Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #588317 > unrolled thread

James Webb Space Telescope new photo is filled with fake stars!

Started by	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post	2022-07-12 10:37 -0700
Last post	2022-07-18 00:54 -0700
Articles	20 on this page of 48 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →

#588317 — James Webb Space Telescope new photo is filled with fake stars!

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-12 10:37 -0700
Subject	James Webb Space Telescope new photo is filled with fake stars!
Message-ID	<62CDB170.154@ix.netcom.com>

Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars

The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars!

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg

If you look at top left hand corner
you can see 4 or 5,6 or more
FAKE STARS
that are copied and pasted
all over the rest of the photo!

(bottom ones also duplicated
and pasted all over in different
sizes)

(too many for me to count now)


I'll show you samples later...
but you can see for youself now here:
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg


I need to do further test.


(my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)


The Starmaker


you can download the TIF version here:
https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z?news=true


(don't trust those little men in their white lab coats and slide rulers)



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#588318

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-12 11:05 -0700
Message-ID	<62CDB7FE.24F6@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588317

of course it's real dumb to copy and paste FAKE STARS
right next to a galaxy or on top of it!

Blame the art director.


Artists: "Where should we put this one?"

Art Director: "Oh, put it right next to dat galaxies! No, move it more to the left! Alright, a little to the right!" "FUCK IT, LEAVE IT THERE!"


if you remove all the fake stars, the rest of them are blurry.

wat did they do to takes pictures with? the lastest version of Iphone???



If there is a God there, I can find Him.


He's probably with some Black hole....








The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars
> 
> The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars!
> 
> https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> 
> If you look at top left hand corner
> you can see 4 or 5,6 or more
> FAKE STARS
> that are copied and pasted
> all over the rest of the photo!
> 
> (bottom ones also duplicated
> and pasted all over in different
> sizes)
> 
> (too many for me to count now)
> 
> I'll show you samples later...
> but you can see for youself now here:
> https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> 
> I need to do further test.
> 
> (my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> you can download the TIF version here:
> https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z?news=true
> 
> (don't trust those little men in their white lab coats and slide rulers)
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588322

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-12 12:34 -0700
Message-ID	<62CDCCD5.A19@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588318

How many FAKE STARS did they inserted in? IT'S FUCKING TOO MANY!!!

You can see them, they all have Blue streaks.


and those Orange galaxies form a ...circle.


(too close to the trees)


It means only one thing...

the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie.


I bet those science guys haven't come up with a name of that either.


takes them a couple of thousand of years to catch up wit me.



Okay, how about we do a contest? How many FAKE STARS can you count in the picture???





https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg




The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> of course it's real dumb to copy and paste FAKE STARS
> right next to a galaxy or on top of it!
> 
> Blame the art director.
> 
> Artists: "Where should we put this one?"
> 
> Art Director: "Oh, put it right next to dat galaxies! No, move it more to the left! Alright, a little to the right!" "FUCK IT, LEAVE IT THERE!"
> 
> if you remove all the fake stars, the rest of them are blurry.
> 
> wat did they do to takes pictures with? the lastest version of Iphone???
> 
> If there is a God there, I can find Him.
> 
> He's probably with some Black hole....
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars
> >
> > The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars!
> >
> > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> >
> > If you look at top left hand corner
> > you can see 4 or 5,6 or more
> > FAKE STARS
> > that are copied and pasted
> > all over the rest of the photo!
> >
> > (bottom ones also duplicated
> > and pasted all over in different
> > sizes)
> >
> > (too many for me to count now)
> >
> > I'll show you samples later...
> > but you can see for youself now here:
> > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> >
> > I need to do further test.
> >
> > (my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)
> >
> > The Starmaker
> >
> > you can download the TIF version here:
> > https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z?news=true
> >
> > (don't trust those little men in their white lab coats and slide rulers)
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588336

From	super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>
Date	2022-07-12 17:29 -0500
Message-ID	<super70s-FC89A4.17291112072022@reader01.eternal-september.org>
In reply to	#588322

In article <62CDCCD5.A19@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> How many FAKE STARS did they inserted in? IT'S FUCKING TOO MANY!!!
> 
> You can see them, they all have Blue streaks.
> 
> 
> and those Orange galaxies form a ...circle.
> 
> 
> (too close to the trees)
> 
> 
> It means only one thing...
> 
> the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie.
> 
> 
> I bet those science guys haven't come up with a name of that either.
> 
> 
> takes them a couple of thousand of years to catch up wit me.
> 
> 
> 
> Okay, how about we do a contest? How many FAKE STARS can you count in the 
> picture???

You're right, this is the biggest scandal since that Trump inauguration 
crowd photo.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588337

From	Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA>
Date	2022-07-12 18:39 -0400
Message-ID	<61urchl98sko216rv3ot0rkf0orlts12qp@4ax.com>
In reply to	#588336

On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:29:11 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

>In article <62CDCCD5.A19@ix.netcom.com>,
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> How many FAKE STARS did they inserted in? IT'S FUCKING TOO MANY!!!
>> 
>> You can see them, they all have Blue streaks.
>> 
>> 
>> and those Orange galaxies form a ...circle.
>> 
>> 
>> (too close to the trees)
>> 
>> 
>> It means only one thing...
>> 
>> the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie.
>> 
>> 
>> I bet those science guys haven't come up with a name of that either.
>> 
>> 
>> takes them a couple of thousand of years to catch up wit me.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Okay, how about we do a contest? How many FAKE STARS can you count in the 
>> picture???
>
>You're right, this is the biggest scandal since that Trump inauguration 
>crowd photo.

<EYEROLL>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588340

From	"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-12 17:25 -0700
Message-ID	<65f04c3b-6160-4eba-a1dd-72dc8af350bcn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#588337

On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 3:39:46 PM UTC-7, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:29:11 -0500, super70s 
> <supe...@super70s.invalid> wrote: 
> 
> >In article <62CDCC...@ix.netcom.com>,
> > The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: 
> > 
> >> How many FAKE STARS did they inserted in? IT'S FUCKING TOO MANY!!! 
> >> 
> >> You can see them, they all have Blue streaks. 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> and those Orange galaxies form a ...circle. 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> (too close to the trees) 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> It means only one thing... 
> >> 
> >> the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie. 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I bet those science guys haven't come up with a name of that either. 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> takes them a couple of thousand of years to catch up wit me. 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Okay, how about we do a contest? How many FAKE STARS can you count in the 
> >> picture??? 
> >
> >You're right, this is the biggest scandal since that Trump inauguration 
> >crowd photo. 
> 
> <EYEROLL>

There were plenty of people there to celebrate...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588351

From	Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
Date	2022-07-12 20:22 -0700
Message-ID	<chine.bleu-E50DDC.20222012072022@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to	#588336

In article 
<super70s-FC89A4.17291112072022@reader01.eternal-september.org>,
 super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

> > the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie.

The universe is a giant plutonium atom.

-- 
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.    @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                                    /|\
Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post         / \
I am an Andrea Chen sockpuppet.                  insults Islam.  Mohammed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588714

From	onion@anon.invalid (Mr Ön!on)
Date	2022-07-24 14:11 +0100
Message-ID	<1pvlopu.18ft77e1cx4gwpN%onion@anon.invalid>
In reply to	#588351

Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:

> In article 
> <super70s-FC89A4.17291112072022@reader01.eternal-september.org>,
>  super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
> 
> > > the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie.
> 
> The universe is a giant plutonium atom.

Archie?  Is that you?  

-- 
  \|/  
(((Ï)))    Mr Ön!on 

When we shake the ketchup bottle 
At first none comes, then a lot'll.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588716

From	Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
Date	2022-07-24 07:25 -0700
Message-ID	<chine.bleu-AF521D.07253924072022@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to	#588714

In article <1pvlopu.18ft77e1cx4gwpN%onion@anon.invalid>,
 onion@anon.invalid (Mr Ön!on) wrote:

> Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > In article 
> > <super70s-FC89A4.17291112072022@reader01.eternal-september.org>,
> >  super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
> > 
> > > > the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie.
> > 
> > The universe is a giant plutonium atom.
> 
> Archie?  Is that you?

We have discoverred element 121. Look out at the night sky and 
you will see it.

-- 
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.    @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                                    /|\
Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post         / \
I am an Andrea Chen sockpuppet.                  insults Islam.  Mohammed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588722

From	onion@anon.invalid (Mr Ön!on)
Date	2022-07-24 17:34 +0100
Message-ID	<1pvly2a.17zy77eqcd4geN%onion@anon.invalid>
In reply to	#588716

Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:

[...]

> > > > > the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie.
> > > 
> > > The universe is a giant plutonium atom.
> > 
> > Archie?  Is that you?
> 
> We have discoverred element 121. Look out 
> at the night sky and you will see it.

Unobtanium!  

-- 
  \|/  
(((Ï)))    Mr Ön!on 

When we shake the ketchup bottle 
At first none comes, then a lot'll.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588727

From	Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
Date	2022-07-24 13:28 -0700
Message-ID	<chine.bleu-4AE57C.13284624072022@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to	#588722

In article <1pvly2a.17zy77eqcd4geN%onion@anon.invalid>,
 onion@anon.invalid (Mr Ön!on) wrote:

> Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> [...]
>  
> > > > > > the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie.
> > > > 
> > > > The universe is a giant plutonium atom.
> > > 
> > > Archie?  Is that you?
> > 
> > We have discoverred element 121. Look out 
> > at the night sky and you will see it.
> 
> Unobtanium!

The universe will end when it does beta decay and the damned will 
ride that helium nuclei into paradise springs florida.

-- 
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.    @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                                    /|\
Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post         / \
I am an Andrea Chen sockpuppet.                  insults Islam.  Mohammed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588341

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-12 17:31 -0700
Message-ID	<62CE1268.21F0@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588322

I circled the fake stars in Red:

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547013445458964481/photo/1

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096




Here is a sample of the two stars that are exact copy and paste by NASA:

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547013445458964481/photo/2


very sloppy those people...


I guess their attitude is..."SO WHAT, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT!?!"


We'll throw you in a commie jail in China! China, Washington, DChina



(we'll cut your Usenet access...)

and sell your momma to the chinese.





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> How many FAKE STARS did they inserted in? IT'S FUCKING TOO MANY!!!
> 
> You can see them, they all have Blue streaks.
> 
> and those Orange galaxies form a ...circle.
> 
> (too close to the trees)
> 
> It means only one thing...
> 
> the whole universe is just ONE big galaxie.
> 
> I bet those science guys haven't come up with a name of that either.
> 
> takes them a couple of thousand of years to catch up wit me.
> 
> Okay, how about we do a contest? How many FAKE STARS can you count in the picture???
> 
> https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > of course it's real dumb to copy and paste FAKE STARS
> > right next to a galaxy or on top of it!
> >
> > Blame the art director.
> >
> > Artists: "Where should we put this one?"
> >
> > Art Director: "Oh, put it right next to dat galaxies! No, move it more to the left! Alright, a little to the right!" "FUCK IT, LEAVE IT THERE!"
> >
> > if you remove all the fake stars, the rest of them are blurry.
> >
> > wat did they do to takes pictures with? the lastest version of Iphone???
> >
> > If there is a God there, I can find Him.
> >
> > He's probably with some Black hole....
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Okay, first yous need to get rid of all the FAKE Stars
> > >
> > > The James Webb Space Telescope New Photo is filled with fake stars!
> > >
> > > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> > >
> > > If you look at top left hand corner
> > > you can see 4 or 5,6 or more
> > > FAKE STARS
> > > that are copied and pasted
> > > all over the rest of the photo!
> > >
> > > (bottom ones also duplicated
> > > and pasted all over in different
> > > sizes)
> > >
> > > (too many for me to count now)
> > >
> > > I'll show you samples later...
> > > but you can see for youself now here:
> > > https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_deep_field_smacs0723-5mb.jpg
> > >
> > > I need to do further test.
> > >
> > > (my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > you can download the TIF version here:
> > > https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z?news=true
> > >
> > > (don't trust those little men in their white lab coats and slide rulers)
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588344

From	rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-12 18:13 -0700
Message-ID	<02390a6a-7b96-43c4-8189-4285c145ccc5n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#588341

On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 8:31:32 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> I circled the fake stars in Red: 

So are you saying that those stars are not really there?
That is, if I take out a telescope and I look at those locations, there won't be a corresponding star there?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588350

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-12 20:17 -0700
Message-ID	<62CE3933.57C0@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588344

rotchm wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 8:31:32 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > I circled the fake stars in Red:
> 
> So are you saying that those stars are not really there?
> That is, if I take out a telescope and I look at those locations, there won't be a corresponding star there?


Why would anyone replace a real star with a fake one???? 



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588359

From	rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-13 05:27 -0700
Message-ID	<63970bec-9439-41a1-b20a-25d4706dce6cn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#588350

On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 11:16:58 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> rotchm wrote: 

> > So are you saying that those stars are not really there? 

No answer?

> > That is, if I take out a telescope and I look at those locations, there won't be a corresponding star there?

No answer?

> Why would anyone replace a real star with a fake one????

That does not answer my above questions. So you chickened out again!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588378

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-13 11:47 -0700
Message-ID	<62CF1358.974@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588359

rotchm wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 11:16:58 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > rotchm wrote:
> 
> > > So are you saying that those stars are not really there?
> 
> No answer?
> 
> > > That is, if I take out a telescope and I look at those locations, there won't be a corresponding star there?
> 
> No answer?
> 
> > Why would anyone replace a real star with a fake one????
> 
> That does not answer my above questions. So you chickened out again!


I thought the question I asked answered the question.


Why would anyone replace a real star with a fake one????


If someone copy and pasted over another star, then that photo would be
ruined.

So, you need a copy of the photo before they ruined it to see what they
copy and pasted over...

you question are...rot-tchen




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588390

From	rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-13 16:22 -0700
Message-ID	<53cd582f-0a8a-4058-857f-e77510109508n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#588378

On Wednesday, July 13, 2022 at 2:47:58 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> rotchm wrote: 
> > 
> > On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 11:16:58 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > rotchm wrote: 
> > 
> > > > So are you saying that those stars are not really there? 
> > 
> > No answer? 

Still no answer? Its a simple yes/no answer...
> > 
> > > > That is, if I take out a telescope and I look at those locations, there won't be a corresponding star there? 
> > 
> > No answer? 

Still no answer? Its a simple yes/no answer...


> I thought the question I asked answered the question.

You thought wrong. Try again.


> So, you need a copy of the photo before they ruined it to see what they 
> copy and pasted over... 

I have such a photos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588392

From	Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date	2022-07-13 18:42 -0700
Message-ID	<e9e11cb0-cbc9-452a-a2a3-aabde6d51cb9n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#588390

On Wednesday, July 13, 2022 at 4:22:22 PM UTC-7, rotchm wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2022 at 2:47:58 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > rotchm wrote: 
> > > 
> > > On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 11:16:58 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > > rotchm wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > > So are you saying that those stars are not really there? 
> > > 
> > > No answer?
> Still no answer? Its a simple yes/no answer...
> > > 
> > > > > That is, if I take out a telescope and I look at those locations, there won't be a corresponding star there? 
> > > 
> > > No answer?
> Still no answer? Its a simple yes/no answer...

> > I thought the question I asked answered the question.

> You thought wrong. Try again.

> > So, you need a copy of the photo before they ruined it to see what they 
> > copy and pasted over...

> I have such a photos.

Such photos are readily available... and they show these same stars "without" the Webb spikes... which are clearly artifacts of the telescope design...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588353

From	Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net>
Date	2022-07-12 23:46 -0500
Message-ID	<Yt2dnablsYKn01P_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#588344

On 7/12/22 8:13 PM, rotchm wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 8:31:32 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
>> I circled the fake stars in Red: 
> 
> So are you saying that those stars are not really there?
> That is, if I take out a telescope and I look at those locations, there won't be a corresponding star there?

Most of them are not "fake stars", or real stars, they are GALAXIES.
There are only 1-2 dozen individual stars in that image. As usual,
Starmaker doesn't have a clue.

Tom Roberts

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588348

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2022-07-12 20:01 -0700
Message-ID	<62CE3592.7B0F@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#588341

Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 5:31:34 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > I circled the fake stars in Red:
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547013445458964481/photo/1
> >
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> And your evidence for this claim is exactly what? You are really testing my bullshit meter, which is vibrating like mad right now.


Okay, I see some of yous need a closer view...

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1547051286104682496/photo/1

Here is 'just' two fake stars outlined
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg6p8UVUAEnSnb?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

Here is more closer...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg601-VsAA7jmY?format=jpg&name=large


Here is more more closer...as you can see, the two are a match of cut and paste fake stars:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXg65kuVQAA9fTQ?format=jpg&name=4096x4096


(my gawd, it's filled with ...fake stars!)



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXgYKfLVQAIGcUj?format=jpg&name=4096x4096


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →

csiph-web

James Webb Space Telescope new photo is filled with fake stars!

Contents

#588317 — James Webb Space Telescope new photo is filled with fake stars!

#588318

#588322

#588336

#588337

#588340

#588351

#588714

#588716

#588722

#588727

#588341

#588344

#588350

#588359

#588378

#588390

#588392

#588353

#588348