Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #588317 > unrolled thread

James Webb Space Telescope new photo is filled with fake stars!

Started by	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post	2022-07-12 10:37 -0700
Last post	2022-07-18 00:54 -0700
Articles	20 on this page of 48 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →

#588376

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-13 11:40 -0700
Message-ID	<62CF11B6.868@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588348

Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 8:01:34 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 5:31:34 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > > I circled the fake stars in Red:
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547013445458964481/photo/1
> > > >
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > >
> > > And your evidence for this claim is exactly what? You are really testing my bullshit meter, which is vibrating like mad right now.
> > Okay, I see some of yous need a closer view...
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547051286104682496/photo/1
> >
> > Here is 'just' two fake stars outlined
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg6p8UVUAEnSnb?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >
> > Here is more closer...
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg601-VsAA7jmY?format=jpg&name=large
> >
> >
> > Here is more more closer...as you can see, the two are a match of cut and paste fake stars:
> >
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg65kuVQAA9fTQ?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > (my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> Your little red circles are not evidence. Your imagination is not evidence. You have provided zero evidence.
> 
> You owe me a new bullshit meter since you have busted mine..

I think you busted your meter on yourself since the links I made for you contained White outlines, not Red. 


You shouldn't wear your meter soooo close to you. You're sooooo BUSTED! And everybody knows because everybody saw the news links
I provived just for you and they know it had only two White outines, not Red color.

You're sooooo BUSTED!


and your stupid meter.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588388

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-13 14:17 -0700
Message-ID	<62CF3651.4ABE@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588376

Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2022 at 11:41:03 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 8:01:34 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 5:31:34 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I circled the fake stars in Red:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547013445458964481/photo/1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> > > You owe me a new bullshit meter since you have busted mine..
> > I think you busted your meter on yourself since the links I made for you contained White outlines, not Red.
> >
> >
> > You shouldn't wear your meter soooo close to you. You're sooooo BUSTED! And everybody knows because everybody saw the news links
> > I provived just for you and they know it had only two White outines, not Red color.
> 
> Again, here is a direct quote from one of your early posts in this thread...
> 
> "I circled the fake stars in Red:"
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547013445458964481/photo/1
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> Note where you CLEARLY said "RED"... and indeed, they ARE red.
> 
> So now you are proven by your own words to be a liar. Who would ever believe a known liar?

Okay, you're visually impaired..Here is the post stating " 'just' two fake stars outlined"

Okay, I see some of yous need a closer view...

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547051286104682496/photo/1

Here is 'just' two fake stars outlined
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg6p8UVUAEnSnb?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

Here is more closer...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg601-VsAA7jmY?format=jpg&name=large


Here is more more closer...as you can see, the two are a match of cut and paste fake stars:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg65kuVQAA9fTQ?format=jpg&name=4096x4096


(my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096



You're sooooo BUSTED!!!

----------------------------original post--------------

Path: buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:01:23 -0500
Message-ID: <62CE3592.7B0F@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 20:01:39 -0700
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: James Webb Space Telescope new photo is filled with fake stars!
References: <62CDB170.154@ix.netcom.com> <62CDB7FE.24F6@ix.netcom.com>
	 <62CDCCD5.A19@ix.netcom.com> <62CE1268.21F0@ix.netcom.com> <4a497bd9-a086-421d-95db-3f43c783ca0cn@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220712-6, 07/12/2022), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 40
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47
X-Trace: sv3-TDPi7WurEzX+gAIFcd/dLiKj08oRuaW3t52asuTTIQMSg30HPvY99TwmgB9WDKT7Eaq2PylkQywqpVv!CDQu17eNEMEoPCIUwAABxDJEFL+70MoU0Syu3LRbSgQ9V2/+9gfAziDSN4+47zeic12vp/H7Veiu!vjLrQapQRQI=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2621
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:7998752 sci.physics:2394331 sci.physics.relativity:1493285
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220713-8, 07/13/2022), Inbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean

Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 5:31:34 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > I circled the fake stars in Red:
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547013445458964481/photo/1
> >
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> And your evidence for this claim is exactly what? You are really testing my bullshit meter, which is vibrating like mad right now.


Okay, I see some of yous need a closer view...

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547051286104682496/photo/1

Here is 'just' two fake stars outlined
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg6p8UVUAEnSnb?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

Here is more closer...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg601-VsAA7jmY?format=jpg&name=large


Here is more more closer...as you can see, the two are a match of cut and paste fake stars:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg65kuVQAA9fTQ?format=jpg&name=4096x4096


(my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588384

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-13 12:17 -0700
Message-ID	<62CF1A5F.6DF1@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588341

I wasn't even looking for fake stars...
it was a given they they will try to
enhance their photos for entertainemnt purposes only...

but, there were sooo many fake stars that it
interfered with my experiments.

Remove all the fakes stars and you just got another blurry photo!

Have some common sense...
some of these fakes stars are BIGGER than a GALAXY!!!!

(did you notice i did not circle the one in the middle?)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096


THAT'S A FUCKING BIG FAKE STAR!!!! (why circle it?) (i bet most of yous didn't even notice it, or looked the other way)


'none are so blind that as those who refuse to see'


DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK.


THAT'S A FUCKING BIG FAKE STAR!!!! (why circle it?) (i bet most of yous didn't even notice it, or looked the other way)


'none are so blind that as those who refuse to see'


DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK.


Now, How can I mentioned the girl in the picture???? 



The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I circled the fake stars in Red:
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547013445458964481/photo/1
> 
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> Here is a sample of the two stars that are exact copy and paste by NASA:
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547013445458964481/photo/2
> 
> very sloppy those people...
> 
> I guess their attitude is..."SO WHAT, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT!?!"
> 
> We'll throw you in a commie jail in China! China, Washington, DChina
> 
> (we'll cut your Usenet access...)
> 
> and sell your momma to the chinese.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > How many FAKE STARS did they inserted in? IT'S FUCKING TOO MANY!!!
> >
> > You can see them, they all have Blue streaks.
> >
> > and those Orange galaxies form a ...circle.
> >
> > (too close to the trees)
> >
> > It means only one thing...
> >
> > the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie.
> >
> > I bet those science guys haven't come up with a name of that either.
> >
> > takes them a couple of thousand of years to catch up wit me.
> >
> > Okay, how about we do a contest? How many FAKE STARS can you count in the picture???
> >
> > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > of course it's real dumb to copy and paste FAKE STARS
> > > right next to a galaxy or on top of it!
> > >
> > > Blame the art director.
> > >
> > > Artists: "Where should we put this one?"
> > >
> > > Art Director: "Oh, put it right next to dat galaxies! No, move it more to the left! Alright, a little to the right!" "FUCK IT, LEAVE IT THERE!"
> > >
> > > if you remove all the fake stars, the rest of them are blurry.
> > >
> > > wat did they do to takes pictures with? the lastest version of Iphone???
> > >
> > > If there is a God there, I can find Him.
> > >
> > > He's probably with some Black hole....
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars
> > > >
> > > > The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars!
> > > >
> > > > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> > > >
> > > > If you look at top left hand corner
> > > > you can see 4 or 5,6 or more
> > > > FAKE STARS
> > > > that are copied and pasted
> > > > all over the rest of the photo!
> > > >
> > > > (bottom ones also duplicated
> > > > and pasted all over in different
> > > > sizes)
> > > >
> > > > (too many for me to count now)
> > > >
> > > > I'll show you samples later...
> > > > but you can see for youself now here:
> > > > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> > > >
> > > > I need to do further test.
> > > >
> > > > (my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker
> > > >
> > > > you can download the TIF version here:
> > > > https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z?news=true
> > > >
> > > > (don't trust those little men in their white lab coats and slide rulers)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588386

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-13 14:02 -0700
Message-ID	<62CF32DE.732@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588384

Now, after I had to bypass all those fake stars (they were all in my way)
I need to see what is real.

That's where I notice the girl's face in the picture..
all the way near the top, in the middle...(while arrow pointing to her...)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXky1zLUcAEGEQ5?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

she looks a like Jane Jetson.

https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/legendsofthemultiuniverse/images/5/5c/Jane-Jetson-the-jetsons-8031560-250-292.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/249?cb=20150821034747



Here:
https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547324410037620737
https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547324410037620737/photo/1

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXky1zLUcAEGEQ5?format=jpg&name=4096x4096




I was looking for God, instead I found the Jetsons! 




I'm still searching..
i need to make more tests.






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I wasn't even looking for fake stars...
> it was a given they they will try to
> enhance their photos for entertainemnt purposes only...
> 
> but, there were sooo many fake stars that it
> interfered with my experiments.
> 
> Remove all the fakes stars and you just got another blurry photo!
> 
> Have some common sense...
> some of these fakes stars are BIGGER than a GALAXY!!!!
> 
> (did you notice i did not circle the one in the middle?)
> 
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> THAT'S A FUCKING BIG FAKE STAR!!!! (why circle it?) (i bet most of yous didn't even notice it, or looked the other way)
> 
> 'none are so blind that as those who refuse to see'
> 
> DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK.
> 
> THAT'S A FUCKING BIG FAKE STAR!!!! (why circle it?) (i bet most of yous didn't even notice it, or looked the other way)
> 
> 'none are so blind that as those who refuse to see'
> 
> DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK. DON'T LOOK.
> 
> Now, How can I mentioned the girl in the picture????
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > I circled the fake stars in Red:
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547013445458964481/photo/1
> >
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >
> > Here is a sample of the two stars that are exact copy and paste by NASA:
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547013445458964481/photo/2
> >
> > very sloppy those people...
> >
> > I guess their attitude is..."SO WHAT, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT!?!"
> >
> > We'll throw you in a commie jail in China! China, Washington, DChina
> >
> > (we'll cut your Usenet access...)
> >
> > and sell your momma to the chinese.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > How many FAKE STARS did they inserted in? IT'S FUCKING TOO MANY!!!
> > >
> > > You can see them, they all have Blue streaks.
> > >
> > > and those Orange galaxies form a ...circle.
> > >
> > > (too close to the trees)
> > >
> > > It means only one thing...
> > >
> > > the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie.
> > >
> > > I bet those science guys haven't come up with a name of that either.
> > >
> > > takes them a couple of thousand of years to catch up wit me.
> > >
> > > Okay, how about we do a contest? How many FAKE STARS can you count in the picture???
> > >
> > > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > of course it's real dumb to copy and paste FAKE STARS
> > > > right next to a galaxy or on top of it!
> > > >
> > > > Blame the art director.
> > > >
> > > > Artists: "Where should we put this one?"
> > > >
> > > > Art Director: "Oh, put it right next to dat galaxies! No, move it more to the left! Alright, a little to the right!" "FUCK IT, LEAVE IT THERE!"
> > > >
> > > > if you remove all the fake stars, the rest of them are blurry.
> > > >
> > > > wat did they do to takes pictures with? the lastest version of Iphone???
> > > >
> > > > If there is a God there, I can find Him.
> > > >
> > > > He's probably with some Black hole....
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars
> > > > >
> > > > > The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars!
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > If you look at top left hand corner
> > > > > you can see 4 or 5,6 or more
> > > > > FAKE STARS
> > > > > that are copied and pasted
> > > > > all over the rest of the photo!
> > > > >
> > > > > (bottom ones also duplicated
> > > > > and pasted all over in different
> > > > > sizes)
> > > > >
> > > > > (too many for me to count now)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll show you samples later...
> > > > > but you can see for youself now here:
> > > > > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > I need to do further test.
> > > > >
> > > > > (my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker
> > > > >
> > > > > you can download the TIF version here:
> > > > > https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z?news=true
> > > > >
> > > > > (don't trust those little men in their white lab coats and slide rulers)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588347

From	governor.swill@gmail.com
Date	2022-07-12 22:41 -0400
Message-ID	<c5cschhb3vcqkncbougn9cqatj3qitqt37@4ax.com>
In reply to	#588322

On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:34:45 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

You think the earth is flat, don't you?

*flush*

Swill
 --
And speaking of stupid, how dumb do you have to be to believe a god
who didn't prevent the Holocaust is going to help you win a football
game?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588342

From	patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net>
Date	2022-07-12 17:42 -0700
Message-ID	<e778b3ef-acbe-44eb-86b5-a619123105fbn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#588317

On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars 
> 
> The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars! 
> 
> https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg 
> 
> If you look at top left hand corner 
> you can see 4 or 5,6 or more 
> FAKE STARS 
> that are copied and pasted 
> all over the rest of the photo! 
> 
> (bottom ones also duplicated 
> and pasted all over in different 
> sizes) 
> 
> (too many for me to count now) 
> 
> 
> I'll show you samples later... 
> but you can see for youself now here: 
> https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg 
> 
> 
> I need to do further test. 
> 
> 
> (my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!) 
> 
> 
> The Starmaker 
> 
> 
> you can download the TIF version here: 
> https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z?news=true 
> 
> 
> (don't trust those little men in their white lab coats and slide rulers) 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge 
> the unchallengeable.

The photo featured on television news seems to be filled with gravitational lenses too.  They're all over the place in the photo.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588374

From	"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-13 11:14 -0700
Message-ID	<7808b820-0ae8-4669-81ef-c70b6a2183f5n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#588342

On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 5:42:31 PM UTC-7, patdolan wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars 
> > 
> > The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars! 
> > 
> > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg 
> > 
> > If you look at top left hand corner 
> > you can see 4 or 5,6 or more 
> > FAKE STARS 
> > that are copied and pasted 
> > all over the rest of the photo! 
> > 
> > (bottom ones also duplicated 
> > and pasted all over in different 
> > sizes) 
> > 
> > (too many for me to count now) 
> > 
> > 
> > I'll show you samples later... 
> > but you can see for youself now here: 
> > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg 
> > 
> > 
> > I need to do further test. 
> > 
> > 
> > (my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!) 
> > 
> > 
> > The Starmaker 
> > 
> > 
> > you can download the TIF version here: 
> > https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z?news=true 
> > 
> > 
> > (don't trust those little men in their white lab coats and slide rulers) 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge 
> > the unchallengeable.
> The photo featured on television news seems to be filled with gravitational lenses too. They're all over the place in the photo.

pat? don't you remember hearing James Webb was falling back?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588346

From	governor.swill@gmail.com
Date	2022-07-12 22:40 -0400
Message-ID	<3sbsch59c5se13qmvomb098s36keen59ko@4ax.com>
In reply to	#588317

On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:37:52 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars
>
>The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars!
>
>https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
>
>If you look at top left hand corner
>you can see 4 or 5,6 or more
>FAKE STARS
>that are copied and pasted
>all over the rest of the photo!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_lens

Swill
 --
And speaking of stupid, how dumb do you have to be to believe a god
who didn't prevent the Holocaust is going to help you win a football
game?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588349

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-12 20:12 -0700
Message-ID	<62CE381A.154B@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588346

governor.swill@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:37:52 -0700, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars
> >
> >The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars!
> >
> >https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> >
> >If you look at top left hand corner
> >you can see 4 or 5,6 or more
> >FAKE STARS
> >that are copied and pasted
> >all over the rest of the photo!
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_lens
> 
> Swill

You're sure it ain't...climate change? Or Putin?? 

>  --
> And speaking of stupid, how dumb do you have to be to believe a god
> who didn't prevent the Holocaust is going to help you win a football
> game?

Why would a god prevent the Holocaust if it was god that created the Holocaust to keep the balance of Nature?

You got a billion people in China, a billion is India, do you think God or anyone else put up with a billion Jewish people??

Nature would not have it.

i heard India is soon going to surpass China in population.

The purpose of an atomic bomb is to depopulate. Trust Nature, she knows what she is doing. 

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588355

From	Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-13 01:03 -0500
Message-ID	<taln7u$4go9$1@solani.org>
In reply to	#588349

On 7/12/2022 10:12 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> You got a billion people in China, a billion is India, do you think God or anyone else put up with a billion Jewish people??
> 

Hehe :) I like that.

But it's close, not exact. Jews are really fine people but with a 
5% difference in them compared to 100% Modern Human. This 5% has 
been making a mighty effect on the outcome, making them possess 
more enthusiasm about interesting things than the average 100% 
MH. But the down side of it is that it has placed a limit on the 
size of their population.

Reason for it is that Jews are tribal people, not "citizens." 
They don't understand citizenship. The latter began with the 
advent of cities after agriculture started. Jews formula of life 
is older than that. Goes back to when MH began domesticating 
animals. That's way before agriculture.

So don't worry about them. They're in a way self-limited. They 
bring down the system before their numbers go too far up in that 
system. Any system!

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588357

From	"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no>
Date	2022-07-13 09:50 +0200
Message-ID	<JOuzK.159734$cVE6.60881@fx11.ams4>
In reply to	#588317


Den 12.07.2022 19:37, skrev The Starmaker:
> Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars
> 
> The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars!
> 
> https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> 
> If you look at top left hand corner
> you can see 4 or 5,6 or more
> FAKE STARS
> that are copied and pasted
> all over the rest of the photo!
> 
> (bottom ones also duplicated
> and pasted all over in different
> sizes)
> 
> (too many for me to count now)
> 
> 
> I'll show you samples later...
> but you can see for youself now here:
> https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> 
> 
> I need to do further test.
> 
> 
> (my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)
> 
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> 
> you can download the TIF version here:
> https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z?news=true
> 
> 
> (don't trust those little men in their white lab coats and slide rulers)
> 
> 
> 

The reason why there are (at least one) idiots who think the stars
are "copied and pasted" is probably because they all look alike.
The reason is that the stars are in our galaxy and are heavily
overexposed with strong diffraction spikes.

Note that there are six strong diffraction spikes.
They are caused by the six-sided mirror segments in James Webb.
(And possibly by the three struts supporting the secondary mirror.)

Overexposed stars in Hubble have four strong diffraction spikes
caused by the four struts supporting the secondary mirror.

So the stars can not be "copied and pasted" from Hubble pictures.

(Starmaker is a troll. Nobody can really believe that NASA would
  copy fake stars into the deep field pictures of James Webb.)

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588358

From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Date	2022-07-13 19:48 +1000
Message-ID	<jj7imlFm1irU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#588357

On 13-July-22 5:50 pm, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> 
> 
> Den 12.07.2022 19:37, skrev The Starmaker:
>> Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars
>>
>> The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars!
>>
>> https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg 
>>
>>
>> If you look at top left hand corner
>> you can see 4 or 5,6 or more
>> FAKE STARS
>> that are copied and pasted
>> all over the rest of the photo!
>>
>> (bottom ones also duplicated
>> and pasted all over in different
>> sizes)
>>
>> (too many for me to count now)
>>
>>
>> I'll show you samples later...
>> but you can see for youself now here:
>> https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg 
>>
>>
>>
>> I need to do further test.
>>
>>
>> (my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)
>>
>>
>> The Starmaker
>>
>>
>> you can download the TIF version here:
>> https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z?news=true 
>>
>>
>>
>> (don't trust those little men in their white lab coats and slide rulers)
>>
>>
>>
> 
> The reason why there are (at least one) idiots who think the stars
> are "copied and pasted" is probably because they all look alike.
> The reason is that the stars are in our galaxy and are heavily
> overexposed with strong diffraction spikes.
> 
> Note that there are six strong diffraction spikes.
> They are caused by the six-sided mirror segments in James Webb.
> (And possibly by the three struts supporting the secondary mirror.)
> 
> Overexposed stars in Hubble have four strong diffraction spikes
> caused by the four struts supporting the secondary mirror.
> 
> So the stars can not be "copied and pasted" from Hubble pictures.
> 
> (Starmaker is a troll. Nobody can really believe that NASA would
>   copy fake stars into the deep field pictures of James Webb.)
> 

He probably doesn't realise that the images are in false colour either, 
which is no secret. Indeed he'd have grasped it almost immediately if 
he'd asked himself how an infrared telescope can produce colour pictures.

https://asd.gsfc.nasa.gov/blueshift/index.php/2016/09/13/hubble-false-color/

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588367

From	Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-13 09:34 -0500
Message-ID	<taml5f$58em$2@solani.org>
In reply to	#588358

On 7/13/2022 4:48 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> colour pictures.


Hmm.. you're probably European born then.

By the way, "trolls" are why you guys are in usenet. They provide 
you with stuff you don't have a chance to see in academics.

So, again, don't flatter yourselves please. It is really not 
looking too well on you.


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588394

From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Date	2022-07-14 12:52 +1000
Message-ID	<jj9enmF72d1U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#588367

On 14-July-22 12:34 am, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 7/13/2022 4:48 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> colour pictures.
> 
> 
> Hmm.. you're probably European born then.

I think you mean not-USA born.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588395 — Sylvia is Aussie, upside down.

From	"Dick's DriveIn" <Dicks@Jeff-Relf.Me>
Date	2022-07-13 19:57 -0700
Subject	Sylvia is Aussie, upside down.
Message-ID	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Jul.13--7.57pm.Seattle.2022>
In reply to	#588394

Sylvia is Aussie, upside down.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588400

From	Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-14 06:50 -0500
Message-ID	<taovu4$6l5c$1@solani.org>
In reply to	#588394

On 7/13/2022 9:52 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 14-July-22 12:34 am, Clutterfreak wrote:
>> On 7/13/2022 4:48 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> colour pictures.
>>
>>
>> Hmm.. you're probably European born then.
> 
> I think you mean not-USA born.
> 

The distinction would mean something only if you were either an 
MH or a Russian; cause as a CH, if you aren't American and you 
aren't Russian, then you're a bitch of USA regardless of where 
you happen to be and what name your people have adopted for your 
"country". "Bitch of USA" would be the only identity that you'd have!

That's why all the MH in the world find Russians agreeable. 
They're the only CH among you dimwits who're not bitches of USA.

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588361

From	rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-13 05:30 -0700
Message-ID	<3f91b11e-cd95-477c-86db-c0aa4d11cd3fn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#588357

On Wednesday, July 13, 2022 at 3:50:04 AM UTC-4, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

> (Starmaker is a troll. ...

And don't forget to report him (as spam).
I have.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588379

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-13 11:50 -0700
Message-ID	<62CF1402.4275@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588361

rotchm wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2022 at 3:50:04 AM UTC-4, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> 
> > (Starmaker is a troll. ...
> 
> And don't forget to report him (as spam).
> I have.

dats the first thing i did dis morning...



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588424

From	"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-14 17:23 -0700
Message-ID	<taqc1b$2revn$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#588379

On 7/13/2022 11:50 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> rotchm wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 13, 2022 at 3:50:04 AM UTC-4, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> (Starmaker is a troll. ...
>>
>> And don't forget to report him (as spam).
>> I have.
> 
> dats the first thing i did dis morning...
> 
> 
> 

Is this from math or a colored image from a space telescope? ;^)

https://fractalforums.org/gallery/medium_1612-041021093931.jpeg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588425

From	Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-14 17:51 -0700
Message-ID	<6ee4070c-d95d-4558-8d7d-1ad7832c24a0n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#588424

On Thursday, July 14, 2022 at 5:23:10 PM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/13/2022 11:50 AM, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > rotchm wrote: 
> >> 
> >> On Wednesday, July 13, 2022 at 3:50:04 AM UTC-4, Paul B. Andersen wrote: 
> >> 
> >>> (Starmaker is a troll. ... 
> >> 
> >> And don't forget to report him (as spam). 
> >> I have. 
> > 
> > dats the first thing i did dis morning... 
> > 
> > 
> >
> Is this from math or a colored image from a space telescope? ;^) 
> 
> https://fractalforums.org/gallery/medium_1612-041021093931.jpeg

Since this is from a URL that says "fractal forums" I'm gonna guess that it has nothing to do with anything real in the cosmos. I am very familiar with cool astrophotos and this guy is not at all familiar... but then... who knows?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →

csiph-web

James Webb Space Telescope new photo is filled with fake stars!

Contents

#588376

#588388

#588384

#588386

#588347

#588342

#588374

#588346

#588349

#588355

#588357

#588358

#588367

#588394

#588395 — Sylvia is Aussie, upside down.

#588400

#588361

#588379

#588424

#588425