Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #602516 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-02-28 09:44 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-02-28 15:08 -0800 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The most distance objects got where they are in time after the BB "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 09:44 -0800
Re: The most distance objects got where they are in time after the BB The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 14:06 -0800
Re: The most distance objects got where they are in time after the BB whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-28 16:39 -0600
Re: The most distance objects got where they are in time after the BB The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 15:06 -0800
Re: The most distance objects got where they are in time after the BB The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 15:08 -0800
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-28 09:44 -0800 |
| Subject | The most distance objects got where they are in time after the BB |
| Message-ID | <5b8044f3-a4cc-46e1-8b1e-d5187377a675n@googlegroups.com> |
We do not see the back to the early universe. Everything we see has aged billions of years after the BB. Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-28 14:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63FE7AEA.1DC2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #602516 |
mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > We do not see the back to the early universe. Everything > we see has aged billions of years after the BB. > > Mitchell Raemsch "The most distance objects got where they are in time after the BB"??? "in time"? you mean the objects were in the 4th dimension???? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-28 16:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k67e4cFdjuU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #602535 |
On 2/28/2023 4:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> We do not see the back to the early universe. Everything >> we see has aged billions of years after the BB. >> >> Mitchell Raemsch > > > "The most distance objects got where they are in time after the BB"??? > "in time"? you mean the objects were in the 4th dimension???? I wasted my time reading this. I'm working on improving.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-28 15:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63FE88F3.2A1A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #602539 |
whodat wrote: > > On 2/28/2023 4:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > >> > >> We do not see the back to the early universe. Everything > >> we see has aged billions of years after the BB. > >> > >> Mitchell Raemsch > > > > > > "The most distance objects got where they are in time after the BB"??? > > "in time"? you mean the objects were in the 4th dimension???? > > I wasted my time reading this. I'm working on improving. try eating pussy. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-28 15:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63FE8976.E96@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #602535 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > We do not see the back to the early universe. Everything > > we see has aged billions of years after the BB. > > > > Mitchell Raemsch > > "The most distance objects got where they are in time after the BB"??? > "in time"? you mean the objects were in the 4th dimension???? > I mean, Albert Einsten said the big bang was separate from time. So, how did those other objects get in there?? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web