Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594043 > unrolled thread
| Started by | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-10-23 18:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2022-10-28 10:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 183 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 18:11 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 14:25 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 20:42 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 21:33 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 21:13 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 15:55 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 22:34 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 19:22 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 03:35 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-24 13:46 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 11:26 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-24 21:04 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 17:43 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-25 14:42 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-25 17:52 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:20 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:17 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 22:38 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 14:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 14:14 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 13:17 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 14:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 22:04 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 02:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 12:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 18:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 10:56 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 15:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 17:16 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-14 06:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-14 21:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 04:31 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 11:44 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-15 13:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 13:53 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 10:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-16 10:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 11:18 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-18 09:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jules Scotti <ujsl@ocjssuis.os> - 2022-11-19 15:08 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 10:27 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 11:50 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 13:31 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 15:57 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 17:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 11:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 14:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 15:06 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 19:53 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 16:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 12:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-23 15:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-24 16:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 14:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 15:05 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 11:26 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 19:58 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:07 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:41 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:46 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 16:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:28 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 16:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:40 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 18:06 -0800
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 13:56 +0000
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 14:00 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 09:36 -0800
Re: uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth - FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 18:40 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-11-25 14:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-25 21:10 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:26 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-25 20:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 10:04 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 19:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 12:08 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 10:34 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-28 14:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 22:47 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 00:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 01:48 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 17:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 10:44 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 18:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Finis Mari <fmnf@isiifain.ii> - 2022-11-29 21:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:36 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Lee Barsetti <erre@battaete.tr> - 2022-11-29 21:10 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:34 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 13:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-29 22:16 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 10:45 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 15:33 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 13:23 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 16:46 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-30 16:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-02 21:14 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-03 02:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-12-01 09:09 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-01 00:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 00:29 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 15:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-18 23:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 23:47 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 12:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-19 12:51 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 22:55 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-20 06:30 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:22 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:41 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 21:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 07:43 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-12-23 13:28 -0600
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 13:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-24 13:39 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 20:41 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 21:37 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:36 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 08:23 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 19:43 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 12:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 20:57 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 15:54 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 19:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 20:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 22:21 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 23:56 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-28 11:46 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 06:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 14:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:38 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 20:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 04:42 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-21 09:03 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 00:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-21 09:45 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 03:54 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-11-21 20:16 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 14:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 23:14 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 23:25 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 03:43 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:36 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 11:51 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 10:51 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-25 18:06 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 21:32 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 22:07 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 01:39 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-26 11:20 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 18:31 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-26 23:47 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 11:15 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 11:23 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-27 12:31 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 17:23 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-28 10:21 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 07:02 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-28 16:49 +0200
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-28 19:16 +0200
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 18:56 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-28 21:03 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-31 06:25 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Buddie Fiore <inbe@iieuedi.du> - 2022-10-31 15:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 20:19 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 09:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 17:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 12:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 20:19 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 14:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 14:33 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-09 15:18 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 17:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-10 07:42 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 05:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:08 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-28 10:09 -0700
Page 6 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 10 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-02 21:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <638ADB2D.78D8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #596549 |
Volney wrote: > > On 11/30/2022 4:23 PM, George Hammond wrote: > > SNIP ALIAS > > SNIP SPAM > > Why are you *still* unable to answer my simple questions? > > Is basketball the sport of Mt. Olympus because it has many gods? > What godlike powers do some NBA players have, other than gobs of money? > > Was my coworker's son a Supergod? What godlike powers did he have? Does > he still have them? Or did they vanish when he left the Philippines? Why? Accoeding to the third person Hammond...God is 7 feet, 3 inches tall. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-03 02:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b35a9133-6e1e-4385-b2d2-cda95a11ce23n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596731 |
On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 12:14:04 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. . [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis and a USA] .... Thanks for your help Dude – Me and the Templeton foundation will take it from here ! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-01 09:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <jur5pbFhmqsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #596515 |
On 2022-11-30 18:45:50 +0000, George Hammond said: > SNIP ALIAS > SNIP SPAM As George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis MA seems to have fallen into total incoherence -- not even bothering to say who he's replying to -- the time has come to ignore his posts completely. -- Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36+ years; mainly in England until 1987.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-01 00:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a984fe7f-5907-4ba2-a699-6cd0bdd91646n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596593 |
On Thursday, 1 December 2022 at 09:09:18 UTC+1, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2022-11-30 18:45:50 +0000, George Hammond said: > > > SNIP ALIAS > > SNIP SPAM > > As George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis MA seems to have fallen into total > incoherence -- not even bothering to say who he's replying to - What to expect from a physicist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-02 00:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1b220e1c-f88d-4c8b-b733-88743f611b3bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596593 |
On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 3:09:18 AM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> As George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis MA seems to have fallen into total
> incoherence - ignore his posts completely.
>
>
December 1, 2022
FROM: George E. Hammond
M.S. Physics, Hyannis MA USA
.
RE: OPEN LETTER TO THE
.TEMPLETON FOUNDATION
.
Dear Dr. Xxxxxxx:
..... 6 months ago on XXXXXXX I wrote an open letter to you
about my discovery of the world's 1st scientific proof of God and
I cited my 10 minute YouTube video which explains it: –
.
WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
..... https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
............ (YouTube 12-min)
.
And noted at that time that much of this material exists in written form
on my website located at: –
.
https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond
.
In that video I explain how a worldwide PhD Army of psychometrician's
spent 50 years and $50 million dollars mapping out the entire eigenvector
pyramid of personality Psychometry, including IQ. All of it published in a
peer-reviewed literature now large enough to fill a library!
... This eigenvector pyramid has a single, top eigenvector which they
have dubbed the "GFP" (Gen. Factor of Personality or Gen. Factor of
Psychology if it includes IQ).
...By identifying the 13–2nd order Factors (eigenvectors) as the 12 Olympian
gods of antiquity, and identifying the 4–3 order Factors as the 4 Gospel
Personalities – Matthew, Mark, Luke and John – I perceived immediately
that the single 4th-Order Factor, the so-called "GFP", was without a doubt
the God of the Bible !
... As a physicist I found out all of this by discovering the PHYSICAL CAUSE
of all of these eigenvectors as originating in the CUBIC CLEAVAGE of the
human brain. And here's a diagram of that, drawn by my own hand: –
.
https://html.scribdassets.com/6inure6mww8ngndu/images/2-67a3b11050.png
.
...I have also identified the neuropsychological wiring that underwrites
this as being a generalization of Jeffrey A. Gray's well-known "SHS": –
(Septo- Hippocampal System). Incidentally I published that discovery in
New Ideas in Psychology in 1994.
.
Citation
Elsevier Scientific Ltd. 1994
https://tinyurl.com/2wnrjht3
also a full length free research only copy is located here:
https://tinyurl.com/28tyke6w
.
... The "12 Olympian gods" turn out to be caused by the 13 rotational
symmetry axes of the Cube – and the reason for that is that the symmetry
axes have "opposed lobes" of the brain on each bipolar end of each
symmetry axis – thus creating the long lost "STRUCTURAL MODEL
OF PERSONALITY" the World has been looking for for 2500 years ever
since Hippocrates the father of medicine said he thought there was such
a thing.
.
Okay, that's the Psychology end of the story of the "SPOG" (Scientific
Proof of God) – and all that is contained in my 10 minute video cited
above.
.
But in this 6 months since my last open letter to you I have made a
further "Physics Development" of the theory – which now makes it a full
blown, "Hard Science" Scientific Proof of God !
.
This latter development involves a "Relativistic" description of the so
called "GFP"
.
First off – with very little analysis it is easy to identify "The Human
Growth Curve" as the PRINCIPLE BIOLOGICAL CAUSE of the "GFP".
The Psychometrists have not done so – but it is quite obvious to a
PHYSICIST. The Psychologists perhaps have confused "Nature with
Nurture" – of course both have an impact on the GFP loadings but while
"high-class" (genetics) is not randomly distributed – "high growth" is
more egalitarian in its population distribution – and is in fact the
"root cause" of the phenomenon of "God" itself !
.
This then is the human growth curve: –
.
https://html.scribdassets.com/38jup9thxc6bjcfe/images/8-99f9190673.jpg
.
After parceling out "high-class genetics", it is obvious to me that
people who score high on the GFP are simply people who at adulthood
arrived HIGHER on the human growth curve than others. This explains
their high scores on the GFP top eigenvector. If we define God as a
"fully 100% grown human specimen" then it is obvious that more fully
grown people are "closer to God", as it were! In fact WHO, UNESCO
etc. data indicates that if averaged, the entire world population is about
15% short of "full growth". Some more some less – in Third World
countries people growth stunted to the extent of 30% or 40% is not
uncommon.
...Obviously then, it is this "15% universal shortfall in growth" in the
world population, that is the cause of the phenomenon called "GOD".
.
"Growth" is a major factor in psychological testing because It determines
the "Subjective size and speed of the world" that any person actually SEES.
For instance a 6-month-old child looks up at the bottom of a kitchen table,
while a 20-year-old standing nearby looks down at the top of the table. The
table looks at least 4 TIMES AS LARGE to the 6 month old than it does to
the 20-year-old ! This is simply because the 20-year-old is 4 times larger than
the six-month old.
.
The same thing goes for the subjective SPEED of the world. Thomas Edison
discovered this 120 years ago when he discovered that the minimum film
speed for a movie was 16 frames/sec – IOW that the perceptual speed of the
average adult person is 16 bits/sec. He also discovered that the speed
increases linearly with age under 20 – in the same way, and for the
same reason, that raw intelligence increases linearly with age under 20 – as
demonstrated by the fact that intelligence has to be divided by age under 20,
in order to determine IQ, (genetic) intelligence.
.
All of this tells us that the subjective SIZE AND SPEED of the world has to be
multiplied by a MAGNIFICATION FACTOR, "a(t)" for children under 20 years of age.
In other words, to put it in PHYSICS terms, the "Metric of SUBJECTIVE
space-time" is given by: –
.
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
.
Where a = a(t) is the above defined "magnification factor"
IOW the above formula requires a greater number of "feet"
of enlarged objects, hence multiplication by "a" whereas
the increased speed of objects, requires a fewer number
of seconds, hence division by "a" (greater speed).
This then, I declare identifies the "METRIC OF GOD": –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE (highly curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
Physicists will recognize that the GOD METRIC is remotely related
to the FLRW METRIC (Friedman, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker) which
rules modern Astrophysics, however the FLRW only expands Space –
while the God Metric contracts BOTH space and time making it
fundamentally different.
.
=======================================================
What we see is that the OBJECTIVE UNIVERSE is EXPANDING
..... Whereas the SUBJECTIVE UNIVERSE is CONTRACTING
....The two Metrics are similar but FLRW only expands SPACE
...... while the God metric contracts both SPACE and TIME
=======================================================
Of course in the latter case it is only a "massless image of the universe"
that exists in our mind – that is "contracting" as we grow up!
.
Meanwhile it turns out that if you plug this metric into Mathematica
or Maxima and compute the RIEMANNIAN CURVATURE, you'll find that this
metric is HIGHLY CURVED – and the curvature is proportional to da/dt
(known as the Hubble Constant) – that calculation may be seen here: –
.
Curvature calculation here
https://www.academia.edu/82105046/MAXIMA_Curvature_of_the_Metric_of_God
.
and while the Hubble constant of astrophysics is only 7%/gigayear – the
growth rate of humans under 20 is 5%/year meaning that the curvature of
SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME is 1–BILLION times larger than the curvature of
OBJECTIVE SPACETIME (the Universe of Aastrophysics).
...This clearly suggests the involvement of a "Black Hole" phenomena in
human life and death! Perhaps as suggested by Sir Roger Penrose – from
"quantum gravity acting in the brain". Certainly an object of future research!
.
At any rate we now know for CERTAIN that all of this above tells us we have
finally secured a true and irrefutable, hard science DEFINITION OF GOD: –
.
SCIENTIFIC DEFINITION OF GOD
=====================================
GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE
....... OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
=====================================
And we note that furthermore this is easily measurable to
2 decimal point accuracy experimentally!
.
NOW WHAT DOES ALL OF THIS MEAN : –
.
All of this brings us is down to the POLITICS of attempting
to publish the "World's 1st Scientific Proof of God".
.
And here we are reminded of the famous words of
John Templeton himself:
.
"Scientific spiritual information could come from anywhere
at any time and could prove to be a gold mine for revitalizing
religion of the 21st century". JOHN TEMPLETON
.
AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THIS DISCOVERY IS:
– A GOLD MINE !
.
I am presently 80 years old and a virtually unknown person.
It is therefore absolutely IMPOSSIBLE for me to publish this
historic discovery.
.
In fact, it would probably take the full leverage of a powerful
global institution like the TEMPLETON FOUNDATION to
effect such a publication.
.
Meanwhile, this discovery really belongs to the global academic
Psychology Institutions who experimentally discovered it.
... To stand by and watch the threadbare Academic Psychology
community struggle against all odds to effect this achievement
without calling upon the powerful TEMPLETON FOUNDATION
to come to their aid via negotiating a PUBLICATION of this
discovery – I’m sure you Dr. Xxxxxxxx would find this unacceptable.
.
In closing, I appeal to anyone on this discussion list who has read
this post – to spread the word far and wide that the world’s first
Scientific Proof of God has been discovered – and the author of this
discovery has appealed to the TEMPLETON FOUNDATION for
assistance in its publication.
.
FINALLY, allow me to remind you of the URGENCY of informing
billions of adult human beings around the world that SCIENCE
has discovered and proved the existence of the God of the Bible
and that God is a power a billion times that of Gravity, and which
ultimately completely controls the course of human DESTINY !
.
With the highest regard for both you and the Templeton Foundation,
.
George E Hammond MS physics (1967)
Hyannis, Massachusetts USA
.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-18 15:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <974ccce8-1d30-405a-8930-4dbee5477df9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596593 |
On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 3:09:18 AM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> As George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis MA seems to have fallen into total
> incoherence -- not even bothering to say who he's replying to -- the
> time has come to ignore his posts completely.
>
>
CIA Submission Reference ID: XA4KQRLH
.
TO: – Director of the CIA, William J Burns
.
Dear Bill: –
I am a Physicist (MS 1967) and have made a scientific
discovery of importance to the security of the United States.
The intent of this letter is to inform you of this discovery.
.
I have also informed Dr. Nicholas J. S. Gibson, Ph.D.
Dir. of Human Sciences at the TEMPLETON FOUNDATION of this
discovery.
.
BELIEVE IT OR NOT this discovery consists of the world's first
bona fide, hard science, Scientific Proof of God, and I believe it
is of importance that the Central Intelligence Agency of the US
be among the very first to be informed of this discovery, as a
matter of National Security.
.
My letter to Dr. Gibson describing this discovery has been publicly
posted on the Internet and may be seen here: –
.
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa-jisc.exe?A2=PSY-REL-UK;e31fb2e6.2212
.
I'm sure that I don't need to tell you of the lethargy, disinterest,
and general irresponsibility of the ivory tower intellectuals of
Academia – and it is my hope that the CIA are more realistic
and on their toes, when it comes to the political assessment of
unforeseen scientific discovery.
.
With my highest regards for the CIA,
.
George E Hammond
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-18 23:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63A00EBA.7BA9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #597848 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 3:09:18 AM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > As George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis MA seems to have fallen into total > > incoherence -- not even bothering to say who he's replying to -- the > > time has come to ignore his posts completely. > > > > > CIA Submission Reference ID: XA4KQRLH > . > TO: – Director of the CIA, William J Burns > . > Dear Bill: – > I am a Physicist (MS 1967) and have made a scientific > discovery of importance to the security of the United States. > The intent of this letter is to inform you of this discovery. > . > I have also informed Dr. Nicholas J. S. Gibson, Ph.D. > Dir. of Human Sciences at the TEMPLETON FOUNDATION of this > discovery. > . > BELIEVE IT OR NOT this discovery consists of the world's first > bona fide, hard science, Scientific Proof of God, and I believe it > is of importance that the Central Intelligence Agency of the US > be among the very first to be informed of this discovery, as a > matter of National Security. > . > My letter to Dr. Gibson describing this discovery has been publicly > posted on the Internet and may be seen here: – > . > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa-jisc.exe?A2=PSY-REL-UK;e31fb2e6.2212 > . > I'm sure that I don't need to tell you of the lethargy, disinterest, > and general irresponsibility of the ivory tower intellectuals of > Academia – and it is my hope that the CIA are more realistic > and on their toes, when it comes to the political assessment of > unforeseen scientific discovery. > . > With my highest regards for the CIA, > . > George E Hammond You wrote: "BELIEVE IT OR NOT..", which means it does not matter if it is true or not, so it's okay to believe it or not. btw, what size shoes does God wear? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-18 23:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <474e4ff3-d22d-441b-a3da-83e212967b3cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #597857 |
On Monday, December 19, 2022 at 2:10:45 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 3:09:18 AM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > As George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis MA seems to have fallen into total > > > incoherence -- not even bothering to say who he's replying to -- the > > > time has come to ignore his posts completely. > > > > > > > > CIA Submission Reference ID: XA4KQRLH > > . > > TO: – Director of the CIA, William J Burns > > . > > Dear Bill: – > > I am a Physicist (MS 1967) and have made a scientific > > discovery of importance to the security of the United States. > > The intent of this letter is to inform you of this discovery. > > . > > I have also informed Dr. Nicholas J. S. Gibson, Ph.D. > > Dir. of Human Sciences at the TEMPLETON FOUNDATION of this > > discovery. > > . > > BELIEVE IT OR NOT this discovery consists of the world's first > > bona fide, hard science, Scientific Proof of God, and I believe it > > is of importance that the Central Intelligence Agency of the US > > be among the very first to be informed of this discovery, as a > > matter of National Security. > > . > > My letter to Dr. Gibson describing this discovery has been publicly > > posted on the Internet and may be seen here: – > > . > > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa-jisc.exe?A2=PSY-REL-UK;e31fb2e6.2212 > > . > > I'm sure that I don't need to tell you of the lethargy, disinterest, > > and general irresponsibility of the ivory tower intellectuals of > > Academia – and it is my hope that the CIA are more realistic > > and on their toes, when it comes to the political assessment of > > unforeseen scientific discovery. > > . > > With my highest regards for the CIA, > > . > > George E Hammond . [George Hammond MS Physics] I was looking for an intelligent person, so I thought the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) would be a good place to look ! . > [STARMAKER] > You wrote: "BELIEVE IT OR NOT..", which means it does not matter if it > is true or not, so it's okay to believe it or not. > [George Hammond MS physics] No – it means it is TRUE – but you can believe it and go to Heaven or disbelieve it and go to Hell. > > btw, what size shoes does God wear? > [George Hammond MS Physics] Same size as me – 17 George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-19 12:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63A0C559.EC@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #597858 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Monday, December 19, 2022 at 2:10:45 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > George Hammond wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 3:09:18 AM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > > As George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis MA seems to have fallen into total > > > > incoherence -- not even bothering to say who he's replying to -- the > > > > time has come to ignore his posts completely. > > > > > > > > > > > CIA Submission Reference ID: XA4KQRLH > > > . > > > TO: – Director of the CIA, William J Burns > > > . > > > Dear Bill: – > > > I am a Physicist (MS 1967) and have made a scientific > > > discovery of importance to the security of the United States. > > > The intent of this letter is to inform you of this discovery. > > > . > > > I have also informed Dr. Nicholas J. S. Gibson, Ph.D. > > > Dir. of Human Sciences at the TEMPLETON FOUNDATION of this > > > discovery. > > > . > > > BELIEVE IT OR NOT this discovery consists of the world's first > > > bona fide, hard science, Scientific Proof of God, and I believe it > > > is of importance that the Central Intelligence Agency of the US > > > be among the very first to be informed of this discovery, as a > > > matter of National Security. > > > . > > > My letter to Dr. Gibson describing this discovery has been publicly > > > posted on the Internet and may be seen here: – > > > . > > > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa-jisc.exe?A2=PSY-REL-UK;e31fb2e6.2212 > > > . > > > I'm sure that I don't need to tell you of the lethargy, disinterest, > > > and general irresponsibility of the ivory tower intellectuals of > > > Academia – and it is my hope that the CIA are more realistic > > > and on their toes, when it comes to the political assessment of > > > unforeseen scientific discovery. > > > . > > > With my highest regards for the CIA, > > > . > > > George E Hammond > . > [George Hammond MS Physics] > I was looking for an intelligent person, so I thought > the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) would be a > good place to look ! The word "Intelligence" in CIA doesn't stand for a person.. it means an agency that 'collects' ...information. Only stupid people work at the CIA. Everybody knows dat! The CIA is just a bunch of stupid motherfuckers. Everybody knows dat! If you're searching for intelligent life on Earth..you might be very disappointed. Intelligent life does not exist on Earth, or anywhere else for that matter. Do you consider yourself to be an intelligent life form???? "Huston, we got a problem!" Come on, lets get real here, ...YOU'RE COMPLETELY FUCKING NUTS!!!! > . > > [STARMAKER] > > You wrote: "BELIEVE IT OR NOT..", which means it does not matter if it > > is true or not, so it's okay to believe it or not. > > > [George Hammond MS physics] > No – it means it is TRUE – but you can believe it > and go to Heaven or disbelieve it and go to Hell. Maybe you simply don't understand what you wrote:"BELIEVE IT OR NOT.." If I write in a book there is a person in South Africa with twenty four toes.. and I show you a drawing of him with twenty four toes.. you can BELIEVE IT OR NOT. So, people are going to tell you..."I Don't Believe It!" BELIEVE IT OR NOT > > > > btw, what size shoes does God wear? > > > [George Hammond MS Physics] > Same size as me – 17 > George Since you say God is 7'3" tall.. that means His shoes size would have to be size 12 or 13. Your number 17 is not proportion for someone who's height is 7'3" tall. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-19 12:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <735aaed0-a6c3-47e8-91f5-f9c46de2b9cdn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #597878 |
On Monday, December 19, 2022 at 3:11:07 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > [George Hammond MS Physics] > > Same size as me – 17 > > George > Since you say God is 7'3" tall.. > that means His shoes size > would have to be size 12 or 13. > Your number 17 is not proportion for someone > who's height is 7'3" tall. > -- [George Hammond MS Physics] My nickname in high school was "BIGFOOT". .... In DC in '89 I was living in a Black neighborhood and the shoe store was having a closeout sale – I walked in and picked up a pair of sneakers – and they were size 22 ! 17 is nothing for a 7'3" basketball player. ..... Bill Burns director of the CIA is on television all the time – he's obviously got an IQ over 200. Some of the smartest people in the world work for the CIA. The jibonys on sci.physics.relativity don't run much over 110 – 120 ! ..... Don't kid yourself – the CIA will spot that letter and quickly realize that the discovery of the world's 1st Scientific Proof of God will have a profound impact on World Religion – unlike you they're not dat stupid ! George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-19 22:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63A15C64.1730@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #597880 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Monday, December 19, 2022 at 3:11:07 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > [George Hammond MS Physics] > > > Same size as me – 17 > > > George > > Since you say God is 7'3" tall.. > > that means His shoes size > > would have to be size 12 or 13. > > Your number 17 is not proportion for someone > > who's height is 7'3" tall. > > -- > [George Hammond MS Physics] > My nickname in high school was "BIGFOOT". > .... In DC in '89 I was living in a Black neighborhood > and the shoe store was having a closeout sale – > I walked in and picked up a pair of sneakers – and > they were size 22 ! 17 is nothing for a 7'3" basketball > player. > ..... Bill Burns director of the CIA is on television all the > time – he's obviously got an IQ over 200. Some of the > smartest people in the world work for the CIA. Bill Burns is a stupid motherfucker. He's a basketball player. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_J._Burns_(diplomat) wite men can't jump. > The jibonys on sci.physics.relativity don't run much > over 110 – 120 ! > ..... Don't kid yourself – the CIA will spot that letter > and quickly realize that the discovery of the world's > 1st Scientific Proof of God will have a profound > impact on World Religion – unlike you they're not > dat stupid ! > George -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-20 06:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5df5ab27-8cf2-49fd-a9c5-dd849a783778n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #597902 |
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:55:28 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > George Hammond wrote: |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a²| where: a=a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth (because adults are 350% taller than babies) and falls to 1.18 at adulthood (because the avg. adult is only 85% full grown and (1/.85=1.18)... thus meaning that the avg. adult SEES a world that is 18% LARGER AND FASTER ....THEN IT ACTUALLY IS And this baffles, scares, and terrifies the world population and is known historically as the phenomenon of "GOD" . People have argued whether it is real or not for thousands of years – AND NOW HAMMOND has proven that it is absolutely real – and that it is now a SCIENTIFIC PROVEN FACT THAT GOD IS REAL – and measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally. ..... Hopefully the world's first scientific proof of God will ecumenically unite the worlds 5 Major Religions: – Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism into ONE SCIENTIFIC WORLD RELIGION George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-20 09:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63A1EF4A.2434@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #597921 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:55:28 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > George Hammond wrote: > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > where: > a=a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth (because > adults are 350% taller than babies) and > falls to 1.18 at adulthood (because the > avg. adult is only 85% full grown and > (1/.85=1.18)... thus meaning that > the avg. adult SEES a world that is > 18% LARGER AND FASTER > ....THEN IT ACTUALLY IS > And this baffles, scares, and terrifies > the world population and is known > historically as the phenomenon of "GOD" > . > People have argued whether it is real or not > for thousands of years – AND NOW HAMMOND > has proven that it is absolutely real – and that > it is now a SCIENTIFIC PROVEN FACT > THAT GOD IS REAL – and measurable to > 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally. > ..... Hopefully the world's first scientific proof > of God will ecumenically unite the worlds 5 Major > Religions: – Christianity, Judaism, Islam, > Hinduism, and Buddhism into > ONE SCIENTIFIC WORLD RELIGION > George Believe it or not. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-20 09:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63A1F3C0.7DA0@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #597921 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:55:28 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > George Hammond wrote: > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > where: > a=a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth (because > adults are 350% taller than babies) and > falls to 1.18 at adulthood (because the > avg. adult is only 85% full grown and > (1/.85=1.18)... thus meaning that > the avg. adult SEES a world that is > 18% LARGER AND FASTER > ....THEN IT ACTUALLY IS > And this baffles, scares, and terrifies > the world population and is known > historically as the phenomenon of "GOD" > . > People have argued whether it is real or not > for thousands of years – AND NOW HAMMOND > has proven that it is absolutely real – and that > it is now a SCIENTIFIC PROVEN FACT > THAT GOD IS REAL – and measurable to > 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally. > ..... Hopefully the world's first scientific proof > of God will ecumenically unite the worlds 5 Major > Religions: – Christianity, Judaism, Islam, > Hinduism, and Buddhism into > ONE SCIENTIFIC WORLD RELIGION > George There is only one problem here....there is no God! There is nothing with big feet out there... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-20 21:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63A293AE.D16@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #597921 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:55:28 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > George Hammond wrote: > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > where: > a=a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth (because > adults are 350% taller than babies) and > falls to 1.18 at adulthood (because the > avg. adult is only 85% full grown and > (1/.85=1.18)... thus meaning that > the avg. adult SEES a world that is > 18% LARGER AND FASTER > ....THEN IT ACTUALLY IS > And this baffles, scares, and terrifies > the world population and is known > historically as the phenomenon of "GOD" > . > People have argued whether it is real or not > for thousands of years – AND NOW HAMMOND > has proven that it is absolutely real – and that > it is now a SCIENTIFIC PROVEN FACT > THAT GOD IS REAL – and measurable to > 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally. > ..... Hopefully the world's first scientific proof > of God will ecumenically unite the worlds 5 Major > Religions: – Christianity, Judaism, Islam, > Hinduism, and Buddhism into > ONE SCIENTIFIC WORLD RELIGION > George This post George Hammond puts out contains...FRAUD. For example: |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a² | THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD is contained in a square like box. What is that 'square like box' all about???? it contains 4 rows across and 4 rows down. What is dat all about???? The last paragraph contain a list of religions... Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism... What each symbol represents are in fact...religions. 4 rows across and 4 rows down each symbol represents religions of the world. 4 x 4 = 16 That equals 16 religions. Here is the complete list of each of the 16 religions: Religious symbols from left to right, top to bottom: Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, the Bahá'í Faith, Eckankar, Sikhism, Jainism, Wicca, Unitarian Universalism, Shinto, Taoism, Thelema, Tenrikyo, and Zoroastrianism. |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a² | Christianity is a² and the last one is Zoroastrianism is -1/a² and here is the complete box: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_religion#/media/File:16_religionist_symbols.png https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_religion Now all George needs is a box to put shoes in...da big guy gots big feet! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-23 07:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3a9f1ca2-2cbe-48ae-885a-eddae3d545f8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #597955 |
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 12:03:21 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:55:28 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > For example: > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a² | > > What is that 'square like box' all about???? > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] It's called a "MATRIX". .... Look STARMAKER, you're a 6th-grade school dropout –so let me give you a 2–minute explanation of Einstein's theory. . You've got an 8.5 x 11 sheet of paper in front of you. A guy named PYTHAGORAS figured out 2500 years ago that the DIAGONAL (corner to corner) length was given by Diagonal=√(8.5²+11²)=13.9 inches ....IOW: diagonaal²=length²+width² and this is known as the PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM. And it's got nothing to do with PYTHONS. .... Okay, The Pythagorean Theorem is the FOUNDATION STONE Of Einstein's Relativity. .... In 4–dimensions Pythagorean theorem becomes: – s²=x²+y²+z²-t² where x, y, and z is the length, width an height of the Universe and t is the universal time. .... But then Einstein discovered that his gravity theory would not allow a "static" universe – the thing would collapse under its own gravity – and people began to wonder if his theory of gravity was correct .... Then, out of the blue a scrawny Russian mathematician named Friedmann suggested that there was a way out of the problem by making the universe EXPAND – and he said you could do this by simply multiplying the spatial part of the metric (xyz) by a MAGNIFICATION FACTOR called "a": – IOW: s²=a²(x²+y²+z²)-t² = the Friedmann metric . ... And lo and behold, he turned out to be correct – because the astronomer Hubble proved it by discovering the Red Shift of distant stars – proving that the universe WAS EXPANDING just like Friedman said it was. Today the Friedmann metric is called the FLRW metric (Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker) metric – and it RULES all of ASTROPHYSICS. .... Okay – then along comes HAMMOND who discovers that "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" also could EXPAND – – or even CONTRACT – – just like the FLRW metric of OBJECTIVE SPACETIME does. And as I explained previously SUBJECTIVE space-time is the space-time that we actually SEE – for instance a 6-month-old baby SEES objects to be 4 times as large as adults do – simply because he's only 1/4 the size of an adult! Likewise for speed – things look like they are moving 4 times faster to a 6-month-old than they due to a 20-year-old. ... So Hammond says that the METRIC of SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME is: – s²=a²(x²+y²+z²)-t²/a² = THE HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD . ... And notice that while the FLRW metric only expands SPACE and doesn't affect TIME – we notice that the GOD METRIC CONTRACTS BOTH TIME AND SPACE ! . .... So okay, any competent physicist listening to this might say, OKAY – you've shown that subjective spacetime contracts and slows down as we grow up – – but why in hell do you insist that THIS FACT EXPLAINS GOD !!!! . =================================================== ... So Hammond will EAGERLY EXPLAIN to you WHY IT IS GOD =================================================== . Fact of the matter is, that this phenomenon is caused by the HUMAN GROWTH CURVE – IOW is a person grows up along the human growth curve – the world shrinks in size and slows down in speed. It's all caused by human growth. In fact, it never shrinks down to 1.0 because people never grow to hundred percent – the world average for adults is about 85% – and since1/.85=1.18 the average adult actually SEES a world that appears 18% LARGER AND FASTER than it actually is – and that tends to scare the should out of almost everyone – and this phenomena is called "GOD" !! .. But meanwhile, Psychology Departments all over the world – a 1000 man PhD psychology Army has been measuring the IQ and personality structure worldwide for 50 years, ever since the advent of desktop computers and published the results in a peer-reviewed literature large enough to fill a major library – and they have discovered an "eigenvector pyramid" with the top eigenvector dubbed the "GFP". And it turns out GFP includes people who are very high on the growth curve – not only that – but it turns out the 2nd order factors are the "Olympian gods" of antiquity, while the 3rd order factors are the 4 gospel personalities – Matthew Mark Luke and John " therefore it is quite obvious, that the 4th order factor, the GFP – is the GOD OF THE BIBLE. And all of this is explained in my 10 minute YouTube video: – WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD .........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk ............... (YouTube 12-min) . So there is SCANT ROOM FOR DOUBT, that the GFP is in fact the God of the Bible – and Hammond has positively identified it as "a 100% fully grown man" and the the "CURVATURE TENSOR of EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY. Hence we have the world's first SCIENTIFIC DEFINITION OF GOD ==================================== GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME ==================================== George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-23 13:28 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <lVidnWN4BZfWnDv-nZ2dnZfqlJ_8fwAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #598092 |
On 12/23/22 9:43 AM, George Hammond wrote: > [...] GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME It is USELESS to use words of your personal vocabulary that are spelled the same as standard words with very different meanings. That is not what anybody else means by "god". Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-23 13:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67657acb-9d3e-4c08-b2a8-9c8de2924bc5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598107 |
On Friday, 23 December 2022 at 20:28:18 UTC+1, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 12/23/22 9:43 AM, George Hammond wrote: > > [...] GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME > > It is USELESS to use words of your personal vocabulary that are spelled > the same as standard words with very different meanings. Yes, your Shit is useless.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-24 13:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0c0b7ef1-49f7-449a-8605-c9398a231ab0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598107 |
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 2:28:18 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 12/23/22 9:43 AM, George Hammond wrote: > > [...] GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME > > It is USELESS to use words of your personal vocabulary that are spelled > the same as standard words with very different meanings. That is not > what anybody else means by "god". > > Tom Roberts > [George Hammond MS physics] "GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" . First of all, I have not used any words in the above "definition of God" that are not in accordance with established scientific (Academic) definitions. . Secondly, I assert that my scientific definition of God is in complete experiential congruence with the common usage of the word "god": – but that I am the only person in the world who knows it, simply because I am the person who HAS DISCOVERED IT ! They don't know about it ! . I won't go into further discussion, because I don't believe that you're really interested in the facts of the matter: – you're simply miffed because the definition of God I have given OBVIOUSLY confirms a powerful and long-standing public suspicion ! . George Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-23 20:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <to53p1$1qspr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #598092 |
George Hammond wrote: > [G̶e̶o̶r̶g̶e̶ E̶ H̶a̶m̶m̶o̶n̶d̶ M̴̶̡̺̀͗͐͒̃ͅS̴̶̡͈͎̬͍̥͈̣͑̾͋ p̷̶̛̻̺̝͂̓̎́̕͝h̷̶͓̗̜͚̤̣͉̦̐̈͊͗͒̓͋̑͆̕y̷̶̢̛̪͈͒̆͝s̸̶̗͙̤͍̩̤͍͍̝̖̃̐̽̌̕i̶̶̢͑̄̈́̾̾̅̕c̷̶̯̬̮̼͆͊͋̆̊͝s̸̶̗͙̤͍̩̤͍͍̝̖̃̐̽̌̕, H̶y̶a̶n̶n̶i̶s̶ M̶A̶ U̶S̶A̶] > I̶t̶'s̶ c̶a̶l̶l̶e̶d̶ a̶ "M̶A̶T̶R̶I̶X̶". > .... L̶o̶o̶k̶ S̶T̶A̶R̶M̶A̶K̶E̶R̶, y̶o̶u̶'r̶e̶ a̶ 6t̶h̶-g̶r̶a̶d̶e̶ s̶c̶h̶o̶o̶l̶ d̶r̶o̶p̶o̶u̶t̶ –s̶o̶ l̶e̶t̶ m̶e̶ g̶i̶v̶e̶ > y̶o̶u̶ a̶ 2–m̶i̶n̶u̶t̶e̶ e̶x̶p̶l̶a̶n̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ o̶f̶ E̶i̶n̶s̶t̶e̶i̶n̶'s̶ t̶h̶e̶o̶r̶y̶. > Y̶o̶u̶'v̶e̶ g̶o̶t̶ a̶n̶ 8.5 x̶ 11 s̶h̶e̶e̶t̶ o̶f̶ p̶a̶p̶e̶r̶ i̶n̶ f̶r̶o̶n̶t̶ o̶f̶ y̶o̶u̶. A̶ g̶u̶y̶ n̶a̶m̶e̶d̶ > P̶Y̶T̶H̶A̶G̶O̶R̶A̶S̶ f̶i̶g̶u̶r̶e̶d̶ o̶u̶t̶ 2500 y̶e̶a̶r̶s̶ a̶g̶o̶ t̶h̶a̶t̶ t̶h̶e̶ D̶I̶A̶G̶O̶N̶A̶L̶ (c̶o̶r̶n̶e̶r̶ t̶o̶ > c̶o̶r̶n̶e̶r̶) l̶e̶n̶g̶t̶h̶ w̶a̶s̶ g̶i̶v̶e̶n̶ b̶y̶ D̴̶̜̖̹̹̖̩̗͈̔͆͗͊̾̽͝i̶̶̢͑̄̈́̾̾̅̕à̶̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽g̶̶͎̲̲͎͍͈̱͔̭̾ỏ̵̶̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕n̸̶̢͙̯͓̝͔̣͈̓̄̆̀̓̈̾̕͜à̶̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽l̷̶̡̧̢̙͈͍͈͈̉̄͋̔̉̆͝=√(8.5²+11²)=13.9 i̶n̶c̶h̶e̶s̶ ....I̶O̶W̶: you are a terrorist state, blowing up submersible gas pipelines, leading to starving in cold people, on an entire continent. We talk about continents here, not countries. You depraved putrid lying bitch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web