Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #588190 > unrolled thread

Dark Matter

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-09 22:50 -0700
    Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-09 23:05 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-10 11:38 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-10 12:02 -0700
    Re: Dark Matter "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 13:57 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-07-21 13:13 +0000
    Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-15 22:48 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 14:36 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 14:48 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-18 15:48 -0700
          Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 16:36 -0700
            Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-18 17:40 -0700
              Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 19:15 -0700
                Re: Dark Matter Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 23:11 -0500
                Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-18 21:11 -0700
                  Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 00:06 -0700
                    Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-19 06:31 -0700
                      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 10:22 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 16:01 -0700
          Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-19 16:28 -0700
            Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 21:10 -0700
          Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 20:50 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-21 15:52 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#588577

Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
> >> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> >> > >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> >> > >
> >> > >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> >> > >not in terms that you can understand.
> >> > >
> >> > >For one...it's dark.
> >> >
> >> > Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
> >> > a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
> >> > the same thing!
> >>
> >> Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
> >>
> >> According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
> >> approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
> >> "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
> >> approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
> >>
> >> and, according to britannica.com:
> >>
> >> Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
> >> https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
> >>
> >> 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.
> >
> >
> > Now, according to wikipedia...85% of the matter in the universe is dark
> > matter, and
> > dark energy contributes 68% of the total energy in the present-day
> > observable universe.
> >
> >
> > When you total dark matter and dark energy, dats equals 153 percent! Dat
> > means here is more dark energy and dark mater then there is a universe.
> >
> > Where is the other 53 percent located at????
> 
> Try reading footnote a, idiot.

Of course, Jim Pennino went to 'FootNote University', cause he cannot
believe all dat stuff in wikipedia either.


Like, don't trust the Lawyers, read the fine print...FinePrint
University.


What does footnote mean? It means somebody wrote something and is
saying..."I'm not sure this is right, FUCK IT!"

Let the next wikipedia parasite edit it.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588576

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> > > >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> > > >
> > > >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> > > >not in terms that you can understand.
> > > >
> > > >For one...it's dark.
> > >
> > > Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
> > > a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
> > > the same thing!
> >
> > Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
> >
> > According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
> > "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
> >
> > and, according to britannica.com:
> >
> > Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
> >
> > 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.
> 
> Now, according to wikipedia...85% of the matter in the universe is dark
> matter, and
> dark energy contributes 68% of the total energy in the present-day
> observable universe.
> 
> When you total dark matter and dark energy, dats equals 153 percent! Dat
> means here is more dark energy and dark mater then there is a universe.
> 
> Where is the other 53 percent located at????
> 

I forgot to mention...
according to 
https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-energy
dark energy, repulsive force that is the dominant component (69.4 percent) of the universe.


So that's  (69.4 percent) plus 30.1 percent equal 100 percent. britannica.com right again...

Why do you people bother with wikipedia?  You're just making yourself look foolish every time
you quote from wikipedia.


according to wikipedia...85% of the matter and 68% equals 150.



How many years would it take for wikipedia to get it right???? 

Which are the smartest kids, the ones that read the   Britannica Encyclopædia or the ones that read Wikipedia?













-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588631

Dark Matter 
existed
before the big bang.

So, if you having differculty
trying to figure out
what dark matter is, 
it's because
it's matter
that existed
'Before'
the big bang.

And yous seem
not to have gotten 
past that yet.








The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> >
> >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> >not in terms that you can understand.
> >
> >For one...it's dark.
> 
> Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
> a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
> the same thing!
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web