Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594043 > unrolled thread
| Started by | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-10-23 18:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2022-10-28 10:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 183 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 18:11 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 14:25 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 20:42 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 21:33 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 21:13 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 15:55 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 22:34 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 19:22 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 03:35 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-24 13:46 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 11:26 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-24 21:04 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 17:43 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-25 14:42 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-25 17:52 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:20 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:17 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 22:38 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 14:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 14:14 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 13:17 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 14:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 22:04 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 02:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 12:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 18:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 10:56 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 15:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 17:16 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-14 06:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-14 21:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 04:31 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 11:44 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-15 13:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 13:53 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 10:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-16 10:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 11:18 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-18 09:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jules Scotti <ujsl@ocjssuis.os> - 2022-11-19 15:08 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 10:27 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 11:50 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 13:31 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 15:57 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 17:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 11:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 14:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 15:06 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 19:53 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 16:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 12:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-23 15:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-24 16:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 14:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 15:05 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 11:26 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 19:58 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:07 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:41 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:46 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 16:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:28 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 16:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:40 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 18:06 -0800
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 13:56 +0000
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 14:00 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 09:36 -0800
Re: uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth - FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 18:40 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-11-25 14:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-25 21:10 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:26 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-25 20:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 10:04 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 19:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 12:08 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 10:34 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-28 14:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 22:47 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 00:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 01:48 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 17:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 10:44 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 18:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Finis Mari <fmnf@isiifain.ii> - 2022-11-29 21:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:36 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Lee Barsetti <erre@battaete.tr> - 2022-11-29 21:10 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:34 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 13:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-29 22:16 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 10:45 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 15:33 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 13:23 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 16:46 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-30 16:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-02 21:14 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-03 02:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-12-01 09:09 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-01 00:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 00:29 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 15:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-18 23:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 23:47 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 12:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-19 12:51 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 22:55 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-20 06:30 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:22 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:41 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 21:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 07:43 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-12-23 13:28 -0600
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 13:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-24 13:39 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 20:41 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 21:37 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:36 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 08:23 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 19:43 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 12:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 20:57 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 15:54 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 19:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 20:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 22:21 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 23:56 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-28 11:46 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 06:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 14:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:38 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 20:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 04:42 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-21 09:03 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 00:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-21 09:45 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 03:54 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-11-21 20:16 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 14:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 23:14 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 23:25 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 03:43 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:36 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 11:51 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 10:51 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-25 18:06 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 21:32 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 22:07 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 01:39 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-26 11:20 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 18:31 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-26 23:47 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 11:15 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 11:23 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-27 12:31 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 17:23 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-28 10:21 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 07:02 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-28 16:49 +0200
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-28 19:16 +0200
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 18:56 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-28 21:03 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-31 06:25 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Buddie Fiore <inbe@iieuedi.du> - 2022-10-31 15:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 20:19 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 09:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 17:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 12:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 20:19 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 14:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 14:33 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-09 15:18 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 17:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-10 07:42 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 05:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:08 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-28 10:09 -0700
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-19 10:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <70c0419d-db0e-40ba-8af5-d8d9de123c59n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #595683 |
On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 10:08:54 AM UTC-5, Jules Scotti wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > >>[STARMAKER] > >> There is no God. > > [HAMMOND, MS Physics] > > You're DEAD WRONG and I have proved it. > >[Jules Scotti, academic credentials unknown] > let us hear. . [George Hammond MS Physics (1967)] .... If you have any Academic or other professional credentials now is the time to mention it. You don't have to give names, dates, addresses – I'll take you at your word – since at age 80 and a lifelong intellectual and scientific researcher – I'll know if you're lying in 5 minutes flat! .... I'm looking for any EDUCATED person to discuss this "Worlds First Discovery Of a Scientific Proof of God" . Yours, George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-19 11:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63793385.BF8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #595688 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 10:08:54 AM UTC-5, Jules Scotti wrote: > > George Hammond wrote: > > >>[STARMAKER] > > >> There is no God. > > > [HAMMOND, MS Physics] > > > You're DEAD WRONG and I have proved it. > > > >[Jules Scotti, academic credentials unknown] > > let us hear. > . > [George Hammond MS Physics (1967)] > .... If you have any Academic or other professional credentials > now is the time to mention it. You don't have to give names, dates, > addresses – I'll take you at your word – since at age 80 and a > lifelong intellectual and scientific researcher – I'll know if you're > lying in 5 minutes flat! > .... I'm looking for any EDUCATED person to discuss this > "Worlds First Discovery Of a Scientific Proof of God" > . > Yours, George "Worlds First Discovery..."???? "Discovery"? Let me explain something to you...here's the thing.. You made a discovery there are two realities the visible reality and the invisible reality.. Your discovery was made in the invisible reality.. meaning, you dreamt it up. Your discovery occured in your mind while sleeping. You're dreaming! Wake Up! Tech support! Tech support!! I mean, I understand... sometimes I have trouble figuring out am I dreaming or am i awake. So, what I do to test whether I'm draming or not is I reach over the light switch and turn it off or on.. In a dream, the light switch doesn't work. Have you tried this metric of God formula using paper and pencil only? In a visible reality, I mean... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-19 13:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e88fcd81-2315-4d11-beb6-a174900bfbean@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #595689 |
On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 2:50:16 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > [STARMAKER] > Let me explain something to you...here's the thing.. > there are two realities > the visible reality and > the invisible reality.. > [George E Hammond MS physics] ... Let me explains something to YOU: – there is no "INVISIBLE REALITY" (dreaming) nvolved in my "Scientific Proof of God" .... Both OBJECTIVE and SUBJECTIVE space-time I are absolutely physically real REALITIES. . 1 – SUBJECTIVE reality is what we ACTUALLY SEE 2 – OBJECTIVE reality is what we ACTUALLY MEASURE ......(with clocks and rulers) . They are NOT THE SAME SIZE OR SPEED DUE to the fact that no human being is actually "100% fully grown" – and this makes us SEE a size and speed of actual "measurable" reality that is 10 to 20% LARGER THAN IT ACTUALLY MEASURES ! (Some people more, some people less) . IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do WITH DREAMING !!!!! . ... You don't even understand what the theory is about. You're not a qualified scientist. . .... Go read some more Comic Books for chrissakes ! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-19 15:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63796D61.D21@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #595698 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 2:50:16 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > [STARMAKER] > > Let me explain something to you...here's the thing.. > > there are two realities > > the visible reality and > > the invisible reality.. > > > [George E Hammond MS physics] > ... Let me explains something to YOU: – > there is no "INVISIBLE REALITY" (dreaming) nvolved in > my "Scientific Proof of God" > .... Both OBJECTIVE and SUBJECTIVE space-time > I are absolutely physically real REALITIES. > . > 1 – is what we ACTUALLY SEE > 2 – OBJECTIVE reality is what we ACTUALLY MEASURE > ......(with clocks and rulers) > . > They are NOT THE SAME SIZE OR SPEED DUE to the fact > that no human being is actually "100% fully grown" – and this > makes us SEE a size and speed of actual "measurable" reality > that is 10 to 20% LARGER THAN IT ACTUALLY MEASURES ! > (Some people more, some people less) > . > IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do WITH DREAMING !!!!! > . > ... You don't even understand what the theory is about. > You're not a qualified scientist. > . > .... Go read some more Comic Books for chrissakes ! > . > George SUBJECTIVE reality OBJECTIVE reality it's all dreamworld.. https://stevepavlina.com/blog/2007/09/subjective-reality-simplified/ Maybe this will help you make your numbers more simple for others to understand... Here are the numbers to : Proof that God Exist 950 0950 91950 4-30-34-45-51 19 18-35-56-58-64 9 Just convert your dreams to numbers! https://lotterypredictor.com/wordtranslator https://lotterytexts.com/blog/lottery-dream-numbers/ https://www.numerando.it/en/dreams-interpretation-numbers.php I bet your grandmother used to play the numbers... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-19 17:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <65285182-4b5e-42a3-9851-765bc6f2519dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #595708 |
On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 6:57:06 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > >[George Hammond MS Physics] > > IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do WITH DREAMING !!!!! > > .... Go read some more Comic Books ! > > . > [STARMAKER] > it's all dreamworld.. > Just convert your dreams to numbers! > [George E Hammond MS Physics] Listen PUTZ – if a 6-month-old child looks up at the bottom of a kitchen table while a 20-year-old looks down at the top of the table – . THE TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO THE CHILD THAN IT DOES TO THE 20-YEAR-OLD . Are you so FRIGGIN STUPID t or something – it's caused by human growth ! . The child's "subjective space" is magnified by 400% compared to the subjective space of the 20-year-old.. . Dummy up SCHMUCK – that isn't hard to understand !. . And excuse my Yiddish – I know damn well you're half Jewish or something – which is making you tick ! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-20 11:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <637A80E3.455B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #595710 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 6:57:06 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > >[George Hammond MS Physics] > > > IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do WITH DREAMING !!!!! > > > .... Go read some more Comic Books ! > > > . > > [STARMAKER] > > it's all dreamworld.. > > Just convert your dreams to numbers! > > > [George E Hammond MS Physics] > Listen PUTZ – if a 6-month-old child looks up at the bottom > of a kitchen table while a 20-year-old looks down at the top > of the table – > . > THE TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO THE > CHILD THAN IT DOES TO THE 20-YEAR-OLD > . > Are you so FRIGGIN STUPID t or something – it's caused by > human growth ! > . > The child's "subjective space" is magnified by 400% compared to > the subjective space of the 20-year-old.. > . > Dummy up SCHMUCK – that isn't hard to understand !. > . > And excuse my Yiddish – I know damn well you're half > Jewish or something – which is making you tick ! > . > George what is this obsession you have with...kitchen tables???? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EWTuBWVXgAAFkyB.jpg:large -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-20 14:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7f7bf4c7-a0e6-4ca1-bbfa-41ef6202188cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #595779 |
On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 2:32:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > [George E Hammond MS Physics] > > A TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO A > > CHILD THAN IT DOES TO A 20-YEAR-OLD > > George > > >[STARMAKER] > what is this obsession you have with...kitchen tables???? > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS Physics] .... Nothing special about tables – here's the same story for – WINDMILLS: – ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity) https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ .... Windmills are better than tables because they involve BOTH SIZE AND SPEED !!! – – They not only look LARGER to a child – they look like they are going FASTER to a child ALSO ! .................. THIS IS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD ! .......................... TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT ! ..................... DON'T BE AN IGNORANT PERSON Are you confessing. that you can't UNDERSTAND the SIMPLE BASIC principle of the world's first "Scientific Proof of God" ? .... IF SO what the hell are you doing on sci.physics.relativity ???? . After all – we're here to show that this effect causes the GOD METRIC : – . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = THE RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD. |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a²| . That is the ENTIRE POINT of this THREAD ! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-20 15:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <637AB2E9.64E6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #595801 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 2:32:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > [George E Hammond MS Physics] > > > A TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO A > > > CHILD THAN IT DOES TO A 20-YEAR-OLD > > > George > > > > >[STARMAKER] > > what is this obsession you have with...kitchen tables???? > > > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS Physics] > .... Nothing special about tables – here's the same story for – > WINDMILLS: – > ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity) > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ > .... Windmills are better than tables because they involve > BOTH SIZE AND SPEED !!! – – They not only look LARGER to a child – > they look like they are going FASTER to a child ALSO ! > .................. THIS IS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD ! > .......................... TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT ! > ..................... DON'T BE AN IGNORANT PERSON > Are you confessing. that you can't UNDERSTAND the SIMPLE BASIC principle > of the world's first "Scientific Proof of God" ? > .... IF SO what the hell are you doing on sci.physics.relativity ???? > . > After all – we're here to show that this effect causes the > GOD METRIC : – > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD. > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > . > That is the ENTIRE POINT of this THREAD ! > . > George So, do you believe that God lives in the future? And maybe travels from the future to here in a UFO type of aircraft... or maybe through some...Stargate? (you know like the movie Stargate) -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-20 19:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <637AF651.7B04@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #595801 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 2:32:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > [George E Hammond MS Physics] > > > A TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO A > > > CHILD THAN IT DOES TO A 20-YEAR-OLD > > > George > > > > >[STARMAKER] > > what is this obsession you have with...kitchen tables???? > > > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS Physics] > .... Nothing special about tables – here's the same story for – > WINDMILLS: – > ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity) > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ > .... Windmills are better than tables because they involve > BOTH SIZE AND SPEED !!! – – They not only look LARGER to a child – > they look like they are going FASTER to a child ALSO ! > .................. THIS IS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD ! > .......................... TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT ! > ..................... DON'T BE AN IGNORANT PERSON > Are you confessing. that you can't UNDERSTAND the SIMPLE BASIC principle > of the world's first "Scientific Proof of God" ? > George "...the world's first "Scientific Proof of God"???? Okay, here is where you completely messed up... I notice there are a lot of fraudulent science books. The Titles of these book are to attract attention to get suckers to buy the book. But by the end of the book these science authors always admit they have no idea what they are talking about. It's always...speculation. (they hope 'others' will take the road further from where they left off...) You're no different then they are. You come up with a title: "Scientific Proof of God" but you end it the same way all these others fraudulent science writers end it...By saying to the effect "I don't know, I don't know, I don't know." And at the *very end* (the very last sentence) of "Scientific Proof of God" pdf paper you write: "If a scientific proof has actually been found, we have every reason to expect an immanent and miraculous advance in Civilization." "If a scientific proof has actually been found, ...."???? IF? IF? IF??? If a scientific proof has ACTUALLY has been found???? WHAT?? IT HASN'T BEEN FOUND???? If a scientific proof has ACTUALLY has been found???? https://www.academia.edu/196570/Scientific_Proof_of_God How can you write here "...the world's first "Scientific Proof of God"???? then your paper ends with: "If a scientific proof has actually been found, we have every reason to expect an immanent and miraculous advance in Civilization." https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gbv=2&sxsrf=ALiCzsbZHHVX8m47E5zfJkh9KvI5Z1MBJw%3A1669002657178&q=%22If+a+scientific+proof+has+actually+been+found%22&oq=%22If+a+scientific+proof+has+actually+been+found%22&aqs=heirloom-srp.. https://www.academia.edu/196570/Scientific_Proof_of_God mendacity -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-21 16:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4f4de39b-daf6-4b1b-a0c5-8fd49372c657n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #595833 |
On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 10:53:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS Physics] > > .... Nothing special about tables – here's the same story for – > > WINDMILLS: – > > ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity) > > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ > > .... Windmills are better than tables because they involve > > BOTH SIZE AND SPEED !!! – – They not only look LARGER to a child – > > they look like they are going FASTER to a child ALSO ! > > .................. THIS IS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD ! > > .......................... TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT ! > > ..................... DON'T BE AN IGNORANT PERSON > > [STARMAKER] > I notice there are a lot of fraudulent science books. > The Titles of these book are to attract attention to > get suckers to buy the book. > You're no different then they are. > [George E Hammond MS physics] .... LOOK – you spent days reading "The Scientific Proof of God" on my website – THAT PAPER IS 20 YEARS OLD ... That paper was written only halfway through my 40 year research! READ SOMETHING UP TO DATE: – https://tinyurl.com/4jkdd34e which I wrote within the last year ! . Look STARMAKER – you are a "POLITICAL FORCE" – I am a "SCIENTIFIC FORCE". I appreciate the fact that you have single-handedly kept this thread on the FRONT PAGE of sci.physics.relativity . So you work the POLITICAL ANGLE and I'll work the SCIENTIFIC ANGLE and maybe we can "kick ass" hard enough so some COMPETENT SCIENTIST will notice the WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD ! I won't challenge you on your political talk – but for chrissakes don't try to challenge me on the scientifici talk ! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-23 12:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <637E8415.2A5A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #595906 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 10:53:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS Physics] > > > .... Nothing special about tables – here's the same story for – > > > WINDMILLS: – > > > ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity) > > > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ > > > .... Windmills are better than tables because they involve > > > BOTH SIZE AND SPEED !!! – – They not only look LARGER to a child – > > > they look like they are going FASTER to a child ALSO ! > > > .................. THIS IS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD ! > > > .......................... TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT ! > > > ..................... DON'T BE AN IGNORANT PERSON > > > > [STARMAKER] > > I notice there are a lot of fraudulent science books. > > The Titles of these book are to attract attention to > > get suckers to buy the book. > > You're no different then they are. > > > [George E Hammond MS physics] > .... LOOK – you spent days reading "The Scientific Proof of God" > on my website – THAT PAPER IS 20 YEARS OLD > ... That paper was written only halfway through my 40 year research! > READ SOMETHING UP TO DATE: – > https://tinyurl.com/4jkdd34e > which I wrote within the last year ! > . > Look STARMAKER – you are a "POLITICAL FORCE" – I am a "SCIENTIFIC FORCE". > I appreciate the fact that you have single-handedly kept this thread on the > FRONT PAGE of sci.physics.relativity > . > So you work the POLITICAL ANGLE and I'll work the SCIENTIFIC ANGLE > and maybe we can "kick ass" hard enough so some COMPETENT SCIENTIST > will notice the WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD ! > I won't challenge you on your political talk – but for chrissakes don't > try to challenge me on the scientifici talk ! > . > George A "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD" is equivalent to a "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF EVERYTHING"! and no one has come up with a theory of everything yet, let alone proof of everything. You don't expect You can take out your calculator and come up with a..."SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD"? which is the same-thing as coming up with a "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF EVERYTHING". Even Einstein could not prove that Time or Gravity exist. There is no Time There is no Gravity There is no Space There is no Universe There is no God. You're just a collection of atoms with illusions of grandeur. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-23 15:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <29ade778-5eb7-4bb2-b4ed-263e110636edn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596034 |
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 3:35:24 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > A "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD" is equivalent to a "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF EVERYTHING"! > and no one has come up with a theory of everything yet > You don't expect You can take out your calculator > and come up with a..."SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD"? > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS PHYSICS, HYANNIS MA USA] . You're POLITICALLY SAVVY – because you're not timid about ANTI-SEMITISM On a scale of 1 to 100 that's worth 90 POINTS. . But you only get 5 POINTS for SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE. You don't know SHIT about SCIENCE. . FYI – – a scientific PROOF OF GOD IS A PROOF OF EVERYTHING !!! .. LOOK STARMAKER when I say that: – . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = THE (Highly Curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD. |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a²| . THAT DOES NOT COME OUT OF A CALCULATOR – YOU IDIOT It come from taking 2-1/2 Academic degrees in THEORETICAL PHYSICS. . I've told you 10 times that the SCIENTIFIC PROOF that this metric describes GOD – has been supplied by a $50 million dollar, 50 year effort by a 1000 man PhD Army of Psychometrists – and THIS 10 MINUTE YOUTUBE VIDEO . PROVES THAT THE ABOVE METRIC is the GFP – the top EIGENVECTOR of this 50 year, global measurement ! – And therefore is the: – . WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD ........... https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk ................... (YouTube 12-min) . THIS VIDEO DID NOT COME OUT OF A CALCULATOR !! . UNTIL YOU WATCH THIS VIDEO YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-23 23:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <637F1744.DE5@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #596047 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 3:35:24 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > A "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD" is equivalent to a "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF EVERYTHING"! > > and no one has come up with a theory of everything yet > > You don't expect You can take out your calculator > > and come up with a..."SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD"? > > > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS PHYSICS, HYANNIS MA USA] > . > You're POLITICALLY SAVVY – because you're not timid about ANTI-SEMITISM > On a scale of 1 to 100 that's worth 90 POINTS. > . > But you only get 5 POINTS for SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE. > You don't know SHIT about SCIENCE. > . > FYI – – a scientific PROOF OF GOD IS A PROOF OF EVERYTHING !!! > .. > LOOK STARMAKER when I say that: – > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE (Highly Curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD. > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > . > THAT DOES NOT COME OUT OF A CALCULATOR – YOU IDIOT > It come from taking 2-1/2 Academic degrees in THEORETICAL PHYSICS. > . > I've told you 10 times that the SCIENTIFIC PROOF that this metric describes > GOD – has been supplied by a $50 million dollar, 50 year effort by a 1000 man > PhD Army of Psychometrists – and THIS 10 MINUTE YOUTUBE VIDEO > . > PROVES THAT THE ABOVE METRIC is the GFP – the top EIGENVECTOR of this > 50 year, global measurement ! – And therefore is the: – > . > WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD > ........... https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk > ................... (YouTube 12-min) > . > THIS VIDEO DID NOT COME OUT OF A CALCULATOR !! > . > UNTIL YOU WATCH THIS VIDEO YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT > . > George So, ...you keep mentioning some other guy named Hammond. "Fortunately for us, Hammond has provided the simple scientific explanation..." Who is this other guy you call Hammond? Seems to have the same last name as yours but, but...sounds like another person? i'm confused... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-23 23:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <637F1C52.54D1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #596069 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > George Hammond wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 3:35:24 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > A "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD" is equivalent to a "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF EVERYTHING"! > > > and no one has come up with a theory of everything yet > > > You don't expect You can take out your calculator > > > and come up with a..."SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD"? > > > > > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS PHYSICS, HYANNIS MA USA] > > . > > You're POLITICALLY SAVVY – because you're not timid about ANTI-SEMITISM > > On a scale of 1 to 100 that's worth 90 POINTS. > > . > > But you only get 5 POINTS for SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE. > > You don't know SHIT about SCIENCE. > > . > > FYI – – a scientific PROOF OF GOD IS A PROOF OF EVERYTHING !!! > > .. > > LOOK STARMAKER when I say that: – > > . > > |a² o o o. | > > |o a² o o. | = THE (Highly Curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD. > > |o o a² o. | > > |ooo-1/a²| > > . > > THAT DOES NOT COME OUT OF A CALCULATOR – YOU IDIOT > > It come from taking 2-1/2 Academic degrees in THEORETICAL PHYSICS. > > . > > I've told you 10 times that the SCIENTIFIC PROOF that this metric describes > > GOD – has been supplied by a $50 million dollar, 50 year effort by a 1000 man > > PhD Army of Psychometrists – and THIS 10 MINUTE YOUTUBE VIDEO > > . > > PROVES THAT THE ABOVE METRIC is the GFP – the top EIGENVECTOR of this > > 50 year, global measurement ! – And therefore is the: – > > . > > WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD > > ........... https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk > > ................... (YouTube 12-min) > > . > > THIS VIDEO DID NOT COME OUT OF A CALCULATOR !! > > . > > UNTIL YOU WATCH THIS VIDEO YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT > > . > > George > > So, ...you keep mentioning some other guy named Hammond. > > "Fortunately for us, Hammond has provided the simple scientific > explanation..." > > Who is this other guy you call Hammond? Seems to have the same last name > as > yours but, but...sounds like another person? i'm confused... In other words, ...which Hammond said this: "Namely, Hammond proved that the data constituted the first experimental measurement of God, to 2 decimal point accuracy." Or, which Hammond PERFORMED the first experimental measurement of God? Was it You that perfomed the experiment, or was it the 'other' Hammond that perfomed the experimental measurement of God, to 2 decimal point accuracy? Or was it 1000 monkies on a typewriter? The Truth is...there never was any a first experimental measurement of God. No measurement exist...not even to 2 decimal point accuracy. Ask Hammond, he'll tell you...he's under the kitchen table. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-24 16:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d565cb36-2e5c-4a9a-929c-b362f49669a4n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596071 |
On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 2:24:47 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > [STARMAKER] > > So, ...you keep mentioning some other guy named Hammond. > > "Fortunately for us, Hammond has provided the simple scientific > > explanation..." > > Who is this other guy you call Hammond? > > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] .... Cut the bullshit Starmaker – you're supposed to know about writing in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd PERSON by the time you're outta the 6th grade. . LISTEN – I GOT AN IDEA ! I'm thinking about making a NETFLIX MOVIE about the "WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD". . Publishing a paper, writing a book, making a YouTube video – are USELESS – and the chances of getting it on TELEVISION are zilch. Sosomeone suggested "MAKE A NETFLIX MOVIE" – – – – AND I THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA . Do you know anything about NETFLIX ? . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 14:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tlqkn7$10qfc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #596131 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 2:24:47 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: >> > [STARMAKER] >> > So, ...you keep mentioning some other guy named Hammond. "Fortunately >> > for us, Hammond has provided the simple scientific explanation..." >> > Who is this other guy you call Hammond? >> > > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > .... Cut the bullshit Starmaker – you're supposed to know about writing > in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd PERSON by the time you're outta the 6th grade. Americans Are Fat, Lazy, & Have Low Testosterone, Men Are Weak. Useless.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 15:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tlqlkf$10qfc$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #596131 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 2:24:47 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: >> > [STARMAKER] >> > So, ...you keep mentioning some other guy named Hammond. "Fortunately >> > for us, Hammond has provided the simple scientific explanation..." >> > Who is this other guy you call Hammond? >> > > [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS] > .... Cut the bullshit Starmaker – you're supposed to know about writing > in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd PERSON by the time you're outta the 6th grade. good news, Turkey is bombing nato "allies", which are nazis and *state_terrorists* blowing up countries and continents energy pipelines. Very good news. Turkish military reacts to claims it endangered US troops https://%72%74.com/news/567158-t%C3%BCrkiye-us-troops-syria/ Putting the lives of NATO allies at risk is “in of the question,” the defense minister said. They are sons of the nazi bitches, destroying the fucking europe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 11:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dc9713fe-10e6-4bba-8ce7-4178dcf75836n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596153 |
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:06:05 AM UTC-5, Forest Vaccaro wrote: [George Hammond MS physics] Hey NYMSHIFTER "Forest Vaccaro" – keep political trash off this thread George . . [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS – – TO PROF. A.C. BOWDEN] Hello Prof. Athel C. Bowden – .... Look – the only thing that counts in this discussion is how much EDUCATION one has. . Both you, and me, have spent upwards of 100,000 hours studying and researching academic Science. . You are an CHEMISTRY expert. I am a PHYSICS expert. In addition to that I happen to be a PSYCHOMETRY expert. . All of these accomplishments require an IQ well above 140, and DECADES of concentrated study. . Ad hominem discussion is hardly a substitute for technical expertise. . MEANWHILE – The entire human race is arguing over whether or not there is a REAL GOD . THE EXPERTS (the Vatican for instance) are absolutely convinced is there is a real God – but they can't SCIENTIFICALLY PROVE IT . Many people think That a Scientific Proof of God is IMPOSSIBLE although Newton, Descartes, Leibniz and many others thought it possible . .................. and it certainly is POSSIBLE . And it turns out that: – . GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME . |a².o...o....o..| |o..a²..o....o..| = THE (highly curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD. |o..o...a²...o..| |o..o...o.-1/a²| . The proof is SIMPLE in physics terms – but it is massive and expensive in Psychological terms. . Fortunately for us – Hammond has provided the simple scientific explanation whille ACADEMIC PSYCHOLOGY has spent 50 years and $50 million dollars funding a worldwide PSYCHOMETRIC ARMY of 1,000 PhD's in 20 countries using desktop computers DISCOVERING the top EIGENVECTOR In Personality and Intelligence testing – and dubbed it the "GFP" (General Factor of Psychology)" – – and what I have proved is that the GFP is actually The God of the Bible – – EVEN THOUGH THE PSYCHOLOGISTS DON'T REALIZE IT !!!! . For Pete's sake ATHEL – an intelligent and experienced scientific mind like yours is DESPERATELY NEEDED to help obtain a coherent assessment of this discovery !. . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 19:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tlr6p3$12rn3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #596168 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:06:05 AM UTC-5, Forest Vaccaro wrote: > [George Hammond MS physics] > Hey NYMSHIFTER "Forest Vaccaro" – keep political trash off this thread > George . [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS – – TO PROF. A.C. BOWDEN] > Hello Prof. Athel C. Bowden – > .... Look – the only thing that counts in this discussion is how much > EDUCATION one has. it has nothing to do with politics, old friend, but with some real bombs, as those used by your shithole of a country, destroying energy pipelines to an entire continent. Can't you see it coming? As those dropped over Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Hiroshima and Nagasak. You repulsive impertinent nazi sons of the bitches.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-25 14:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0010bcff-434e-4eb5-bae8-cbb0f2206aban@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596173 |
On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 2:58:30 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > > > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:06:05 AM UTC-5, Forest Vaccaro wrote: > > [George Hammond MS physics] > > Hey NYMSHIFTER "Forest Vaccaro" – keep political trash off this thread > > George . . [Micheal Agnelli] > real bombs, as those used by your shithole of a country, destroying > energy pipelines to an entire continent. . [George Hammond MS physics USA] .... Listen you technical flunky moron – the Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP! There are thousands of fishing boats with fish finding depth sounder ONBOARD SONAR that could EASILY locate that 3 foot diameter concrete encased gas pipeline at 150 feet and drop an easily obtained $500 World War II surplus DEPTH CHARGE on it – it was OBVIOUSLY done by a single LONE WILDCARD HOMEGROWN TERRORIST who owns a fishing boat on the Baltic Sea – and he probably put a 2 or 3 day timer on it to cover his getaway ! ..... The idea that ANY NATIONAL GOVERNMENT did it – IS NOT BELIEVABLE !! Wise up – and get real ! George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web