Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #598787 > unrolled thread
| Started by | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-01-01 13:08 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-04-06 02:33 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 193 — 34 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 13:08 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 13:26 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 13:45 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 14:13 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 14:22 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 15:11 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 15:23 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 15:58 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 16:53 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 17:17 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 14:54 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 15:03 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 17:13 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Doodnath Sarti <ttha@dnhnahan.nh> - 2023-01-01 23:00 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:35 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:52 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Braydon Germano <rrae@boddao.gn> - 2023-01-02 18:20 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 07:23 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Braydon Germano <rrae@boddao.gn> - 2023-01-02 16:32 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 10:25 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 12:24 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 15:21 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-04 10:24 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-09 01:58 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 16:11 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-09 11:03 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 19:18 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 19:26 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-09 13:32 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 23:01 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 23:36 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-09 21:01 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-09 22:27 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 12:56 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 14:41 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 22:31 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-10 18:04 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 22:42 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-10 23:58 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 00:17 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 00:36 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 09:55 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 12:15 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 18:49 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Otto Fiscella <tfit@tiselelc.it> - 2023-01-13 16:41 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 11:48 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-19 11:23 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 12:47 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-19 14:05 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Ciro Di pietro <pide@rioied.ao> - 2023-01-20 00:02 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 21:20 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-20 14:31 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Ciro Di pietro <pide@rioied.ao> - 2023-01-20 23:30 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-20 20:49 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Giovanne Bologna <gnoy@ninvo.ln> - 2023-01-21 14:47 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-21 13:37 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Giovanne Bologna <gnoy@ninvo.ln> - 2023-01-22 01:35 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-21 20:06 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Giovanne Bologna <gnoy@ninvo.ln> - 2023-01-22 22:21 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 00:40 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 13:15 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-24 18:42 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Faustino Biondo <uinn@bfotboia.nt> - 2023-01-25 17:21 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Faustino Biondo <uinn@bfotboia.nt> - 2023-01-25 17:03 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-25 14:06 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-28 20:17 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Bow Down Before Me <God@throne.heaven> - 2023-01-25 13:44 -0500
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-29 09:54 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-31 19:26 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-01 09:14 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-02-01 12:25 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-01 18:28 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Alexander Basso <axsd@daoadnbl.ba> - 2023-02-02 00:58 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-01 17:56 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-01 18:13 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-01 17:57 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Alexander Basso <axsd@daoadnbl.ba> - 2023-02-02 20:25 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-02 15:42 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-02 23:24 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-03 13:50 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 19:57 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-03 21:58 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-04 11:09 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 12:43 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-06 13:06 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 12:03 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Estaban Alduino <tosd@teabnnai.ou> - 2023-02-06 23:20 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 22:15 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-07 01:39 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 04:43 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 03:06 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-08 17:19 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-11 00:03 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-08 07:51 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-08 10:57 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-08 12:46 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 23:14 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 20:51 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-10 07:15 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 21:50 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 05:38 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Walton Esposito <nsoi@ipstoonl.ns> - 2023-02-11 19:12 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-13 11:23 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Lino Sebastiani <oala@ansllaeo.bo> - 2023-02-13 23:05 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-14 04:42 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Northstream 2 and 1 <sdfasf@sdfgdg.sd> - 2023-02-16 04:04 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Lino Sebastiani <oala@ansllaeo.bo> - 2023-02-13 23:14 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 21:25 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-11 04:41 -0500
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 16:49 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Walton Esposito <nsoi@ipstoonl.ns> - 2023-02-12 02:14 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Rusbel Confortola <fnbo@orfolcec.tl> - 2023-02-07 21:10 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 15:25 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-12 13:29 -0500
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 19:46 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-14 11:51 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-14 16:00 -0500
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-16 15:17 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 01:39 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:28 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 15:52 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 22:11 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 12:06 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 19:38 +0100
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 03:57 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-24 02:08 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-24 03:07 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 12:55 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-25 16:40 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 01:21 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 10:45 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-01 00:35 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 17:59 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 13:54 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 14:47 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-04 12:57 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-04 18:26 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-04 23:13 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-03-05 08:28 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-05 22:06 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-06 00:43 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-06 12:10 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-06 17:18 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-06 22:58 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-08 01:01 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-08 10:08 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-08 16:51 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-08 22:13 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-09 02:22 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-09 12:00 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-09 12:11 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 06:29 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 06:58 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 17:47 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 18:15 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 19:16 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 19:26 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-18 07:40 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-19 16:50 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 12:10 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-19 19:21 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-19 14:49 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 00:30 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-06 14:32 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD John-Paul Mosconi <hmus@omsjcmcu.ao> - 2023-04-07 00:20 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-04-10 01:46 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD James Willi Negri <lnes@allligal.nr> - 2023-04-10 23:01 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-10 22:35 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-04-11 00:27 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Dentcho Rustici <osin@icctcesd.do> - 2023-04-11 17:03 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-04-13 23:30 -0700
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 11:57 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 12:41 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 18:03 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Bubba Pagano <nuan@bappn.bb> - 2023-02-26 21:17 +0000
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-18 12:33 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 14:47 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:40 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 22:16 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-13 08:21 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-14 11:55 -0500
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-15 02:40 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-15 11:33 -0500
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-15 09:52 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:50 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-18 14:40 -0500
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-18 12:02 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 14:29 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 17:55 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-19 12:22 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 14:48 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 14:53 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-04-06 02:33 -0700
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-03 19:57 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <99a94c60-c3a9-4f94-a6bd-2bb0a678983bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600711 |
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 2:50:19 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 2/3/23 1:24 AM, George Hammond wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 4:43:00 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts
> > wrote:
> >> On 2/1/23 7:57 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> >>> a 2nd rank tensor CAN and USUALLY IS written as a MATRIX
> >> [Tom Roberts] wrote: This is not true. It is the COMPONENTS of the
> >> rank-2 tensor, relative to a specified basis, that can be written
> >> as a matrix; the basis is usually, but not always, a local set of
> >> coordinate axes.
> > [George E Hammond MS Physics] You conveniently failed to quote the
> > 2nd sentence following the one you quoted above – in which I say: –
> > .
> >> "In particular, In Relativity the 4 x 4 METRIC TENSOR is
> >> universally written as a 4 x 4 MATRIX"
> > . So CLEARLY – I am talking SPECIFICALLY about the COMPONENTS of the
> > 4 x 4 metric tensor...
> Yes -- all too many authors, including yourself, discuss tensor
> components while calling them "the tensor". My point was that the
> distinction is important: the tensor is independent of basis and
> coordinates, but its components explicitly depend on the basis
> (coordinates).
>
> [That basis/coordinate independence is one of the primary
> reasons for using tensors in physical theories.]
> > FURTHERMORE this entire thread is a discussion of this 4 x 4
> > COMPONENT metric/matrix expressed in Cartesian coordinates
> That's your problem -- you are discussing a matrix that is EXPLICITLY
> coordinate dependent. Note that coordinates are arbitrary human
> constructs, and nature never uses them, so no coordinate-dependent
> quantity can accurately model any phenomenon of nature. But here that's
> OK, as "GOD" is not any phenomenon of nature -- both "GOD" and those
> metric components are figments of your imagination.
>
> [Of course the whole thing is useless to anyone who does
> not share your imaginary figments, which is why I am
> normally absent from this thread).
>
> Tom Roberts
.
[George E Hammond MS Physics]
.... Look Tom –
The Einstein Metric of objective space-time
The Friedmann Metric Of Astrophysics
The Hammond God Metric of Subjective Space-Time
.
Are by definition
ALL COORDINATE INDEPENDENT: –
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|o o o..-1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
You can write them in Cartesian coordinates,
spherical coordinates, or any coordinate system
you choose – because they are tensor equations.
.
====================================
So you are WRONG when you say that the
"God Metric" is "Coordinate Dependent"
it is just as "coordinate INDEPENDENT"
as the FL RW metric of Astrophysics is !!
====================================
.
The problem is that you do not understand the
difference between:
OBJECTIVE space-time
and
SUBJECTIVE space-time
.
You don't even NEED to understand the
DIFFERENCE – just consider them 2 separate
and independent space times with different
METRICS .
.
But for the more Scientifically Inquisitive
reader let me explain that OBJECTIVE
space-time is measured with clocks and rulers,
while SUBJECTIVE space-time is the reality
that you actually SEE – – for instance a
6 month old kid SEES a world that is
4 TIMES LARGER AND 4 TIMES FASTER
THEN AN ADULT
.
And this is WHY a "Friedman type Scale Factor"
a{t} appears in the GOD METRIC !
..
NOW OBVIOUSLY "subjective" space-time is
what is commonly called "Psychological Reality.
Whereas "objective" space-time is psychologically
independent "objective (scientifically measurable)
reality".
.
THIS IS WHY it is called the "GOD METRIC".
.
Now I don't expect you to understand or even CARE
about all that – but let me remind you that there are
billions of people in the world who DO !.
.
And the reason is this is – for 2023 years we have had
to suffer the disgusting experience of sitting in a
Christian church facing a dead body hanging from a
Cross in the front of the Church – because that was
the only way they could "explain what God is".
.
Well guess what Tom – your SPR buddy George has
discovered A SCIENTIFIC Proof of God – that does not
require a dead body hanging from a Cross to scientifically
proof that there is a "REAL GOD".
.
You may not think that's important or significant,
but I think it's so important that we should RESTART
THE JULIAN CALENDAR at year 01 starting in 2024 !
I'm here to tell you that the "Age of Jesus" is over !
We now have a scientific Proof of God !
.
Please don't go away mad– if you have any further
comments about the "God Metric" I would certainly like
to hear about them!
.
George
.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-03 21:58 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <63DDF3ED.3DDD@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #600744 |
George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 2:50:19 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote:
> > On 2/3/23 1:24 AM, George Hammond wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 4:43:00 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts
> > > wrote:
> > >> On 2/1/23 7:57 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> > >>> a 2nd rank tensor CAN and USUALLY IS written as a MATRIX
> > >> [Tom Roberts] wrote: This is not true. It is the COMPONENTS of the
> > >> rank-2 tensor, relative to a specified basis, that can be written
> > >> as a matrix; the basis is usually, but not always, a local set of
> > >> coordinate axes.
> > > [George E Hammond MS Physics] You conveniently failed to quote the
> > > 2nd sentence following the one you quoted above – in which I say: –
> > > .
> > >> "In particular, In Relativity the 4 x 4 METRIC TENSOR is
> > >> universally written as a 4 x 4 MATRIX"
> > > . So CLEARLY – I am talking SPECIFICALLY about the COMPONENTS of the
> > > 4 x 4 metric tensor...
> > Yes -- all too many authors, including yourself, discuss tensor
> > components while calling them "the tensor". My point was that the
> > distinction is important: the tensor is independent of basis and
> > coordinates, but its components explicitly depend on the basis
> > (coordinates).
> >
> > [That basis/coordinate independence is one of the primary
> > reasons for using tensors in physical theories.]
> > > FURTHERMORE this entire thread is a discussion of this 4 x 4
> > > COMPONENT metric/matrix expressed in Cartesian coordinates
> > That's your problem -- you are discussing a matrix that is EXPLICITLY
> > coordinate dependent. Note that coordinates are arbitrary human
> > constructs, and nature never uses them, so no coordinate-dependent
> > quantity can accurately model any phenomenon of nature. But here that's
> > OK, as "GOD" is not any phenomenon of nature -- both "GOD" and those
> > metric components are figments of your imagination.
> >
> > [Of course the whole thing is useless to anyone who does
> > not share your imaginary figments, which is why I am
> > normally absent from this thread).
> >
> > Tom Roberts
> .
> [George E Hammond MS Physics]
> .... Look Tom –
> The Einstein Metric of objective space-time
> The Friedmann Metric Of Astrophysics
> The Hammond God Metric of Subjective Space-Time
> .
> Are by definition
> ALL COORDINATE INDEPENDENT: –
> .
> | 1 o o o. |
> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
> | o o 1 o. |
> | o o o -1.|
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
> |o o a² o. |
> |o o o..-1.|
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> You can write them in Cartesian coordinates,
> spherical coordinates, or any coordinate system
> you choose – because they are tensor equations.
> .
> ====================================
> So you are WRONG when you say that the
> "God Metric" is "Coordinate Dependent"
> it is just as "coordinate INDEPENDENT"
> as the FL RW metric of Astrophysics is !!
> ====================================
> .
> The problem is that you do not understand the
> difference between:
> OBJECTIVE space-time
> and
> SUBJECTIVE space-time
> .
> You don't even NEED to understand the
> DIFFERENCE – just consider them 2 separate
> and independent space times with different
> METRICS .
> .
> But for the more Scientifically Inquisitive
> reader let me explain that OBJECTIVE
> space-time is measured with clocks and rulers,
> while SUBJECTIVE space-time is the reality
> that you actually SEE – – for instance a
> 6 month old kid SEES a world that is
> 4 TIMES LARGER AND 4 TIMES FASTER
> THEN AN ADULT
> .
> And this is WHY a "Friedman type Scale Factor"
> a{t} appears in the GOD METRIC !
> ..
> NOW OBVIOUSLY "subjective" space-time is
> what is commonly called "Psychological Reality.
> Whereas "objective" space-time is psychologically
> independent "objective (scientifically measurable)
> reality".
> .
> THIS IS WHY it is called the "GOD METRIC".
> .
> Now I don't expect you to understand or even CARE
> about all that – but let me remind you that there are
> billions of people in the world who DO !.
> .
> And the reason is this is – for 2023 years we have had
> to suffer the disgusting experience of sitting in a
> Christian church facing a dead body hanging from a
> Cross in the front of the Church – because that was
> the only way they could "explain what God is".
> .
> Well guess what Tom – your SPR buddy George has
> discovered A SCIENTIFIC Proof of God – that does not
> require a dead body hanging from a Cross to scientifically
> proof that there is a "REAL GOD".
> .
> You may not think that's important or significant,
> but I think it's so important that we should RESTART
> THE JULIAN CALENDAR at year 01 starting in 2024 !
> I'm here to tell you that the "Age of Jesus" is over !
> We now have a scientific Proof of God !
> .
> Please don't go away mad– if you have any further
> comments about the "God Metric" I would certainly like
> to hear about them!
> .
> George
> .
There is no reality in SUBJECTIVE space-time.
and have Never been proven to be a reality.
go back to the drawing board....
call tech support..
error, error, error.
There is no reality in SUBJECTIVE space-time.
and have Never been proven to be a reality.
go back to the drawing board....
call tech support..
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzerror, error, error.
error, error, error.
call tech support..
in India.
you got a billion people who will take your call.
or any 7/11 store can help you.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 11:09 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <sFOdnVffZbTCDEP-nZ2dnZfqlJ9j4p2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #600744 |
On 2/3/23 9:57 PM, George Hammond wrote: > The Einstein Metric of objective space-time > The Friedmann Metric Of Astrophysics > The Hammond God Metric of Subjective Space-Time > . > Are by definition > ALL COORDINATE INDEPENDENT: – This is just plain not true. All your equations below implicitly use a specific coordinate system. > | 1 o o o. | > | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC > | o o 1 o. | > | o o o -1.| > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC > |o o a² o. | > |o o o..-1.| > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > . > You can write them in Cartesian coordinates, > spherical coordinates, or any coordinate system > you choose – because they are tensor equations. This is just plain not true. Those are TENSOR COMPONENTS relative to a specific coordinate system, NOT the tensors themselves. See example below. A metric tensor (field) is a bi-linear function of two vectors onto the reals, evaluated at each point of the manifold [#]. One obtains the above sets of components by evaluating the tensor on the 4x4 matrix of basis vectors (at each point), which in these cases are the local coordinate axes. This is TRIVIALLY OBVIOUS, because you display a 4x4 array of REAL NUMBERS, not any bi-linear function of two vectors onto the reals. [#] This is the actual definition, and shows why the metric tensor defines the dot product between vectors. The vectors implicitly belong to the tangent space at each point of the manifold. > [... further nonsense omitted] YOU clearly do not understand this. As a simple example, consider your "EINSTEIN METRIC", which is actually the COMPONENTS of the Minkowski metric of Special Relativity, expressed in Minkowski coordinates (x,y,z,t) using units with c=1. When expressed in terms of spherical coordinates (r,theta,phi,t), the matrix of COMPONENTS is transformed: | 1 0 0 0 | | 0 r^2 0 0 | | 0 0 r^2 sin^2(theta) 0 | | 0 0 0 -1 | The COMPONENTS are clearly dependent on the coordinates used. You really should learn something about the subject before attempting to write about it. And my earlier remark still applies: >> [Of course the whole thing is useless to anyone who does >> not share your imaginary figments, which is why I am >> normally absent from this thread). Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-05 12:43 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <621551b3-eb2c-4414-a098-3878f0016c35n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600770 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 12:09:58 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: > > You really should learn something about the subject before attempting to > write about it. And my earlier remark still applies: > >> [Of course the whole thing is useless to anyone who does > >> not share your imaginary figments, which is why I am > >> normally absent from this thread). > > Tom Roberts .... .... [George E Hammond MS Physics] February 5, 2023 . Hi Tom: ... Dick Feynman famously coined the phrase "Tickling the Tail of the Dragon" while working on the atomic bomb at Los Alamos during World War II. . You, Tom Roberts, are the only competent relativity Physicist who has EVER taken a serious look at this Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) discovery. And I dare say you are now engaged in another case of "TICKLING THE TAIL OF THE DRAGON". ... IMHO the discovery of the SPOG is roughly equivalent to the discovery of the world's first Atomic Bomb in that regard! . zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz With that introduction, I will now proceed to reply to your previous post here on SPR. . ... I have posted the following 3 well-known space-time metrics expressed as 4 x 4 matrices in Cartesian Coordinates. . Eqns 1 and 2 have appeared in thousands of textbooks for decades. They are commonplace and it is well understood what they mean! Eqn 3 originates with me and is something new! . | 1 o o o. | | o 1 o o. | = Eqn 1 – EINSTEIN METRIC | o o 1 o. | | o o o -1.| . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = Eqn 2 – FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC |o o a² o. | |o o o..-1.| . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = Eqn 3 – HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a²| . You can write these Eqns in Cartesian coordinates, spherical coordinates, or any coordinate system you choose – . When I said "they are coordinate independent" I simply meant that if you change the coordinates it does not change the underlying "physical reality" of the problem – that remains the same irregardless of the coordinates used. . Okay, so you pointed out that "coordinate independent" actually (to be technically correct) actually means something else. I must demur to your opinion and apologize for my sloppy language. Since I'm 80 years old I've probably forgotten more Physics than I can remember ! . .zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz MEANWHILE this discussion is not about "nomenclature arguments". It is ALL ABOUT the "PHYSICS OF THE PROBLEM". It is all about the PHYSICS underlying eqn # 3 ! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz . Now I am simply saying that it is a proven fact that eqn 2 is scientifically correct – – the FLRW is one of the most studied metrics in modern Science. And furthermore I am saying that you can UNDERSTAND eqn 3 by comparing it to eqn 2 ! . Because a=a(t) in eqn 2 is a monotonically increasing quantity, eqn 2 describes an "expansion of space" in the 4 dimensional spacetime of (x,y,z,t). And it has been proven experimentally that this expansion actually exists in the real universe, and that eqn 2 accurately mathematically describes it! . KNOWING THAT a=a(t) in eqn 2 is a monotonically increasing function of "t", it is immediately mathematically apparent that if "a(t)" in eqn 3 is a monotonically DECREASING function of time – – that eqn 3 represents a "contraction" of space and at the same time an "increasing speed of motion" in the said spacetime. . We immediately notice that FUNDAMENTALLY eqn 3 is merely an EXTENSION of eqn 2, to include the 4th dimension (time) ! And also it has a DECREASING "scale factor" rather than an INCREASING scale factor. IOW there is absolutely no question as to the mathematical meaning of either eqn 2 or eqn 3. . OF COURSE – eqn 3 CANNOT possibly apply to "real spacetime", it applies to some other independent spacetime – and this independent spacetime is referred to here as HUMAN SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME . . OBJECTIVE SPACETIME Is what Astrophysics measures with clocks and rulers. SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME is what people actually SEE. There is a difference between what various people see, dramatically so with respect to age. A 6-month-old child actually SEES a world that is nearly 4 TIMES LARGER AND 4 TIMES FASTER than the world seen by an adult ! . Therefore a "magnification factor" a=a(t)) must be used to describe Subjective Spacetime and a(t) begins at about 3.5 at birth and drops to about 1.18 at adulthood. It does not drop to 1.0, because according to WHO and UNESCO data, the average adult in the world is only about 85% fully grown and 1/.85= 1.18. . Meanwhile, using this "human scale factor – a(t)" we can compose Eqn 3 using the following rationale – eqn 3 is formulated using the standard Einstein formula for the "distance" between 2 events in this new "subjective space-time: –– . ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a² . Where a = a(t) is the above defined "magnification factor" (scale factor). IOW the above formula requires a greater number of "feet" of childhood enlarged objects, hence multiplication by "a" , whereas the increased speed of childhood observed objects, requires a fewer number of seconds, hence division by "a" (greater speed). . And this in turn gives us directly the origin of Eq 3 a.k.a. the Hammond God Metric . Now why is it called the "God metric" and the answer to that is this: – we notice that no one actually ever achieves "full growth". In fact WHO, UNESCO and other world health organizations estimate that the average person in the world is only 85% fully grown – some more some less – in 3rd World countries 30 to 40% growth stunting is not uncommon due simply to starvation, hardship and disease. . As a result of this on a world average adults wind up only about 85% fully grown and since 1/.85= 1.18, the average person winds up being 18% short of full growth – and as explained above this means that the average adult in the world is walking around SEEING a world that appears 18% LARGER AND FASTER THAN IT ACTUALLY IS !! . zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz This phenomenon strikes fear into the hearts of every human being on Earth, and has been called historically, for thousands of years, the phenomenon of "GOD". IOW "God" is identified as a 100% fully grown human specimen,usually assumed to be a male, and for the record we realize that no such person has ever been seen, and indubitably has never actually physically existed on Earth ! And this is why it is assumed that God is an INVISIBLE man who only exists in "Heaven". zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz . Now admittedly – the above description does not PROVE that this "childhood growth phenomenon" is actually "God" but it proves that the phenomenon itself definitely EXISTS. . However – there is ANOTHER gigantic chunk of the theory that I have not mentioned in this post – that DOES PROVE beyond all doubt, that this "less than full growth phenomenon" is in fact "the God of the Bible". . It turns out that evidence comes from a 50 year, $100 million study conducted by thousands of Psychometricians worldwide in 20 languages and published in a peer-reviewed literature large enough to fill a library. ... I do not present this evidence here because this is a "Relativity" newsgroup, and not a "Psychology" newsgroup. ... However, should anyone be interested, I have made a entertaining 10 minute YouTube video which explains all this – and is certainly easy for anyone with a physics degree to understand: – . WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD ......https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk ................(YouTube 12-min) . . Okay, Tom, with that I will end this post here, and congratulate you personally on being the first Physicist in the world, to actually take a competent Physics Level look at Hammond's SPOG ! ... I'll be sure to share the Nobel Prize with you! . George website located at: https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 13:06 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <Y-ecncLhLLdO0nz-nZ2dnZfqlJ9j4p2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #600844 |
On 2/5/23 2:43 PM, George Hammond wrote: > [...] What you wrote is not scientific, proves nothing, and has no relationship whatsoever to what other people mean by "God". There's no point in continuing. Goodbye. Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 12:03 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <2fa6da96-4840-4f40-a2c4-3f9a8c140a6dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600904 |
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: > > [Tom Roberts wrote:] > What you wrote is not scientific, > [George Hammond, MS Physics] PROVE IT – SO FAR YOU HAVE PROVED NOTHING OF THE KIND – THAT'S JUST AN UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION My CV is posted here – https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae mind posting your CV, Mr. Roberts? > > [Tom Roberts wrote:] > proves nothing, and has no relationship whatsoever > to what other people mean by "God". > [George Hammond, MS Physics] THAT'S AN UNSUPPORTED NON–SCIENTIFIC OPINION and has no place in this discussion thread ! > > [Tom Roberts wrote:] > There's no point in continuing. Goodbye. > Tom Roberts > [George Hammond, MS Physics] Goodbye – and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out ! . I mistook you for a serious Relativity scientist – turns out you're just another argumentative Internet crank ! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Estaban Alduino <tosd@teabnnai.ou> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 23:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <trs203$38ihs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #600909 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: >> >> [Tom Roberts wrote:] >> What you wrote is not scientific, >> > [George Hammond, MS Physics] > PROVE IT – SO FAR YOU HAVE PROVED NOTHING OF THE KIND – > THAT'S JUST AN UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION My CV is posted here – > h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶://i̶n̶d̶e̶p̶e̶n̶d̶e̶n̶t̶.a̶c̶a̶d̶e̶m̶i̶a̶.e̶d̶u̶/G̶e̶o̶r̶g̶e̶H̶a̶m̶m̶o̶n̶d̶/C̶u̶r̶r̶i̶c̶u̶l̶u̶m̶V̶i̶t̶a̶e̶ mind > posting your CV, Mr. Roberts? you look like gay. Those links says _download_free_, then asking for username and password. You fucking morons don't know *_free_* stands for in Physics. Let alone tensors.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 22:15 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <f5678412-fc32-4b63-a7f3-f4c018a9076dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600915 |
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:20:38 PM UTC-5, Estaban Alduino wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: > >> > >> [Tom Roberts wrote:] > >> What you wrote is not scientific, > >> > > [George Hammond, MS Physics] > > PROVE IT – SO FAR YOU HAVE PROVED NOTHING OF THE KIND – > > THAT'S JUST AN UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION My CV is posted here – > > h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶://i̶n̶d̶e̶p̶e̶n̶d̶e̶n̶t̶.a̶c̶a̶d̶e̶m̶i̶a̶.e̶d̶u̶/G̶e̶o̶r̶g̶e̶H̶a̶m̶m̶o̶n̶d̶/C̶u̶r̶r̶i̶c̶u̶l̶u̶m̶V̶i̶t̶a̶e̶ mind > > posting your CV, Mr. Roberts? > you look like gay. Those links says _download_free_, then asking for > username and password. You fucking morons don't know *_free_* stands for > in Physics. Let alone tensors. . .[George E Hammond MS Physics] LIAR – there's something wrong with your computer. . I'll post my CV – HERE – – you won't have to "click on any URLs "! . CURRICULUM VITAE GEORGE E. HAMMOND . B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USA M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA, USA Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern Univ.Boston MA .. Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt at N.U. and later Distinguished Professor of Physics at TAMU . Peer reviewed publications: . Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167 Elsevier Scientific Ltd.. Online copy ofpublished paper is posted at:Elsevier Scientific Ltd. 1994 . https://tinyurl.com/2wnrjht3 also a full length free research only copy is located here: https://tinyurl.com/28tyke6w . Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July2003, pp231-244(Noetic Press) Online copy of peer/published paper is postedat: https://www.academia.edu/196570/Scientific_Proof_of_God . [George E Hammond, MS Physics] And it still remains highly mysterious about what Tom Roberts' CV actually is ! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-07 01:39 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <63E21C4B.4C2A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #600938 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:20:38 PM UTC-5, Estaban Alduino wrote: > > George Hammond wrote: > > > > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: > > >> > > >> [Tom Roberts wrote:] > > >> What you wrote is not scientific, > > >> > > > [George Hammond, MS Physics] > > > PROVE IT – SO FAR YOU HAVE PROVED NOTHING OF THE KIND – > > > THAT'S JUST AN UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION My CV is posted here – > > > h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶://i̶n̶d̶e̶p̶e̶n̶d̶e̶n̶t̶.a̶c̶a̶d̶e̶m̶i̶a̶.e̶d̶u̶/G̶e̶o̶r̶g̶e̶H̶a̶m̶m̶o̶n̶d̶/C̶u̶r̶r̶i̶c̶u̶l̶u̶m̶V̶i̶t̶a̶e̶ mind > > > posting your CV, Mr. Roberts? > > you look like gay. Those links says _download_free_, then asking for > > username and password. You fucking morons don't know *_free_* stands for > > in Physics. Let alone tensors. > . > .[George E Hammond MS Physics] > LIAR – there's something wrong with your computer. > . > I'll post my CV – HERE – – you won't have to "click on any URLs "! > . > CURRICULUM VITAE > GEORGE E. HAMMOND > . > B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USA > M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA, USA > Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern Univ.Boston MA > .. > Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt at N.U. and later Distinguished > Professor of Physics at TAMU > . > Peer reviewed publications: > . > Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in New Ideas In Psychology, > Vol 12(2) 153-167 Elsevier Scientific Ltd.. > Online copy ofpublished paper is posted at:Elsevier Scientific Ltd. 1994 > . > https://tinyurl.com/2wnrjht3 > also a full length free research only copy is located here: > https://tinyurl.com/28tyke6w > . > Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God > Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July2003, pp231-244(Noetic Press) > Online copy of peer/published paper is postedat: > https://www.academia.edu/196570/Scientific_Proof_of_God > . > [George E Hammond, MS Physics] > And it still remains highly mysterious about > what Tom Roberts' CV actually is ! > . > George What I don't truly understand is this thing called... The God Metric. There is no God Matric, and there cannot be possiby a God Metric since... there is no God. So, how can someone come up with a matric to something that don't exist? I don't get it. Where is this thing you call...God? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-07 04:43 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <k4eo9pF6a4sU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #600946 |
On 2/7/2023 3:39 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > George Hammond wrote: >> >> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 6:20:38 PM UTC-5, Estaban Alduino wrote: >>> George Hammond wrote: >>> >>>> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 2:07:07 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [Tom Roberts wrote:] >>>>> What you wrote is not scientific, >>>>> >>>> [George Hammond, MS Physics] >>>> PROVE IT – SO FAR YOU HAVE PROVED NOTHING OF THE KIND – >>>> THAT'S JUST AN UNSUPPORTED ASSERTION My CV is posted here – >>>> h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶://i̶n̶d̶e̶p̶e̶n̶d̶e̶n̶t̶.a̶c̶a̶d̶e̶m̶i̶a̶.e̶d̶u̶/G̶e̶o̶r̶g̶e̶H̶a̶m̶m̶o̶n̶d̶/C̶u̶r̶r̶i̶c̶u̶l̶u̶m̶V̶i̶t̶a̶e̶ mind >>>> posting your CV, Mr. Roberts? >>> you look like gay. Those links says _download_free_, then asking for >>> username and password. You fucking morons don't know *_free_* stands for >>> in Physics. Let alone tensors. >> . >> .[George E Hammond MS Physics] >> LIAR – there's something wrong with your computer. >> . >> I'll post my CV – HERE – – you won't have to "click on any URLs "! >> . >> CURRICULUM VITAE >> GEORGE E. HAMMOND >> . >> B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USA >> M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA, USA >> Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern Univ.Boston MA >> .. >> Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt at N.U. and later Distinguished >> Professor of Physics at TAMU >> . >> Peer reviewed publications: >> . >> Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in New Ideas In Psychology, >> Vol 12(2) 153-167 Elsevier Scientific Ltd.. >> Online copy ofpublished paper is posted at:Elsevier Scientific Ltd. 1994 >> . >> https://tinyurl.com/2wnrjht3 >> also a full length free research only copy is located here: >> https://tinyurl.com/28tyke6w >> . >> Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God >> Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July2003, pp231-244(Noetic Press) >> Online copy of peer/published paper is postedat: >> https://www.academia.edu/196570/Scientific_Proof_of_God >> . >> [George E Hammond, MS Physics] >> And it still remains highly mysterious about >> what Tom Roberts' CV actually is ! >> . >> George > > > What I don't truly understand is this thing called... > The God Metric. > > > There is no God Matric, and there cannot be possiby a God Metric > since... > > > there is no God. > > So, how can someone come up with a matric to something that don't exist? > > I don't get it. > > > Where is this thing you call...God? God is, if nothing else, a cultural icon. Nobody can actually prove he exists, or doesn't exist. God is the essence of "good and evil" that makes the system work as well as it does. And it is OK if you fail to appreciate the contribution to society that makes so long as some suitably minimum percentage of the world population believes it or at least fears it could be true. By your own standards you are nothing. Revel in that for a while. I fall into the "uncertain but unconcerned" category. There is actually no safe space when considering God, good, and evil.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-07 03:06 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <6883fb1b-15d5-44a8-9d95-c817b6925194n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600950 |
On Tuesday, 7 February 2023 at 11:43:09 UTC+1, whodat wrote: > God is, if nothing else, a cultural icon. Nobody can actually prove he > exists, or doesn't exist. Of course one can, and both. A matter of axioms assumed, just like other proofs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-08 17:19 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <a17e330e-c5e0-4d47-bd0c-6bae0cba6b59n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600951 |
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 6:06:46 AM UTC-5, maluw...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, 7 February 2023 at 11:43:09 UTC+1, > whodat wrote: > > > [WHODAT wrote:] > > God is, if nothing else, a cultural icon. > > Nobody can actually prove he > > exists, or doesn't exist > > [MALUW wrote:] > Of course one can, and both. > A matter of axioms assumed, > just like other proofs. > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] ... Both of you are a couple of aging Jr. College ignoramuses – AND BOTH OF YOU ARE WRONG . Hammond has just succeeded in proving there IS A REAL GOD right here on SPR – see: – https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/VU1ZwYJ5EAAJ . And you know what – time is running out for ignoramuses like you two and Richard Dawkins ! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-11 00:03 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <ts6m06$15e4f$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #601103 |
George Hammond wrote: > [GEORGE E HAMMOND M̶S̶ P̶H̶Y̶S̶I̶C̶S̶] > ... Both of you are a couple of aging Jr. College ignoramuses – AND BOTH > OF YOU ARE WRONG . > Hammond has just succeeded i̶n̶ p̶r̶o̶v̶i̶n̶g̶ t̶h̶e̶r̶e̶ I̶S̶ A̶ R̶E̶A̶L̶ G̶O̶D̶ right here on this billionaire is admitting *_the_guilt_*, NOT being arrested. Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel Admits Company Produced 100,000 COVID-19 Vaccine Doses In 2019 *_Before_* The Pandemic https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/GYez3fkarifD
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-08 07:51 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <4c4a55fe-1c87-4a7f-80c2-ee64ba7ca311n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600946 |
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 4:39:15 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > What I don't truly understand is this thing called... > The God Metric. > . [George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA] . Good news STARMAKER: – ... Hammond's SPOG (Scientific Proof of God) has passed the test – it's proven to be CORRECT: see SPR post: – . https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/VU1ZwYJ5EAAJ . His nibs Tom Roberts – could not refute this post – and he's a qualified relativity expert ! He turned tail and took a powder when I challenged him to ! . It's simple – the SPOG is nothing but an extension of the PROVEN FLRW metric to the 4th dimension – time and applied to "Human Subjective Spacetime" !! . A High School student can understand it for chrissakes ! . Hammond's SPOG is in fact: – THE WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD . The "AGE OF JESUS" has scientifically ENDED ! . The "SCIENTIFIC AGE OF GOD" has BEGUN ! . And I suggest, in view of that, that we RESTART the JULIAN CALENDAR on January 1, 2024: – and I mean start it at "01 PD" (Probatur Deus) which means "01 Proven God" in English ! The age of A.D. (Anno Domini) HAS OFFICIALLY ENDED. . Okay STARMAKER that's the good goddamned news – the're gonna have to take that crucified body down off the cross in the front of all the Christian churches, from now on in – we will be worshiping God himself, and not the "son of God" from here on in ! . Thanks for all the support buddy – I appreciate it ! And if you got any Jewish friends – be sure to tell them the good news ! . George .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-08 10:57 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <63E3F093.3C6C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #601072 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 4:39:15 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > What I don't truly understand is this thing called... > > The God Metric. > > > . > [George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA] > . > Good news STARMAKER: – > ... Hammond's SPOG (Scientific Proof of God) > has passed the test – it's proven to be CORRECT: > see SPR post: – > . > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/VU1ZwYJ5EAAJ > . > His nibs Tom Roberts – could not refute this post – > and he's a qualified relativity expert ! He turned tail > and took a powder when I challenged him to ! > . > It's simple – the SPOG is nothing but an extension of the > PROVEN FLRW metric to the 4th dimension – time > and applied to "Human Subjective Spacetime" !! > . > A High School student can understand it for chrissakes ! > . > Hammond's SPOG is in fact: – > THE WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD > . > The "AGE OF JESUS" has scientifically ENDED ! > . > The "SCIENTIFIC AGE OF GOD" has BEGUN ! > . > And I suggest, in view of that, that we RESTART > the JULIAN CALENDAR on January 1, 2024: – > and I mean start it at "01 PD" (Probatur Deus) > which means "01 Proven God" in English ! > The age of A.D. (Anno Domini) HAS OFFICIALLY ENDED. > . > Okay STARMAKER that's the good goddamned news > – the're gonna have to take that crucified body down > off the cross in the front of all the Christian churches, > from now on in – we will be worshiping God himself, > and not the "son of God" from here on in ! > . > Thanks for all the support buddy – I appreciate it ! > And if you got any Jewish friends – be sure to tell > them the good news ! > . > George > . The "AGE OF GOD" has scientifically ENDED ! There is no God. Here is the proof! The Metrics of No God! T h e r e i s n o G o d -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-08 12:46 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <63E40A1A.64BD@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #601078 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > George Hammond wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 4:39:15 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > What I don't truly understand is this thing called... > > > The God Metric. > > > > > . > > [George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA] > > . > > Good news STARMAKER: – > > ... Hammond's SPOG (Scientific Proof of God) > > has passed the test – it's proven to be CORRECT: > > see SPR post: – > > . > > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/VU1ZwYJ5EAAJ > > . > > His nibs Tom Roberts – could not refute this post – > > and he's a qualified relativity expert ! He turned tail > > and took a powder when I challenged him to ! > > . > > It's simple – the SPOG is nothing but an extension of the > > PROVEN FLRW metric to the 4th dimension – time > > and applied to "Human Subjective Spacetime" !! > > . > > A High School student can understand it for chrissakes ! > > . > > Hammond's SPOG is in fact: – > > THE WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD > > . > > The "AGE OF JESUS" has scientifically ENDED ! > > . > > The "SCIENTIFIC AGE OF GOD" has BEGUN ! > > . > > And I suggest, in view of that, that we RESTART > > the JULIAN CALENDAR on January 1, 2024: – > > and I mean start it at "01 PD" (Probatur Deus) > > which means "01 Proven God" in English ! > > The age of A.D. (Anno Domini) HAS OFFICIALLY ENDED. > > . > > Okay STARMAKER that's the good goddamned news > > – the're gonna have to take that crucified body down > > off the cross in the front of all the Christian churches, > > from now on in – we will be worshiping God himself, > > and not the "son of God" from here on in ! > > . > > Thanks for all the support buddy – I appreciate it ! > > And if you got any Jewish friends – be sure to tell > > them the good news ! > > . > > George > > . > > The "AGE OF GOD" has scientifically ENDED ! > > There is no God. > > Here is the proof! The Metrics of No God! > > T h e r > e i s n > o G o d Notice there are only 3 dimensions, not 4. and it didn't take a thousand monkies, just one. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-10 23:14 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <ts6j3r$15e4f$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #601072 |
George Hammond wrote: > SGlzIG5pYnM= Tom Roberts – Y291bGQgbm90IHJlZnV0ZSB0aGlzIHBvcw==t – > dHVybmVkIHRhaWw= a qualified relativity expert ! He dHVybmVkIHRhaWw= and took a > powder when SSBjaGFsbGVuZ2VkIGhpbSB0bw== ! > . > It's simple – dGhlIFNQT0c= is nothing but YW4gZXh0ZW5zaW9u of the PROVEN FLRW > dHVybmVkIHRhaWw= – time and applied to "SHVtYW4gU3ViamVjdGl2ZQo+IFNwYWNldGltZSIgISE= remember, these khazars mazafaka wanted you dead with "vaccines". Reporter From ‘Impartial’ BBC Hugs Ukrainian President Zelensky During Press Conference https://%6e%65%77%73%70%75%6e%63%68.com/reporter-from-impartial-bbc-hugs-ukrainian-president-zelensky-during-press-conference/ CDC Warn Multiple COVID Jabs ‘Lowers Lifespan by 24 Years’ https://%6e%65%77%73%70%75%6e%63%68.com/cdc-warn-multiple-covid-jabs-lowers-lifespan-by-24-years/ watch the *_face_construction_* of this mazafaka. Either he is on strong drugs, or have *_loads_of_shit_* in his pants. Pfizer CEO, *_khazar_Albert_Bourla_*, Relies On Aggressive Security Tactics To Escape Questioning By Veritas https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/XlG3EL3CqMk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-09 20:51 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <48d3324a-4abc-45f4-b9d7-ca544a477c15n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600946 |
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 4:39:15 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > There is no God METRIC, and there > cannot be possiby a God METRIC > since... there is no God. > I don't get it. > Where is this thing you call...God? > [George Hammond MS Physics] I'll tell you where God is – he's right in front of your eyes . God causes the average person to SEE the world appearing 20% LARGER AND FASTER than it actually is (by actual measurement). . This not only changes the SIZE AND SPEED of the world – it DRAMATICALLY changes the FACIAL EXPRESSION of everyone you meet. . PSYCHOTIC CRIMINALS are acutely aware of this – while the average person is not ! . This allows them to run rampant through society committing crimes, atrocities, rapine and murder with ABSOLUTE IMPUNITY ! . Wake up you idiot – we now have a scientific explanation and measurement of the phenomenon ! . There sure in hell is A REAL GOD ! And if you're not aware of it – you're a SITTING DUCK !!! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-10 07:15 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <b20953f6-3920-46e6-bd5f-a401edea8dc4n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601190 |
On Thursday, February 9, 2023 at 11:51:22 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote: > On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 4:39:15 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > There is no God METRIC, and there > > cannot be possiby a God METRIC > > since... there is no God. > > I don't get it. > > Where is this thing you call...God? > > .[George Hammond MS Physics] Try and understand the explanation given below: – . > [George Hammond MS Physics] > I'll tell you where God is – > he's right in front of your eyes > . > God causes the average person > to SEE the world appearing 20% > LARGER AND FASTER than it > actually is (by actual measurement). > . . [George Hammond MS Physics] Look STARMAKER – the "God Metric" is given below, – . | 1 o o o. | | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC | o o 1 o. | | o o o -1.| . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC |o o a² o. | |o o o..-1.| . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a²| . "a=a(t)" only drops to 1.18 at adulthood for the average adult in the world – this means we are saddled with almost a 20% MAGNIFICATION of the apparent SIZE AND SPEED of "REALITY" for the rest of our lives! – (This is caused by the fact that no one ever reaches full growth – the world average is only around 85%) And this phenomenon has been referred to as "GOD" for thousands of years! . .... This also changes the APPEARANCE of every single person's PERSONALITY – and "psychotics" are ignorant people who don't realize that this is "the effect of God" – and they believe it is simply a "mental trick" to be taken advantage of ! . > This not only changes the SIZE AND SPEED > of the world – it DRAMATICALLY changes > the FACIAL EXPRESSION of everyone you > meet. > . > PSYCHOTIC CRIMINALS are acutely aware > of this – while the average person is not ! > . > This allows them to run rampant through > society committing crimes, atrocities, rapine > and murder with ABSOLUTE IMPUNITY ! > . > Wake up you idiot – we now have a scientific > explanation and measurement of the > phenomenon ! > . > There sure in hell is > A REAL GOD ! And if you're > not aware of it – you're a > SITTING DUCK !!! > . > George . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-10 21:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Message-ID | <ts6e70$15e4f$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #601201 |
George Hammond wrote: > |à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽² ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕. | > |o a² o o. | = H̶A̶M̶M̶O̶N̶D̶ M̶E̶T̶R̶I̶C̶ O̶F̶ G̶O̶D̶ > |ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽² ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕. | > |ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕-1/à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽²| > . > ImE9YSh0KSIgb25seSBkcm9wcyB0byAxLjE4IGF0IGFkdWx0aG9vZCBmb3I= > the average adult in the world – dGhpcyBtZWFucyB3ZQ== > are saddled with almost YSAyMCUgTUFHTklGSUNBVElPTg== > of the apparent SIZE QU5EIFNQRUVEIG9mICJSRUFMSVRZIg== here's some reality. Hersh, an investigative journalist and Pulitzer Prize laureate, published a report titled *_“How_America_Took_Out_The_Nord_Stream_Pipeline”_* on Wednesday. He cited a “source with direct knowledge of the operational planning” of the attack on the Russia-Germany pipelines. He claims a bomb was *_planted_by_the_US_* during *_the_BALTOPS_22_NATO_exercises_*, and the explosive *_was_then_detonated_by_Norway_* dropping a *_sonar_buoy_* from a military plane.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web