > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > > > > your hallucinations. > > > > > > Rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > yous seeing things > > > > > > or reading into rocks > > > > > > yous might have laws, but > > > rocks don't have laws. > > > > In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > > and if yous believe that the 'laws of physics' exist...'out there', > where is this...'out there'??? > > Where is this...'out there'? of course everybody knows if you ask richard feynman how you come up with the 'laws of physics'...he'll say.. you just..."Guess." -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-17 10:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66C0E2DF.AA9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656049 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > and another thing Hachel > > > > > > > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > > > > > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > > > > > > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > > > > > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > > > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > > > > > > your hallucinations. > > > > > > > > Rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > > > yous seeing things > > > > > > > > or reading into rocks > > > > > > > > yous might have laws, but > > > > rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > > > > and if yous believe that the 'laws of physics' exist...'out there', > > where is this...'out there'??? > > > > Where is this...'out there'? > > of course everybody knows if you ask richard feynman how you come up > with the 'laws of physics'...he'll say.. > > you just..."Guess." and for those who don't know 'where' the laws of physics come from... https://youtu.be/OL6-x0modwY the stupid audience...laughs. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-17 13:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66C10334.3D8C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656080 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > and another thing Hachel > > > > > > > > > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > > > > > > > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > > > > > > > > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > > > > > > > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > > > > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > > > > > > > > your hallucinations. > > > > > > > > > > Rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > > > > > yous seeing things > > > > > > > > > > or reading into rocks > > > > > > > > > > yous might have laws, but > > > > > rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > > > In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > > > > > > and if yous believe that the 'laws of physics' exist...'out there', > > > where is this...'out there'??? > > > > > > Where is this...'out there'? > > > > of course everybody knows if you ask richard feynman how you come up > > with the 'laws of physics'...he'll say.. > > > > you just..."Guess." > > and for those who don't know 'where' the laws of physics come from... > > https://youtu.be/OL6-x0modwY > > the stupid audience...laughs. In other words, 'the laws of physics' are just an invention by man, not nature. Math, another invention that doesn't exist 'out there'. Hallucinations. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-18 11:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66C23944.6CE3@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656083 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > and another thing Hachel > > > > > > > > > > > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > > > > > > > > > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > > > > > > > > > > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > > > > > > > > > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > > > > > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > > > > > > > > > > your hallucinations. > > > > > > > > > > > > Rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > > > > > > > yous seeing things > > > > > > > > > > > > or reading into rocks > > > > > > > > > > > > yous might have laws, but > > > > > > rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > > > > > In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > > > > > > > > and if yous believe that the 'laws of physics' exist...'out there', > > > > where is this...'out there'??? > > > > > > > > Where is this...'out there'? > > > > > > of course everybody knows if you ask richard feynman how you come up > > > with the 'laws of physics'...he'll say.. > > > > > > you just..."Guess." > > > > and for those who don't know 'where' the laws of physics come from... > > > > https://youtu.be/OL6-x0modwY > > > > the stupid audience...laughs. Where do you suppose the stupid audience thinks 'laws of nature' come from? God?? Don't tell them they are just "Gusses", they are made up, they are inventions, and do not or ever came from nature. Illusions. Science in fact is...fake. You know what Nature has to say about this...."I DON'T KNOW WHERE THESE PEOPLE GET THESE LAWS FROM, NOT FROM ME!" THEY JUST FUCKING MADE IT UP! https://youtu.be/OL6-x0modwY Go ahead, laugh. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-18 12:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66C24642.5098@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656101 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and another thing Hachel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > > > > > > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your hallucinations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yous seeing things > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or reading into rocks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yous might have laws, but > > > > > > > rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > > > > > > > > > > and if yous believe that the 'laws of physics' exist...'out there', > > > > > where is this...'out there'??? > > > > > > > > > > Where is this...'out there'? > > > > > > > > of course everybody knows if you ask richard feynman how you come up > > > > with the 'laws of physics'...he'll say.. > > > > > > > > you just..."Guess." > > > > > > and for those who don't know 'where' the laws of physics come from... > > > > > > https://youtu.be/OL6-x0modwY > > > > > > the stupid audience...laughs. > > Where do you suppose the stupid audience thinks 'laws of nature' come > from? God?? > > Don't tell them they are just "Gusses", they are made up, they are > inventions, > > and do not or ever came from nature. > > Illusions. > > Science in fact is...fake. > > You know what Nature has to say about this...."I DON'T KNOW WHERE THESE > PEOPLE GET THESE LAWS FROM, NOT FROM ME!" > > THEY JUST FUCKING MADE IT UP! > > https://youtu.be/OL6-x0modwY > > Go ahead, laugh. Is there a 'Laws of Physics' school where one can learn How To make up these Laws???? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-19 10:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66C38088.397A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #656102 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and another thing Hachel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (i have nothing against...French Science) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but, I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where do the laws of nature come from in French Science? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have looked, and looked, and looked... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all i see out there is...rocks, there is no one or anything > > > > > > > > where laws of nature seems to be coming from...except.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your hallucinations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yous seeing things > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or reading into rocks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yous might have laws, but > > > > > > > > rocks don't have laws. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, they are NOT nature's laws...they are your laws. > > > > > > > > > > > > and if yous believe that the 'laws of physics' exist...'out there', > > > > > > where is this...'out there'??? > > > > > > > > > > > > Where is this...'out there'? > > > > > > > > > > of course everybody knows if you ask richard feynman how you come up > > > > > with the 'laws of physics'...he'll say.. > > > > > > > > > > you just..."Guess." > > > > > > > > and for those who don't know 'where' the laws of physics come from... > > > > > > > > https://youtu.be/OL6-x0modwY > > > > > > > > the stupid audience...laughs. > > > > Where do you suppose the stupid audience thinks 'laws of nature' come > > from? God?? > > > > Don't tell them they are just "Gusses", they are made up, they are > > inventions, > > > > and do not or ever came from nature. > > > > Illusions. > > > > Science in fact is...fake. > > > > You know what Nature has to say about this...."I DON'T KNOW WHERE THESE > > PEOPLE GET THESE LAWS FROM, NOT FROM ME!" > > > > THEY JUST FUCKING MADE IT UP! > > > > https://youtu.be/OL6-x0modwY > > > > Go ahead, laugh. > > Is there a 'Laws of Physics' school where one can learn How To make up > these Laws???? or take a fashion design class on...patterns. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web