Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594043 > unrolled thread
| Started by | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-10-23 18:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2022-10-28 10:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 183 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 18:11 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 14:25 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 20:42 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 21:33 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 21:13 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 15:55 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 22:34 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 19:22 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 03:35 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-24 13:46 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 11:26 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-24 21:04 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 17:43 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-25 14:42 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-25 17:52 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:20 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:17 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 22:38 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 14:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 14:14 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 13:17 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 14:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 22:04 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 02:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 12:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 18:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 10:56 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 15:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 17:16 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-14 06:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-14 21:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 04:31 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 11:44 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-15 13:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 13:53 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 10:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-16 10:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 11:18 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-18 09:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jules Scotti <ujsl@ocjssuis.os> - 2022-11-19 15:08 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 10:27 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 11:50 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 13:31 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 15:57 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 17:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 11:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 14:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 15:06 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 19:53 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 16:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 12:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-23 15:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-24 16:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 14:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 15:05 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 11:26 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 19:58 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:07 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:41 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:46 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 16:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:28 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 16:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:40 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 18:06 -0800
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 13:56 +0000
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 14:00 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 09:36 -0800
Re: uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth - FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 18:40 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-11-25 14:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-25 21:10 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:26 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-25 20:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 10:04 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 19:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 12:08 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 10:34 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-28 14:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 22:47 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 00:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 01:48 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 17:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 10:44 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 18:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Finis Mari <fmnf@isiifain.ii> - 2022-11-29 21:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:36 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Lee Barsetti <erre@battaete.tr> - 2022-11-29 21:10 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:34 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 13:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-29 22:16 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 10:45 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 15:33 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 13:23 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 16:46 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-30 16:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-02 21:14 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-03 02:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-12-01 09:09 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-01 00:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 00:29 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 15:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-18 23:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 23:47 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 12:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-19 12:51 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 22:55 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-20 06:30 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:22 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:41 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 21:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 07:43 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-12-23 13:28 -0600
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 13:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-24 13:39 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 20:41 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 21:37 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:36 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 08:23 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 19:43 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 12:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 20:57 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 15:54 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 19:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 20:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 22:21 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 23:56 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-28 11:46 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 06:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 14:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:38 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 20:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 04:42 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-21 09:03 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 00:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-21 09:45 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 03:54 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-11-21 20:16 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 14:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 23:14 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 23:25 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 03:43 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:36 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 11:51 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 10:51 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-25 18:06 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 21:32 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 22:07 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 01:39 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-26 11:20 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 18:31 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-26 23:47 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 11:15 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 11:23 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-27 12:31 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 17:23 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-28 10:21 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 07:02 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-28 16:49 +0200
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-28 19:16 +0200
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 18:56 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-28 21:03 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-31 06:25 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Buddie Fiore <inbe@iieuedi.du> - 2022-10-31 15:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 20:19 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 09:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 17:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 12:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 20:19 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 14:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 14:33 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-09 15:18 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 17:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-10 07:42 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 05:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:08 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-28 10:09 -0700
Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 Next page →
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-27 17:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <430792a7-d119-4f9c-bea7-f7d6cce10b1cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594276 |
On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:30:52 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: > Can you explain what you wrote: "just before you die and downloads a > 3-year afterlife dream" > > i'm not dat smart... > -- [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] . .... Okay Starmaker, you have asked: – . [STARMAKER]: – "what do you mean when you say: – "just before you die it (the brain) downloads a 3-year afterlife dream" . [HAMMOND]: – .... On my academia.edu website located at: – https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond . You will find one of my papers entitled: – . A simple "airbag" theory of Life After Death: – https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_simple_airbag_theory_of_Life_After_Death . It is LARGE PRINT – ILLUSTRATED – only 2 pages long and this paper will explain to you how LIFE AFTER DEATH actually works (if it exists) – and as I explained – – In my scientific opinion the ODDS are above 1 in 3 that it actually does exist ! . To clarify that – I maintain that the EXISTENCE of God has been scientifically proven to a 100% certainty – but the scientific chances of the existence of "Life after Death" SCIENTIFICALLY appears to be about "1 chance in 3", at the present time; in my professional opinion ! . But figure it out – if someone told you the chances of your next automobile trip ending in a head-on collision was 1 chance in 3 – you certainly would drive goddamed carefully ! George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-28 10:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tjgaer$31g9m$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #594290 |
George Hammond wrote: >> i'm not dat smart... >> -- > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > .... Okay Starmaker, you have asked: – > [STARMAKER]: – "what do you mean when you say: – > "just before you die it (the brain) downloads a 3-year afterlife dream" amazing, none of the brainwashed capitalists from america are protesting against the bidans private war in nazi "uKraine", using the military apparatus industrial complex of the big america. The bidans owned nazi "uKraine" before the war, my friend. His son was about to go in prison in "uKraine", saved by his father, illegally dismissing the judges from the process. So you are committing a crime then you dismiss the judges, what the fuck is that?? Where are all those good americans, from the movies, western, avatar, scifi and crap, not out being protesting, having a guy using their military for a 100% private case of owning a wannabe country in europe. With, an immediate danger of atomic war. Where are you guys, not out, protesting?? Ben Shapiro FINALLY Realizes mRNA Jabs are Bad https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/video/pt9Bjtu6ROPk/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-28 07:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3960003c-7608-4b55-b63d-3459ac68d76cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594290 |
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] ..... STARMAKER: – I hope you've read my paper: . https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_simple_airbag_theory_of_Life_After_Death . .... I sent this paper to STUART HAMEROFF HIMSELF who is the world's leading authority on MICROTUBULES – and he sent me back this EMAIL – . Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:43:23 -0700 From: Stuart Hameroff, U. Arizona .. Subject: Re: (fwd) A Scientifically Competent ...........Religious Question for Stuart Hameroff To: George Hammond Cc: Frank Tipler, Tulane U. Dear George Hammond: I believe downloading and Afterlife are possible. Stuart Hameroff .. So as you can see – the world's leading authority on microtubules believes that my theory of Life after Death is "POSSIBLE" !!! George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-28 16:49 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <js28g3Fq0jsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #594318 |
On 2022-10-28 14:02:35 +0000, George Hammond said: > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > ..... STARMAKER: – I hope you've read my paper: > . > https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_simple_airbag_theory_of_Life_After_Death > . > .... I sent this paper to STUART HAMEROFF HIMSELF who is > the world's leading authority on MICROTUBULES – and hesent me back this EMAIL – > . > Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:43:23 -0700 > From: Stuart Hameroff, U. Arizona > .. Subject: Re: (fwd) A Scientifically Competent...........Religious > Question for Stuart Hameroff > To: George Hammond > Cc: Frank Tipler, Tulane U. > Dear George Hammond: > I believe downloading and Afterlife are possible. > Stuart Hameroff > .. > So as you can see – the world's leading authority on microtubules > believes that my theory of Life after Death is "POSSIBLE" !!! > George On what basis do you describe Stuart Hameroff as "the world's leading authority on microtubules"? He's far from being the most highly cited, and people like Charles Cantor and Marc Kirschner are far better known. Copying the message to Frank Tipler should ring loud bells. -- Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-28 19:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <js2h3vFr9ktU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #594321 |
On 2022-10-28 14:49:39 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said: > On 2022-10-28 14:02:35 +0000, George Hammond said: > >> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] >> ..... STARMAKER: – I hope you've read my paper: >> . >> https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_simple_airbag_theory_of_Life_After_Death >> . >> .... I sent this paper to STUART HAMEROFF HIMSELF who is >> the world's leading authority on MICROTUBULES – and hesent me back this EMAIL – >> . >> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:43:23 -0700 >> From: Stuart Hameroff, U. Arizona >> .. Subject: Re: (fwd) A Scientifically Competent...........Religious >> Question for Stuart Hameroff >> To: George Hammond >> Cc: Frank Tipler, Tulane U. >> Dear George Hammond: >> I believe downloading and Afterlife are possible. >> Stuart Hameroff >> .. >> So as you can see – the world's leading authority on microtubules >> believes that my theory of Life after Death is "POSSIBLE" !!! >> George > > On what basis do you describe Stuart Hameroff as "the world's leading > authority on microtubules"? He's far from being the most highly cited, > and people like Charles Cantor and Marc Kirschner are far better known. > Copying the message to Frank Tipler should ring loud bells. I have just checked. Only 831 papers on microtubules have been cited more than Hameroff's paper of 2014, his best-known work on this topic. Not especially impressive. -- Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-28 18:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3d6129fc-7c28-4d35-a334-54e209ca4490n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594326 |
On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:16:49 PM UTC-4, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2022-10-28 14:49:39 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said: > > > > > On what basis do you describe Stuart Hameroff as "the world's leading > > authority on microtubules"? He's far from being the most highly cited, > > and people like Charles Cantor and Marc Kirschner are far better known. > > Copying the message to Frank Tipler should ring loud bells. >> > I have just checked. Only 831 papers on microtubules have been cited > more than Hameroff's paper of 2014, his best-known work on this topic. > Not especially impressive. > > -- [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] . Dear Prof. Athel Bowden, . You've published 200 papers and 9 textbooks and and are at home in the academic fortresses of formality. . Sci.physics.relativity (SPR) is unmoderated and wide open to rude, lowbrow hecklers and diverse mental cases. . I absolutely STAND CORRECTED that Dr. Stuart Hameroff M.D. is not the "world's leading authority on microtubules" he is in fact the world's leading authority on: ................. "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS" but in this checkered Internet milieu I simply thought it was unnecessary to add the word "Consciousness". I had no idea that a professionally educated academic authority such as yourself would be anywhere near this discussion thread. . Stuart Hameroff is cofounder and DIRECTOR of the Center for Consciousness at the University of Arizona where he holds the rank of Professor Of Anesthesiology. .... He is widely known for his collaboration with Sir Roger Penrose on the creation of the "Orch-Or" model of Consciousness. And he first obtained notoriety in 1998 with his publication of this paper in 1998 – . Quantum computation in brain microtubules? The Penrose–Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ model of consciousness . In the philosophical transactions Of the Royal Society of London which put him, Roger Penrose, and microtubules on the front pages of worldwide "Consciousness" studies ! ..... Meanwhile, he's been on global television numerous times, has given thousands of lectures at major world universities and has been cited many times by Roger Penrose in his best-selling books. In fact, at one time Penrose and Hameroff were being referred to as the "Odd Couple" in scientific circles ! George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-28 21:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <635CA607.6ADE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #594349 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:16:49 PM UTC-4, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > On 2022-10-28 14:49:39 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said: > > > > > > > > On what basis do you describe Stuart Hameroff as "the world's leading > > > authority on microtubules"? He's far from being the most highly cited, > > > and people like Charles Cantor and Marc Kirschner are far better known. > > > Copying the message to Frank Tipler should ring loud bells. > >> > > I have just checked. Only 831 papers on microtubules have been cited > > more than Hameroff's paper of 2014, his best-known work on this topic. > > Not especially impressive. > > > > -- > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > . > Dear Prof. Athel Bowden, > . > You've published 200 papers and 9 textbooks and and are > at home in the academic fortresses of formality. > . > Sci.physics.relativity (SPR) is unmoderated and wide open to > rude, lowbrow hecklers and diverse mental cases. > . > I absolutely STAND CORRECTED that Dr. Stuart Hameroff M.D. > is not the "world's leading authority on microtubules" he is in > fact the world's leading authority on: > ................. "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS" > but in this checkered Internet milieu I simply thought it was > unnecessary to add the word "Consciousness". I had no idea > that a professionally educated academic authority such as yourself > would be anywhere near this discussion thread. > . > Stuart Hameroff is cofounder and DIRECTOR of the > Center for Consciousness at the University of Arizona where he > holds the rank of Professor Of Anesthesiology. > .... He is widely known for his collaboration with Sir Roger Penrose > on the creation of the "Orch-Or" model of Consciousness. And he > first obtained notoriety in 1998 with his publication of this paper > in 1998 – > . > Quantum computation in brain microtubules? > The Penrose–Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ model > of consciousness > . > In the philosophical transactions Of the Royal Society of London > which put him, Roger Penrose, and microtubules on the front pages > of worldwide "Consciousness" studies ! > ..... Meanwhile, he's been on global television numerous times, has > given thousands of lectures at major world universities and has been > cited many times by Roger Penrose in his best-selling books. > In fact, at one time Penrose and Hameroff were being referred to > as the "Odd Couple" in scientific circles ! > George Tell Prof. Athel Bowden that I said he can go fuck his mother! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-31 06:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <364ed066-3205-409b-a5b5-229a4aa24891n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594354 |
On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 12:02:37 AM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > > > > On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:16:49 PM UTC-4, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > On 2022-10-28 14:49:39 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said: > > > > > > > > > > > On what basis do you describe Stuart Hameroff as "the world's leading > > > > authority on microtubules"? He's far from being the most highly cited, > > > > and people like Charles Cantor and Marc Kirschner are far better known. > > > > Copying the message to Frank Tipler should ring loud bells. > > >> > > > I have just checked. Only 831 papers on microtubules have been cited > > > more than Hameroff's paper of 2014, his best-known work on this topic. > > > Not especially impressive. > > > > > > -- > > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > > . > > Dear Prof. Athel Bowden, > > . > > You've published 200 papers and 9 textbooks and and are > > at home in the academic fortresses of formality. > > . > > Sci.physics.relativity (SPR) is unmoderated and wide open to > > rude, lowbrow hecklers and diverse mental cases. > > . > > I absolutely STAND CORRECTED that Dr. Stuart Hameroff M.D. > > is not the "world's leading authority on microtubules" he is in > > fact the world's leading authority on: > > ................. "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS" > > but in this checkered Internet milieu I simply thought it was > > unnecessary to add the word "Consciousness". I had no idea > > that a professionally educated academic authority such as yourself > > would be anywhere near this discussion thread. > > . > > Stuart Hameroff is cofounder and DIRECTOR of the > > Center for Consciousness at the University of Arizona where he > > holds the rank of Professor Of Anesthesiology. > > .... He is widely known for his collaboration with Sir Roger Penrose > > on the creation of the "Orch-Or" model of Consciousness. And he > > first obtained notoriety in 1998 with his publication of this paper > > in 1998 – > > . > > Quantum computation in brain microtubules? > > The Penrose–Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ model > > of consciousness > > . > > In the philosophical transactions Of the Royal Society of London > > which put him, Roger Penrose, and microtubules on the front pages > > of worldwide "Consciousness" studies ! > > ..... Meanwhile, he's been on global television numerous times, has > > given thousands of lectures at major world universities and has been > > cited many times by Roger Penrose in his best-selling books. > > In fact, at one time Penrose and Hameroff were being referred to > > as the "Odd Couple" in scientific circles ! .> > George > >[Starmaker] > Tell Prof. Athel Bowden that I said he can go fuck his mother! > -- [Hammond] Easy for you to say !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Buddie Fiore <inbe@iieuedi.du> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-31 15:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tjoqsf$hapb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #594495 |
George Hammond wrote: >>[Starmaker] >> Tell Prof. Athel Bowden that I said he can go fuck his mother! >> -- > [Hammond] > Easy for you to say
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-07 20:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1e4b4542-3ab2-4f97-afe4-807f999f4d75n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594497 |
On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 11:50:42 AM UTC-4, Buddie Fiore wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > > Easy for you to say . . [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | ...= ..THE METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a²| . (Derivation is given at: – DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity) https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ . plugging this metric into a MAXIMA relativity computer program and you get the following results: – . THE RIEMANN TENSOR is NONZERO THE EINSTEIN TENSOR is NONZERO THE SCALAR CURVATURE is NONZERO . and in fact all 3 of these quantities are proportional to (da/dt)^2 which is about 5%/year for a growing child. Hammond realized that this is an – ENORMOUS SPACETIME CURVATURE by ordinary Relativity standards ! A near BLACK HOLE size curvature! . The MAXIMA computer printout can be seen here: https://www.academia.edu/82105046/MAXIMA_curvature_calculation . Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) and that: – . GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME . .... Meanwhile, I had long since published the foundation of my theory in the peer reviewed literature: – . Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167 Elsevier Scientific Ltd. 1994 . https://tinyurl.com/2wnrjht3 . . Maybe you-all (on alt.philosophy.debate) should try suing Elsevier Scientific Ltd. who published my work – and who is the world's largest scientific publisher !! YOU'D LOOK PRETTY FUNNY TRYING !! . You (Jeffrey Rubard) have posted the same heckling comments to Matt Faunce whose IQ is twice yours Matt Faunce pointed out that my "Scientific Proof of God" is entirely supported by WILLIAM JAMES in his historic statement: – . [Matt Faunce posted to George Hammond on alt.philosophy.debate:] ...I think this quote by William James fits your theory. [William James wrote:] “[T]he theologian’s contention that the religious man is moved by an external power is vindicated, for it is one of the peculiarities of invasions from the subconscious region to take on objective appearances, and to suggest to the Subject an external control. In the religious life the control is felt as ‘higher’; but since on our hypothesis it is primarily the higher faculties of our own hidden mind which are controlling, the sense of union with the power beyond us is a sense of something, not merely apparently, but literally true.” –William James, in The Varieties of Religious Experience, Lecture XX, (paragraph 512). . . So you may not believe my theory – but WILLIAM JAMES certainly believed it – even though he couldn't prove it 120 years ago – but now HAMMOND has actually scientifically PROVED IT !! . GO FLY A KITE "JEFFREY RHUBARB" . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-08 09:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2f2d6a01-9610-4606-868e-420ca7ae7fb5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594942 |
On Monday, November 7, 2022 at 11:19:46 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote: > On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 11:50:42 AM UTC-4, Buddie Fiore wrote: > > George Hammond wrote: > > > Easy for you to say > . > . > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | ...= ..THE METRIC OF GOD > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > . > (Derivation is given at: – > DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity) > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ > . > plugging this metric into > a MAXIMA relativity computer program and > you get the following results: – > . > THE RIEMANN TENSOR is NONZERO > THE EINSTEIN TENSOR is NONZERO > THE SCALAR CURVATURE is NONZERO > . > and in fact all 3 of these quantities are > proportional to (da/dt)^2 which is about > 5%/year for a growing child. > Hammond realized that this is an – > ENORMOUS SPACETIME CURVATURE > by ordinary Relativity standards ! > A near BLACK HOLE size curvature! > . > The MAXIMA computer printout can be seen here: > https://www.academia.edu/82105046/MAXIMA_curvature_calculation > . > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first > Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) and that: – > . > GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE > OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME > . > .... Meanwhile, I had long since published the foundation of my theory > in the peer reviewed literature: – > . > Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory > New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167 > Elsevier Scientific Ltd. 1994 > . > https://tinyurl.com/2wnrjht3 > . > . > Maybe you-all (on alt.philosophy.debate) should try suing Elsevier Scientific Ltd. > who published my work – and > who is the world's largest scientific publisher !! > YOU'D LOOK PRETTY FUNNY TRYING !! > . > You (Jeffrey Rubard) have posted the same heckling comments to Matt Faunce > whose IQ is twice yours > > Matt Faunce pointed out that my "Scientific Proof of God" is entirely > supported by WILLIAM JAMES in his historic statement: – > . > [Matt Faunce posted to George Hammond on alt.philosophy.debate:] > ...I think this quote by William James fits your theory. > > [William James wrote:] > “[T]he theologian’s contention that the religious man is moved by an > external power is vindicated, for it is one of the peculiarities of > invasions from the subconscious region to take on objective appearances, > and to suggest to the Subject an external control. In the religious life > the control is felt as ‘higher’; but since on our hypothesis it is > primarily the higher faculties of our own hidden mind which are > controlling, the sense of union with the power beyond us is a sense of > something, not merely apparently, but literally true.” > > –William James, in The Varieties of Religious Experience, Lecture XX, > (paragraph 512). > . > . > So you may not believe my theory – but WILLIAM JAMES certainly > believed it – even though he couldn't prove it 120 years ago – > but now HAMMOND has actually scientifically PROVED IT !! > . > GO FLY A KITE "JEFFREY RHUBARB" > . > George . . [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] . .... Above I have written down my discovery of the GOD METRIC: – . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a²| . And have cited its SIMPLE DERIVATION. . ... But as any Wag will tell you – it would take far more than that to convince anyone that it was actually "God". . .... Well for those Skeptics let me inform you that THERE IS A LOT MORE – and it comes from the 50 year Global research in 20 languages of a 1,000 man Academic Psychology Army, using desktop computers resulting in a peer – published literature large enough to fill a major library – and costing an estimated $50,000,000 ! .......... AND THE RESULT OF THAT – is superbly summarized, and entertainingly pedagogically presented by ME in this now famous 10 minute YouTube video: – . WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD .......https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk ................(YouTube 12-min) . .... SO YES – it turns out an intrepid physicist George Hammond heading up an army of 1,000 PhD Psychologists has actually DISCOVERED THE WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD . And it turns out that: – . GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME . And is currently measurable to a 2 decimal point accuracy in SI units! . Richard Dawkins: – you owe me a bottle of champagne ! . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-08 17:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tke4sp$3v3bg$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #594975 |
George Hammond wrote: > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > .... Above I have written down my discovery of the GOD METRIC: – > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > And have cited its SIMPLE DERIVATION. what kind of tensor is that? That's not even a matrix, let alone a tensor. You don't undrestand your tensors, my friend. Nor did Einstine, so you are equal.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-08 12:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b427110f-f4fa-4ab0-bdc4-9acb83e36997n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594976 |
On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 12:50:20 PM UTC-5, Everly Segreti wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > > > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > > .... Above I have written down my discovery of the GOD METRIC: – > > |a² o o o. | > > |o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD > > |o o a² o. | > > |ooo-1/a²| > > And have cited its SIMPLE DERIVATION. > > > [Everly Segreti] > what kind of tensor is that? That's not even a matrix, let alone a tensor. > You don't undrestand your tensors, my friend. Nor did Einstine, so you are > equal. . [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] .... On a scale of (0–100) you get 80 POINTS for simply being responsible enough to respond !! Most readers get a big fat goose egg = 0 !! .. ... As all qualified physicists know, a 2nd rank tensor is commonly represented as a matrix therefore g^uv the "metric tensor" of flat Cartesian space-time is commonly represented as a 4 x 4 matrix: – . |1000..| |0100. | = g^uv |0010. | |000-1 | . ... Likewise therefore it is correct for me to write the METRIC OF GOD as: – . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a²| . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-08 20:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tkedla$3vq68$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #594942 |
George Hammond wrote: > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific Proof > of God (SPOG) and that: – > GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as different from *objective*?? ? Western media praise Ukrainian Azov soldier known for promoting Nazism http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/EjWlgrHw0NUe/ Pentagon terrorists admit direct involvement in war in Ukraine http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/J8jktlZzc3YS/ American Instructors Train AFU To ＂Nato Standards＂ (How To Die Like Cowards) http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/21OlRL7tvRA2/ AFU Racist Ukrainian Nazi's Beat Black American Mercenary On Their Own Side http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/sPw7rZKVyJ2x/ American tiktok brigade http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/yyYFis82zvjo/ The United States is giving Ukraine almost $2.5 million an hour, http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/L8vugAnuB30H/ Footage emerges of Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) DETAINING 9 Ukrainian saboteurs http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/jeFPGiyEiLVG/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-08 14:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b805c7cf-99da-4089-816b-b179319800afn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594988 |
On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 3:19:57 PM UTC-5, Everly Segreti wrote: > George Hammond wrote: > > > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific Proof > > of God (SPOG) and that: – > > > > GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME > >[Everly Segreti] > I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as > different from *objective*?? ? > > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] . .... I am giving you another 20 points for simply being the first person to actually ask: – "what is subjective spacetime" I've talked to 10,000 people – and you're the first one to ask THE MOST OBVIOUS QUESTION !!!! Maybe you're a genius ! Either that or a high-ranking authority ! . OBJECTIVE of space-time is measured by CLOCKS and RULERS and is the same for everyone irregardless of age. . SUBJECTIVE space-time varies drastically with age for instance: – a 6 month old baby looks up at the bottom of the kitchen table while an 18-year-old standing nearby looks down at the top of the table! . The table looks (subjectively) at least 3 or 4 times larger to the 6-month-old than it does to the 18-year-old ! . Likewise, the speed of motion (any motion) looks 3 or 4 times faster to the 6-month-old than it does to the 18-year-old because his perceptual speed is likewise 3 or 4 times SLOWER than an adult. This of course is again simply because GROWTH and in this case, of brain growth.. . This magnification factor (scale factor) is called a (t) similar to FRIEDMANS famous 1922 "scale factor" for the expansion of the universe. . In the "phenomenon of God" the scale factor a (t) begins at 3.5 at birth and CONTRACTS down to 1.8 at age 18 to 20 years old. . So while the FRIEDMAN METRIC of astrophysics is: – . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = THE FRIEDMANN METRIC OF ASTROPHYSICS |o o a² o. | |o o o..-1.| . And the OBJECTIVE universe EXPANDS; . The metric of God is given by: – . a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a²| . And the SUBJECTIVE universe CONTRACTS as we grow up ! . .... This is all because "length" in SUBJECTIVE space-time is measured by the size of your foot: – which varies with age. .... And time is measured by your own "perceptual speed" which likewise similarly varies with age under the age of 20 ! . .... "God" comes into the picture because no one ever reaches "full 100% growth": – the world population average for adults is only around 85%: – which causes every adult to see a world that is 15% LARGER and 15% FASTER than it actually (objectively) is ! SOME MORE – SOME LESS (some people are closer to God than others (elected officials, movie stars, CEOs, 5 star generals, etc. etc.: –And this phenomenon is called "GOD"! . I hope this answers your question – . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-09 14:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <636C2AD1.2F91@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #594988 |
Everly Segreti wrote: > > George Hammond wrote: > > > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific Proof > > of God (SPOG) and that: – > > GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME > > I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as > different from *objective*?? ? *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-09 15:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2c2f5624-dfb1-404e-b4f1-69b36a4403b4n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #595065 |
On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 5:33:31 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field. > -- > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] . WRONG: – – STARMAKER – "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" can be measured to 2 decimal point accuracy in SI units (MKS units). . That means "Subjective Space-Time" is a PHYSICS MEASUREMENT, and not a "Philosophical Quantity". . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-09 17:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <636C4EEF.4FA6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #595070 |
George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 5:33:31 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.
> > --
> >
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .
> WRONG: – – STARMAKER – "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" can be measured
> to 2 decimal point accuracy in SI units (MKS units).
> .
> That means "Subjective Space-Time" is a PHYSICS MEASUREMENT,
> and not a "Philosophical Quantity".
> .
> George
Maybe you no speaky good inglish...so let's start wit de furst werd...
Subjective...
have you ever looked up the meaning?
Subjective:
based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.
"his views are highly subjective"
synonyms: personal, personalized, individual, internal, emotional, instinctive, intuitive, impressionistic, biased, prejudiced, bigoted, idiosyncratic, irrational, gut, gut reaction
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gbv=2&sxsrf=ALiCzsa6VcWdmdeJ-cjoKm7_vq90b8UyKA%3A1668040636721&q=define+subjective
1 - philosophy : relating to the way a person experiences things in his or her own mind
subjective reality
Dreaming is a subjective experience.
https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/subjective
You're dreaming. WAKEUP WAKEUP! TECH SUPPORT, TECH SUPPORT!!
Physics, in general, can define, explain and measure only the objective component. The subjective component is not a subject of physics and similar sciences.
Subjective means making assumptions, making interpretations based on personal opinions without any verifiable facts.
Subjective measurement is more of an opinion.
In other words, you need to take your "Subjective Space-Time" and throw it where it belongs...in the garbage can. It's garbage!
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-10 07:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tkia1u$gjlr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #595065 |
The Starmaker wrote: > Everly Segreti wrote: >> George Hammond wrote: >> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific >> > Proof of God (SPOG) and that: â GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN >> > CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME >> >> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as >> different from *objective*?? ? > > *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more > into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field. sure. The WEF’s Stakeholder Capitalism Is Just Global Fascism By Another Name https://%7a%65%72%6f%68%65%64%67%65.com/geopolitical/wefs-stakeholder-capitalism-just-global-fascism-another-name Mussolini’s fascism is at the root of the very corporate governance that leftists applaud and lust after today. They have far more in common with fascists than they realize. The Allied Holocaust in Dresden https://%76%65%74%65%72%61%6e%73%74%6f%64%61%79.com/2022/11/08/the-allied-holocaust-in-dresden/ Revealed: Documents Show Bill Gates Has Given $319 Million to Media Outlets https://%74%68%65%74%72%75%74%68%73%65%65%6b%65r.co.uk/?p=260949
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-10 05:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9b8b8ea1-37c9-4950-a2d1-8c5ba8fbe993n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #595093 |
On Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 2:42:57 AM UTC-5, Everly Segreti wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: > > Everly Segreti wrote: > >> George Hammond wrote: > >> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific > >> > Proof of God (SPOG) and that: – GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN > >> > CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME > >> > >> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as > >> different from *objective*?? ? > > > > *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more > > into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field. > > > [George E Hammond MS physics] . Okay, we have (above) 2 comments: – . one comment by – EVERLY SEGRETI and one comment by – STARMAKER . ... Note that Srgreti's comment is "Scientific" while Starmaker's comment is "Philosophical" . To be noted here is that "Starmaker" takes his Pseudonym from Olaf Stapledon's famous 1937 Science-Fiction Bible entitled "Star Maker" – so he's a Science-Fiction buff and not a scientist ! .... On the other hand Segreti's question indicates that he has some classical Scientific education ! . So let me scientifically answer Segreti's question: – . WHAT ON EARTH IS "SUBJFECTIVE SPACETIME" ? . ..... And I have already illustrated what "SUBJECTIVE SPACE" is by pointing out the difference between a 6 month old child looking up at the BOTTOM of a kitchen table as compared to an 18-year-old looking down at the TOP of the table ! .... Obviously – the TABLE looks 3 or 4 times LARGER to the 6-month-old than it does to the 18-year-old ! That is an illustration of "Subjective Space". . Okay – so much for "Subjective Space: – now we turn to "Subjective Time". .... Subjective time was first measured by Thomas Edison a 120 years ago when he invented the Movie Projector ! He first discovered that the average adult of average intelligence required a "frame rate" of 16 frames/sec – proving that the "perceptual speed" of the average adult is 16 bits/sec. .... He also discovered that the speed is "age-dependent" for children under 20 years of age. And like INTELLIGENCE it has to be "divided by age" for people under 20 ! .... This was the first scientific proof that "SUBJECTIVE TIME" is age-dependent under 20 years of age – IOW just like SUBJECTIVE SPACE time "contracts" or "slows" with age just like SPACE does – up until the age of 20 ! . OKAY – there you have an explanation, a measurement, and a SCIENTIFIC PROOF of what "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" actually is ! . I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION ! . And as a further final note, I point out that NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH – in fact the world average for adults is only about 85% full growth (according to WHO, UNESCO, and many other world health organizations). . Now: 1/.85 = 1.18 which means that the AVERAGE ADULT actually SEES a World that is 18% LARGER and 18% FASTER then it ACTUALLY IS – – And it is this effect that causes the universal FEAR, TERROR, and ANXIETY universally experienced by every person in the World ! . and this phenomenon is historically referred to as "GOD" – therefore we have now discovered the world's first scientific proof of God !. . George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web