Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #587199 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-06-19 09:10 -0700 |
| Last post | 2022-07-10 07:25 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 427 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 09:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-19 10:31 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:01 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-19 12:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-19 12:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:49 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-19 13:07 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 13:15 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-19 20:29 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 13:34 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-19 21:22 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-20 11:36 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-20 08:49 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 01:53 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-20 09:12 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 02:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-20 09:50 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 03:52 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-20 11:27 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 15:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-20 22:27 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-21 10:45 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 10:18 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-21 12:27 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 10:48 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 10:50 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-21 13:58 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 12:38 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 05:52 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 13:04 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 10:22 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 16:10 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 18:25 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 05:08 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 07:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 08:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 08:41 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 08:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 09:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 11:05 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 12:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 13:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 13:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 13:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 13:37 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 22:42 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 07:43 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 08:56 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 22:15 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-21 12:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 13:44 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 00:34 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 01:04 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 11:30 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 09:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 23:00 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 12:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 22:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-20 09:48 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 08:01 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 17:21 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 23:43 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-22 12:09 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-22 18:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-24 11:43 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 09:27 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 07:40 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 08:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 11:04 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:12 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 13:07 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-20 10:12 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 08:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 08:30 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 08:51 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 09:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 11:51 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 12:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 16:46 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 07:37 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Al Coe <coeal5136@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 12:00 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-22 11:49 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-20 15:29 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 13:05 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 13:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 13:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 13:27 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-20 17:35 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 22:44 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 07:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-22 11:42 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 13:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-29 23:03 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 11:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-19 12:05 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 12:31 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-19 12:44 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-19 13:12 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-19 14:48 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 07:25 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-19 22:14 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 07:31 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-20 14:58 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-20 08:29 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 13:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-21 18:05 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 09:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 10:02 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-21 20:26 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 10:45 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-21 13:28 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-21 22:09 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 11:36 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-22 11:55 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-24 11:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-24 12:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-24 13:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-25 13:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 13:46 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-06-25 22:56 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-26 12:00 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-27 11:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-06-27 23:32 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 13:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-24 22:40 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-24 17:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 22:58 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-25 10:23 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 03:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 22:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-25 12:18 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 03:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-26 20:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-27 09:30 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 02:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-06-27 11:04 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 10:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-06-27 13:04 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 10:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 11:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-07-01 22:10 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 22:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 22:58 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-27 14:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 23:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-27 22:27 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-06-28 07:31 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-28 16:45 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 08:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 09:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 09:51 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-28 22:34 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 20:01 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-29 10:04 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 08:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 07:47 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-25 13:48 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-06-25 22:58 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-26 11:56 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-27 11:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 12:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 12:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-28 14:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 16:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 18:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 22:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-29 14:51 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 12:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-05 12:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-05 13:45 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 17:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 20:42 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-07 14:54 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 16:59 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 00:26 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 21:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 11:09 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-08 06:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 14:13 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 14:55 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 11:14 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 06:32 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 14:32 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 14:44 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 08:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 09:08 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 09:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 11:52 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-08 16:36 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 14:24 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 11:12 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-08 18:36 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemoveandReplaceATkevinaylward.co.uk> - 2022-07-13 16:57 +0100
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 10:25 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-12 13:12 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 18:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-13 20:44 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-13 20:47 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-29 11:53 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 02:33 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-29 09:43 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 02:54 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-29 16:21 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 06:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-29 13:48 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Python <python@invalid> - 2022-06-29 19:36 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 14:30 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-29 23:06 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-28 12:05 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-28 14:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-29 11:44 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-06-26 16:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-27 12:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 07:08 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-01 10:00 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-01 12:47 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-01 13:19 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-02 12:13 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-01 18:18 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-01 12:54 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-01 22:29 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 16:04 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 12:08 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-01 19:33 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-01 13:07 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 16:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-01 23:42 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 17:25 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-02 07:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-02 08:45 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-02 13:36 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-02 14:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-03 07:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 10:56 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 11:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-03 12:47 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 15:00 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 19:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 19:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 19:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 19:37 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-04 08:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-04 10:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-04 18:18 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-05 16:40 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-02 20:11 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-02 18:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-03 10:01 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 00:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-05 05:35 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-05 09:57 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-07-04 22:49 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 07:48 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-05 08:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 09:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 09:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 09:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 10:33 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 13:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-07-05 23:03 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-05 17:21 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 20:41 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-06 10:08 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 09:02 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 09:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 10:02 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-06 22:47 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 22:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 23:31 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 08:33 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 09:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 09:27 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 08:53 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 06:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 16:34 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-05 11:42 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 13:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-06 06:42 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 07:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 12:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 08:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-05 09:11 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-05 13:32 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-05 15:26 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 07:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-06 03:58 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-06 10:33 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 07:49 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 08:40 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-06 09:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-06 09:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 09:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-06 10:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-06 17:33 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 22:30 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 22:47 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-07 13:27 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-08 10:37 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-08 14:56 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-09 10:57 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 09:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-09 07:41 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-09 17:51 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 09:52 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-09 08:36 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-09 09:05 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-09 14:06 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 11:52 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-09 18:19 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 07:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-10 08:36 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 09:28 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 11:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-11 07:46 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 09:33 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-11 10:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 12:39 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-07-11 13:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 14:13 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 17:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 18:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 18:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-11 14:06 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 12:41 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-11 16:16 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 13:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-12 12:40 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 13:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 13:23 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 14:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-12 10:54 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-12 08:58 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 07:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 08:01 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 11:49 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-11 19:38 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 13:30 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 16:56 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-12 09:45 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 11:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-12 13:16 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 16:56 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-13 07:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 12:04 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-13 13:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 16:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-14 07:46 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-14 09:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-14 09:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 10:09 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-15 01:15 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-14 21:23 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-14 22:03 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-15 14:40 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-15 16:29 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-15 19:15 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Alsor <alsorgzl@gmail.com> - 2022-07-15 10:10 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 12:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-14 19:29 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 16:54 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-07-17 20:10 +0000
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-17 14:57 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 16:07 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 16:48 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-25 21:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-26 10:23 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 04:24 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 20:46 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 10:18 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Alsor <alsorgzl@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 10:12 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-12 14:02 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 15:15 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 17:03 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-07-12 10:36 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 12:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-07-12 17:11 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 18:30 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-07-18 21:36 -0500
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 19:54 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 23:12 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 16:34 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 23:14 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ufonaut <ufonaut9@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 06:35 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 08:58 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ufonaut <ufonaut9@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 05:17 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 09:20 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-11 15:40 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-11 14:01 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-11 19:31 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 21:58 -0700
Chez Watt (was Re: Time Dilation Experiments) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-12 12:40 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-09 12:51 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 09:55 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-09 10:06 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-09 13:41 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-07-09 20:44 +0200
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-09 12:15 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 21:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 07:36 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 08:40 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-10 18:45 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-10 18:53 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-10 01:33 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 07:43 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 09:04 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-10 09:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 10:32 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 12:50 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 11:42 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-10 12:56 -0400
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 10:22 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-10 13:35 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 12:02 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-10 13:38 +0300
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-07-02 07:08 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> - 2022-07-02 07:21 -0700
Re: Time Dilation Experiments Alsor <alsorgzl@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 07:25 -0700
Page 6 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 22 Next page →
| From | Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-19 13:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0c1368eb-dfd9-41db-afbf-c2d9cdb5079bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587227 |
On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 2:44:06 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 2:04:59 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > Over the years, I've accumulated a list of 12 major Time Dilation > > > > experiments which CONFIRM that Time Dilation is REAL, and that > > > > time does run at different rates for an object depending upon an > > > > object's speed and its proximity to a gravitational mass. > > > > > > > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > > > > > > > Here's the list of experiments: > > > > 1. Hafele-Keating > > > > 2. NIST Optical Clocks and Relativity > > > > 3. Geodesy and Metrology experiment (measuring altitude by time difference) > > > > 4. Muon experiments > > > > 5. University of Maryland > > > > 6. Japanese Mitaka to Norikura > > > > 7. Briatore and Leschiutta > > > > 8. National Physical Laboratory - 1996 > > > > 9. Van Baak - 2005 > > > > 10. National Physical Laboratory - 2010 > > > > 11. Van Baak - 2016 > > > > 12. Tokyo Skytree - 2020 > > > > > > > > Is there anyone here who seriously claims that Time Dilation > > > > has NOT been fully verified by these experiments? > > > Of course time dilation is real, but what is never mentioned is > > > that Time Dilatiion runs as different rates for different objects. > > > > > > (not that > > > time runs at different rates for an different objects) > > > > > > It is that ..Time Dilatiion runs as different rates for different > > > objects. > > > > > > Time Dilation is...inconsistent. > > > > > > To put it simply, sometime it dilatates, sometimes it doesn't. > > > > > > Does any of those on dat list mentioned WHEN time dilatated???? > > > > > > In otherwords, do an experiment...all of them using the same object. > > > > > > Will they all get the same result? > > > > > > They will discover that > > > sometime it dilatates, sometimes it doesn't. > > > > > > Time Dilation is...inconsistent. > > > > You make no sense. The "objects" being used in ALL the time dilation > > experiments are TWO ATOMIC CLOCKS. Nothing else can MEASURE or > > DISPLAY the very very TINY effect that velocity and altitude have on objects > > at the speeds and altitudes we can achieve with today's technology. > > > > One of the astronaut twins was in space for over a year, while the other twin > > was mostly on the ground. As a result, one twin aged 5 MICROSECONDS > > more than his twin. Only an atomic clock can measure microseconds. > > > > Ed > Okay, then everyone at that list can do the experiment all 'at the same > time', > with two clocks. > Will they all get the same result? > Do you have to wait a year to see a 5 micosseconds? > > Is that like around one second every other month? > > When does the one second happen? in two months? > > > or at the end of the year? There's an on--line computer for calculating velocity time dilation at this link: https://keisan.casio.com/exec/system/1224059993 Someone in orbit may travel 17,000 mph which is 7.6 kilometers per second. That means that 1 second for the person in orbit will be 1.0000000003213 seconds for the person on the ground. Someone would have to travel 259,628 kilometers per second before on second for him will be 2 seconds for someone on the ground. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-19 14:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62AF99C8.5A7C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #587233 |
Ed Lake wrote: > > On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 2:44:06 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 2:04:59 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Over the years, I've accumulated a list of 12 major Time Dilation > > > > > experiments which CONFIRM that Time Dilation is REAL, and that > > > > > time does run at different rates for an object depending upon an > > > > > object's speed and its proximity to a gravitational mass. > > > > > > > > > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > > > > > > > > > Here's the list of experiments: > > > > > 1. Hafele-Keating > > > > > 2. NIST Optical Clocks and Relativity > > > > > 3. Geodesy and Metrology experiment (measuring altitude by time difference) > > > > > 4. Muon experiments > > > > > 5. University of Maryland > > > > > 6. Japanese Mitaka to Norikura > > > > > 7. Briatore and Leschiutta > > > > > 8. National Physical Laboratory - 1996 > > > > > 9. Van Baak - 2005 > > > > > 10. National Physical Laboratory - 2010 > > > > > 11. Van Baak - 2016 > > > > > 12. Tokyo Skytree - 2020 > > > > > > > > > > Is there anyone here who seriously claims that Time Dilation > > > > > has NOT been fully verified by these experiments? > > > > Of course time dilation is real, but what is never mentioned is > > > > that Time Dilatiion runs as different rates for different objects. > > > > > > > > (not that > > > > time runs at different rates for an different objects) > > > > > > > > It is that ..Time Dilatiion runs as different rates for different > > > > objects. > > > > > > > > Time Dilation is...inconsistent. > > > > > > > > To put it simply, sometime it dilatates, sometimes it doesn't. > > > > > > > > Does any of those on dat list mentioned WHEN time dilatated???? > > > > > > > > In otherwords, do an experiment...all of them using the same object. > > > > > > > > Will they all get the same result? > > > > > > > > They will discover that > > > > sometime it dilatates, sometimes it doesn't. > > > > > > > > Time Dilation is...inconsistent. > > > > > > You make no sense. The "objects" being used in ALL the time dilation > > > experiments are TWO ATOMIC CLOCKS. Nothing else can MEASURE or > > > DISPLAY the very very TINY effect that velocity and altitude have on objects > > > at the speeds and altitudes we can achieve with today's technology. > > > > > > One of the astronaut twins was in space for over a year, while the other twin > > > was mostly on the ground. As a result, one twin aged 5 MICROSECONDS > > > more than his twin. Only an atomic clock can measure microseconds. > > > > > > Ed > > Okay, then everyone at that list can do the experiment all 'at the same > > time', > > with two clocks. > > Will they all get the same result? > > Do you have to wait a year to see a 5 micosseconds? > > > > Is that like around one second every other month? > > > > When does the one second happen? in two months? > > > > > > or at the end of the year? > > There's an on--line computer for calculating velocity time dilation at > this link: https://keisan.casio.com/exec/system/1224059993 > > Someone in orbit may travel 17,000 mph which is 7.6 kilometers per second. > That means that 1 second for the person in orbit will be 1.0000000003213 > seconds for the person on the ground. > > Someone would have to travel 259,628 kilometers per second before > on second for him will be 2 seconds for someone on the ground. > > Ed All I want to know Mr. Ed is, if it takes a year (365 days) to record 5 MICROSECONDS, then WHEN did the 1 MICROSECONDS happen? It has to a number between 1 and 364. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-20 07:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <eba56c46-938c-4a52-92d5-d60d639dedb0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587242 |
On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 4:48:51 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 2:44:06 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 2:04:59 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > Ed Lake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Over the years, I've accumulated a list of 12 major Time Dilation > > > > > > experiments which CONFIRM that Time Dilation is REAL, and that > > > > > > time does run at different rates for an object depending upon an > > > > > > object's speed and its proximity to a gravitational mass. > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the list of experiments: > > > > > > 1. Hafele-Keating > > > > > > 2. NIST Optical Clocks and Relativity > > > > > > 3. Geodesy and Metrology experiment (measuring altitude by time difference) > > > > > > 4. Muon experiments > > > > > > 5. University of Maryland > > > > > > 6. Japanese Mitaka to Norikura > > > > > > 7. Briatore and Leschiutta > > > > > > 8. National Physical Laboratory - 1996 > > > > > > 9. Van Baak - 2005 > > > > > > 10. National Physical Laboratory - 2010 > > > > > > 11. Van Baak - 2016 > > > > > > 12. Tokyo Skytree - 2020 > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anyone here who seriously claims that Time Dilation > > > > > > has NOT been fully verified by these experiments? > > > > > Of course time dilation is real, but what is never mentioned is > > > > > that Time Dilatiion runs as different rates for different objects. > > > > > > > > > > (not that > > > > > time runs at different rates for an different objects) > > > > > > > > > > It is that ..Time Dilatiion runs as different rates for different > > > > > objects. > > > > > > > > > > Time Dilation is...inconsistent. > > > > > > > > > > To put it simply, sometime it dilatates, sometimes it doesn't. > > > > > > > > > > Does any of those on dat list mentioned WHEN time dilatated???? > > > > > > > > > > In otherwords, do an experiment...all of them using the same object. > > > > > > > > > > Will they all get the same result? > > > > > > > > > > They will discover that > > > > > sometime it dilatates, sometimes it doesn't. > > > > > > > > > > Time Dilation is...inconsistent. > > > > > > > > You make no sense. The "objects" being used in ALL the time dilation > > > > experiments are TWO ATOMIC CLOCKS. Nothing else can MEASURE or > > > > DISPLAY the very very TINY effect that velocity and altitude have on objects > > > > at the speeds and altitudes we can achieve with today's technology. > > > > > > > > One of the astronaut twins was in space for over a year, while the other twin > > > > was mostly on the ground. As a result, one twin aged 5 MICROSECONDS > > > > more than his twin. Only an atomic clock can measure microseconds. > > > > > > > > Ed > > > Okay, then everyone at that list can do the experiment all 'at the same > > > time', > > > with two clocks. > > > Will they all get the same result? > > > Do you have to wait a year to see a 5 micosseconds? > > > > > > Is that like around one second every other month? > > > > > > When does the one second happen? in two months? > > > > > > > > > or at the end of the year? > > > > There's an on--line computer for calculating velocity time dilation at > > this link: https://keisan.casio.com/exec/system/1224059993 > > > > Someone in orbit may travel 17,000 mph which is 7.6 kilometers per second. > > That means that 1 second for the person in orbit will be 1.0000000003213 > > seconds for the person on the ground. > > > > Someone would have to travel 259,628 kilometers per second before > > on second for him will be 2 seconds for someone on the ground. > > > > Ed > All I want to know Mr. Ed is, if it takes a year (365 days) to record 5 > MICROSECONDS, then > WHEN did the 1 MICROSECONDS happen? It has to a number between 1 and > 364. 364 divided by 5 equals 72.8. So, every 72.8 days that Scott Kelly spent in orbit meant that his brother Mark, on the ground, aged 1 MILLIsecond more than Scott. Here's an article about it: https://www.space.com/33411-astronaut-scott-kelly-relativity-twin-brother-ages.html I wrote microseconds when I meant milliseconds. A microsecond is one millionth of a second. A millisecond is one thousandth of a second. So Mark aged a thousand times faster than what I wrote. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-19 22:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lVXK8H0fisvPycwIBspxYnJ1VTE@jntp> |
| In reply to | #587233 |
Le 19/06/2022 à 22:12, Ed Lake a écrit : > Someone would have to travel 259,628 kilometers per second before > on second for him will be 2 seconds for someone on the ground. This is true and false at the same time. If the object passes transversely, yes. But if the displacement is not transverse, it is false. This is what Dr. Hachel calls the longitudinal relativistic Doppler effect. For him this Doppler effect is NOT only visual, but real. The three expected effects on times, lengths (or distances), and wavelengths are real. <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?lVXK8H0fisvPycwIBspxYnJ1VTE@jntp/Data.Media:1> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?lVXK8H0fisvPycwIBspxYnJ1VTE@jntp/Data.Media:2> R.H. -- "Mais ne nous trompons pas. Il n'y a pas que de la violence avec des armes : il y a des situations de violence." Abbé Pierre. <http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=lVXK8H0fisvPycwIBspxYnJ1VTE@jntp>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-20 07:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f155d919-b9f3-4f67-8269-3fb6f78ea795n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587245 |
On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 5:14:54 PM UTC-5, Richard Hachel wrote: > Le 19/06/2022 à 22:12, Ed Lake a écrit : > > Someone would have to travel 259,628 kilometers per second before > > on second for him will be 2 seconds for someone on the ground. > This is true and false at the same time. > > If the object passes transversely, yes. > > But if the displacement is not transverse, it is false. Time dilation has nothing to do with the direction of travel. It is just about your speed relative to a different speed. Someone traveling at 259,628 kilometers per second toward the earth, away from the earth, or at right angles to the earth will age at 1/2 the rate as someone on earth. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-20 14:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2N3DjruxT9X8AXNOUidO914HRTc@jntp> |
| In reply to | #587287 |
Le 20/06/2022 à 16:31, Ed Lake a écrit : > On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 5:14:54 PM UTC-5, Richard Hachel wrote: > Time dilation has nothing to do with the direction of travel. No. You, you say that "time dilation has nothing to do with the direction of travel". And (in reality) it's false. > Ed R.H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-20 08:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7a7eeb43-01b3-44e6-a84d-94d132992b21n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587290 |
On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 9:59:00 AM UTC-5, Richard Hachel wrote: > Le 20/06/2022 à 16:31, Ed Lake a écrit : > > On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 5:14:54 PM UTC-5, Richard Hachel wrote: > > > Time dilation has nothing to do with the direction of travel. > No. In English, "No" could mean you AGREE that "Time dilation has nothing to do with the direction of travel." > > You, you say that "time dilation has nothing to do with the direction of > travel". > > And (in reality) it's false. Your English is very bad. What is false? And WHY do you believe it is "false"? Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-19 13:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <48120ff4-506d-458c-b272-8966248033ben@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587199 |
On Sunday, June 19, 2022 at 9:10:21 AM UTC-7, det...@outlook.com wrote: > Over the years, I've accumulated a list of 12 major Time Dilation > experiments which CONFIRM that Time Dilation is REAL, and that > time does run at different rates for an object depending upon an > object's speed and its proximity to a gravitational mass. > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > Here's the list of experiments: > 1. Hafele-Keating > 2. NIST Optical Clocks and Relativity > 3. Geodesy and Metrology experiment (measuring altitude by time difference) > 4. Muon experiments > 5. University of Maryland > 6. Japanese Mitaka to Norikura > 7. Briatore and Leschiutta > 8. National Physical Laboratory - 1996 > 9. Van Baak - 2005 > 10. National Physical Laboratory - 2010 > 11. Van Baak - 2016 > 12. Tokyo Skytree - 2020 > > Is there anyone here who seriously claims that Time Dilation > has NOT been fully verified by these experiments? I say instead it's space contraction (alternate mechanism).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 18:05 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1%lsK.333328$3%%8.238954@fx06.ams4> |
| In reply to | #587199 |
Den 19.06.2022 18:10, skrev Ed Lake: > Over the years, I've accumulated a list of 12 major Time Dilation > experiments which CONFIRM that Time Dilation is REAL, and that > time does run at different rates for an object depending upon an > object's speed and its proximity to a gravitational mass. > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > Here's the list of experiments: > 1. Hafele-Keating > 2. NIST Optical Clocks and Relativity > 3. Geodesy and Metrology experiment (measuring altitude by time difference) > 4. Muon experiments > 5. University of Maryland > 6. Japanese Mitaka to Norikura > 7. Briatore and Leschiutta > 8. National Physical Laboratory - 1996 > 9. Van Baak - 2005 > 10. National Physical Laboratory - 2010 > 11. Van Baak - 2016 > 12. Tokyo Skytree - 2020 > > Is there anyone here who seriously claims that Time Dilation > has NOT been fully verified by these experiments? https://paulba.no/pdf/Mutual_time_dilation.pdf -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 09:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f5dbc629-ed1a-4960-ba07-004c853b909bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587370 |
On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 at 18:05:20 UTC+2, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 19.06.2022 18:10, skrev Ed Lake: > > Over the years, I've accumulated a list of 12 major Time Dilation > > experiments which CONFIRM that Time Dilation is REAL, and that > > time does run at different rates for an object depending upon an > > object's speed and its proximity to a gravitational mass. > > > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > > > Here's the list of experiments: > > 1. Hafele-Keating > > 2. NIST Optical Clocks and Relativity > > 3. Geodesy and Metrology experiment (measuring altitude by time difference) > > 4. Muon experiments > > 5. University of Maryland > > 6. Japanese Mitaka to Norikura > > 7. Briatore and Leschiutta > > 8. National Physical Laboratory - 1996 > > 9. Van Baak - 2005 > > 10. National Physical Laboratory - 2010 > > 11. Van Baak - 2016 > > 12. Tokyo Skytree - 2020 > > > > Is there anyone here who seriously claims that Time Dilation > > has NOT been fully verified by these experiments? > > https://paulba.no/pdf/Mutual_time_dilation.pdf In the meantime in the real world - forbidden and announced by your bunch of idiots as incorrect GPS clocks keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks always did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 10:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5285f085-e94c-41e3-8878-eefdbd241caen@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587370 |
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 11:05:20 AM UTC-5, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 19.06.2022 18:10, skrev Ed Lake: > > Over the years, I've accumulated a list of 12 major Time Dilation > > experiments which CONFIRM that Time Dilation is REAL, and that > > time does run at different rates for an object depending upon an > > object's speed and its proximity to a gravitational mass. > > > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > > > Here's the list of experiments: > > 1. Hafele-Keating > > 2. NIST Optical Clocks and Relativity > > 3. Geodesy and Metrology experiment (measuring altitude by time difference) > > 4. Muon experiments > > 5. University of Maryland > > 6. Japanese Mitaka to Norikura > > 7. Briatore and Leschiutta > > 8. National Physical Laboratory - 1996 > > 9. Van Baak - 2005 > > 10. National Physical Laboratory - 2010 > > 11. Van Baak - 2016 > > 12. Tokyo Skytree - 2020 > > > > Is there anyone here who seriously claims that Time Dilation > > has NOT been fully verified by these experiments? > > https://paulba.no/pdf/Mutual_time_dilation.pdf Your paper is about a FICTITIOUS universe where only two objects exist. The 12 experiments listed above took place in our REAL universe where countless objects exist and the speed of light is the highest speed that is possible, which means all other speeds can be viewed as a percentage of the speed of light. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 20:26 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <t8sv0k$3fc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #587379 |
On 2022-06-21 17:02:19 +0000, Ed Lake said: ... > and the speed of light is the highest > speed that is possible, which means all other speeds can be viewed > as a percentage of the speed of light. The "which means" is not right. Even if something could move faster than light its speed could be expressed as a percentage of the speed of light: "The particle we found moved at 105% of c." What makes it possible and sensible to express speeds as a percentage of light speed is that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same in every place, at all times, and for all observers. Mikko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 10:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1bc5244c-bc00-4402-a619-53f25b5085e3n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587383 |
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 10:26:47 AM UTC-7, Mikko wrote: > On 2022-06-21 17:02:19 +0000, Ed Lake said: > > ... > > and the speed of light is the highest > > speed that is possible, which means all other speeds can be viewed > > as a percentage of the speed of light. > The "which means" is not right. Even if something could move faster > than light its speed could be expressed as a percentage of the speed > of light: "The particle we found moved at 105% of c." > > What makes it possible and sensible to express speeds as a percentage > of light speed is that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same in > every place, at all times, and for all observers. > > Mikko FTL aether energy does not exist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 13:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <65de337d-a334-474b-867a-2a722340a418n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587383 |
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 12:26:47 PM UTC-5, Mikko wrote: > On 2022-06-21 17:02:19 +0000, Ed Lake said: > > ... > > and the speed of light is the highest > > speed that is possible, which means all other speeds can be viewed > > as a percentage of the speed of light. > The "which means" is not right. Even if something could move faster > than light its speed could be expressed as a percentage of the speed > of light: "The particle we found moved at 105% of c." But nothing CAN move faster than the speed of light. So, you are just being argumentative. > > What makes it possible and sensible to express speeds as a percentage > of light speed is that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same in > every place, at all times, and for all observers. No, it's NOT the same for OBSERVERS. It is ONLY the same for EMITTERS. An observer moving at v will encounter oncoming light as arriving at c+v. That has been confirmed by MANY experiments. It is the BASIS for how police radar guns work. Here's a list of 8 of those experiments: 1. The Sagnac Effect 2. Pulsars 3. Mirrors on the Moon 4. GPS 5. Eclipses of Io 6. Radar Guns 7. The Michelson-Gale Experiment 8. The Kennedy-Thorndike Experiment I have a web page where you can learn more about those experiments. It's at this link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Variable-Speed-of-Light-Experiments.html Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 22:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <BuAYflHJQlrcd7y2KWKbAn9Fegs@jntp> |
| In reply to | #587383 |
Le 21/06/2022 à 19:26, Mikko a écrit : > ... >> and the speed of light is the highest >> speed that is possible, which means all other speeds can be viewed >> as a percentage of the speed of light. > > The "which means" is not right. Even if something could move faster > than light its speed could be expressed as a percentage of the speed > of light: "The particle we found moved at 105% of c." > > What makes it possible and sensible to express speeds as a percentage > of light speed is that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same in > every place, at all times, and for all observers. > > Mikko What must be understood when we speak of exceeding the speed of light is that we are not saying a physical impossibility, but a theoretical absurdity. It's like asking a child to find a natural number between 3 and 4. This is what must be understood, and unfortunately, all nations combined, I am not sure that it is perceived as that. R.H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 11:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fbbc9a53-3c62-4d0b-8f4d-50884c4b13e8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587379 |
On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 at 19:02:23 UTC+2, det...@outlook.com wrote: > On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 11:05:20 AM UTC-5, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > > Den 19.06.2022 18:10, skrev Ed Lake: > > > Over the years, I've accumulated a list of 12 major Time Dilation > > > experiments which CONFIRM that Time Dilation is REAL, and that > > > time does run at different rates for an object depending upon an > > > object's speed and its proximity to a gravitational mass. > > > > > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > > > > > Here's the list of experiments: > > > 1. Hafele-Keating > > > 2. NIST Optical Clocks and Relativity > > > 3. Geodesy and Metrology experiment (measuring altitude by time difference) > > > 4. Muon experiments > > > 5. University of Maryland > > > 6. Japanese Mitaka to Norikura > > > 7. Briatore and Leschiutta > > > 8. National Physical Laboratory - 1996 > > > 9. Van Baak - 2005 > > > 10. National Physical Laboratory - 2010 > > > 11. Van Baak - 2016 > > > 12. Tokyo Skytree - 2020 > > > > > > Is there anyone here who seriously claims that Time Dilation > > > has NOT been fully verified by these experiments? > > > > https://paulba.no/pdf/Mutual_time_dilation.pdf > Your paper is about a FICTITIOUS universe where only two objects > exist. The 12 experiments listed above took place in our REAL universe > where countless objects exist and the speed of light is the highest > speed that is possible where forbidden by your insane religion as "incorrect" GPS clocks keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks always did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-22 11:55 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <t8uldd$nnt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #587199 |
On 2022-06-19 16:10:17 +0000, Ed Lake said:
> Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html
Here is another link:
http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html
Mikko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 11:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a1dd5c5f-dd48-4794-8a99-9b290c2b061bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587449 |
On June 22, Mikko wrote: > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > Here is another link: > http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html Which one tests length contraction? -- Rich
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 12:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <116cc0e7-620c-4c96-8875-dade99451057n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587506 |
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 1:50:48 PM UTC-5, RichD wrote: > On June 22, Mikko wrote: > > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > > > Here is another link: > > http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html > Which one tests length contraction? > > -- > Rich None of them. As far as I know, length contraction has never been confirmed by any experiment. The experiments just confirm time dilation. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 13:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9c03f969-7740-4d8e-9d95-fe57bc2fc1a6n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587510 |
El viernes, 24 de junio de 2022 a las 15:57:05 UTC-4, det...@outlook.com escribió: > On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 1:50:48 PM UTC-5, RichD wrote: > > On June 22, Mikko wrote: > > > > Here's the link: http://www.ed-lake.com/Time-Dilation-Experiments.html > > > > > > Here is another link: > > > http://sasuke.econ.hc.keio.ac.jp/~ken/physics-faq/experiments.html > > Which one tests length contraction? > > > > -- > > Rich > None of them. As far as I know, length contraction has never been confirmed > by any experiment. The experiments just confirm time dilation. > Actually, if time dilation which is a property of Special Relativity (coming as a consequence of the Lorentz Transformation Equations), then length contraction (also a consequence of the LTE) should also be valid. In other words, you can't have time dilation without having length contraction.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 22 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web