Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #587199 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-06-19 09:10 -0700 |
| Last post | 2022-07-10 07:25 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 427 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 09:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-19 10:31 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:01 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-19 12:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-19 12:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:49 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-19 13:07 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 13:15 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-19 20:29 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 13:34 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-19 21:22 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-20 11:36 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-20 08:49 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 01:53 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-20 09:12 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 02:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-20 09:50 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 03:52 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-20 11:27 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 15:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-20 22:27 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-21 10:45 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 10:18 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-21 12:27 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 10:48 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 10:50 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-21 13:58 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 12:38 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 05:52 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 13:04 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 10:22 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 16:10 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 18:25 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 05:08 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 07:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 08:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 08:41 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 08:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 09:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 11:05 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 12:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 13:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 13:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 13:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 13:37 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 22:42 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 07:43 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 08:56 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 22:15 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-21 12:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 13:44 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 00:34 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 01:04 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 11:30 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 09:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 23:00 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 12:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 22:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-20 09:48 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 08:01 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 17:21 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 23:43 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-22 12:09 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-22 18:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-24 11:43 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 09:27 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 07:40 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 08:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 11:04 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:12 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 13:07 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-20 10:12 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 08:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 08:30 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 08:51 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 09:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 11:51 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 12:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 16:46 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 07:37 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 12:00 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-22 11:49 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-20 15:29 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 13:05 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 13:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 13:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 13:27 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-20 17:35 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 22:44 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 07:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-22 11:42 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 13:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-29 23:03 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 11:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-19 12:05 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:31 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-19 12:44 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 13:12 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-19 14:48 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 07:25 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-19 22:14 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 07:31 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-20 14:58 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 08:29 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 13:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-21 18:05 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 09:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 10:02 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-21 20:26 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 10:45 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 13:28 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 22:09 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 11:36 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-22 11:55 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-24 11:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-24 12:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-24 13:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-25 13:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 13:46 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-06-25 22:56 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-26 12:00 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-27 11:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-06-27 23:32 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 13:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-24 22:40 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-24 17:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 22:58 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-25 10:23 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 03:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 22:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-25 12:18 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 03:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-26 20:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-27 09:30 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 02:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-06-27 11:04 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 10:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-06-27 13:04 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 10:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 11:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-07-01 22:10 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 22:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 22:58 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-27 14:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 23:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-27 22:27 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-28 07:31 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-28 16:45 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 08:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 09:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 09:51 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-28 22:34 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 20:01 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-29 10:04 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 08:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 07:47 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-25 13:48 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-06-25 22:58 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-26 11:56 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-27 11:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 12:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 12:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-28 14:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 16:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 18:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 22:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-29 14:51 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 12:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-05 12:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-05 13:45 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 17:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 20:42 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-07 14:54 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 16:59 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 00:26 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 21:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 11:09 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-08 06:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 14:13 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 14:55 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 11:14 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 06:32 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 14:32 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 14:44 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 08:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 09:08 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 09:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 11:52 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-08 16:36 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 14:24 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 11:12 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 18:36 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemoveandReplaceATkevinaylward.co.uk> - 2022-07-13 16:57 +0100
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 10:25 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-12 13:12 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 18:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-13 20:44 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-13 20:47 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-29 11:53 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 02:33 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-29 09:43 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 02:54 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-29 16:21 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 06:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-29 13:48 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Python <python@invalid> - 2022-06-29 19:36 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 14:30 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-29 23:06 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-28 12:05 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-28 14:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-29 11:44 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-26 16:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-27 12:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 07:08 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-01 10:00 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-01 12:47 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-01 13:19 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-02 12:13 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-01 18:18 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-01 12:54 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-01 22:29 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 16:04 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 12:08 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-01 19:33 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-01 13:07 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 16:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-01 23:42 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 17:25 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-02 07:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-02 08:45 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-02 13:36 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-02 14:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-03 07:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 10:56 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 11:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-03 12:47 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 15:00 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 19:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 19:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 19:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 19:37 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-04 08:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-04 10:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-04 18:18 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-05 16:40 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-02 20:11 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-02 18:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-03 10:01 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 00:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-05 05:35 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-05 09:57 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-07-04 22:49 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 07:48 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-05 08:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 09:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 09:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 09:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 10:33 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 13:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-07-05 23:03 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-05 17:21 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 20:41 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-06 10:08 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 09:02 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 09:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 10:02 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-06 22:47 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 22:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 23:31 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 08:33 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 09:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 09:27 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 08:53 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 06:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 16:34 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-05 11:42 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 13:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-06 06:42 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 07:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 12:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 08:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 09:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 13:32 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-05 15:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 07:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-06 03:58 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-06 10:33 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 07:49 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 08:40 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-06 09:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 09:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 09:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-06 10:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-06 17:33 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 22:30 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 22:47 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-07 13:27 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 10:37 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-08 14:56 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-09 10:57 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 09:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-09 07:41 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-09 17:51 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 09:52 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-09 08:36 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-09 09:05 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-09 14:06 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 11:52 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-09 18:19 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 07:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-10 08:36 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 09:28 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 11:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-11 07:46 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 09:33 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-11 10:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 12:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-11 13:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 14:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 17:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 18:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 18:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-11 14:06 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 12:41 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-11 16:16 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 13:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-12 12:40 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 13:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 13:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 14:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-12 10:54 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-12 08:58 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 07:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 08:01 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 11:49 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-11 19:38 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 13:30 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 16:56 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-12 09:45 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 11:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-12 13:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 16:56 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-13 07:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 12:04 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-13 13:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 16:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-14 07:46 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-14 09:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-14 09:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 10:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-15 01:15 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-14 21:23 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-14 22:03 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-15 14:40 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-15 16:29 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-15 19:15 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Alsor <alsorgzl@gmail.com> - 2022-07-15 10:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 12:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-14 19:29 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 16:54 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-17 20:10 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-17 14:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 16:07 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 16:48 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 21:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-26 10:23 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 04:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 20:46 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 10:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Alsor <alsorgzl@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 10:12 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-12 14:02 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 15:15 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 17:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-07-12 10:36 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 12:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-07-12 17:11 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 18:30 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-07-18 21:36 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 19:54 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 23:12 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 16:34 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 23:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ufonaut <ufonaut9@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 06:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 08:58 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ufonaut <ufonaut9@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 05:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 09:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-11 15:40 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 14:01 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-11 19:31 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 21:58 -0700
Chez Watt (was Re: Time Dilation Experiments) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-12 12:40 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-09 12:51 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 09:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-09 10:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-09 13:41 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-07-09 20:44 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-09 12:15 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 21:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 07:36 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 08:40 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-10 18:45 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-10 18:53 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-10 01:33 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 07:43 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 09:04 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 09:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 10:32 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 12:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 11:42 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-10 12:56 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 10:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-10 13:35 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 12:02 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-10 13:38 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-07-02 07:08 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-02 07:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Alsor <alsorgzl@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 07:25 -0700
Page 7 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 22 Next page →
| From | RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-25 13:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <95bdc1e2-b28d-496f-9523-ef88bd11fc81n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587511 |
On June 24, Paparios wrote: >>>> http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html > >>> Which one tests length contraction? > >> As far as I know, length contraction has never been confirmed >> by any experiment. The experiments just confirm time dilation. > > Actually, if time dilation which is a property of Special Relativity (coming as a consequence > of the Lorentz Transformation Equations), then length contraction (also a consequence of the LTE) > should also be valid. In other words, you can't have time dilation without having length contraction. If I need a sofa for my living room, I pull out my tape measure, and measure the length of the room. Then in the furniture store, I measure the length of the sofa. I don't invent fairy tales about the half life of sofas, based on their speed, seen from various frames, then derive their length from that. I MEASURE THE SOFA! Your argument is unscience and unlogical. One doesn't invent a theory, then deduce the outcome of experiments which HAVE NOT BEEN PERFORMED, then congratulate oneself for confirming the theory. -- Rich
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-25 13:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f06c3535-24ef-482b-ad36-23d2339343acn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587550 |
On Saturday, June 25, 2022 at 1:26:16 PM UTC-7, RichD wrote: > Your argument is unscience and unlogical. One doesn't invent a theory, then > deduce the outcome of experiments which HAVE NOT BEEN PERFORMED, > then congratulate oneself for confirming the theory. Perhaps you should take a relativity course before you start lecturing about why it is incorrect... just a thought...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-25 22:56 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <t97sqk$3k8af$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #587550 |
Op 25-jun.-2022 om 22:26 schreef RichD: > On June 24, Paparios wrote: >>>>> http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html >> >>>> Which one tests length contraction? >> >>> As far as I know, length contraction has never been confirmed >>> by any experiment. The experiments just confirm time dilation. >> >> Actually, if time dilation which is a property of Special Relativity (coming as a consequence >> of the Lorentz Transformation Equations), then length contraction (also a consequence of the LTE) >> should also be valid. In other words, you can't have time dilation without having length contraction. > > If I need a sofa for my living room, I pull out my tape measure, and measure > the length of the room. Then in the furniture store, I measure the length of the sofa. > > I don't invent fairy tales about the half life of sofas, based on their speed, seen > from various frames, then derive their length from that. I MEASURE THE SOFA! > > Your argument is unscience and unlogical. One doesn't invent a theory, then > deduce the outcome of experiments which HAVE NOT BEEN PERFORMED, > then congratulate oneself for confirming the theory. You were never thrown from a high tower to verify whether you will splash onto the pavement. Let's not congratulate Newton for his theory before we PERFORM THAT EXPERIMENT. Dirk Vdm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-26 12:00 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <t9977s$3sc6c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #587550 |
On 2022-06-25 20:26:13 +0000, RichD said: > One doesn't invent a theory, then deduce the outcome of experiments > which HAVE NOT BEEN PERFORMED, then congratulate oneself for confirming > the theory. Instead one invents a theory, then deduces the oucome of experiments (or at least one experiment), then waits until someone performs the experiment and observes the predicted result, then receives the Nobel price. Mikko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-27 11:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3db3ede7-eca7-4c82-b062-8e6401bd5e9bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587577 |
On June 26, Mikko wrote: >> One doesn't invent a theory, then deduce the outcome of experiments >> which HAVE NOT BEEN PERFORMED, then congratulate oneself for confirming >> the theory. > > Instead one invents a theory, then deduces the oucome of experiments, > then waits until someone performs the experiment and observes the predicted > result, then receives the Nobel price. Right. So one invents a theory which predicts a meter stick moving at √(3/4) c will measure as .5 meter. We're still waiting for confirmation on that one - -- Rich
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-27 23:32 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <t9d7m9$odqm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #587614 |
Op 27-jun.-2022 om 20:21 schreef RichD: > On June 26, Mikko wrote: >>> One doesn't invent a theory, then deduce the outcome of experiments >>> which HAVE NOT BEEN PERFORMED, then congratulate oneself for confirming >>> the theory. >> >> Instead one invents a theory, then deduces the oucome of experiments, >> then waits until someone performs the experiment and observes the predicted >> result, then receives the Nobel price. > > Right. > So one invents a theory which predicts a meter stick moving at > √(3/4) c will measure as .5 meter. > > We're still waiting for confirmation on that one - We're still waiting on confirmation of an idiot getting smeared all over the pavement. Dirk Vdm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 13:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8251c310-aeea-49af-ab8e-fefb80dc2a37n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587510 |
On Friday, 24 June 2022 at 21:57:05 UTC+2, det...@outlook.com wrote: > by any experiment. The experiments just confirm time dilation. In the meantime in the real world, however, forbidden by your insane religion GPS and TAI keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks always did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1pu2qy8.1e3i0ig1czmb0mN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #587510 |
Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> wrote: > On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 1:50:48 PM UTC-5, RichD wrote: > > On June 22, Mikko wrote: > > > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > > > > > Here is another link: > > > http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html > > Which one tests length contraction? > > > > -- > > Rich > > None of them. As far as I know, length contraction has never been confirmed > by any experiment. The experiments just confirm time dilation. Time dilation, as we observe for the fast muon is seen by the muon as length contraction. It's two sides of the same coin, Jan (see my Mr. Tompkins posting)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 17:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dd5c1798-576a-4994-9392-6ad32dc8b7d2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587513 |
On June 24, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>>> http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html > >>> Which one tests length contraction? > >> As far as I know, length contraction has never been confirmed >> by any experiment. The experiments just confirm time dilation. > > Time dilation, as we observe for the fast muon > is seen by the muon as length contraction. Has anyone asked the muon what he sees? -- Rich
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 22:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a4092211-e0e2-4af7-b976-f6babac23d8en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587523 |
On Saturday, 25 June 2022 at 02:50:28 UTC+2, RichD wrote: > On June 24, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>>> http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html > > > >>> Which one tests length contraction? > > > >> As far as I know, length contraction has never been confirmed > >> by any experiment. The experiments just confirm time dilation. > > > > Time dilation, as we observe for the fast muon > > is seen by the muon as length contraction. > Has anyone asked the muon what he sees? Do you suggest that muons can be cranks not seeing the wisdom of Giant Guru? A nonsense; how could a muon be a crank?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-25 10:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1pu3n66.19j1gwy1skj443N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #587523 |
RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> wrote: > On June 24, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>>> http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html > > > >>> Which one tests length contraction? > > > >> As far as I know, length contraction has never been confirmed > >> by any experiment. The experiments just confirm time dilation. > > > > Time dilation, as we observe for the fast muon > > is seen by the muon as length contraction. > > Has anyone asked the muon what he sees? Muons can't speak, Jan (who can play dumb too)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-25 03:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64b44d9b-c440-4ef7-99d4-00c61acb6f21n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587533 |
On Saturday, 25 June 2022 at 10:23:48 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote: > RichD <r_dela...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On June 24, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >>>> http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html > > > > > >>> Which one tests length contraction? > > > > > >> As far as I know, length contraction has never been confirmed > > >> by any experiment. The experiments just confirm time dilation. > > > > > > Time dilation, as we observe for the fast muon > > > is seen by the muon as length contraction. > > > > Has anyone asked the muon what he sees? > Muons can't speak, If they could they would say that our Giant Guru was ingenious and praise his infinite wisdom, no doubt. Or they would be stupid cranks if they didn't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 22:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d726fd95-079d-4844-82dc-3f96fbed9a8dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587513 |
On Friday, 24 June 2022 at 22:40:52 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Ed Lake <det...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 1:50:48 PM UTC-5, RichD wrote: > > > On June 22, Mikko wrote: > > > > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > > > > > > > Here is another link: > > > > http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html > > > Which one tests length contraction? > > > > > > -- > > > Rich > > > > None of them. As far as I know, length contraction has never been confirmed > > by any experiment. The experiments just confirm time dilation. > Time dilation, as we observe for the fast muon In the meantime in the real world, however, forbidden by your bunch of idiots GPS and TAI keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks always did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-25 12:18 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <t96js8$3gftl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #587506 |
On 2022-06-24 18:50:45 +0000, RichD said: > On June 22, Mikko wrote: >>> Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html >> >> Here is another link: >> http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html > > Which one tests length contraction? So far no experiment has directly tested length contraction. It is not that easy to measure the length of an moving object. There are indirect confirmations. For example, the null result of Michelson-Morley experiment cannot be explained with time dilation but can be explained with length contraction. Likewise, length contraction can explain the magnetic field around an electric current but time diation can't. More generally, if length contraction is not true then Special and General Relativities aren't, either. But in that case there should be other deviations besides length contraction, and none is observed. That is another indirect confirmation of length contraction. Indirect confirmations are less convincing than direct ones as there is always a possibility that the confirming results follow from some unknown effects even when no such explanations are known. Mikko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-25 03:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <859cd5c2-d62f-45e7-8f45-a0843a9a2d1en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587535 |
On Saturday, 25 June 2022 at 11:18:03 UTC+2, Mikko wrote: > On 2022-06-24 18:50:45 +0000, RichD said: > > > On June 22, Mikko wrote: > >>> Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > >> > >> Here is another link: > >> http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html > > > > Which one tests length contraction? > So far no experiment has directly tested length contraction. It is not > that easy to measure the length of an moving object. > > There are indirect confirmations. For example, the null result of In the meantime in the real world, forbidden by your insane religion GPS and TAI keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks always did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-26 20:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62B922E9.399@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #587537 |
I just don't understand if a clock is at a mountain and the other clock is on the ground level... how does time dilation occur at both clocks at the same time? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-27 09:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1pu76kv.pq2jd41k1wleeN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #587600 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > I just don't understand > if a clock is at a mountain and > the other clock is on the ground level... > how does time dilation occur at both clocks > at the same time? It doesn't occur at one time, it occurs all the time. The clock on top of the mountain just runs faster. For a thousand meter high mountain it will gain about 10 nanoseconds per day wrt to a clock at sea level. This was known and understood more than 50 years ago. (and confirmed experimentally) It is routinely accounted for when calculating -the- atomic time, TAI, by averaging the readings of hundreds of clocks situated all over the Earth. (at different altitudes of course) Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-27 02:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <07e9306d-23af-40f5-b434-a12d7a8bf04en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587603 |
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 09:30:50 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote: > The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > I just don't understand > > if a clock is at a mountain and > > the other clock is on the ground level... > > how does time dilation occur at both clocks > > at the same time? > It doesn't occur at one time, it occurs all the time. > The clock on top of the mountain just runs faster. Against the Holiest Postulate of your idiot guru, demanding it to run at the same rate, and demanding you to mumble that "it runs at the same rate but its spacetime trajectory blahblahblahblah..."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-27 11:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vO6dnQIwx99pSST_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #587603 |
On 6/27/22 2:30 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: > The clock on top of the mountain just runs faster. No, it doesn't. The clocks each run (tick) at the same rate. But because spacetime is curved due to earth's mass, COMPARISONS of the clocks show a difference in how they accumulate ticks. Analogy: A carpenter's level in New York shows a horizontal line, and an identical level in Chicago also shows a horizontal line. But these two lines are not parallel, because the earth's surface is CURVED. Similarly, a clock at the top of the mountain ticks one second per second, and an identical clock in the valley ticks one second per second. But when one compares how they accumulate ticks, they disagree because spacetime is CURVED. In particular, the dominant curvature is along the time dimension, which is unfamiliar to most people; it directly affects such comparisons. In GR this is easily explained: the two clocks follow different paths through spacetime. If one modeled them as ticking at different rates, one would not get correspondence with actual clocks in the world we inhabit. > For a thousand meter high mountain it will gain about 10 nanoseconds > per day wrt to a clock at sea level. Yes. But still, both clocks tick at the same rate. > This was known and understood more than 50 years ago. (and confirmed > experimentally) Yes, but this is more subtle than many people understand, and the details were not adequately understood by many of the writers of popular science books. And writers around here. > It is routinely accounted for when calculating -the- atomic time, > TAI, by averaging the readings of hundreds of clocks situated all > over the Earth. (at different altitudes of course) Yes. Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-27 10:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cf7784c1-797a-45be-9793-971344ec58bdn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587610 |
On Monday, June 27, 2022 at 9:04:12 AM UTC-7, tjrob137 wrote: > On 6/27/22 2:30 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > The clock on top of the mountain just runs faster. > No, it doesn't. The clocks each run (tick) at the same rate. But because > spacetime is curved due to earth's mass, COMPARISONS of the clocks show > a difference in how they accumulate ticks. > > Analogy: A carpenter's level in New York shows a horizontal line, and an > identical level in Chicago also shows a horizontal line. But these two > lines are not parallel, because the earth's surface is CURVED. > > Similarly, a clock at the top of the mountain ticks one second per > second, and an identical clock in the valley ticks one second per > second. But when one compares how they accumulate ticks, they disagree > because spacetime is CURVED. In particular, the dominant curvature is > along the time dimension, which is unfamiliar to most people; it > directly affects such comparisons. > > In GR this is easily explained: the two clocks follow different paths > through spacetime. If one modeled them as ticking at different rates, > one would not get correspondence with actual clocks in the world we inhabit. > > For a thousand meter high mountain it will gain about 10 nanoseconds > > per day wrt to a clock at sea level. > Yes. But still, both clocks tick at the same rate. > > This was known and understood more than 50 years ago. (and confirmed > > experimentally) > Yes, but this is more subtle than many people understand, and the > details were not adequately understood by many of the writers of popular > science books. And writers around here. > > It is routinely accounted for when calculating -the- atomic time, > > TAI, by averaging the readings of hundreds of clocks situated all > > over the Earth. (at different altitudes of course) > Yes. > > Tom Roberts Don't all cases of "time dilation" have as well a model where "time dilation (and length contraction) is explained as space contraction". ? It's pretty firmly held that time invariance has always been held up, a clock hypothesis and all, .... According to cosmology today, the cosmological constant is about zero, ..., for a theory where it's non-zero, it's about infinitesimal, ..., mathematics _owes_ physics more real mathematics of infinities and infinitiesimals, to explain singularities, which include both usual asymptotes as what go to infinity, or poles, and polar theory, and also origins, like a spiral-space-filling curve, what happens to be a singularity, and has curvature like 1/R and happens to fit with a cosmological about zero or "1 / infinity, sums over infinitely-many to 1". About "the real metric" or "R-metric".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 22 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web