Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #655860 > unrolled thread

Space-time interval (2)

Started by Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr>
First post2024-08-12 17:35 +0000
Last post2024-09-03 17:13 -0700
Articles 5 on this page of 105 — 14 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-12 17:35 +0000
    Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 19:39 +0200
    Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 21:06 +0200
      Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-12 20:25 +0000
        Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 23:16 +0200
        Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-13 12:45 +0200
          Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 12:46 +0000
            Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 16:15 +0200
              Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-13 16:37 +0200
              Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 16:50 +0000
            Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-13 19:54 +0200
              Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 21:20 +0000
              Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 21:25 +0000
              Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 22:01 +0000
                Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 22:12 +0000
                  Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 22:42 +0000
                    Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 23:07 +0000
                    Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-13 21:48 -0700
                      Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-14 09:40 -0700
                        Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-14 17:15 +0000
                          Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-14 11:06 -0700
                        Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-14 16:00 -0700
                          Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-14 22:49 -0700
                            Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-15 09:43 -0700
                              Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 18:45 +0200
                                Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-15 10:29 -0700
                                  Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 19:34 +0200
                                    Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 11:42 -0700
                                Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 10:45 -0700
                                  Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 10:55 -0700
                                    Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 22:20 -0700
                              Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-15 10:25 -0700
                                Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-15 17:34 +0000
                          Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 11:47 -0700
                            Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 22:10 -0700
                              Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-17 10:50 -0700
                                Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-17 13:08 -0700
                                  Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-18 11:11 -0700
                                    Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-18 12:06 -0700
                                      Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-19 10:27 -0700
                                        Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-19 10:52 -0700
                                          Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-19 11:51 -0700
                                            Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-20 17:22 -0700
                                              Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-22 00:32 -0700
                            Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-08-16 22:16 -0700
                    Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-14 21:53 +0200
                      Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-14 22:04 +0200
                      Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 20:27 +0000
                        Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-15 11:42 +0200
                  Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-14 06:25 +0200
                    Re: Space-time interval (2) Mubarak Schitov <uaka@acikt.ru> - 2024-08-14 05:47 +0000
                    Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 12:25 +0000
                      Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 14:36 +0200
                        Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 12:54 +0000
                          Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 14:59 +0200
                            Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-15 13:18 +0200
                          Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 15:08 +0200
                            Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 13:24 +0000
                              Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-14 14:39 +0000
                                Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 17:37 +0000
                                  Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-14 18:11 +0000
                                    Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-14 20:29 +0200
                                      Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-14 19:20 +0000
                                        Re: Space-time interval (2) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-14 12:24 -0700
                                        Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-14 21:50 +0200
                                          Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-14 22:36 +0000
                                            Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 06:50 +0200
                                            Re: Space-time interval (2) Belgov Turpaev <eesssu@unuvpat.ru> - 2024-08-15 10:58 +0000
                              Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 20:44 +0200
                              Re: Space-time interval (2) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-15 12:46 +0300
                                Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-15 12:10 +0000
                                  Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 14:29 +0200
                                    Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-15 14:52 +0000
                                      Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 16:58 +0200
                                      Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 17:16 +0200
                                  Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-15 13:02 +0000
                                    Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 15:15 +0200
                                      Re: Space-time interval (2) hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-15 13:44 +0000
                                    Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 17:31 +0200
                                      Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 17:37 +0200
                                        Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 18:04 +0200
                                          Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 18:26 +0200
                                            Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 19:46 +0200
                                              Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-15 18:05 +0000
                                                Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 20:27 +0200
                                  Re: Space-time interval (2) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-16 15:10 +0300
                                    Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-16 12:38 +0000
                                      Re: Space-time interval (2) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-17 11:14 +0300
                              Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-15 21:12 +0200
                              Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-15 21:22 +0200
                                Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 21:31 +0200
                            Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-14 19:54 +0200
                              Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 20:47 +0200
                Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-14 19:34 +0200
                  Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 17:43 +0000
                    Re: Space-time interval (2) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-15 12:22 +0200
                      Re: Space-time interval (2) Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-15 17:29 +0200
                Re: Space-time interval (2) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-15 08:13 +0200
            Re: Space-time interval (2) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-15 12:33 +0300
              Re: Space-time interval (2)  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-15 11:24 +0000
                Re: Space-time interval (2) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 13:49 +0200
                Re: Space-time interval (2) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-17 11:18 +0300
          Re: Space-time interval (2) guido wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2024-08-14 21:01 +0200
    Re: Space-time interval (2) film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-09-02 17:02 +0000
      Re: Space-time interval (2) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-09-03 17:13 -0700

Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]


#655994

FromPython <python@invalid.org>
Date2024-08-15 13:49 +0200
Message-ID<v9kq0e$trev$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#655993
Le 15/08/2024 à 13:24, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
> Le 15/08/2024 à 11:33, Mikko a écrit :
>> On 2024-08-13 12:46:55 +0000, Richard Hachel said:
> 
>>>> https://paulba.no/pdf/TwinsByMetric.pdf
>>>> Chapter 1.
>>>
>>>  There are equations that are correct in your pdf, but also equations 
>>> that are incorrect.
>>
>> When you say that there equations (or anything) that are not correct
>> you should identify at least one incorrect equation and tell how you
>> saw that it is not correct.
> 
> But I do that.
> I denounce false formulas and false concepts.

No. You deny the validity of sound and demonstrated equations.

> I re-explain all that, and I give the correct equations.

No. You pull out of you *ss ill-defined and contradictory claims.

> It has been wrong for a long time.

You have been wrong for a long time. Remember "hachelian sines and
cosines" you dropped out silently 20 years ago?

> The problem: 1. I am not read 2. I am not believed.

You are read. You are then proven wrong. You are in a state of denial.




[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#656054

FromMikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Date2024-08-17 11:18 +0300
Message-ID<v9pmdg$1ref3$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#655993
On 2024-08-15 11:24:57 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

> Le 15/08/2024 à 11:33, Mikko a écrit :
>> On 2024-08-13 12:46:55 +0000, Richard Hachel said:
> 
>>>> https://paulba.no/pdf/TwinsByMetric.pdf
>>>> Chapter 1.
>>> 
>>> There are equations that are correct in your pdf, but also equations 
>>> that are incorrect.
>> 
>> When you say that there equations (or anything) that are not correct
>> you should identify at least one incorrect equation and tell how you
>> saw that it is not correct.
> 
>  But I do that.

Perhaps elsewhere but not in the message I commented.
You don't do it below, either.

> I denounce false formulas and false concepts.
> I re-explain all that, and I give the correct equations.
> It has been wrong for a long time.
> The problem: 1. I am not read 2. I am not believed.

-- 
Mikko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655955

Fromguido wugi <wugi@brol.invalid>
Date2024-08-14 21:01 +0200
Message-ID<v9iuu9$idej$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#655889
Op 13-8-2024 om 12:45 schreef Paul.B.Andersen:
> Den 12.08.2024 22:25, skrev Richard Hachel:
>> Le 12/08/2024 à 21:06, Python a écrit :
>>
>>>> Finally, what is ds²? It is just -c².Tr²
>>>
>>> No! ds^2 = c^2 dt^2 - dl^2. 
>>
>> LOL.
>>
>> Non : ds²=dl²-c²dt²
>
> https://paulba.no/pdf/TwinsByMetric.pdf
> Chapter 1.

Nice to have a TP simulation, but one needs an app to install.
Here's my Desmos "TP simulator" (only the linear case, admittedly, no 
continuous accelerations here)
4 cases (2x2) shown:
1. Lorentz description
("observed" meaning: measured, back-calculated; showing Lorentz 
transform effects)
1a: POV hometwin
1b: POV traveltwin
2. "Doppler/Einstein" description
("observed" meaning: actually seeing, looking at, the other twin! 
Besides Lorentz, additional Doppler effects)
2a: POV hometwin
2b: POV traveltwin

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/aoacey9t1v?lang=nl
More SRT Desmos examples: https://www.wugi.be/srtinterac.html

-- 
guido wugi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#656705

Fromfilm.art@gmail.com (JanPB)
Date2024-09-02 17:02 +0000
Message-ID<0a12eb82ccef999ddcb46a79123c6815@www.novabbs.com>
In reply to#655860
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 17:35:41 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

> The notion of space-time interval should be abandoned because it is
> complex and leads to nothing, except final errors.
> What is the space-time interval?
> A metric, measured in meters.
> It is mostly an abstract thing that is not very useful.
> So we set ds²=dl²-c²t².
> Why and for WHAT?
> For nothing.
> For fun.

What you write is not even wrong, it's gobbledygook. It's like saying
that Newton was wrong because he used vectors or Hamilton was
wrong because he used characteristics.

> Hachel notation is much more practical,

Stop wasting your life on asinine fantasies. Face it: you
cannot do physics, it's not the end of the world. I cannot
play Beethoven sonatas. I survived.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#656732

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2024-09-03 17:13 -0700
Message-ID<66D7A62E.3F37@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#656705
JanPB wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 17:35:41 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
> 
> > The notion of space-time interval should be abandoned because it is
> > complex and leads to nothing, except final errors.
> > What is the space-time interval?
> > A metric, measured in meters.
> > It is mostly an abstract thing that is not very useful.
> > So we set ds²=dl²-c²t².
> > Why and for WHAT?
> > For nothing.
> > For fun.
> 
> What you write is not even wrong, it's gobbledygook. It's like saying
> that Newton was wrong because he used vectors or Hamilton was
> wrong because he used characteristics.
> 
> > Hachel notation is much more practical,
> 
> Stop wasting your life on asinine fantasies. Face it: you
> cannot do physics, it's not the end of the world. I cannot
> play Beethoven sonatas. I survived.
> 
> --
> Jan


It is not a good idea to learn piano from people with ...autism.


Why would you bother to learn piano from someone that's sick in the
head????

they are playing piano with a marked deck..

Chopin had a smaller piano then everyone else...

it's easier to move your fingers if the keys are closer together.

but what would you know...you wasted time on ...Relativity, by another
austistic person.


i think you're attracted to ...sick people. are you sick too????


Jan, Personal Best, gimme a break!


rubbish! 



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web