Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #602276 > unrolled thread

Re: ChatGPT

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2023-02-25 16:13 -0800
Last post2023-03-04 13:41 -0600
Articles 7 on this page of 27 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 16:13 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 23:40 -0800
      Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-26 01:54 -0600
        Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 17:12 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT Connie Scutese <uiin@tssccenc.ne> - 2023-02-27 18:55 +0000
            Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:12 -0800
      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 11:53 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 21:20 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 21:43 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-27 12:26 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 13:05 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:36 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-30 11:07 -0700
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-01 10:22 -0700
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-08 15:29 -0700
                  Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-11 10:57 -0700
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:57 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-01 16:47 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-02 17:24 -0600
                  Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 16:45 -0800
                  Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 11:18 -0800
                    Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 12:06 -0800
                    Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-03 20:39 -0600
                      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:22 -0800
                        Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:27 -0800
                          Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:51 -0600
                        Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:41 -0600

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#602795

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-03-03 11:18 -0800
Message-ID<640247F5.3FA8@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#602714
whodat wrote:
> 
> On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth,
> > right?
> >
> > you guys are...obsolete.
> 
> That's a mater of opinion. 

It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact.

You have been replaced by ChatGPT.

Is there any reason to hire another computer programmer? when you can
just use ChatGPT to 
help your least knowledgeable computer programmer????


The horse was replaced by the car.

You've been replaced.

You're obsolete.


.. to be or become obsolete by replacing it with something new.



Everyone knows that..yous scientists have no patience for, stupidity.


How do you make a pencil? Ask ChatGPT.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602810

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2023-03-03 12:06 -0800
Message-ID<tttk0e$ned2$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#602795
On 3/3/2023 11:18 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> whodat wrote:
>>
>> On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth,
>>> right?
>>>
>>> you guys are...obsolete.
>>
>> That's a mater of opinion.
> 
> It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact.
> 
> You have been replaced by ChatGPT.
> 
> Is there any reason to hire another computer programmer? when you can
> just use ChatGPT to
> help your least knowledgeable computer programmer????
[..]

LOL! I would not trust ChatGPT wrt code. No way, no how.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602844

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2023-03-03 20:39 -0600
Message-ID<k6fpbtF9lkqU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#602795
On 3/3/2023 1:18 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> whodat wrote:
>>
>> On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth,
>>> right?
>>>
>>> you guys are...obsolete.
>>
>> That's a mater of opinion.
> 
> It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact.

Thanks for demonstrating your imbecilic thought process.

<snip rest of "Starmaker" crap>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602849

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-03-03 21:22 -0800
Message-ID<6402D5A3.59D6@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#602844
whodat wrote:
> 
> On 3/3/2023 1:18 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > whodat wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth,
> >>> right?
> >>>
> >>> you guys are...obsolete.
> >>
> >> That's a mater of opinion.
> >
> > It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact.
> 
> Thanks for demonstrating your imbecilic thought process.

Well of course 'FACTS' is not something you're familiar with...

over 50% of high schools in New York City don't even offer physics.

bad enough they cannot find qualified physics teachers...


anyone here qualified here to teach physics? maybe Richard Hammond?
Dono? Pentcho Valev? Mitch? Ken Seto???


It's over.


Yous cannot even keep physics in Usenet anymore...


If you cannot compete with...ChatGPT, it game over.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602851

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-03-03 21:27 -0800
Message-ID<6402D6BE.3ADA@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#602849
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> whodat wrote:
> >
> > On 3/3/2023 1:18 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > whodat wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>> You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth,
> > >>> right?
> > >>>
> > >>> you guys are...obsolete.
> > >>
> > >> That's a mater of opinion.
> > >
> > > It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact.
> >
> > Thanks for demonstrating your imbecilic thought process.
> 
> Well of course 'FACTS' is not something you're familiar with...
> 
> over 50% of high schools in New York City don't even offer physics.
> 
> bad enough they cannot find qualified physics teachers...
> 
> anyone here qualified here to teach physics? maybe Richard Hammond?
> Dono? Pentcho Valev? Mitch? Ken Seto???
> 
> It's over.
> 
> Yous cannot even keep physics in Usenet anymore...
> 
> If you cannot compete with...ChatGPT, it game over.

facts

    Of all school subjects, Physics has the most severe teacher shortage, followed by math and chemistry.  There are large surpluses of biology and earth science teachers.
    Only 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have a degree in physics or physics education.
    Almost 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have taken fewer than 3 college physics classes.
    90% of middle school students are taught physical science by a teacher lacking a major or certification in the physical sciences (chemistry, geology, general science or physics). 
    Our local and regional school districts have had substantial difficulty finding and retaining qualified physics teachers. 52% of New York City high schools do not even offer physics.

http://phystec.physics.cornell.edu/content/crisis-physics-education


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602902

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2023-03-04 13:51 -0600
Message-ID<k6hlqoFieqvU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#602851
On 3/3/2023 11:27 PM, The self proclaimed expert on everything proclaimed:

[...]

>> Well of course 'FACTS' is not something you're familiar with...

You certainly don't know what it is you don't know. To achieve some
understanding refer to articles on Kruger Dunning effect.

You don't even realize that simply quoting someone else may impute
to people with your characteristics that you actually understand
something. But that's not necessarily true, no matter what you believe.

Sad day.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602901

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2023-03-04 13:41 -0600
Message-ID<k6hl6lFieqvU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#602849
On 3/3/2023 11:22 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> whodat wrote:
>>
>> On 3/3/2023 1:18 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> whodat wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 3/1/2023 6:47 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> You can say that ChatGPT is more knowlegable than anybody else on earth,
>>>>> right?
>>>>>
>>>>> you guys are...obsolete.
>>>>
>>>> That's a mater of opinion.
>>>
>>> It's not a matter of a opinion, it's a fact.

ibid.

<snip balance of nonsense>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web