Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #601306 > unrolled thread

Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD

Started byworm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com>
First post2023-02-12 13:29 -0500
Last post2023-02-19 14:53 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 79 — 14 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-12 13:29 -0500
    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 19:46 -0800
      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-14 11:51 -0800
        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-14 16:00 -0500
          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-16 15:17 -0800
            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 01:39 -0800
              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:28 -0800
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 15:52 -0800
                  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 22:11 -0800
                    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 12:06 -0600
                      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 19:38 +0100
                        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 03:57 -0800
                        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-24 02:08 -0800
                          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-24 03:07 -0800
                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 12:55 -0800
                              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-25 16:40 -0600
                                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 01:21 -0800
                                  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 10:45 -0800
                                    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-01 00:35 -0800
                                      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 17:59 -0800
                                        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 13:54 -0800
                                          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 14:47 -0800
                                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-04 12:57 -0800
                                              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-04 18:26 -0800
                                                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-04 23:13 -0800
                                                  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-03-05 08:28 -0800
                                                    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-05 22:06 -0800
                                                  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-06 00:43 -0800
                                                    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-06 12:10 -0800
                                                      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-06 17:18 -0800
                                                        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-06 22:58 -0800
                                                          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-08 01:01 -0800
                                                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-08 10:08 -0800
                                                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-08 16:51 -0800
                                                              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-08 22:13 -0800
                                                                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-09 02:22 -0800
                                                                  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-09 12:00 -0800
                                                                    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-09 12:11 -0800
                                                                      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 06:29 -0800
                                                                        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 06:58 -0800
                                                                          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 17:47 -0800
                                                                        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 18:15 -0800
                                                                          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 19:16 -0800
                                                                    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 19:26 -0700
                                                                      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-18 07:40 -0700
                                                                        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-19 16:50 +0000
                                                                          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 12:10 -0700
                                                                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-19 19:21 +0000
                                                                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-19 14:49 -0700
                                                                              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 00:30 -0700
                                                                            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-06 14:32 -0700
                                                                              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD John-Paul Mosconi <hmus@omsjcmcu.ao> - 2023-04-07 00:20 +0000
                                                                              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-04-10 01:46 -0700
                                                                                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD James Willi Negri <lnes@allligal.nr> - 2023-04-10 23:01 +0000
                                                                                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-10 22:35 -0700
                                                                                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-04-11 00:27 -0700
                                                                                  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Dentcho Rustici <osin@icctcesd.do> - 2023-04-11 17:03 +0000
                                                                                    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-04-13 23:30 -0700
                              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 11:57 -0800
                                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 12:41 -0800
                                  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 18:03 -0800
                                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Bubba Pagano <nuan@bappn.bb> - 2023-02-26 21:17 +0000
                      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-18 12:33 -0800
                        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 14:47 -0600
            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:40 -0800
              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 22:16 -0800
    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-13 08:21 -0800
      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-14 11:55 -0500
        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-15 02:40 -0800
          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-15 11:33 -0500
            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-15 09:52 -0800
            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:50 -0800
              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-18 14:40 -0500
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-18 12:02 -0800
                  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 14:29 -0600
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 17:55 -0800
                  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-19 12:22 -0800
                    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 14:48 -0800
                      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 14:53 -0800

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →


#601306 — Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD

Fromworm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com>
Date2023-02-12 13:29 -0500
SubjectRe: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD
Message-ID<tsbb76$1rdgl$1@dont-email.me>
On 1/1/2023 4:08 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> THE RIEMANN  CURVATURE OF GOD
> January 1, 2023
> FROM: George E Hammond MS physics
> .
> In 1920 Einstein found the universe was not
> "stable" as he had hoTped – it would collapse
> under its own gravity.
> .
> FRIEDMANN discovered a way out of this dilemma – he
> said the universe was EXPANDING.
> .
> He said you could simply multiply the space part (XYZ)
> of Einstein's metric:
> .
> | 1 o o o. |
> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
> | o o 1 o. |
> | o o o -1.|
> .
> by a "EXPANSION FACTOR", a = a(t),
> which would convert Einstein's metric to the
> Friedmann metric: –
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN  (FLRW)  METRIC
> |o o a² o. |
> |o o o..-1.|
> .
> And today this metric, now referred to as the FLRW
> (Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker metric)
> rules all of Astrophysics.
> .
> a(t) is called the "scale factor" and expands with time
> thus providing an "expanding universe".
> .
> (da/dt) is known as the "Hubble constant" and is about
> 7%/gigayear .  IOW it takes 1 billion years for the universe
> to expand by 7%
> .
> MORE RECENTLY HAMMOND has discovered that the
> phenomenon called "God" is actually a CONTRACTION
> of SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME caused by the growth of
> the human brain under the age of 20 at a rate of about
> 5%/year .
> .
> And, COPYING FRIEDMANN Hammond has proposed
> that this can be expressed by the HAMMOND METRIC: –
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | =  HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> Here the scale factor "a(t)" DECREASES WITH TIME and in fact
> begins at around a=3.5 at human birth, and falls to about
> a=1.18 at human adulthood.
> .
> The reason it does not fall to 1.0 at (age 18) is because no one
> ever reaches 100% full growth – in fact WHO, UNESCO data
> indicate that the world average of adult growth is only about 85%,
> of full growth, and since 1/.85=1.18 : –
> .
> the huge RIEMANN CURVATURE of the "GOD METRIC" leaves
> the average adult human being SEEING a World that APPEARS
> 18% LARGER AND FASTER than it actually is!
> .
> OBVIOUSLY, such a phenomenon can be terrifyingly frightening
> to every human being –and this perceptual phenomenon is known
> to history as the: – PHENOMENON OF GOD.,
> including notably, the God of the Bible and the God of every other
> world religion.
> .
> As we can see from the above metrics  that the
> "Hubble constant of God" (da/dt) is a BILLION times larger than
> the  "Hubble constant of Astrophysics" – we see that the
> "curvature power" of God a BILLION TIMES larger than the
> "curvature power of Gravity" – save for the instance of being in
> the vicinity of a BLACK HOLE !
> .
> Thus – debate over whether or not there is a real God is NOW OVER !
> Richard Dawkins notwithstanding – it has been scientifically proven
> and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that
> THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the
> King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions!
> .
> George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis Massachusetts

George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink 
(https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and 
he may have a lot to talk about.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#601333

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2023-02-12 19:46 -0800
Message-ID<d4c90183-b4a2-4629-8110-726aab11e0c7n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#601306
On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote:
> > [George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven 
> > and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that 
> > THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the 
> > King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions! 
> > . 
> 
> [worm food wrote]:
> George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink 
> (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and 
> he may have a lot to talk about.
>
[George Hammond MS Physics]
Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance
that you might be a serious person –
.
I have the following questions for you: –
.
1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the 
name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted
for this specific post?
.
You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since
you quoted the entire message in your post?
.
2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have
ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work
is entirely about :
.
QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY
.
while my work is all about :
.
RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY
.
THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC
COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ?
.
Truly yours, George

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#601416

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-02-14 11:51 -0800
Message-ID<63EBE644.1761@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#601333
George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote:
> > > [George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven
> > > and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that
> > > THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the
> > > King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions!
> > > .
> >
> > [worm food wrote]:
> > George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink
> > (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and
> > he may have a lot to talk about.
> >
> [George Hammond MS Physics]
> Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance
> that you might be a serious person –
> .
> I have the following questions for you: –
> .
> 1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the
> name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted
> for this specific post?
> .
> You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since
> you quoted the entire message in your post?
> .
> 2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have
> ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work
> is entirely about :
> .
> QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY
> .
> while my work is all about :
> .
> RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY
> .
> THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC
> COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ?
> .
> Truly yours, George


Objectivism is ...antiquated.

Your proof of God
needs to be added
to that pile
of
burning books of history.

Couldn't you come up with something new????

maybe a better mousetrap.

throw yourself on dat fire..

food for fire.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#601422

Fromworm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com>
Date2023-02-14 16:00 -0500
Message-ID<tsgsov$2kgmf$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#601416
On 2/14/2023 2:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote:
>>>> [George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven
>>>> and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that
>>>> THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the
>>>> King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions!
>>>> .
>>>
>>> [worm food wrote]:
>>> George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink
>>> (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and
>>> he may have a lot to talk about.
>>>
>> [George Hammond MS Physics]
>> Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance
>> that you might be a serious person –
>> .
>> I have the following questions for you: –
>> .
>> 1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the
>> name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted
>> for this specific post?
>> .
>> You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since
>> you quoted the entire message in your post?
>> .
>> 2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have
>> ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work
>> is entirely about :
>> .
>> QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY
>> .
>> while my work is all about :
>> .
>> RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY
>> .
>> THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC
>> COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ?
>> .
>> Truly yours, George
> 
> 
> Objectivism is ...antiquated.
> 
> Your proof of God
> needs to be added
> to that pile
> of
> burning books of history.
> 
> Couldn't you come up with something new????
> 
> maybe a better mousetrap.
> 
> throw yourself on dat fire..
> 
> food for fire.
> 
> 
> 

I see Loki is out here doing [god's] work.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#601562

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-02-16 15:17 -0800
Message-ID<63EEB96F.6495@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#601422
worm food wrote:
> 
> On 2/14/2023 2:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote:
> >>>> [George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven
> >>>> and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that
> >>>> THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the
> >>>> King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions!
> >>>> .
> >>>
> >>> [worm food wrote]:
> >>> George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink
> >>> (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and
> >>> he may have a lot to talk about.
> >>>
> >> [George Hammond MS Physics]
> >> Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance
> >> that you might be a serious person –
> >> .
> >> I have the following questions for you: –
> >> .
> >> 1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the
> >> name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted
> >> for this specific post?
> >> .
> >> You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since
> >> you quoted the entire message in your post?
> >> .
> >> 2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have
> >> ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work
> >> is entirely about :
> >> .
> >> QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY
> >> .
> >> while my work is all about :
> >> .
> >> RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY
> >> .
> >> THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC
> >> COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ?
> >> .
> >> Truly yours, George
> >
> >
> > Objectivism is ...antiquated.
> >
> > Your proof of God
> > needs to be added
> > to that pile
> > of
> > burning books of history.
> >
> > Couldn't you come up with something new????
> >
> > maybe a better mousetrap.
> >
> > throw yourself on dat fire..
> >
> > food for fire.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> I see Loki is out here doing [god's] work.


I see you reference 'god' twice in one sentence....dats odd?







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#601572

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2023-02-17 01:39 -0800
Message-ID<9607d4e9-32f6-425d-acaf-6fdb70660bc5n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#601562
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:16:48 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> I see you reference 'god' twice in one sentence....dats odd?
> -- 
.
[George Hammond MS Physics]
... Hey STARMAKER – cut the smalltalk –
lemme tell you something –
.
There isn't one person on the face of the earth
who is INTELLIGENT or EDUCATED enough to 
understand this discovery –
.
I only understand it because I spent 30
years studying PHYSICS and another 20 years
studying PSYCHOMETRY ! And even then –
IT WAS AN ACCIDENTAL DISCOVERY !
.
It would take the likes of Dick Feynman,
Albert Einstein, Hans Eysenck, and 
Ray Cattell, and me, all sitting in one room
discussing this for an hour to confirm it's TRUE.
.
And unfortunately all those scientists
except me, are dead of old age!  And I'm
80 years old myself !
.
It's a result of their work that I found it
.
I don't need to tell you that the world's firs
______SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
is important – every God-fearing person in
the world knows it's important !
.
You happen to know any influential JEWS 
who might know some high-ranking Jewish
ACADEMICS ?  At least THEY would know 
the world political significance of this ! 
.
George

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#601575

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-02-17 10:28 -0800
Message-ID<63EFC753.4F27@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#601572
George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:16:48 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > I see you reference 'god' twice in one sentence....dats odd?
> > --
> .
> [George Hammond MS Physics]
> ... Hey STARMAKER – cut the smalltalk –
> lemme tell you something –

smalltalk?  If it isn't Your talk, then it's small talk.


You talk the talk, but do you walk the walk????



or you get monkies to do your walking?


You got top show 'proof yourself' otherwise,
it's just talk.


You don't walk the walk.






> .
> There isn't one person on the face of the earth
> who is INTELLIGENT or EDUCATED enough to
> understand this discovery –
> .
> I only understand it because I spent 30
> years studying PHYSICS and another 20 years
> studying PSYCHOMETRY ! And even then –
> IT WAS AN ACCIDENTAL DISCOVERY !
> .
> It would take the likes of Dick Feynman,
> Albert Einstein, Hans Eysenck, and
> Ray Cattell, and me, all sitting in one room
> discussing this for an hour to confirm it's TRUE.
> .
> And unfortunately all those scientists
> except me, are dead of old age!  And I'm
> 80 years old myself !
> .
> It's a result of their work that I found it
> .
> I don't need to tell you that the world's firs
> ______SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> is important – every God-fearing person in
> the world knows it's important !
> .
> You happen to know any influential JEWS
> who might know some high-ranking Jewish
> ACADEMICS ?  At least THEY would know
> the world political significance of this !
> .
> George

influential JEWS who might know some high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS???? 


Their God is different...they worship a god who is...6 inches tall.


  


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#601588

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2023-02-17 15:52 -0800
Message-ID<5508bdae-f99a-42d1-8eee-7a73079247c3n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#601575
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:28:23 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> [GEORGE HAMMOND] WROTE: 
> do you know some
> influential JEWS who might know some 
> high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS ?? 
> 
> [STARMAKER] WROTE:
> Their God is different...they worship a 
> god who is...6 inches tall.
> 
[GEORGE HAMMOND] wrote:
Here is a list of the top half dozen
........ISRAELI UNIVERSITIES: –
1 – Technion-Israel Institute of Technology – Haifa
2 – University of Haifa
3 – Hebrew University of Jerusalem
4 – Weizmann Institute of Science – Tel Aviv
5 – Tel Aviv University
6 – Bar Ilan University – Tel Aviv
.
These Christian Physicists on SPR don't know 
what God is!
.
I need to talk to some JEWISH PHYSICISTS
who know BOTH what Physics is, and God is !
.
All of these universities teach in ENGLISH as well
as HEBREW.
.
If anyone reading this post besides Dum-Dum
STARMAKER knows any "Jewish Physicists"
who might understand both PHYSICS and GOD
please let them know about this discovery
of the world's first scientific proof of God
(relativistic metric of God) – and the fact 
that GEORGE HAMMOND is desperately 
looking for them !
.
George

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#601611

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-02-17 22:11 -0800
Message-ID<63F06C2D.1186@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#601588
George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:28:23 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > [GEORGE HAMMOND] WROTE:
> > do you know some
> > influential JEWS who might know some
> > high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS ??
> >
> > [STARMAKER] WROTE:
> > Their God is different...they worship a
> > god who is...6 inches tall.
> >
> [GEORGE HAMMOND] wrote:
> Here is a list of the top half dozen
> ........ISRAELI UNIVERSITIES: –
> 1 – Technion-Israel Institute of Technology – Haifa
> 2 – University of Haifa
> 3 – Hebrew University of Jerusalem
> 4 – Weizmann Institute of Science – Tel Aviv
> 5 – Tel Aviv University
> 6 – Bar Ilan University – Tel Aviv
> .
> These Christian Physicists on SPR don't know
> what God is!
> .
> I need to talk to some JEWISH PHYSICISTS
> who know BOTH what Physics is, and God is !
> .
> All of these universities teach in ENGLISH as well
> as HEBREW.
> .
> If anyone reading this post besides Dum-Dum
> STARMAKER knows any "Jewish Physicists"
> who might understand both PHYSICS and GOD
> please let them know about this discovery
> of the world's first scientific proof of God
> (relativistic metric of God) – and the fact
> that GEORGE HAMMOND is desperately
> looking for them !
> .
> George

A JEWISH PHYSICISTS who knows BOTH what Physics is, and God is...doesn't exist.
...and they certaintly don't want to have anything to
do with scientists who aren't Jewish. 

And they will simply steal your idea and call it their own.

Don't you know their history since the beginning? They are vampires.





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#601639

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2023-02-18 12:06 -0600
Message-ID<k5cid1Fqbu1U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#601611
On 2/18/2023 12:11 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:28:23 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> [GEORGE HAMMOND] WROTE:
>>> do you know some
>>> influential JEWS who might know some
>>> high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS ??
>>>
>>> [STARMAKER] WROTE:
>>> Their God is different...they worship a
>>> god who is...6 inches tall.
>>>
>> [GEORGE HAMMOND] wrote:
>> Here is a list of the top half dozen
>> ........ISRAELI UNIVERSITIES: –
>> 1 – Technion-Israel Institute of Technology – Haifa
>> 2 – University of Haifa
>> 3 – Hebrew University of Jerusalem
>> 4 – Weizmann Institute of Science – Tel Aviv
>> 5 – Tel Aviv University
>> 6 – Bar Ilan University – Tel Aviv
>> .
>> These Christian Physicists on SPR don't know
>> what God is!
>> .
>> I need to talk to some JEWISH PHYSICISTS
>> who know BOTH what Physics is, and God is !
>> .
>> All of these universities teach in ENGLISH as well
>> as HEBREW.
>> .
>> If anyone reading this post besides Dum-Dum
>> STARMAKER knows any "Jewish Physicists"
>> who might understand both PHYSICS and GOD
>> please let them know about this discovery
>> of the world's first scientific proof of God
>> (relativistic metric of God) – and the fact
>> that GEORGE HAMMOND is desperately
>> looking for them !
>> .
>> George
> 
> A JEWISH PHYSICISTS who knows BOTH what Physics is, and God is...doesn't exist.
> ...and they certaintly don't want to have anything to
> do with scientists who aren't Jewish.
> 
> And they will simply steal your idea and call it their own.
> 
> Don't you know their history since the beginning? They are vampires.

Haven't you ever wondered why nobody has ever considered stealing
any of your ideas? Luck has nothing to do with it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#601643

FromAthel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com>
Date2023-02-18 19:38 +0100
Message-ID<k5ck9eFqmjvU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#601639
On 2023-02-18 18:06:18 +0000, whodat said:

> On 2/18/2023 12:11 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> George Hammond wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:28:23 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> [GEORGE HAMMOND] WROTE:
>>>> do you know some
>>>> influential JEWS who might know some
>>>> high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS ??
>>>> 
>>>> [STARMAKER] WROTE:
>>>> Their God is different...they worship a
>>>> god who is...6 inches tall.
>>>> 
>>> [GEORGE HAMMOND] wrote:
>>> Here is a list of the top half dozen
>>> ........ISRAELI UNIVERSITIES: –
>>> 1 – Technion-Israel Institute of Technology – Haifa
>>> 2 – University of Haifa
>>> 3 – Hebrew University of Jerusalem
>>> 4 – Weizmann Institute of Science – Tel Aviv

Not a university, not in Tel Aviv.

>>> 5 – Tel Aviv University
>>> 6 – Bar Ilan University – Tel Aviv
>>> .
>>> These Christian Physicists on SPR don't know
>>> what God is!
>>> .
>>> I need to talk to some JEWISH PHYSICISTS
>>> who know BOTH what Physics is, and God is !
>>> .
>>> All of these universities teach in ENGLISH as well
>>> as HEBREW.
>>> .
>>> If anyone reading this post besides Dum-Dum
>>> STARMAKER knows any "Jewish Physicists"
>>> who might understand both PHYSICS and GOD
>>> please let them know about this discovery
>>> of the world's first scientific proof of God
>>> (relativistic metric of God) – and the fact
>>> that GEORGE HAMMOND is desperately
>>> looking for them !
>>> .
>>> George
>> 
>> A JEWISH PHYSICISTS who knows BOTH what Physics is, and God is...doesn't exist.
>> ...and they certaintly don't want to have anything to
>> do with scientists who aren't Jewish.
>> 
>> And they will simply steal your idea and call it their own.
>> 
>> Don't you know their history since the beginning? They are vampires.
> 
> Haven't you ever wondered why nobody has ever considered stealing
> any of your ideas? Luck has nothing to do with it.


-- 
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#601684

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2023-02-19 03:57 -0800
Message-ID<e1fff7ff-fc7b-470e-b9f0-a692bba3cca6n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#601643
On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:38:43 PM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
.
> >>> [GE Hammond MS Physics] wrote:--
> >>> 4 -- Weizmann Institute of Science -- Tel Aviv
.
> [Prof. AC  Bowden] wrote:
> Not a university, not in Tel Aviv.
.
[GE Hammond MS physics]
Thanks for the correction A.C. -- 
I've never been to Israel !
.
You might want to show this publicly 
posted 12/1/23 message to: --
.
Nicholas J. S. Gibson, Ph.D.
DIRECTOR, HUMAN SCIENCES
TEMPLETON FOUNDATION
.
some of your high-ranking Oxford buddies
just to let them know what's coming their way:--
.
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa-jisc.exe?A2=PSY-REL-UK;e31fb2e6.2212
.
George

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#602120

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2023-02-24 02:08 -0800
Message-ID<3a1fa02a-41ed-488c-a631-fa97d3944cf9n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#601643
On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:38:43 PM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>
> [ Athel Cornish-Bowden] wrote
> athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, 
> 
>
[George Hammond MS Physics]
OK Athel- let me give you a 60-sec
lecture on Relativity - and then
you will be a "Relativity Physicist" !
.
As an Oxford Chemistry PhD you know
the PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM  --
.
s² = x²+y²+z²    (Pythagorean Theorem in 3D)
.
Which can be written as a 3x3 matrix:-
.
| 1 o o |
| o 1 o | = Pythagorean theorem
| o o 1 |
.
Relativity is ALL ABOUT the Pythagorean Theorem
IN 4D where it's called the Einstein Metric-
.
ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²    (Einstein metric)
.
Nevermind the minus sign, it's caused by subtracting 
the time it takes light to get from one event to another.
.
This eqn can be written as a 4x4 MATRIX - called the
(world famous) "Einstein metric" -
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
OK – Einstein used this metric to deduce his
Gravitational Field Equations which replaced
Newton's simple inverse square law of Gravity.
.
But then a Russian mathematician named Friedmann
proposed that the universe was EXPANDING
and he told Einstein that he could simply
multiply the spatial part of his metric by an
"expansion factor" a=a(t) - and Einstein agreed:
.
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²)-dt²  (Friedmann metric)
.
Or written as a matrix :-
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|o o o..-1.|
.
Today this metric is called the FLRW metric
(Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker) metric
and rules all of Astrophysics !
.
.......END 60-sec RELATIVITY LECTURE
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.....BEGIN 60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE
.
We want to be as competent as the Jewish Physicists
since they not only know PHYSICS, they also know 
what GOD is; since the Jews wrote the Bible !
.... I'm a "Swamp Yankee Protestant" by birth and I
expect you are probably a Wesleyan Methodist
since most Cornish people are.
 .
We now propose "Theology Space" as an independent
spacetime.  Theology Space is also called (human) 
"SUBJECTIVE Spacetime" whereas Astrophysics 
spacetime is referred to as "OBJECTIVE space-time".
.
OBJECTIVE spacetime is measured by clocks and rulers.
SUBJECTIVE spacetime is what people actually SEE.
.
Different people see different things – especially if they are
over, versus under, 20 years of age.  Children see a much
LARGER and FASTER world than adults do.
.
In fact, we have to multiply what CHILDREN SEE by a
"magnification factor", a=a(t), so that their metric of
SUBJECTIVE spacetime is actually:-
.
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a² 
.
Or again, written as a matrix:-
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
Here we see that multiplication by "a" increases the SIZE
of objects for very young people, and dividing the time by
"a" increases the SPEED of objects (less time=more speed).
.
Now I have called this the "METRIC OF GOD" – why is that?
.
And the answer is this – a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth, since an
adult is about 3.5 times as big as a newborn.  Likewise, the
"perceptual speed" of an adult is likewise known to be 3.5
times as fast as that of a child (by actual measurement of
the movie "motion picture fusion frequency"), first discovered 
and measured by Thomas Edison over 100 years ago.
.
Obviously both these size and speed measurements simply 
depends on the person's location on the human growth curve: –
HUMAN GROWTH CURVE: -
https://html.scribdassets.com/38jup9thxc6bjcfe/images/8-99f9190673.jpg
.
But why am I calling it "God"?  And the answer to that is this –
.........NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH.
In fact WHO and UNESCO data indicate that the average adult
in the world population is only about 85% fully grown – 
some more, some less. In 3rd world countries growth stunting
of 30 and 40% is not uncommon !  And 1/1.85=1.18.   IOW the 
average adult in the world is SEEING a world that appears
.
================================================
.......18% LARGER AND 18% FASTER than it actually is !
================================================
.
And this, I'm here to tell you, is the scientific explanation of GOD.
.
Imagine if the world suddenly got 20% larger and 20% faster than
it actually is !
.
This would literally SCARE THE DAYLIGHTS out of people!
.
WELL GUESS WHAT – that is what has actually happened to every
single person on earth, and this phenomenon is called GOD.
.
Okay, so I've explained what I think God is – and obviously the
phenomenon exists – but how can I actually PROVE that it is GOD?
.
And for that we need a "60-sec Lecture on Psychometry"
.
End "60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE"
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
BEGIN the  "60-sec PSYCHOMETRY LECTURE"

=======================================
HERE WE GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING of my
40 years of research, which ultimately led to the
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD (SPOG).... Back to 
the year 1982.
=======================================
.
I never knew anything about GOD, was never interested in
GOD, and never in my life even thought about it !
.
But in 1982, as a result of driving a cab in Boston, I became
interested in "Human Personality Structure".
... Despite having an advanced degree in PHYSICS -- I totally 
gave up looking for a job Physics and I actually launched into 
a 20 year, INDEPENDENT, investigation of PSYCHOMETRY !
.
PSYCHOMETRY is the statistical branch of Psychology concerned 
mainly with written tests to determine both IQ and Personality.
In many ways it is considered the FLAGSHIP of modern Psychology
.
IQ (intelligence) testing is very old, while Personality testing has been
very active for the past 75 years. The Scientific Proof of God (SPOG)
centers around Personality testing in the search for the "long-lost" 
STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY which has been underway 
ever since HIPPOCRATES The Father of Medicine said he thought 
there was such a thing 2500 years ago.  He said Man had 4 personalities
caused by 4 Humoral fluids. Turns out he was right about the "4" but he 
was wrong about the fluids !
.
With the advent of the desktop computer around 1970, Academic
Psychometry spread worldwide with Psychology researchers writing
Personality Tests and analyzing them with desktop computers. The
peer–published literature in this field is now so large it would 
ENTIRELY FILL A MAJOR LIBRARY!.
.
Computers are used to extract the EIGENVECTORS from the 
personality test data (correlation matrices). And it is believed that this
 multilevel eigenvector structure – is in fact the "long-lost" 
HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY.
. 
To sum up all this history – it is now believed that there is an
EIGENVECTOR PYRAMID in the data with about 30 diverse
eigenvectors (also referred to as "FACTORS" by psychologists)
at the 1st level (called 1st-order Factors), and about 13-2nd order
Factors, 4-3rd Order Factors and finally ONE TOP EIGENVECTOR
referred to as the "GFP" (Gen. factor of Personality, or
Gen. factor of Psychology, if it includes IQ).
.
THE PSYCHOLOGISTS HAVE NO IDEA WHERE these EIGENVECTOR
FACTORS come from in the brain !  But they are SURE they exist in
the DATA !
.
========================================================
ALL THEY KNOW-- is that a worldwide PHD ARMY of psychometrists
using desktop computers in 20 countries, in 20 languages, costing
$100s of millions of dollars, and taking more than 50 YEARS-- has
produced this ENORMOUS well-documented peer-published RESULT.
========================================================
.
AND THAT'S WHEN GEORGE HAMMOND ARRIVED ON THE SCENE
.
BEING A PHYSICIST, it wasn't more than a few years before I realized
that the long-lost Structural Model of Personality was probably caused
by the same underlying fact that causes all animals to have FOUR FEET !
Namely the CARTESIAN STRUCTURE OF SPACE 
.
I observed THAT THE BRAIN IS CUBICALLY CLEAVED, and I drew this 
picture of it with my own hand:--
.
https://html.scribdassets.com/76h12hhjls6bm5q2/images/2-7f6a975f24.jpg
........... ABOVE & BELOW (HAMMOND)--- CUBIC BRAIN
https://html.scribdassets.com/6inure6mww8ngndu/images/2-67a3b11050.png
.
Not only is the brain cubically cleaved, I showed in a 1994 peer-reviewed
paper that Prof. Jeffrey A Gray's well-known SHS (Septo-Hippocampal System) 
actually controls his 2 of the cubic-diagonal Personality Eigenvectors.  And
more recently I've concluded that Gray's SHS actually mediates ALL-13 of the 
2nd-Order Personality Eigenvectors-- and THAT ACTUALLY CONSTITUTES the 
LONG-LOST HIPPOCRATIC  STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY!
.
These 13 (cubic) 2nd order eigenvector "Personality Types", I have concluded 
are none other than the fabled "12 Olympian Gods" of antiquity !
.
And this brings us to the well known 4-3rd Order eigenvectors, and it is easy
to identify them as the LEGENDARY 4 Gospel personalities:-- Mt, Mk, Lk and Jn.
.
That leaves us facing the now WIDELY TOUTED single 4th-order eigenvector
mentioned above; the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology).
.... And having determined that the 2nd Orders are the "gods" And the 3rd Orders
are the 4 gospel Saints:-- it is not hard to conclude that 
.............. The GFP IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE  !!
.
===================================================================
THUS WE HAVE DISCOVERED THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
we have discovered that the GOD METRIC mentioned in the "Theology Lecture"
above, is now actually experimentally proven to be "God" !
===================================================================
.
Okay Athel, I'll wrap it up here since this post is getting too long !
.
You come from Cornwall which is a peninsula in the Southwest of England.
I come from a peninsula in the eastern part of Massachusetts USA named
Cape Cod.
Although you are a Chemist and I am a Physicist we are both SCIENTISTS.
.
You of course have had a stellar scientific career, and have a familiarity
with the elite intellectuals of Oxford University where you graduated.
I on the other hand, it appears, am a middle-class nobody who has 
ACCIDENTALLY made what appears to be a STELLAR HISTORIC
scientific discovery.
.
I hope that you will not remain blind to the importance of our accidental
meeting on sci.physics.relativity and will undertake to consider this
accidental meeting PORTENTOUSLY SERIOUS !
.
Regards, George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis Massachusetts

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#602121

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2023-02-24 03:07 -0800
Message-ID<23767292-e9fc-46ad-b702-0e9028f84572n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#602120
On Friday, February 24, 2023 at 5:08:11 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:38:43 PM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: 
> >
> > [ Athel Cornish-Bowden] wrote
> > athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, 
> > 
> >
> [George Hammond MS Physics] 
> OK Athel- let me give you a 60-sec 
> lecture on Relativity - and then 
> you will be a "Relativity Physicist" ! 
> . 
> As an Oxford Chemistry PhD you know 
> the PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM -- 
> . 
> s² = x²+y²+z² (Pythagorean Theorem in 3D) 
> . 
> Which can be written as a 3x3 matrix:- 
> . 
> | 1 o o | 
> | o 1 o | = Pythagorean theorem 
> | o o 1 | 
> . 
> Relativity is ALL ABOUT the Pythagorean Theorem 
> IN 4D where it's called the Einstein Metric- 
> . 
> ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt² (Einstein metric) 
> . 
> Nevermind the minus sign, it's caused by subtracting 
> the time it takes light to get from one event to another. 
> . 
> This eqn can be written as a 4x4 MATRIX - called the 
> (world famous) "Einstein metric" - 
> . 
> | 1 o o o. | 
> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC 
> | o o 1 o. | 
> | o o o -1.| 
> . 
> OK – Einstein used this metric to deduce his 
> Gravitational Field Equations which replaced 
> Newton's simple inverse square law of Gravity. 
> . 
> But then a Russian mathematician named Friedmann 
> proposed that the universe was EXPANDING 
> and he told Einstein that he could simply 
> multiply the spatial part of his metric by an 
> "expansion factor" a=a(t) - and Einstein agreed: 
> . 
> ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²)-dt² (Friedmann metric) 
> . 
> Or written as a matrix :- 
> . 
> |a² o o o. | 
> |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC 
> |o o a² o. | 
> |o o o..-1.| 
> . 
> Today this metric is called the FLRW metric 
> (Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker) metric 
> and rules all of Astrophysics ! 
> . 
> .......END 60-sec RELATIVITY LECTURE 
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> .....BEGIN 60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE 
> . 
> We want to be as competent as the Jewish Physicists 
> since they not only know PHYSICS, they also know 
> what GOD is; since the Jews wrote the Bible ! 
> .... I'm a "Swamp Yankee Protestant" by birth and I 
> expect you are probably a Wesleyan Methodist 
> since most Cornish people are. 
> . 
> We now propose "Theology Space" as an independent 
> spacetime. Theology Space is also called (human) 
> "SUBJECTIVE Spacetime" whereas Astrophysics 
> spacetime is referred to as "OBJECTIVE space-time". 
> . 
> OBJECTIVE spacetime is measured by clocks and rulers. 
> SUBJECTIVE spacetime is what people actually SEE. 
> . 
> Different people see different things – especially if they are 
> over, versus under, 20 years of age. Children see a much 
> LARGER and FASTER world than adults do. 
> . 
> In fact, we have to multiply what CHILDREN SEE by a 
> "magnification factor", a=a(t), so that their metric of 
> SUBJECTIVE spacetime is actually:- 
> . 
> ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a² 
> . 
> Or again, written as a matrix:- 
> . 
> |a² o o o. | 
> |o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. | 
> |ooo-1/a²| 
> .
> Here we see that multiplication by "a" increases the SIZE 
> of objects for very young people, and dividing the time by 
> "a" increases the SPEED of objects (less time=more speed). 
> . 
> Now I have called this the "METRIC OF GOD" – why is that? 
> . 
> And the answer is this – a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth, since an 
> adult is about 3.5 times as big as a newborn. Likewise, the 
> "perceptual speed" of an adult is likewise known to be 3.5 
> times as fast as that of a child (by actual measurement of 
> the movie "motion picture fusion frequency"), first discovered 
> and measured by Thomas Edison over 100 years ago. 
> . 
> Obviously both these size and speed measurements simply 
> depends on the person's location on the human growth curve: – 
> HUMAN GROWTH CURVE: - 
> https://html.scribdassets.com/38jup9thxc6bjcfe/images/8-99f9190673.jpg 
> . 
> But why am I calling it "God"? And the answer to that is this – 
> .........NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH. 
> In fact WHO and UNESCO data indicate that the average adult 
> in the world population is only about 85% fully grown – 
> some more, some less. In 3rd world countries growth stunting 
> of 30 and 40% is not uncommon ! And 1/1.85=1.18. IOW the 
> average adult in the world is SEEING a world that appears 
> . 
> ================================================ 
> .......18% LARGER AND 18% FASTER than it actually is ! 
> ================================================ 
> . 
> And this, I'm here to tell you, is the scientific explanation of GOD. 
> . 
> Imagine if the world suddenly got 20% larger and 20% faster than 
> it actually is ! 
> . 
> This would literally SCARE THE DAYLIGHTS out of people! 
> . 
> WELL GUESS WHAT – that is what has actually happened to every 
> single person on earth, and this phenomenon is called GOD. 
> . 
> Okay, so I've explained what I think God is – and obviously the 
> phenomenon exists – but how can I actually PROVE that it is GOD? 
> . 
> And for that we need a "60-sec Lecture on Psychometry" 
> . 
> End "60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE" 
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> BEGIN the "60-sec PSYCHOMETRY LECTURE" 
> 
> ======================================= 
> HERE WE GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING of my 
> 40 years of research, which ultimately led to the 
> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD (SPOG).... Back to 
> the year 1982. 
> ======================================= 
> . 
> I never knew anything about GOD, was never interested in 
> GOD, and never in my life even thought about it ! 
> . 
> But in 1982, as a result of driving a cab in Boston, I became 
> interested in "Human Personality Structure". 
> ... Despite having an advanced degree in PHYSICS -- I totally 
> gave up looking for a job Physics and I actually launched into 
> a 20 year, INDEPENDENT, investigation of PSYCHOMETRY ! 
> . 
> PSYCHOMETRY is the statistical branch of Psychology concerned 
> mainly with written tests to determine both IQ and Personality. 
> In many ways it is considered the FLAGSHIP of modern Psychology 
> . 
> IQ (intelligence) testing is very old, while Personality testing has been 
> very active for the past 75 years. The Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) 
> centers around Personality testing in the search for the "long-lost" 
> STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY which has been underway 
> ever since HIPPOCRATES The Father of Medicine said he thought 
> there was such a thing 2500 years ago. He said Man had 4 personalities 
> caused by 4 Humoral fluids. Turns out he was right about the "4" but he 
> was wrong about the fluids ! 
> . 
> With the advent of the desktop computer around 1970, Academic 
> Psychometry spread worldwide with Psychology researchers writing 
> Personality Tests and analyzing them with desktop computers. The 
> peer–published literature in this field is now so large it would 
> ENTIRELY FILL A MAJOR LIBRARY!. 
> . 
> Computers are used to extract the EIGENVECTORS from the 
> personality test data (correlation matrices). And it is believed that this 
> multilevel eigenvector structure – is in fact the "long-lost" 
> HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY. 
> . 
> To sum up all this history – it is now believed that there is an 
> EIGENVECTOR PYRAMID in the data with about 30 diverse 
> eigenvectors (also referred to as "FACTORS" by psychologists) 
> at the 1st level (called 1st-order Factors), and about 13-2nd order 
> Factors, 4-3rd Order Factors and finally ONE TOP EIGENVECTOR 
> referred to as the "GFP" (Gen. factor of Personality, or 
> Gen. factor of Psychology, if it includes IQ). 
> . 
> THE PSYCHOLOGISTS HAVE NO IDEA WHERE these EIGENVECTOR 
> FACTORS come from in the brain ! But they are SURE they exist in 
> the DATA ! 
> . 
> ======================================================== 
> ALL THEY KNOW-- is that a worldwide PHD ARMY of psychometrists 
> using desktop computers in 20 countries, in 20 languages, costing 
> $100s of millions of dollars, and taking more than 50 YEARS-- has 
> produced this ENORMOUS well-documented peer-published RESULT. 
> ======================================================== 
> . 
> AND THAT'S WHEN GEORGE HAMMOND ARRIVED ON THE SCENE 
> . 
> BEING A PHYSICIST, it wasn't more than a few years before I realized 
> that the long-lost Structural Model of Personality was probably caused 
> by the same underlying fact that causes all animals to have FOUR FEET ! 
> Namely the CARTESIAN STRUCTURE OF SPACE 
> . 
> I observed THAT THE BRAIN IS CUBICALLY CLEAVED, and I drew this 
> picture of it with my own hand:-- 
> . 
> https://html.scribdassets.com/76h12hhjls6bm5q2/images/2-7f6a975f24.jpg 
> ........... ABOVE & BELOW (HAMMOND)--- CUBIC BRAIN 
> https://html.scribdassets.com/6inure6mww8ngndu/images/2-67a3b11050.png 
> . 
> Not only is the brain cubically cleaved, I showed in a 1994 peer-reviewed 
> paper that Prof. Jeffrey A Gray's well-known SHS (Septo-Hippocampal System) 
> actually controls his 2 of the cubic-diagonal Personality Eigenvectors. And 
> more recently I've concluded that Gray's SHS actually mediates ALL-13 of the 
> 2nd-Order Personality Eigenvectors-- and THAT ACTUALLY CONSTITUTES the 
> LONG-LOST HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY! 
> . 
> These 13 (cubic) 2nd order eigenvector "Personality Types", I have concluded 
> are none other than the fabled "12 Olympian Gods" of antiquity ! 
> . 
> And this brings us to the well known 4-3rd Order eigenvectors, and it is easy 
> to identify them as the LEGENDARY 4 Gospel personalities:-- Mt, Mk, Lk and Jn. 
> . 
> That leaves us facing the now WIDELY TOUTED single 4th-order eigenvector 
> mentioned above; the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology). 
> .... And having determined that the 2nd Orders are the "gods" And the 3rd Orders 
> are the 4 gospel Saints:-- it is not hard to conclude that 
> .............. The GFP IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE !! 
> . 
> =================================================================== 
> THUS WE HAVE DISCOVERED THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD 
> we have discovered that the GOD METRIC mentioned in the "Theology Lecture" 
> above, is now actually experimentally proven to be "God" ! 
> =================================================================== 
> . 
> Okay Athel, I'll wrap it up here since this post is getting too long ! 
> . 
> You come from Cornwall which is a peninsula in the Southwest of England. 
> I come from a peninsula in the eastern part of Massachusetts USA named 
> Cape Cod. 
> Although you are a Chemist and I am a Physicist we are both SCIENTISTS. 
> . 
> You of course have had a stellar scientific career, and have a familiarity 
> with the elite intellectuals of Oxford University where you graduated. 
> I on the other hand, it appears, am a middle-class nobody who has 
> ACCIDENTALLY made what appears to be a STELLAR HISTORIC 
> scientific discovery. 
> . 
> I hope that you will not remain blind to the importance of our accidental 
> meeting on sci.physics.relativity and will undertake to consider this 
> accidental meeting PORTENTOUSLY SERIOUS ! 
> . 
> Regards, George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis Massachusetts
>
>
[George Hammond MS Physics]
PS:----
I should mention that my credentials in "Psychometry"
should be bolstered by this photo of me with the then
world's leading expert in Psychometry Hans Eysenck
taken at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
in Montréal in 1996 where we were both invited speakers
at the same podium and to the same audience. (photo 
taken by Prof. Peter F Merenda Chairman of the 
Psychology department at URI).
.
https://html.scribdassets.com/icjqusczk4alsap/images/1-c1c01b1d46.jpg
.
.... And also, I personally explain in this 10 minute 
YouTube video the relevant findings of the field of 
Psychometry to the Scientific Proof of God.
.
WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
.........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
................(YouTube 12-min)
.
George

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#602258

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2023-02-25 12:55 -0800
Message-ID<63FA75D6.50CD@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#602121
George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Friday, February 24, 2023 at 5:08:11 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:38:43 PM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> > >
> > > [ Athel Cornish-Bowden] wrote
> > > athel -- biochemist, not a physicist,
> > >
> > >
> > [George Hammond MS Physics]
> > OK Athel- let me give you a 60-sec
> > lecture on Relativity - and then
> > you will be a "Relativity Physicist" !
> > .
> > As an Oxford Chemistry PhD you know
> > the PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM --
> > .
> > s² = x²+y²+z² (Pythagorean Theorem in 3D)
> > .
> > Which can be written as a 3x3 matrix:-
> > .
> > | 1 o o |
> > | o 1 o | = Pythagorean theorem
> > | o o 1 |
> > .
> > Relativity is ALL ABOUT the Pythagorean Theorem
> > IN 4D where it's called the Einstein Metric-
> > .
> > ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt² (Einstein metric)
> > .
> > Nevermind the minus sign, it's caused by subtracting
> > the time it takes light to get from one event to another.
> > .
> > This eqn can be written as a 4x4 MATRIX - called the
> > (world famous) "Einstein metric" -
> > .
> > | 1 o o o. |
> > | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
> > | o o 1 o. |
> > | o o o -1.|
> > .
> > OK – Einstein used this metric to deduce his
> > Gravitational Field Equations which replaced
> > Newton's simple inverse square law of Gravity.
> > .
> > But then a Russian mathematician named Friedmann
> > proposed that the universe was EXPANDING
> > and he told Einstein that he could simply
> > multiply the spatial part of his metric by an
> > "expansion factor" a=a(t) - and Einstein agreed:
> > .
> > ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²)-dt² (Friedmann metric)
> > .
> > Or written as a matrix :-
> > .
> > |a² o o o. |
> > |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
> > |o o a² o. |
> > |o o o..-1.|
> > .
> > Today this metric is called the FLRW metric
> > (Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker) metric
> > and rules all of Astrophysics !
> > .
> > .......END 60-sec RELATIVITY LECTURE
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > .....BEGIN 60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE
> > .
> > We want to be as competent as the Jewish Physicists
> > since they not only know PHYSICS, they also know
> > what GOD is; since the Jews wrote the Bible !
> > .... I'm a "Swamp Yankee Protestant" by birth and I
> > expect you are probably a Wesleyan Methodist
> > since most Cornish people are.
> > .
> > We now propose "Theology Space" as an independent
> > spacetime. Theology Space is also called (human)
> > "SUBJECTIVE Spacetime" whereas Astrophysics
> > spacetime is referred to as "OBJECTIVE space-time".
> > .
> > OBJECTIVE spacetime is measured by clocks and rulers.
> > SUBJECTIVE spacetime is what people actually SEE.
> > .
> > Different people see different things – especially if they are
> > over, versus under, 20 years of age. Children see a much
> > LARGER and FASTER world than adults do.
> > .
> > In fact, we have to multiply what CHILDREN SEE by a
> > "magnification factor", a=a(t), so that their metric of
> > SUBJECTIVE spacetime is actually:-
> > .
> > ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
> > .
> > Or again, written as a matrix:-
> > .
> > |a² o o o. |
> > |o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
> > |o o a² o. |
> > |ooo-1/a²|
> > .
> > Here we see that multiplication by "a" increases the SIZE
> > of objects for very young people, and dividing the time by
> > "a" increases the SPEED of objects (less time=more speed).
> > .
> > Now I have called this the "METRIC OF GOD" – why is that?
> > .
> > And the answer is this – a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth, since an
> > adult is about 3.5 times as big as a newborn. Likewise, the
> > "perceptual speed" of an adult is likewise known to be 3.5
> > times as fast as that of a child (by actual measurement of
> > the movie "motion picture fusion frequency"), first discovered
> > and measured by Thomas Edison over 100 years ago.
> > .
> > Obviously both these size and speed measurements simply
> > depends on the person's location on the human growth curve: –
> > HUMAN GROWTH CURVE: -
> > https://html.scribdassets.com/38jup9thxc6bjcfe/images/8-99f9190673.jpg
> > .
> > But why am I calling it "God"? And the answer to that is this –
> > .........NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH.
> > In fact WHO and UNESCO data indicate that the average adult
> > in the world population is only about 85% fully grown –
> > some more, some less. In 3rd world countries growth stunting
> > of 30 and 40% is not uncommon ! And 1/1.85=1.18. IOW the
> > average adult in the world is SEEING a world that appears
> > .
> > ================================================
> > .......18% LARGER AND 18% FASTER than it actually is !
> > ================================================
> > .
> > And this, I'm here to tell you, is the scientific explanation of GOD.
> > .
> > Imagine if the world suddenly got 20% larger and 20% faster than
> > it actually is !
> > .
> > This would literally SCARE THE DAYLIGHTS out of people!
> > .
> > WELL GUESS WHAT – that is what has actually happened to every
> > single person on earth, and this phenomenon is called GOD.
> > .
> > Okay, so I've explained what I think God is – and obviously the
> > phenomenon exists – but how can I actually PROVE that it is GOD?
> > .
> > And for that we need a "60-sec Lecture on Psychometry"
> > .
> > End "60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE"
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > BEGIN the "60-sec PSYCHOMETRY LECTURE"
> >
> > =======================================
> > HERE WE GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING of my
> > 40 years of research, which ultimately led to the
> > SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD (SPOG).... Back to
> > the year 1982.
> > =======================================
> > .
> > I never knew anything about GOD, was never interested in
> > GOD, and never in my life even thought about it !
> > .
> > But in 1982, as a result of driving a cab in Boston, I became
> > interested in "Human Personality Structure".
> > ... Despite having an advanced degree in PHYSICS -- I totally
> > gave up looking for a job Physics and I actually launched into
> > a 20 year, INDEPENDENT, investigation of PSYCHOMETRY !
> > .
> > PSYCHOMETRY is the statistical branch of Psychology concerned
> > mainly with written tests to determine both IQ and Personality.
> > In many ways it is considered the FLAGSHIP of modern Psychology
> > .
> > IQ (intelligence) testing is very old, while Personality testing has been
> > very active for the past 75 years. The Scientific Proof of God (SPOG)
> > centers around Personality testing in the search for the "long-lost"
> > STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY which has been underway
> > ever since HIPPOCRATES The Father of Medicine said he thought
> > there was such a thing 2500 years ago. He said Man had 4 personalities
> > caused by 4 Humoral fluids. Turns out he was right about the "4" but he
> > was wrong about the fluids !
> > .
> > With the advent of the desktop computer around 1970, Academic
> > Psychometry spread worldwide with Psychology researchers writing
> > Personality Tests and analyzing them with desktop computers. The
> > peer–published literature in this field is now so large it would
> > ENTIRELY FILL A MAJOR LIBRARY!.
> > .
> > Computers are used to extract the EIGENVECTORS from the
> > personality test data (correlation matrices). And it is believed that this
> > multilevel eigenvector structure – is in fact the "long-lost"
> > HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY.
> > .
> > To sum up all this history – it is now believed that there is an
> > EIGENVECTOR PYRAMID in the data with about 30 diverse
> > eigenvectors (also referred to as "FACTORS" by psychologists)
> > at the 1st level (called 1st-order Factors), and about 13-2nd order
> > Factors, 4-3rd Order Factors and finally ONE TOP EIGENVECTOR
> > referred to as the "GFP" (Gen. factor of Personality, or
> > Gen. factor of Psychology, if it includes IQ).
> > .
> > THE PSYCHOLOGISTS HAVE NO IDEA WHERE these EIGENVECTOR
> > FACTORS come from in the brain ! But they are SURE they exist in
> > the DATA !
> > .
> > ========================================================
> > ALL THEY KNOW-- is that a worldwide PHD ARMY of psychometrists
> > using desktop computers in 20 countries, in 20 languages, costing
> > $100s of millions of dollars, and taking more than 50 YEARS-- has
> > produced this ENORMOUS well-documented peer-published RESULT.
> > ========================================================
> > .
> > AND THAT'S WHEN GEORGE HAMMOND ARRIVED ON THE SCENE
> > .
> > BEING A PHYSICIST, it wasn't more than a few years before I realized
> > that the long-lost Structural Model of Personality was probably caused
> > by the same underlying fact that causes all animals to have FOUR FEET !
> > Namely the CARTESIAN STRUCTURE OF SPACE
> > .
> > I observed THAT THE BRAIN IS CUBICALLY CLEAVED, and I drew this
> > picture of it with my own hand:--
> > .
> > https://html.scribdassets.com/76h12hhjls6bm5q2/images/2-7f6a975f24.jpg
> > ........... ABOVE & BELOW (HAMMOND)--- CUBIC BRAIN
> > https://html.scribdassets.com/6inure6mww8ngndu/images/2-67a3b11050.png
> > .
> > Not only is the brain cubically cleaved, I showed in a 1994 peer-reviewed
> > paper that Prof. Jeffrey A Gray's well-known SHS (Septo-Hippocampal System)
> > actually controls his 2 of the cubic-diagonal Personality Eigenvectors. And
> > more recently I've concluded that Gray's SHS actually mediates ALL-13 of the
> > 2nd-Order Personality Eigenvectors-- and THAT ACTUALLY CONSTITUTES the
> > LONG-LOST HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY!
> > .
> > These 13 (cubic) 2nd order eigenvector "Personality Types", I have concluded
> > are none other than the fabled "12 Olympian Gods" of antiquity !
> > .
> > And this brings us to the well known 4-3rd Order eigenvectors, and it is easy
> > to identify them as the LEGENDARY 4 Gospel personalities:-- Mt, Mk, Lk and Jn.
> > .
> > That leaves us facing the now WIDELY TOUTED single 4th-order eigenvector
> > mentioned above; the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology).
> > .... And having determined that the 2nd Orders are the "gods" And the 3rd Orders
> > are the 4 gospel Saints:-- it is not hard to conclude that
> > .............. The GFP IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE !!
> > .
> > ===================================================================
> > THUS WE HAVE DISCOVERED THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> > we have discovered that the GOD METRIC mentioned in the "Theology Lecture"
> > above, is now actually experimentally proven to be "God" !
> > ===================================================================
> > .
> > Okay Athel, I'll wrap it up here since this post is getting too long !
> > .
> > You come from Cornwall which is a peninsula in the Southwest of England.
> > I come from a peninsula in the eastern part of Massachusetts USA named
> > Cape Cod.
> > Although you are a Chemist and I am a Physicist we are both SCIENTISTS.
> > .
> > You of course have had a stellar scientific career, and have a familiarity
> > with the elite intellectuals of Oxford University where you graduated.
> > I on the other hand, it appears, am a middle-class nobody who has
> > ACCIDENTALLY made what appears to be a STELLAR HISTORIC
> > scientific discovery.
> > .
> > I hope that you will not remain blind to the importance of our accidental
> > meeting on sci.physics.relativity and will undertake to consider this
> > accidental meeting PORTENTOUSLY SERIOUS !
> > .
> > Regards, George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis Massachusetts
> >
> >
> [George Hammond MS Physics]
> PS:----
> I should mention that my credentials in "Psychometry"
> should be bolstered by this photo of me with the then
> world's leading expert in Psychometry Hans Eysenck
> taken at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
> in Montréal in 1996 where we were both invited speakers
> at the same podium and to the same audience. (photo
> taken by Prof. Peter F Merenda Chairman of the
> Psychology department at URI).
> .
> https://html.scribdassets.com/icjqusczk4alsap/images/1-c1c01b1d46.jpg
> .
> .... And also, I personally explain in this 10 minute
> YouTube video the relevant findings of the field of
> Psychometry to the Scientific Proof of God.
> .
> WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> .........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
> ................(YouTube 12-min)
> .
> George

Your mistake is :................(YouTube 12-min)

I mean, it should not be there. It's a turn off. In a tiktock world the
view is less than a minute. dropoff view even less than that.

Don't even put one minute.


I mean, who do you know that can listen to you talk for 12 minutes????
YOU GO OUT OF YOUR FUCKIN MIND!!!!


How about a Devil metric? kids Love it!

Fuck God! Nobody gives a fuck about God. Only stupid people believe in
God.


...and they don't even read the bible!













-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#602270

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2023-02-25 16:40 -0600
Message-ID<k5vh3kFodriU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#602258
ibid.


On 2/25/2023 2:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, February 24, 2023 at 5:08:11 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
>>> On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:38:43 PM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [ Athel Cornish-Bowden] wrote
>>>> athel -- biochemist, not a physicist,
>>>>
>>>>
>>> [George Hammond MS Physics]
>>> OK Athel- let me give you a 60-sec
>>> lecture on Relativity - and then
>>> you will be a "Relativity Physicist" !
>>> .
>>> As an Oxford Chemistry PhD you know
>>> the PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM --
>>> .
>>> s² = x²+y²+z² (Pythagorean Theorem in 3D)
>>> .
>>> Which can be written as a 3x3 matrix:-
>>> .
>>> | 1 o o |
>>> | o 1 o | = Pythagorean theorem
>>> | o o 1 |
>>> .
>>> Relativity is ALL ABOUT the Pythagorean Theorem
>>> IN 4D where it's called the Einstein Metric-
>>> .
>>> ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt² (Einstein metric)
>>> .
>>> Nevermind the minus sign, it's caused by subtracting
>>> the time it takes light to get from one event to another.
>>> .
>>> This eqn can be written as a 4x4 MATRIX - called the
>>> (world famous) "Einstein metric" -
>>> .
>>> | 1 o o o. |
>>> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
>>> | o o 1 o. |
>>> | o o o -1.|
>>> .
>>> OK – Einstein used this metric to deduce his
>>> Gravitational Field Equations which replaced
>>> Newton's simple inverse square law of Gravity.
>>> .
>>> But then a Russian mathematician named Friedmann
>>> proposed that the universe was EXPANDING
>>> and he told Einstein that he could simply
>>> multiply the spatial part of his metric by an
>>> "expansion factor" a=a(t) - and Einstein agreed:
>>> .
>>> ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²)-dt² (Friedmann metric)
>>> .
>>> Or written as a matrix :-
>>> .
>>> |a² o o o. |
>>> |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
>>> |o o a² o. |
>>> |o o o..-1.|
>>> .
>>> Today this metric is called the FLRW metric
>>> (Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker) metric
>>> and rules all of Astrophysics !
>>> .
>>> .......END 60-sec RELATIVITY LECTURE
>>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>>> .....BEGIN 60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE
>>> .
>>> We want to be as competent as the Jewish Physicists
>>> since they not only know PHYSICS, they also know
>>> what GOD is; since the Jews wrote the Bible !
>>> .... I'm a "Swamp Yankee Protestant" by birth and I
>>> expect you are probably a Wesleyan Methodist
>>> since most Cornish people are.
>>> .
>>> We now propose "Theology Space" as an independent
>>> spacetime. Theology Space is also called (human)
>>> "SUBJECTIVE Spacetime" whereas Astrophysics
>>> spacetime is referred to as "OBJECTIVE space-time".
>>> .
>>> OBJECTIVE spacetime is measured by clocks and rulers.
>>> SUBJECTIVE spacetime is what people actually SEE.
>>> .
>>> Different people see different things – especially if they are
>>> over, versus under, 20 years of age. Children see a much
>>> LARGER and FASTER world than adults do.
>>> .
>>> In fact, we have to multiply what CHILDREN SEE by a
>>> "magnification factor", a=a(t), so that their metric of
>>> SUBJECTIVE spacetime is actually:-
>>> .
>>> ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
>>> .
>>> Or again, written as a matrix:-
>>> .
>>> |a² o o o. |
>>> |o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
>>> |o o a² o. |
>>> |ooo-1/a²|
>>> .
>>> Here we see that multiplication by "a" increases the SIZE
>>> of objects for very young people, and dividing the time by
>>> "a" increases the SPEED of objects (less time=more speed).
>>> .
>>> Now I have called this the "METRIC OF GOD" – why is that?
>>> .
>>> And the answer is this – a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth, since an
>>> adult is about 3.5 times as big as a newborn. Likewise, the
>>> "perceptual speed" of an adult is likewise known to be 3.5
>>> times as fast as that of a child (by actual measurement of
>>> the movie "motion picture fusion frequency"), first discovered
>>> and measured by Thomas Edison over 100 years ago.
>>> .
>>> Obviously both these size and speed measurements simply
>>> depends on the person's location on the human growth curve: –
>>> HUMAN GROWTH CURVE: -
>>> https://html.scribdassets.com/38jup9thxc6bjcfe/images/8-99f9190673.jpg
>>> .
>>> But why am I calling it "God"? And the answer to that is this –
>>> .........NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH.
>>> In fact WHO and UNESCO data indicate that the average adult
>>> in the world population is only about 85% fully grown –
>>> some more, some less. In 3rd world countries growth stunting
>>> of 30 and 40% is not uncommon ! And 1/1.85=1.18. IOW the
>>> average adult in the world is SEEING a world that appears
>>> .
>>> ================================================
>>> .......18% LARGER AND 18% FASTER than it actually is !
>>> ================================================
>>> .
>>> And this, I'm here to tell you, is the scientific explanation of GOD.
>>> .
>>> Imagine if the world suddenly got 20% larger and 20% faster than
>>> it actually is !
>>> .
>>> This would literally SCARE THE DAYLIGHTS out of people!
>>> .
>>> WELL GUESS WHAT – that is what has actually happened to every
>>> single person on earth, and this phenomenon is called GOD.
>>> .
>>> Okay, so I've explained what I think God is – and obviously the
>>> phenomenon exists – but how can I actually PROVE that it is GOD?
>>> .
>>> And for that we need a "60-sec Lecture on Psychometry"
>>> .
>>> End "60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE"
>>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>>> BEGIN the "60-sec PSYCHOMETRY LECTURE"
>>>
>>> =======================================
>>> HERE WE GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING of my
>>> 40 years of research, which ultimately led to the
>>> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD (SPOG).... Back to
>>> the year 1982.
>>> =======================================
>>> .
>>> I never knew anything about GOD, was never interested in
>>> GOD, and never in my life even thought about it !
>>> .
>>> But in 1982, as a result of driving a cab in Boston, I became
>>> interested in "Human Personality Structure".
>>> ... Despite having an advanced degree in PHYSICS -- I totally
>>> gave up looking for a job Physics and I actually launched into
>>> a 20 year, INDEPENDENT, investigation of PSYCHOMETRY !
>>> .
>>> PSYCHOMETRY is the statistical branch of Psychology concerned
>>> mainly with written tests to determine both IQ and Personality.
>>> In many ways it is considered the FLAGSHIP of modern Psychology
>>> .
>>> IQ (intelligence) testing is very old, while Personality testing has been
>>> very active for the past 75 years. The Scientific Proof of God (SPOG)
>>> centers around Personality testing in the search for the "long-lost"
>>> STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY which has been underway
>>> ever since HIPPOCRATES The Father of Medicine said he thought
>>> there was such a thing 2500 years ago. He said Man had 4 personalities
>>> caused by 4 Humoral fluids. Turns out he was right about the "4" but he
>>> was wrong about the fluids !
>>> .
>>> With the advent of the desktop computer around 1970, Academic
>>> Psychometry spread worldwide with Psychology researchers writing
>>> Personality Tests and analyzing them with desktop computers. The
>>> peer–published literature in this field is now so large it would
>>> ENTIRELY FILL A MAJOR LIBRARY!.
>>> .
>>> Computers are used to extract the EIGENVECTORS from the
>>> personality test data (correlation matrices). And it is believed that this
>>> multilevel eigenvector structure – is in fact the "long-lost"
>>> HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY.
>>> .
>>> To sum up all this history – it is now believed that there is an
>>> EIGENVECTOR PYRAMID in the data with about 30 diverse
>>> eigenvectors (also referred to as "FACTORS" by psychologists)
>>> at the 1st level (called 1st-order Factors), and about 13-2nd order
>>> Factors, 4-3rd Order Factors and finally ONE TOP EIGENVECTOR
>>> referred to as the "GFP" (Gen. factor of Personality, or
>>> Gen. factor of Psychology, if it includes IQ).
>>> .
>>> THE PSYCHOLOGISTS HAVE NO IDEA WHERE these EIGENVECTOR
>>> FACTORS come from in the brain ! But they are SURE they exist in
>>> the DATA !
>>> .
>>> ========================================================
>>> ALL THEY KNOW-- is that a worldwide PHD ARMY of psychometrists
>>> using desktop computers in 20 countries, in 20 languages, costing
>>> $100s of millions of dollars, and taking more than 50 YEARS-- has
>>> produced this ENORMOUS well-documented peer-published RESULT.
>>> ========================================================
>>> .
>>> AND THAT'S WHEN GEORGE HAMMOND ARRIVED ON THE SCENE
>>> .
>>> BEING A PHYSICIST, it wasn't more than a few years before I realized
>>> that the long-lost Structural Model of Personality was probably caused
>>> by the same underlying fact that causes all animals to have FOUR FEET !
>>> Namely the CARTESIAN STRUCTURE OF SPACE
>>> .
>>> I observed THAT THE BRAIN IS CUBICALLY CLEAVED, and I drew this
>>> picture of it with my own hand:--
>>> .
>>> https://html.scribdassets.com/76h12hhjls6bm5q2/images/2-7f6a975f24.jpg
>>> ........... ABOVE & BELOW (HAMMOND)--- CUBIC BRAIN
>>> https://html.scribdassets.com/6inure6mww8ngndu/images/2-67a3b11050.png
>>> .
>>> Not only is the brain cubically cleaved, I showed in a 1994 peer-reviewed
>>> paper that Prof. Jeffrey A Gray's well-known SHS (Septo-Hippocampal System)
>>> actually controls his 2 of the cubic-diagonal Personality Eigenvectors. And
>>> more recently I've concluded that Gray's SHS actually mediates ALL-13 of the
>>> 2nd-Order Personality Eigenvectors-- and THAT ACTUALLY CONSTITUTES the
>>> LONG-LOST HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY!
>>> .
>>> These 13 (cubic) 2nd order eigenvector "Personality Types", I have concluded
>>> are none other than the fabled "12 Olympian Gods" of antiquity !
>>> .
>>> And this brings us to the well known 4-3rd Order eigenvectors, and it is easy
>>> to identify them as the LEGENDARY 4 Gospel personalities:-- Mt, Mk, Lk and Jn.
>>> .
>>> That leaves us facing the now WIDELY TOUTED single 4th-order eigenvector
>>> mentioned above; the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology).
>>> .... And having determined that the 2nd Orders are the "gods" And the 3rd Orders
>>> are the 4 gospel Saints:-- it is not hard to conclude that
>>> .............. The GFP IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE !!
>>> .
>>> ===================================================================
>>> THUS WE HAVE DISCOVERED THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
>>> we have discovered that the GOD METRIC mentioned in the "Theology Lecture"
>>> above, is now actually experimentally proven to be "God" !
>>> ===================================================================
>>> .
>>> Okay Athel, I'll wrap it up here since this post is getting too long !
>>> .
>>> You come from Cornwall which is a peninsula in the Southwest of England.
>>> I come from a peninsula in the eastern part of Massachusetts USA named
>>> Cape Cod.
>>> Although you are a Chemist and I am a Physicist we are both SCIENTISTS.
>>> .
>>> You of course have had a stellar scientific career, and have a familiarity
>>> with the elite intellectuals of Oxford University where you graduated.
>>> I on the other hand, it appears, am a middle-class nobody who has
>>> ACCIDENTALLY made what appears to be a STELLAR HISTORIC
>>> scientific discovery.
>>> .
>>> I hope that you will not remain blind to the importance of our accidental
>>> meeting on sci.physics.relativity and will undertake to consider this
>>> accidental meeting PORTENTOUSLY SERIOUS !
>>> .
>>> Regards, George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis Massachusetts
>>>
>>>
>> [George Hammond MS Physics]
>> PS:----
>> I should mention that my credentials in "Psychometry"
>> should be bolstered by this photo of me with the then
>> world's leading expert in Psychometry Hans Eysenck
>> taken at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
>> in Montréal in 1996 where we were both invited speakers
>> at the same podium and to the same audience. (photo
>> taken by Prof. Peter F Merenda Chairman of the
>> Psychology department at URI).
>> .
>> https://html.scribdassets.com/icjqusczk4alsap/images/1-c1c01b1d46.jpg
>> .
>> .... And also, I personally explain in this 10 minute
>> YouTube video the relevant findings of the field of
>> Psychometry to the Scientific Proof of God.
>> .
>> WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
>> .........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
>> ................(YouTube 12-min)
>> .
>> George
> 
> Your mistake is :................(YouTube 12-min)
> 
> I mean, it should not be there. It's a turn off. In a tiktock world the
> view is less than a minute. dropoff view even less than that.
> 
> Don't even put one minute.
> 
> 
> I mean, who do you know that can listen to you talk for 12 minutes????
> YOU GO OUT OF YOUR FUCKIN MIND!!!!
> 
> 
> How about a Devil metric? kids Love it!
> 
> Fuck God! Nobody gives a fuck about God. Only stupid people believe in
> God.
> 
> 
> ...and they don't even read the bible!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#602483

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2023-02-28 01:21 -0800
Message-ID<edc0c34f-2847-45cb-9848-d50f88a2d129n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#602270
On Saturday, February 25, 2023 at 5:40:57 PM UTC-5, whodat wrote:
>
> ibid.
> 
[Geo. E. Hammond MS Physics]
.
This post is about: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
A (SLOW CLOCK) and a   (SHORT RULER)
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The Einstein metric is: 
ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²
or written as a matrix:
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
Now suppose we use a SLOW CLOCK 
and suppose we also use a SHORT RULER
.
Suppose both are slow and short by the same
multiplication factor "a"
.
A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches"
A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds"
. 
So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a² 
or written as a matrix: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. |
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
DOES ANYONE DISAGREE WITH 
THIS MATHEMATICAL DEDUCTION ?
.
Someone told me that there is a well known
treatise on "slow clocks and short rulers" and
it's effect on Relativity..
.
George
.
RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ
AND
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#602519

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2023-02-28 10:45 -0800
Message-ID<41fcc3f7-57d8-4659-9269-95afa04b7e0en@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#602483
On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 4:21:03 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> On Saturday, February 25, 2023 at 5:40:57 PM UTC-5, whodat wrote: 
> > 
> > ibid. 
> > 
> [Geo. E. Hammond MS Physics] 
> . 
> This post is about: – 
> . 
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> A (SLOW CLOCK) and a (SHORT RULER) 
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> . 
> The Einstein metric is:
> ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²
> or written as a matrix:
> . 
> | 1 o o o. | 
> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC 
> | o o 1 o. | 
> | o o o -1.| 
> .
> Now suppose we use a SLOW CLOCK 
> and suppose we also use a SHORT RULER 
> . 
> Suppose both are slow and short by the same 
> multiplication factor "a" 
> . 
> A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches" 
> A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds" 
> . 
> So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
> ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
> or written as a matrix: –
> . 
> |a² o o o. | 
> |o a² o o. |
> |o o a² o. | 
> |ooo-1/a²| 
> .
> DOES ANYONE DISAGREE WITH 
> THIS MATHEMATICAL DEDUCTION ? 
> . 
> Someone told me that there is a well known 
> treatise on "slow clocks and short rulers" and 
> it's effect on Relativity.. 
> . 
> George
> . 
> RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD 
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ 
> AND 
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ
.
[Geo. E. Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA] 
Well, whaddau know about dat: – a slow clock
and a short ruler – gives us da "God Metric" –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²| 
 .
Gosh, I wunda wat dat means?
.
GEO

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#602584

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2023-03-01 00:35 -0800
Message-ID<6b103634-9132-41b1-be5e-8ea5499332b2n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#602519
[George E. Hammond MS Physics]
.
The Einstein metric is written: 
...... ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²
or a matrix:
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
But suppose we use a "SLOW CLOCK" 
and suppose we use a "SHORT RULER"
.
Slow and short by the same
multiplication factor "a"
.
A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds"
A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches"
. 
So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
...... ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a² 
or as a matrix: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
BUT – WHY DO I CALL IT THE "GOD METRIC" ?
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And the answer is this: – HUMANS under the age of 20
are examples of "a slow clock with a short ruler" !
.
The "Foot" is the standard (English) unit of measure.
An adult foot is 3.5 times as large as a newborn's foot!
.
Not only that – the perceptual speed of an adult is
likewise 3.5 times as fast as a newborn child.  This was
first discovered by THOMAS EDISON 100 years ago.
...The first thing he found was the minimum film speed 
16 frames/sec for adults and increase linearly, under 20, 
just like intelligence, and for the same reason, as 
evidenced by the fact that intelligence has to be divided
by age under 20 to obtain IQ! 
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER !
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And FINALLY we know that NO ONE ever reaches FULL GROWTH, 
in fact WHO, UNESCO etc. found the average adult in the world
population is only about 85% fully grown. And since (1/.85=1.18) ,
we see that the average adult person in the world is: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
SEEING A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER AND FASTER
THAN IT ACTUALLY IS – & THIS PHENOMENON
......................... IS KNOWN AS "GOD" 
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
For more details you can read the following 2 SPR posts: –
RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ
AND
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ

QED: – THERE IS A REAL GOD !   
(Someone tell Richard Dawkins)
. 
George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#602731

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2023-03-02 17:59 -0800
Message-ID<af84d2e5-b8e1-4468-963c-4daf0ddabb49n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#602584
On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 3:35:09 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> [George E. Hammond MS Physics] 
> . 
> The Einstein metric is written: 
> ...... ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt² 
> or a matrix:
> . 
> | 1 o o o. | 
> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC 
> | o o 1 o. | 
> | o o o -1.| 
> .
> But suppose we use a "SLOW CLOCK" 
> and suppose we use a "SHORT RULER" 
> . 
> Slow and short by the same 
> multiplication factor "a" 
> .
> A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds" 
> A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches" 
> . 
> So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
> ...... ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a² 
> or as a matrix: –
> . 
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
> |o o a² o. | 
> |ooo-1/a²| 
> .
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> BUT – WHY DO I CALL IT THE "GOD METRIC" ? 
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> . 
> And the answer is this: – HUMANS under the age of 20 
> are examples of "a slow clock with a short ruler" ! 
> . 
> The "Foot" is the standard (English) unit of measure. 
> An adult foot is 3.5 times as large as a newborn's foot! 
> . 
> Not only that – the perceptual speed of an adult is 
> likewise 3.5 times as fast as a newborn child. This was 
> first discovered by THOMAS EDISON 100 years ago. 
> ...The first thing he found was the minimum film speed 
> 16 frames/sec for adults and increase linearly, under 20, 
> just like intelligence, and for the same reason, as 
> evidenced by the fact that intelligence has to be divided 
> by age under 20 to obtain IQ! 
> . 
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer" 
> using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER ! 
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> . 
> And FINALLY we know that NO ONE ever reaches FULL GROWTH, 
> in fact WHO, UNESCO etc. found the average adult in the world 
> population is only about 85% fully grown. And since (1/.85=1.18) , 
> we see that the average adult person in the world is: – 
> . 
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> SEEING A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER AND FASTER 
> THAN IT ACTUALLY IS – & THIS PHENOMENON 
> ......................... IS KNOWN AS "GOD" 
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 
> . 
> For more details you can read the following 2 SPR posts: –
> RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD 
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ 
> AND 
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ
> QED: – THERE IS A REAL GOD ! 
> (Someone tell Richard Dawkins) 
> . 
> George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA
.
[George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis MA USA]
Ha ha ha ha .... Some dude named WOZNIAK wrote: –
..... "WHAT ABOUT IMPROPER CLOCKS ?"
.
CHILDREN have" improper clocks": –
AND IT CAUSES GOD
.
"Improper clocks" ARE the physical cause of "God"
see "[...]"  above or below !
.
[George E. Hammond MS Physics]
.
The Einstein metric is written:
...... ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²
or a matrix:
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
But suppose we use a "SLOW CLOCK"
and suppose we use a "SHORT RULER"
.
Slow and short by the same
multiplication factor "a"
.
A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds"
A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches"
.
So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
...... ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
or as a matrix: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
BUT – WHY DO I CALL IT THE "GOD METRIC" ?
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And the answer is this: – HUMANS under the age of 20
are examples of "a slow clock with a short ruler" !
.
The "Foot" is the standard (English) unit of measure.
An adult foot is 3.5 times as large as a newborn's foot!
.
Not only that – the perceptual speed of an adult is
likewise 3.5 times as fast as a newborn child. This was
first discovered by THOMAS EDISON 100 years ago.
...The first thing he found was the minimum film speed
16 frames/sec for adults and increase linearly, under 20,
just like intelligence, and for the same reason, as
evidenced by the fact that intelligence has to be divided
by age under 20 to obtain IQ!
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER !
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And FINALLY we know that NO ONE ever reaches FULL GROWTH,
in fact WHO, UNESCO etc. found the average adult in the world
population is only about 85% fully grown. And since (1/.85=1.18) ,
we see that the average adult person in the world is: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
SEEING A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER AND FASTER
THAN IT ACTUALLY IS – & THIS PHENOMENON
......................... IS KNOWN AS "GOD"
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
For more details you can read the following 2 SPR posts: –
RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ
AND
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ

QED: – THERE IS A REAL GOD !
(Someone tell Richard Dawkins)
.
George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web