Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594043 > unrolled thread
| Started by | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-10-23 18:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2022-10-28 10:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 183 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 18:11 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 14:25 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 20:42 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 21:33 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 21:13 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 15:55 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 22:34 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-10-24 19:22 +1100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 03:35 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-24 13:46 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 11:26 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-24 21:04 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 17:43 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-25 14:42 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-25 17:52 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:20 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:17 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 22:38 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 14:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 14:14 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 13:17 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 14:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 22:04 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 02:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-11 12:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-11 18:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 10:56 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 15:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-13 17:16 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-14 06:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-14 21:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 04:31 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 11:44 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-15 13:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-15 13:53 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 10:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-16 10:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-16 11:18 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-18 09:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jules Scotti <ujsl@ocjssuis.os> - 2022-11-19 15:08 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 10:27 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 11:50 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 13:31 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-19 15:57 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 17:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 11:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 14:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 15:06 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-20 19:53 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 16:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 12:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-23 15:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-23 23:25 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-24 16:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 14:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Forest Vaccaro <asoa@ctrsreca.vr> - 2022-11-25 15:05 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 11:26 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 19:58 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:07 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:41 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-25 22:46 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 16:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:28 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 16:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 00:40 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 18:06 -0800
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 13:56 +0000
Re: crackpot George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth, FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Micheal Agnelli <algm@lmcemel.ae> - 2022-11-26 14:00 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 09:36 -0800
Re: uneducated troll George Hammond puts the foot in his mouth - FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 18:40 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-11-25 14:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-25 21:10 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-25 14:26 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-25 20:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 10:04 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Coke Alfero <ckao@olfoaree.oe> - 2022-11-26 19:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-26 12:08 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 10:34 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-28 14:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 22:47 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 00:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 01:48 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 17:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 10:44 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Bobby Spanò <byy@bybpbayo.ay> - 2022-11-29 18:56 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Finis Mari <fmnf@isiifain.ii> - 2022-11-29 21:14 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:36 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Lee Barsetti <erre@battaete.tr> - 2022-11-29 21:10 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:35 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:34 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 13:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-29 22:16 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 10:45 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 15:33 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 13:23 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-30 16:46 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-30 16:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-02 21:14 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-03 02:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-12-01 09:09 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-01 00:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-02 00:29 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 15:28 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-18 23:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-18 23:47 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 12:11 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-19 12:51 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-19 22:55 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-20 06:30 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:22 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 09:41 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-20 21:03 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 07:43 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-12-23 13:28 -0600
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 13:12 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-24 13:39 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 20:41 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-23 21:37 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:01 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 22:36 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 08:23 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 19:43 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 12:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 20:57 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 15:54 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 19:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 20:49 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 22:21 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 23:56 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-28 11:46 -0500
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 06:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 14:00 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 15:38 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-29 20:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 04:42 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-21 09:03 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 00:37 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-11-21 09:45 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 03:54 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-11-21 20:16 +0100
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-21 14:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 23:14 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-23 23:25 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 03:43 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-24 11:36 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-24 11:51 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 10:51 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-25 18:06 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 21:32 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-25 22:07 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 01:39 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-26 11:20 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 18:31 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-26 23:47 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 11:15 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 11:23 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-27 12:31 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 17:23 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> - 2022-10-28 10:21 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 07:02 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-28 16:49 +0200
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-28 19:16 +0200
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-28 18:56 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-28 21:03 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-10-31 06:25 -0700
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Buddie Fiore <inbe@iieuedi.du> - 2022-10-31 15:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 20:19 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 09:32 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 17:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 12:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 20:19 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-08 14:02 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 14:33 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-09 15:18 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 17:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-10 07:42 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2022-11-10 05:09 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:08 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:15 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-10-28 10:09 -0700
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-23 18:11 -0700 |
| Subject | FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God |
| Message-ID | <d92c909f-4fb9-4d5a-acb1-1f494fac58efn@googlegroups.com> |
FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God .... By 1922 Albert Einstein's Static Universe was troubled ! It was obvious that iy would collapse. ..A young Russian mathematician – Alexander Friedman – to use Einstein's words – "Found a way out of this". .... Friedman proposed the Universe was EXPANDING He said you could simply multiply the spatial part of Einstein's Metric by an "Expansion Factor a(t)", so that: – . ds²= a(t)²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - c²dt² . .... Finally by 1931 Einstein accepted the idea and today it is known as the FLRW Metric, confirmed by Hubble's red shift measurements – and today the Friedman metric rules all of Modern Astrophysics! .... Tragically, the heroic Friedman died of typhus due to the constant wars in Russia at the time. But recently the polymathic genius American Physicist George E Hammond has discovered that a generalization of the Friedman Metric – actually yields the world's first and only – SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD: . . |a² o o o. | |o a² o o. | = Generalized Friedman Metric |o o a² o. | |ooo-1/a²| . .... The FLRW metric expands space – but it does not affect time! . .... The Generalized Friedman Metric expands BOTH time and space !! . So that it is considerably different from the original1922 Friedman metric – it is simply a 4 dimensional Generalization of it ! . OKAY – I sometimes refer to this metric as the DUTCH WINDMILL METRIC and I have posted this before on SPR – . ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity) https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ . .... And as this above post demonstrates Generalized Friedman Metric describes the effect that human growth has on human SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME – and in fact my 10 minute YouTube video: . – WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD ........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk ................. (YouTube 12-min) . Demonstrates how 1,000 academic Psychometrician's using desktop computers worldwide in 20 languages, for 50 years, have discovered that the top eigenvector in human SUBJECTIVE SPACEATIME (the so-called GFP) is actually the God of the Bible, EVEN THOUGH THEY DON'T REALIZE IT ! . And finally, it is obvious that the above "Generalized Friedman Metric" explains the enigmatic "GFP" of psychology – and proves that it is the God of the Bible – and in fact demonstrates that – . Scientifically prove that there is a REAL GOD – measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy, and – . GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF HUMAN SUBJECTIVE REALITY . George
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-24 14:25 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <jrmeslFnctrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #594043 |
On 24-Oct-22 12:11 pm, George Hammond wrote: > FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God > > .... By 1922 Albert Einstein's Static Universe was troubled ! > It was obvious that iy would collapse. > ..A young Russian mathematician – Alexander Friedman – > to use Einstein's words – "Found a way out of this". > .... Friedman proposed the Universe was EXPANDING > He said you could simply multiply the spatial part of Einstein's > Metric by an "Expansion Factor a(t)", so that: – > . > ds²= a(t)²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - c²dt² > . > .... Finally by 1931 Einstein accepted the idea and today it is > known as the FLRW Metric, confirmed by Hubble's red shift > measurements – and today the Friedman metric rules all of > Modern Astrophysics! > .... Tragically, the heroic Friedman died of typhus due to the constant > wars in Russia at the time. But recently the polymathic genius American > Physicist George E Hammond has discovered that a generalization > of the Friedman Metric – actually yields the world's first and only – > SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD: . > . > |a² o o o. | > |o a² o o. | = Generalized Friedman Metric > |o o a² o. | > |ooo-1/a²| > . > .... The FLRW metric expands space – but it does not affect time! > . > .... The Generalized Friedman Metric expands BOTH time and space !! > . > So that it is considerably different from the original1922 Friedman metric > – it is simply a 4 dimensional Generalization of it ! > . > OKAY – I sometimes refer to this metric as the DUTCH WINDMILL METRIC > and I have posted this before on SPR – > . > ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity) > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ > . > .... And as this above post demonstrates Generalized Friedman Metric describes the effect that human growth has on human SUBJECTIVE > SPACETIME – and in fact my 10 minute YouTube video: > . – > WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD > ........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk > ................. (YouTube 12-min) > . > Demonstrates how 1,000 academic Psychometrician's using desktop > computers worldwide in 20 languages, for 50 years, have discovered > that the top eigenvector in human SUBJECTIVE SPACEATIME (the so-called > GFP) is actually the God of the Bible, > EVEN THOUGH THEY DON'T REALIZE IT ! > . > And finally, it is obvious that the above "Generalized Friedman Metric" > explains the enigmatic "GFP" of psychology – and proves that it is the > God of the Bible – and in fact demonstrates that – > . > Scientifically prove that there is a REAL GOD > – measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy, and – > . > GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF HUMAN SUBJECTIVE REALITY > . > George To the extent that God exists, He would be part of the real universe. Science does not purport to prove things about the real universe, but rather to describe the behaviour of the universe using mathematical models. So science can no more prove the existence of God that it proves anything else about the universe. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-23 20:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <tj51il$1irpn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #594045 |
On 10/23/2022 8:25 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 24-Oct-22 12:11 pm, George Hammond wrote: >> FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God >> >> .... By 1922 Albert Einstein's Static Universe was troubled ! >> It was obvious that iy would collapse. >> ..A young Russian mathematician – Alexander Friedman – >> to use Einstein's words – "Found a way out of this". >> .... Friedman proposed the Universe was EXPANDING >> He said you could simply multiply the spatial part of Einstein's >> Metric by an "Expansion Factor a(t)", so that: – >> . >> ds²= a(t)²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - c²dt² >> . >> .... Finally by 1931 Einstein accepted the idea and today it is >> known as the FLRW Metric, confirmed by Hubble's red shift >> measurements – and today the Friedman metric rules all of >> Modern Astrophysics! >> .... Tragically, the heroic Friedman died of typhus due to the constant >> wars in Russia at the time. But recently the polymathic genius American >> Physicist George E Hammond has discovered that a generalization >> of the Friedman Metric – actually yields the world's first and only – >> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD: . >> . >> |a² o o o. | >> |o a² o o. | = Generalized Friedman Metric >> |o o a² o. | >> |ooo-1/a²| >> . >> .... The FLRW metric expands space – but it does not affect time! >> . >> .... The Generalized Friedman Metric expands BOTH time and space !! >> . >> So that it is considerably different from the original1922 Friedman >> metric >> – it is simply a 4 dimensional Generalization of it ! >> . >> OKAY – I sometimes refer to this metric as the DUTCH WINDMILL METRIC >> and I have posted this before on SPR – >> . >> ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity) >> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ >> . >> .... And as this above post demonstrates Generalized Friedman Metric >> describes the effect that human growth has on human SUBJECTIVE >> SPACETIME – and in fact my 10 minute YouTube video: >> . – >> WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD >> ........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk >> ................. (YouTube 12-min) >> . >> Demonstrates how 1,000 academic Psychometrician's using desktop >> computers worldwide in 20 languages, for 50 years, have discovered >> that the top eigenvector in human SUBJECTIVE SPACEATIME (the so-called >> GFP) is actually the God of the Bible, >> EVEN THOUGH THEY DON'T REALIZE IT ! >> . >> And finally, it is obvious that the above "Generalized Friedman Metric" >> explains the enigmatic "GFP" of psychology – and proves that it is the >> God of the Bible – and in fact demonstrates that – >> . >> Scientifically prove that there is a REAL GOD >> – measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy, and – >> . >> GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF HUMAN SUBJECTIVE REALITY >> . >> George > > To the extent that God exists, He would be part of the real universe. Perhaps in a higher dimension? ;^) > Science does not purport to prove things about the real universe, but > rather to describe the behaviour of the universe using mathematical > models. So science can no more prove the existence of God that it proves > anything else about the universe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-23 21:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8a9ca22e-394b-487c-8cfe-58591dc890cbn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594047 |
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] ..... "Perhaps in a higher dimension?" – – Na, Na, Na,... – This isn't some kind of esoteric "Philawsephy" mumbo-jumbo – this SPOG (Scientific Proof of God) is based on the 50 year, worldwide, results of a 1,000 man PhD Army of Academic Psychometry researchers testing millions of people in 20 languages – they must of spent $50 million dollars doing it – and they discovered that it produces an "eigenvector pyramid" and at the top is a single eigenvector which they have dubbed the "GFP" (Gen. Factor of Psychology) – and they CAN'T FIGURE OUT WHAT IT IS because NONE of them has a degree in PHYSICS ! ..... I'm a physicist and I studied the data for 20 years and finally realized that if you add a tad of Relativistic Physics to the brew – the world's first SPOG drops out of it like a waxed anvil falling from the sky ! It's another "Michael Faraday" type accident – I didn't even believe in God until the today I discovered it !!! George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-23 21:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <238a2e64-d32a-41ca-bc36-ae4a2d074265n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594045 |
On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 11:25:13 PM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > To the extent that God exists, He would be part of the real universe. > Science does not purport to prove things about the real universe, but > rather to describe the behaviour of the universe using mathematical > models. So science can no more prove the existence of God that it proves > anything else about the universe. > > Sylvia. . [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] ..... Yours is not the majority opinion. I am only interested in the majority opinion. Majority opinion at present believes that there is a God – but believes that unlike other facts of life, Science cannot prove it. ..... Well – for 5000 years they were CORRECT – but as of right now they are SCIENTIFICALLY WRONG – because as of right now – what is popularly described as a "scientific proof of God" – has been discovered by SCIENCE. .... The existence of God is no longer a Philosophy argument, or a Theological argument – it is now a "SCIENTIFIC FACT" – measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy ! .... Popular opinion agrees that if you can measure something in SI units, then it EXISTS !! The "Curvature of God" can be measured in MKS units. George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-24 15:55 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <jrmk6tFnctrU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #594048 |
On 24-Oct-22 3:13 pm, George Hammond wrote: > On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 11:25:13 PM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> To the extent that God exists, He would be part of the real universe. >> Science does not purport to prove things about the real universe, but >> rather to describe the behaviour of the universe using mathematical >> models. So science can no more prove the existence of God that it proves >> anything else about the universe. >> >> Sylvia. > . > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > ..... Yours is not the majority opinion. I am only interested in the majority opinion. > Majority opinion at present believes that there is a God – but believes that > unlike other facts of life, Science cannot prove it. > ..... Well – for 5000 years they were CORRECT – but as of right now they are > SCIENTIFICALLY WRONG – because as of right now – what is popularly described > as a "scientific proof of God" – has been discovered by SCIENCE. > .... The existence of God is no longer a Philosophy argument, or a Theological > argument – it is now a "SCIENTIFIC FACT" – measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy ! > .... Popular opinion agrees that if you can measure something in SI units, > then it EXISTS !! The "Curvature of God" can be measured in MKS units. > George Either God exists, or He doesn't. One way or another, it's a fact. Depending on whether the majority opinion accords with the fact, it is either right, or wrong. Facts are not determined by democracy. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-23 22:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <545be673-10e0-4b6d-a701-b0f7130a8d69n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594050 |
On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 12:56:00 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > Either God exists, or He doesn't. One way or another, it's a fact. > Depending on whether the majority opinion accords with the fact, it is > either right, or wrong. > > Facts are not determined by democracy. > > Sylvia. . [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] ..... I agree with you 100% – and I heard Dick Feynman say exactly the same thing ! ..... What I'm here to tell you, is that there is now a rocksolid, "Scientific Proof" that GOD EXISTS – and I'm talking about "THE GOD OF THE BIBLE" – all 1,184 pages – turgid allegorical, metaphorical exposition and all ! No matter the mistakes, obvious exaggerations – and outright misunderstanding and confusion – and probably barefaced lying – the King James Bible is absolutely "Scientifically True" and I'm here to tell you that the discovery of the world's first scientific proof of God – that – – "God is an Einsteinian curvature of subjective spacetime" is now a hard scientific proven fact. The "Rapture of the Church" is historically, scientifically, justified – and I'm talking about the "emotional rapture" of Religion – not the Biblical Rapture which is as yet only a theory ! George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-24 19:22 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <jrn0a8Fpv3gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #594052 |
On 24-Oct-22 4:34 pm, George Hammond wrote: > On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 12:56:00 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> Either God exists, or He doesn't. One way or another, it's a fact. >> Depending on whether the majority opinion accords with the fact, it is >> either right, or wrong. >> >> Facts are not determined by democracy. >> >> Sylvia. > . > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > ..... I agree with you 100% – and I heard Dick Feynman say > exactly the same thing ! > ..... What I'm here to tell you, is that there is now a rocksolid, > "Scientific Proof" that GOD EXISTS – and I'm talking about > "THE GOD OF THE BIBLE" – all 1,184 pages – turgid allegorical, > metaphorical exposition and all ! No matter the mistakes, > obvious exaggerations – and outright misunderstanding and > confusion – and probably barefaced lying – the King James Bible > is absolutely "Scientifically True" and I'm here to tell you that > the discovery of the world's first scientific proof of God – > that – – "God is an Einsteinian curvature of subjective spacetime" > is now a hard scientific proven fact. The "Rapture of the Church" > is historically, scientifically, justified – and I'm talking about the > "emotional rapture" of Religion – not the Biblical Rapture which is > as yet only a theory ! > George You say you agree with me, but then continue with the same nonsense as before. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-24 03:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6166cf99-3764-450a-b8c5-9a8fd37a2144n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594060 |
On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:22:36 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > You say you agree with me, but then continue with the same nonsense as > before. > > Sylvia. . [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] ..... You don't know any Physics, and couldn't define "Eigenvector".. An insolent male is disgusting, but an insolent broad is enough to make one puke ! George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-24 13:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tj6508$1mmjf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #594064 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:22:36 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> You say you agree with me, but then continue with the same nonsense as >> before. Sylvia. > . > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA].. You don't know any > Physics, and couldn't define "Eigenvector".. An insolent male is > disgusting, but an insolent broad is enough to make one puke ! amazing satanist liars, that country is a shithole populated by shit. Something completely wrong with you, mazafaka. Are you humans? Or what the fuck are you?? Who Blew Up Nord Stream Pipelines？ A Mystery! https://www.bitchute.com/video/2SKnhZyJPuzi/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-24 11:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9d54549d-7dc8-44c0-b980-e0fd6312ed2bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594076 |
On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 9:46:51 AM UTC-4, Chase Rossini wrote: > Who Blew Up Nord Stream Pipelines？ A Mystery! . [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA\ .... Hey phony pseudo-anonymous criminal terrorist – I told you before THE BALTIC SEA IS ONLY 150 FEET DEEP Nord Stream was blown up by a $500 WWII surplus depth charge dropped by a fishing boat who located the pipe using his onboard Depth Sounder – it's near impossible to miss a 10 inch pipe at 150 feet. He probably put a 2 day timer on it to cover his getaway! ..... How about talking about something INTERESTING like how a long-suffering Russian mathematics genius discovered the world's first scientific proof of God in 1922 – and died of typhus within 2 years! George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-24 21:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tj6uli$1osp0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #594088 |
George Hammond wrote: > On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 9:46:51 AM UTC-4, Chase Rossini wrote: > >> Who Blew Up Nord Stream Pipelines？ A Mystery! > . > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA\ > .... Hey phony pseudo-anonymous criminal terrorist – I told you before > THE why are you deleting the link to the data, you stupid uneducated son of whore, you can't undrestand americanis, you disgusting liars and murderers planetary scale.Something completely wrong with you, mazafaka. Are you humans? Or what the fuck are you?? Who Blew Up Nord Stream Pipelines？ A Mystery! https://www.bitchute.com/video/2SKnhZyJPuzi/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-24 17:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <892a5645-16ce-42ae-a32a-99ccd88e4e56n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594097 |
On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:04:53 PM UTC-4, Chase Rossini wrote: > > > >> Who Blew Up Nord Stream Pipelines？ A Mystery! > > . [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA\ .... Hey phony pseudo-anonymous criminal terrorist – I told you before ..............THE BALTIC SEA IS ONLY 150 FOOT DEEP Nord Stream was blown up by a $500 WWII surplus depth charge dropped by a fishing boat who located the pipe using his onboard Depth Sounder – it's near impossible to miss a 10 inch pipe at 150 feet. He probably put a 2 day timer on it to cover his getaway! . ..... How about talking about something INTERESTING like how a long-suffering Russian mathematics genius discovered the world's first scientific proof of God in 1922 – and died of typhus within 2 years! . .....BTW, what PRISON you posting from- La Sante or San Vittore ? Watch your language stooge- the warden will shut off your IP. George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chase Rossini <asoi@riisscss.ho> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-25 14:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tj8sju$21b5s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #594115 |
George Hammond wrote: > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA\ > .... Hey phony pseudo-anonymous criminal terrorist – I told you before > ..............THE BALTIC SEA IS ONLY 150 FOOT DEEP Nord Stream was blown > up by a $500 WWII surplus depth charge dropped by a fishing boat who get the feck out of here. This constituent is 80 years old and lying. Get the feck out of here. You are disgusting. 80 years old and lying. Who Blew Up Nord Stream Pipelines？ A Mystery! https://www.bitchute.com/video/2SKnhZyJPuzi/ 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-25 17:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <397d2498-d2c5-4af2-abc8-197ec96153cfn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594144 |
On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 10:42:08 AM UTC-4, Chase Rossini wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > [George E Hammond MS physics USA\]
> > .... Hey phony pseudo-anonymous criminal terrorist – I told you before
> > ..............THE BALTIC SEA IS ONLY 150 FOOT DEEP Nord Stream was blown
> > up by a $500 WWII surplus depth charge dropped by a fishing boat who
>
[Chase Rossini (phony name)]
> get the feck out of here. This constituent is 80 years old and lying. Get
> the feck out of here. You are disgusting. 80 years old and lying.
.
[George Hammond MS physics, USA]
Hey – listen to common sense: –
1. Russia didn't do it – they wouldn't bomb their own pipeline!
2. Zelinski didn't do it – he wouldn't cut off heating gas to the
countries that are supplying him weapons and taking in
many thousands of refugees from his country!
3. No other Baltic country would do it – for the same reasons!
4. Neither would any NATO country – because they need the heating gas too.
.
So – that means a WILDCARD LONE TERRORIST who owns a fishing boat
on the Baltic Sea did it – probably single-handedly or with 1 or 2 others –
probably because they have a personal grudge against the Russians!
George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-24 11:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6356D75F.3E2B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #594064 |
George Hammond wrote: > > On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 4:22:36 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > You say you agree with me, but then continue with the same nonsense as > > before. > > > > Sylvia. > . > [George E Hammond MS physics, > Hyannis MA USA] > ..... You don't know any Physics, > and couldn't define "Eigenvector".. > An insolent male is disgusting, > but an insolent broad is enough > to make one puke ! > George "broad"? where? where? where? where??? Sylvia is 'a nice Jewish girl'.. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-24 11:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6356D6BC.23BA@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #594060 |
Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 24-Oct-22 4:34 pm, George Hammond wrote: > > On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 12:56:00 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >> Either God exists, or He doesn't. One way or another, it's a fact. > >> Depending on whether the majority opinion accords with the fact, it is > >> either right, or wrong. > >> > >> Facts are not determined by democracy. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > . > > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > > ..... I agree with you 100% – and I heard Dick Feynman say > > exactly the same thing ! > > ..... What I'm here to tell you, is that there is now a rocksolid, > > "Scientific Proof" that GOD EXISTS – and I'm talking about > > "THE GOD OF THE BIBLE" – all 1,184 pages – turgid allegorical, > > metaphorical exposition and all ! No matter the mistakes, > > obvious exaggerations – and outright misunderstanding and > > confusion – and probably barefaced lying – the King James Bible > > is absolutely "Scientifically True" and I'm here to tell you that > > the discovery of the world's first scientific proof of God – > > that – – "God is an Einsteinian curvature of subjective spacetime" > > is now a hard scientific proven fact. The "Rapture of the Church" > > is historically, scientifically, justified – and I'm talking about the > > "emotional rapture" of Religion – not the Biblical Rapture which is > > as yet only a theory ! > > George > > You say you agree with me, but then continue with the same nonsense as > before. > > Sylvia. It's called...religious fanatics. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-10-23 22:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <11bb4832-4cd3-4312-b1d1-cbcc74459fecn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594050 |
On Monday, 24 October 2022 at 06:56:00 UTC+2, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 24-Oct-22 3:13 pm, George Hammond wrote: > > On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 11:25:13 PM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >> To the extent that God exists, He would be part of the real universe. > >> Science does not purport to prove things about the real universe, but > >> rather to describe the behaviour of the universe using mathematical > >> models. So science can no more prove the existence of God that it proves > >> anything else about the universe. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > . > > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > > ..... Yours is not the majority opinion. I am only interested in the majority opinion. > > Majority opinion at present believes that there is a God – but believes that > > unlike other facts of life, Science cannot prove it. > > ..... Well – for 5000 years they were CORRECT – but as of right now they are > > SCIENTIFICALLY WRONG – because as of right now – what is popularly described > > as a "scientific proof of God" – has been discovered by SCIENCE. > > .... The existence of God is no longer a Philosophy argument, or a Theological > > argument – it is now a "SCIENTIFIC FACT" – measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy ! > > .... Popular opinion agrees that if you can measure something in SI units, > > then it EXISTS !! The "Curvature of God" can be measured in MKS units. > > George > Either God exists, or He doesn't. One way or another, it's a fact. > Depending on whether the majority opinion accords with the fact, it is > either right, or wrong. > > Facts are not determined by democracy. Sorry, lady, wrong again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-19 14:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <06e682c8-c9ef-4173-be6f-d92f8acda5c4n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594050 |
Il giorno lunedì 24 ottobre 2022 alle 06:56:00 UTC+2 Sylvia Else ha scritto: > On 24-Oct-22 3:13 pm, George Hammond wrote: > > On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 11:25:13 PM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >> To the extent that God exists, He would be part of the real universe. > >> Science does not purport to prove things about the real universe, but > >> rather to describe the behaviour of the universe using mathematical > >> models. So science can no more prove the existence of God that it proves > >> anything else about the universe. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > . > > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > > ..... Yours is not the majority opinion. I am only interested in the majority opinion. > > Majority opinion at present believes that there is a God – but believes that > > unlike other facts of life, Science cannot prove it. > > ..... Well – for 5000 years they were CORRECT – but as of right now they are > > SCIENTIFICALLY WRONG – because as of right now – what is popularly described > > as a "scientific proof of God" – has been discovered by SCIENCE. > > .... The existence of God is no longer a Philosophy argument, or a Theological > > argument – it is now a "SCIENTIFIC FACT" – measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy ! > > .... Popular opinion agrees that if you can measure something in SI units, > > then it EXISTS !! The "Curvature of God" can be measured in MKS units. > > George > Either God exists, or He doesn't. One way or another, it's a fact. > Depending on whether the majority opinion accords with the fact, it is > either right, or wrong. > > Facts are not determined by democracy. > > Sylvia. God is not is not? there is one more realistic hypothesis: God is the ultimate goeò of the evolution of the intelligences
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-11-19 14:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e38d92bb-f3c3-4c6e-bfdf-69e8de6cf6d0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #594050 |
Il giorno lunedì 24 ottobre 2022 alle 06:56:00 UTC+2 Sylvia Else ha scritto: > On 24-Oct-22 3:13 pm, George Hammond wrote: > > On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 11:25:13 PM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >> To the extent that God exists, He would be part of the real universe. > >> Science does not purport to prove things about the real universe, but > >> rather to describe the behaviour of the universe using mathematical > >> models. So science can no more prove the existence of God that it proves > >> anything else about the universe. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > . > > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > > ..... Yours is not the majority opinion. I am only interested in the majority opinion. > > Majority opinion at present believes that there is a God – but believes that > > unlike other facts of life, Science cannot prove it. > > ..... Well – for 5000 years they were CORRECT – but as of right now they are > > SCIENTIFICALLY WRONG – because as of right now – what is popularly described > > as a "scientific proof of God" – has been discovered by SCIENCE. > > .... The existence of God is no longer a Philosophy argument, or a Theological > > argument – it is now a "SCIENTIFIC FACT" – measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy ! > > .... Popular opinion agrees that if you can measure something in SI units, > > then it EXISTS !! The "Curvature of God" can be measured in MKS units. > > George > Either God exists, or He doesn't. One way or another, it's a fact. > Depending on whether the majority opinion accords with the fact, it is > either right, or wrong. > > Facts are not determined by democracy. > > Sylvia. beda God is or is not? there is a more realistic hypothesis: the evolution of human intelligence into God like power, unless we destroy ourself before. This may be the task of any intelligence existing in the universe, Likely extremely low are the chance of succeeding in such a goal. Does not a tree produce millions of seeds just to make sure that maybe just one will succeed in its scope??? cheers, and regards beda pietanza
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web