Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594043 > unrolled thread
| Started by | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-10-23 18:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2022-10-28 10:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 183 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 18:11 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 14:25 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 20:42 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 21:33 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 21:13 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 15:55 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 22:34 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 19:22 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 03:35 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-24 13:46 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 11:26 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-24 21:04 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 17:43 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-25 14:42 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-25 17:52 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:20 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:17 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 22:38 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 14:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 14:14 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 13:17 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 14:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 22:04 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 02:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 12:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 18:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 10:56 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 15:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 17:16 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-14 06:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-14 21:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 04:31 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 11:44 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-15 13:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 13:53 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 10:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-16 10:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 11:18 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-18 09:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jules Scotti <ujsl@ocjssuis.os> - 2022-11-19 15:08 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 10:27 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 11:50 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 13:31 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 15:57 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 17:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 11:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 14:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 15:06 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 19:53 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 16:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 12:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-23 15:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-24 16:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 14:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 15:05 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 11:26 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 19:58 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:07 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:41 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:46 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 16:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:28 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 16:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:40 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 18:06 -0800
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 13:56 +0000
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 14:00 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 09:36 -0800
Re: uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth - FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 18:40 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-11-25 14:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-25 21:10 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:26 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-25 20:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 10:04 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 19:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 12:08 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 10:34 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-28 14:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 22:47 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 00:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 01:48 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 17:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 10:44 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 18:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Finis Mari <fmnf@isiifain.ii> - 2022-11-29 21:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:36 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Lee Barsetti <erre@battaete.tr> - 2022-11-29 21:10 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:34 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 13:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-29 22:16 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 10:45 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 15:33 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 13:23 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 16:46 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-30 16:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-02 21:14 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-03 02:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-12-01 09:09 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-01 00:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 00:29 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 15:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-18 23:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 23:47 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 12:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-19 12:51 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 22:55 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-20 06:30 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:22 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:41 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 21:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 07:43 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-12-23 13:28 -0600
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 13:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-24 13:39 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 20:41 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 21:37 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:36 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 08:23 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 19:43 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 12:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 20:57 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 15:54 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 19:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 20:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 22:21 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 23:56 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-28 11:46 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 06:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 14:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:38 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 20:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 04:42 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-21 09:03 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 00:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-21 09:45 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 03:54 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-11-21 20:16 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 14:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 23:14 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 23:25 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 03:43 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:36 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 11:51 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 10:51 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-25 18:06 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 21:32 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 22:07 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 01:39 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-26 11:20 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 18:31 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-26 23:47 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 11:15 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 11:23 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-27 12:31 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 17:23 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-28 10:21 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 07:02 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-28 16:49 +0200
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-28 19:16 +0200
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 18:56 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-28 21:03 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-31 06:25 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Buddie Fiore <inbe@iieuedi.du> - 2022-10-31 15:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 20:19 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 09:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 17:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 12:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 20:19 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 14:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 14:33 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-09 15:18 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 17:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-10 07:42 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 05:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:08 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-28 10:09 -0700
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 22:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tlrebg$13ajr$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #596192 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 2:58:30 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: >> George Hammond wrote: >> >> > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:06:05 AM UTC-5, Forest Vaccaro >> > wrote: >> > [George Hammond MS physics] >> > Hey NYMSHIFTER "Forest Vaccaro" – keep political trash off this >> > thread George . > . > [Micheal Agnelli] >> real bombs, as those used by your shithole of a country, destroying >> energy pipelines to an entire continent. > . > [George Hammond MS physics USA] > .... Listen you technical flunky moron – the Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT > DEEP! > There are thousands of fishing boats with fish finding depth sounder > ONBOARD SONAR that could EASILY locate that 3 foot diameter concrete old and lying, piss off. Can't believe it, 80 years old and still lying. It required stronger bombs than Hiroshima, fucking stupid. Under water you need stronger bombs, plus, that a bed of strong concrete were to be blown into pieces likewise, as I understood. Learn Physics from a school, you idiot, not from internet and wikipedia. A normal bomb under water pressure is *NOTHING*. You fucking uneducated idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 14:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <859097bb-215e-4b50-8532-05c9a3b47804n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596195 |
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:07:55 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: > old and lying, piss off. Can't believe it, 80 years old and still lying. > It required stronger bombs than Hiroshima, fucking stupid. Under water you > need stronger bombs, plus, that a bed of strong concrete were to be blown > into pieces likewise, as I understood. Learn Physics from a school, you > idiot, not from internet and wikipedia. A normal bomb under water pressure . [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] My CV is: – CURRICULUM VITAE GEORGE E. HAMMOND B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USA M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA, USA Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern Univ.Boston MA. . And furthermore MORON – a surplus World War II submarine death charge can be bought on the underground Arms black-market for probably a couple of grand at the most. It is capable of easily collapsing the pressure all of the submarine never mind a flimsy "gas pipeline". ... NO ONE BUT AN IMBECILE would believe that you need a nuclear bomb !. . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 22:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tlrgjt$13ajr$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #596199 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:07:55 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: >> old and lying, piss off. Can't believe it, 80 years old and still lying. >> It required stronger bombs than Hiroshima, fucking stupid. Under water >> you need stronger bombs, plus, that a bed of strong concrete were to be >> blown into pieces likewise, as I understood. Learn Physics from a >> school, you idiot, not from internet and wikipedia. A normal bomb under >> water pressure > . > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] My CV is: – > CURRICULUM VITAE GEORGE E. HAMMOND B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester > Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USA M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern > University, Boston MA, USA Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in > Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern Univ.Boston MA. nothing. Zeroo. I said *stronger*, not nuclear, fucking stupid. You don't know any physics, not what it takes for a bomb to explode under water pressure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 16:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <99a527e1-ebe5-45bd-8102-360c3268386fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596201 |
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:46:28 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: > You don't > know any physics, not what it takes for a bomb > to explode under water pressure. . [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] ... You don't know what you're talking about – I have 2-/2 college degrees in physics. . The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires! That's nuthin ! . . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 00:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tlrmip$13ajr$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #596211 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:46:28 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: >> You don't > know any physics, not what it takes for a bomb to explode >> under water pressure. > . > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > ... You don't know what you're talking about – > I have 2-/2 college degrees in physics. > . > The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is > only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires! That's > nuthin ! that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 16:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a0b5d7ae-2342-4075-87b2-d0facacb96b8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596212 |
SNIP SPAM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 00:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tlrn9d$13ajr$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #596213 |
George Hammond wrote: > SNIP SPAM amazing, the proven crackpot uneducated troll, decays to "spam". I'm obliged to insist. George Hammond wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 5:46:28 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: >> You don't > know any physics, not what it takes for a bomb to explode >> under water pressure. > . > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > ... You don't know what you're talking about – > I have 2-/2 college degrees in physics. > . > The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is > only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires! That's > nuthin ! that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 18:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b755040d-cfcb-4a03-bef3-f69688ae16ben@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596214 |
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:40:17 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: . [George Hammond MS physics] you obviously have no scientific credentials and little or no scientific competence – I have 2 degrees in physics. .... Your statements are scientifically IRRELEVANT and RIDICULOUS. . SNIP SPAM . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 13:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God |
| Message-ID | <tlt5tl$1d2h8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #596218 |
uneducated crackpot George Hammond wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:40:17 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: > . > [George Hammond MS physics] > you obviously have no scientific credentials and little or no scientific > competence – I have 2 degrees in physics. > .... Your statements are scientifically IRRELEVANT and RIDICULOUS. > SNIP SPAM . you can wipe your stupid ass with your "degrees". Avoiding *re_quoting_yourself*, equating *air* to an *INCOMPREHENSIBLE* and high viscosity liquid, as *water_under_high_pressure* you fucking idiot. How would you explain that, you stupid crackpot. Allow me to specify, for the newcomers, to see, the stupid you are. ______ > The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is > only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires! That's > nuthin ! that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid. _______
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 14:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God |
| Message-ID | <tlt65b$1d2h8$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #596242 |
Micheal Agnelli wrote: > uneducated crackpot George Hammond wrote: > >> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 7:40:17 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli >> wrote: >> . >> [George Hammond MS physics] >> you obviously have no scientific credentials and little or no >> scientific competence – I have 2 degrees in physics. >> .... Your statements are scientifically IRRELEVANT and RIDICULOUS. >> SNIP SPAM . > > you can wipe your stupid ass with your "degrees". Avoiding > *re_quoting_yourself*, equating *air* to an *INCOMPREHENSIBLE* and high *INCOMPRESSIBLE*. > viscosity liquid, as *water_under_high_pressure* you fucking idiot. How > would you explain that, you stupid crackpot. > > Allow me to specify, for the newcomers, to see, the stupid you are. > > ______ >> The Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP the sea water pressure 150 FEET is >> only 65 psi – for chrissakes I run 65 psi in my bicycle tires! That's >> nuthin ! > > that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high > viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid. > _______
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 09:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5d73bd07-bd9c-4a0e-9aa3-fd6ef5d092abn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596244 |
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 9:00:14 AM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: > Micheal Agnelli wrote: > > > that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high > > viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid. > > .. [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] CURRICULUM VITAE B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USA M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA, USA Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern U..Boston MA. . And furthermore MORON – a surplus World War II submarine depth charge can be bought on the underground Arms black-market for probably a couple of grand at the most. It is capable of easily collapsing the PRESSURE HULL of a submarine never mind a flimsy "gas pipeline". ... YOU'RE SCIENTIFICALLY STUPID ... GET OUTTA HEAH George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 18:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth - FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God |
| Message-ID | <tltmi2$1ea96$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #596255 |
uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth: >> > that's air, fucking stupid. Water is NOT compressible. With high >> > viscosity, compared to air. Fucking stupid. > .. > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > CURRICULUM VITAE B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute > Worcester MA, USA M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA, > USA Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern > U..Boston MA. worthless piece of toilet paper, you fucking janitor. > And furthermore MORON – a surplus World War II submarine depth charge > can be bought on the underground Arms black-market for probably a couple > of grand at the most. It is capable of easily collapsing the PRESSURE > HULL of a submarine never mind a flimsy "gas pipeline". > ... YOU'RE SCIENTIFICALLY STUPID ... GET OUTTA HEAH George fucking cretin, proving once again your imbecility. Gas under *_high_pressure_*, in the pipes. Which adds to the necessary strength of the detonation, recorded as an *_earthquake_*. Three days (3) of gas eruption, you inbreed idiot. a diploma from cacamerica is NOTHING in europe. Fake manned moon landing and such. If you want a proper moon landing, you go to Russia and China. And India, as I can see. Proofs: https://www.google.com/search?q=nord+stream-explosion&tbm=isch&source=lnms
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 14:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ths75j-a7vt.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #596195 |
In sci.physics Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > >> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 2:58:30 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: >>> George Hammond wrote: >>> >>> > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:06:05 AM UTC-5, Forest Vaccaro >>> > wrote: >>> > [George Hammond MS physics] >>> > Hey NYMSHIFTER "Forest Vaccaro" – keep political trash off this >>> > thread George . >> . >> [Micheal Agnelli] >>> real bombs, as those used by your shithole of a country, destroying >>> energy pipelines to an entire continent. >> . >> [George Hammond MS physics USA] >> .... Listen you technical flunky moron – the Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT >> DEEP! >> There are thousands of fishing boats with fish finding depth sounder >> ONBOARD SONAR that could EASILY locate that 3 foot diameter concrete > > old and lying, piss off. Can't believe it, 80 years old and still lying. > It required stronger bombs than Hiroshima, fucking stupid. Under water you > need stronger bombs, plus, that a bed of strong concrete were to be blown > into pieces likewise, as I understood. Learn Physics from a school, you > idiot, not from internet and wikipedia. A normal bomb under water pressure > is *NOTHING*. You fucking uneducated idiot. Yeah, right, depth charges with only a couple hundred pounds of conventional explosives have never destroyed a submarine through hydraulic shock...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <juclopFb5v0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #596168 |
On 2022-11-25 19:26:49 +0000, George Hammond said: [ … ] > For Pete's sake ATHEL – an intelligent and experienced scientific mind > like yours is DESPERATELY NEEDED to help obtain a coherent assessment > of this discovery !. I have read the email messages that you've sent to me off-line, but you're wasting your time. If you have anything to say to me that is relevant to this group, say it here. I don't really have anything useful to say about your proof of the existence of god, in part because I don't believe in the existence of god. But anyway, that's not my opinion as a mathematician or a physicist, because I'm neither. I'm not sure that expertise in chemistry or biochemistry can contribute much. You remind us of your MS in physics at every opportunity but it isn't really very impressive -- no PhD, no publications in recognized physics journals, as far as I can see. -- Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36+ years; mainly in England until 1987.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 14:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9d95c749-17b4-4582-a972-f584a783e50an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596175 |
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 3:10:06 PM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2022-11-25 19:26:49 +0000, George Hammond said: > > I don't really have anything useful to say about your proof of the > existence of god, in part because I don't believe in the existence of god. > Athel . [George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA] .... I didn't believe in God either – until I (accidentally) found the SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT THERE IS A – REAL GOD and it is in fact, the GOD OF THE BIBLE – and then I realized what a complete IDIOT I actually was – and that was 25 years ago! .... In your case perhaps "IT IS TOO LATE TO TEACH AN OLD DOG NEW TRICKS" . So I would be careful from now on going around saying that "you don't believe in the existence of God" – because that opinion in view of this newly discovered PROOF OF GOD now makes you and Richard Dawkins look like a couple of "OLD SCHOOL" IDIOTS ! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 20:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63819115.7F07@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #596131 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 2:24:47 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > [STARMAKER] > > > So, ...you keep mentioning some other guy named Hammond. > > > "Fortunately for us, Hammond has provided the simple scientific > > > explanation..." > > > Who is this other guy you call Hammond? > > > > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > .... Cut the bullshit Starmaker – you're supposed to know about writing > in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd PERSON by the time you're outta the 6th grade. > . > LISTEN – I GOT AN IDEA ! I'm thinking about making a NETFLIX MOVIE > about the "WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD". > . > Publishing a paper, writing a book, making a YouTube video – are USELESS – > and the chances of getting it on TELEVISION are zilch. Sosomeone suggested > "MAKE A NETFLIX MOVIE" – – – – AND I THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA > . > Do you know anything about NETFLIX ? > . > George I'm a starmaker, not a moviemaker. Have you ever in your entire life performed an experiment? Did you performed the first experimental measurement of God?? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 10:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dadfada0-e1c6-4426-8413-72788d96e31cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596223 |
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 11:07:21 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > I'm a starmaker, not a moviemaker. > > Have you ever in your entire life performed an experiment? > Did you perform the first experimental > measurement of God?? > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] ... No AND NEITHER DID ALBERT EINSTEIN perform any experiments! Listen you aggravated F – – KWIT – I already told you a 1000 man PhD academic army performed the experiments over 50 years worldwide testing millions of people and they discovered the TOP EIGENVECTOR In All of Psychology and named it the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology) and because they're NOT PHYSICISTS – they don't know what it is – and I proved IT'S THE GOD OF THE BIBLE controlled by this metric: . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = THE (highly curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a²| . And any one of you half ass amateur science schmucks can plug that into Mathematica or Maxima and show that the curvature is as large As That of a Black Hole for chrissakes – – wake the fuck up !! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 19:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tltoiq$1efl7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #596258 |
George Hammond wrote: > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > ... No AND NEITHER DID ALBERT EINSTEIN perform any experiments! > Listen you aggravated F – – KWIT – I already told you a 1000 man PhD > academic army performed the experiments over 50 years worldwide testing > millions of people and they discovered the TOP EIGENVECTOR In All of > Psychology and named it the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology) and > because nothing. Idiocies. Here you have faking a nazi flag on moon, forgetting the Earth, 66⁰ above the horizon, 4 times larger than Moon as seen from Earth. You fucking nazi paperclips. You are a shame for this planet. Former astronaut nazi Karen Nyberg Bitch reveals how NASA falsifies space flights https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/8BadTlEd8lTF Empire of LIES! https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/naxHReirDhXq Its funny how we've not been back to the moon in 50 years. https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/d5IznWwVk6nF Moon - The On Set Location. Old Studio Footage Including BUZZ Aldrin with Props & Scale Models https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/MZ7C1sxd6ZKz NASA's LAUGHABLE APOLLO LUNA LANDER https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/xfWVEkRsFDD1 I just can't wait buying a car like this when available. Russian Moskvich Brand Takes Over French Renault Plants In Moscow Providing 40,000 Jobs https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/EMRz4rmZFkUC
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-26 12:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <64ba480f-0514-4ae8-b756-3f64113cf7acn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596258 |
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:04:36 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote: . > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > I already told you a 1000 man PhD academic army performed the > experiments over 50 years worldwide in 20 languages, in 20 countries, > testing millions of people and they discovered the TOP EIGENVECTOR > In All of Psychology and named it the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology) > and because they're NOT PHYSICISTS – they don't know what it is – > and I proved IT'S THE GOD OF THE BIBLE controlled by this metric: > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE (highly curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > . > And I plugged that into Maxima and showed that the curvature is > as large as that of a BLACK HOLE > George . [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS MA USA] AND FURTHERMORE in the above METRIC "a(t)" is the "Scale Factor" of the expansion Of the Universe in Astrophysics (objective space-time) whereas it is the scale factor in human growth for the contraction of "subjective space-time" during human growth. ... The leading terms of the RIEMANNIAN CURVATURE are proportional to (da/dt) which is known as the HUBBLE CONSTANT. The Hubble constant in astrophysics is about 7%/gigayear but the Hubble constant for human growth (under age 20) is 5%/year – IOW : – . The Hubble Constant is 1 BILLION times larger for SUBJECTIVE than it is for OBJECTIVE space-time . This CLEARLY indicates that there is some GRAVITATIONAL BLACK WHOLE phenomena associated with HUMAN BIRTH, GROWTH, and DEATH – probably as Sir Roger Penrose suggested – quantum gravity acting in the brain! . THIS RESULT IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT INDICATES THAT LIFE AFTER DEATH IS PROBABLY A BLACK HOLE PHENOMENA .. George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-28 10:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dd0e9ce2-3694-45e4-af14-acab4b66836an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596270 |
On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 3:08:27 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote: > On Saturday, November 26, 2022 at 1:04:36 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote: > . > > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > > I already told you a 1000 man PhD academic army performed the > > experiments over 50 years worldwide in 20 languages, in 20 countries, > > testing millions of people and they discovered the TOP EIGENVECTOR > > In All of Psychology and named it the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology) > > and because they're NOT PHYSICISTS – they don't know what it is – > > and I proved IT'S THE GOD OF THE BIBLE controlled by this metric: > > . > > |a² o o o. | > > |o a² o o. | = THE (highly curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD > > |o o a² o. | > > |ooo-1/a²| > > . > > And I plugged that into Maxima and showed that the curvature is > > as large as that of a BLACK HOLE > > George > . > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS MA USA] > AND FURTHERMORE in the above METRIC "a(t)" is the > "Scale Factor" of the expansion Of the Universe in Astrophysics > (objective space-time) whereas it is the scale factor in human growth > for the contraction of "subjective space-time" during human growth. > ... The leading terms of the RIEMANNIAN CURVATURE are proportional > to (da/dt) which is known as the HUBBLE CONSTANT. The Hubble > constant in astrophysics is about 7%/gigayear but the Hubble constant > for human growth (under age 20) is 5%/year – IOW : – > . > The Hubble Constant is 1 BILLION times larger for > SUBJECTIVE than it is for OBJECTIVE space-time > . > This CLEARLY indicates that there is some GRAVITATIONAL BLACK WHOLE > phenomena associated with HUMAN BIRTH, GROWTH, and DEATH – probably > as Sir Roger Penrose suggested – quantum gravity acting in the brain! > . > THIS RESULT IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT INDICATES THAT > LIFE AFTER DEATH IS PROBABLY A BLACK HOLE PHENOMENA > .. > George . [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS PHYSICS, HYANNIS MA USA] . Apparently the term "HUBBLE CONSTANT" wards off HECKLERS !!! George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web