Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #586913 > unrolled thread

whodat, Volney and others...

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  whodat, Volney and others... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-13 13:53 -0700
    Is STARMAKER a Mitch sock? (was Re: whodat, Volney and others...) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-13 19:31 -0500
    Re: whodat, Volney and others... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 10:17 -0700
      Re: whodat, Volney and others... Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-06-18 12:41 -0500
        Re: whodat, Volney and others... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-18 13:35 -0500
        Re: whodat, Volney and others... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-18 12:22 -0700
        Re: whodat, Volney and others... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-18 13:15 -0700
          Re: whodat, Volney and others... Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 09:13 -0500
            Re: whodat, Volney and others... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-19 11:31 -0700
              Re: whodat, Volney and others... Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 16:02 -0500
                The critic trolls (wqas Re: whodat, Volney and others...) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-19 17:07 -0500
                  Re: The critic trolls (wqas Re: whodat, Volney and others...) Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 22:40 -0700
            Re: whodat, Volney and others... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-19 14:50 -0500

#586913 — whodat, Volney and others...

whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than

Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA.


You say something and right away they
start running like
Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, by
checking the Internet for their
internal coded Bots.


I don't see any difference between
Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
whodat, Volney and others...do you????

It's almost like I already read their coding.


Ask Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA about
Albert Einstein and watch the predictable answers
you get from those bots.


I don't see any difference between
Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
whodat, Volney and others...do you????


I can actually see the source code of
whodat, Volney and others...can you????


I don't see any difference between
Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
whodat, Volney and others...do you????








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#586920 — Is STARMAKER a Mitch sock? (was Re: whodat, Volney and others...)

Are you a Mitch sock?



On 6/13/2022 3:53 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than
> 
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA.
> 
> 
> You say something and right away they
> start running like
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, by
> checking the Internet for their
> internal coded Bots.
> 
> 
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> 
> It's almost like I already read their coding.
> 
> 
> Ask Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA about
> Albert Einstein and watch the predictable answers
> you get from those bots.
> 
> 
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> 
> 
> I can actually see the source code of
> whodat, Volney and others...can you????
> 
> 
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586943

whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.


 I don't see any difference between
 Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
 whodat, Volney and others...do you????


They all programed the same way, scrougning around
the internet for answers.

a bunch of cut and paste bots...










The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than
> 
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA.
> 
> You say something and right away they
> start running like
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, by
> checking the Internet for their
> internal coded Bots.
> 
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> 
> It's almost like I already read their coding.
> 
> Ask Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA about
> Albert Einstein and watch the predictable answers
> you get from those bots.
> 
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> 
> I can actually see the source code of
> whodat, Volney and others...can you????
> 
> I don't see any difference between
> Artificial Intelligence Bots like LaMDA, and
> whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587166

On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
> 
> 
>   I don't see any difference between
>   Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
>   whodat, Volney and others...do you????


Whodat everybody knows is an imposter. Who the hell is "Volney"? You 
mean "Varney" or something? Looks like I've kill-filed him as well using 
some feature in his posts' headers other than his name. Have never seen 
him here. Some of my killfile criteria are based on "injection info" and 
hard to see in a glance which aliases are tied to them.









-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587169

On 6/18/2022 12:41 PM, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
>>
>>
>>   I don't see any difference between
>>   Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
>>   whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> 
> 
> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter. Who the hell is "Volney"? You 
> mean "Varney" or something? Looks like I've kill-filed him as well using 
> some feature in his posts' headers other than his name. Have never seen 
> him here. Some of my killfile criteria are based on "injection info" and 
> hard to see in a glance which aliases are tied to them.

Every imposter has two faces (or more.) Please provide any other face(s)
associated with me. Am I really you? I've been accused (somewhat
stupidly) of being a Starmaker sock. What/who do you think fits? It
us time for a good laugh, this group has fallen through the boring hole.

Make it quick and make it good. I killfiled you in the physics group and
no doubt will have to do that here as well.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587173

On Saturday, 18 June 2022 at 19:41:16 UTC+2, Clutterfreak wrote:
> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots. 
> > 
> > 
> > I don't see any difference between 
> > Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and 
> > whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter. Who the hell is "Volney"?

He's M. Moroney under new nick.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587178

Clutterfreak wrote:
> 
> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
> >
> >
> >   I don't see any difference between
> >   Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
> >   whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> 
> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter. 


who is he impostering???




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587193

On 6/18/2022 3:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
>>>
>>>
>>>    I don't see any difference between
>>>    Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
>>>    whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>>
>> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter.
> 
> 
> who is he impostering???
> 
> 
> 
> 


He's faking a physics background.

I bet he took one, at most two, courses in a humanities dept at some 
college then dropped out. Now comes here acting like he knows what he's 
talking about. I hate these guys. They read a layman's tale of some 
subject in physics in a soft-cover pocketbook then come here trying to 
engage with those who have had the education, even attempting to correct 
them!

Did I explain it enough to you, Starmaker?

It's obvious you don't know jack in physics. But you don't pretend. So 
you haven't been in my kill-file. But that sob Whodat will never see 
anything coming from me by my own intention.


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587209

Clutterfreak wrote:
> 
> On 6/18/2022 3:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Clutterfreak wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>    I don't see any difference between
> >>>    Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
> >>>    whodat, Volney and others...do you????
> >>
> >> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter.
> >
> >
> > who is he impostering???
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> He's faking a physics background.
> 
> I bet he took one, at most two, courses in a humanities dept at some
> college then dropped out. 

Maybe he got a diploma from Wikipedia..

he should be a professor by now.


I see others here struggling to get a diploma from Wikipedia.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587238

On 6/19/2022 1:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 6/18/2022 3:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     I don't see any difference between
>>>>>     Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
>>>>>     whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>>>>
>>>> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter.
>>>
>>>
>>> who is he impostering???
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> He's faking a physics background.
>>
>> I bet he took one, at most two, courses in a humanities dept at some
>> college then dropped out.
> 
> Maybe he got a diploma from Wikipedia..
> 
> he should be a professor by now.
> 
> 
> I see others here struggling to get a diploma from Wikipedia.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Hehe :) They may be, and that disqualifies them as arbiters of any 
discussion in sci.physics.

Wikipedia compilations fit well with journalists' recount of scientific 
facts for laymen and mediocre journalistic levels of history data, 
biographies, etc, anywhere that having colossal shortcomings is not in 
the way of being "better than nothing." It fails in science and in art. 
Won't work there.

"Engineers" don't understand the above cause they are journalists 
compared to scientists. Hence their stupid and often ugly presence in 
this forum. Thanks to myself, I made them a bit aware of what they are 
in the past two years that I had time, but "engineer" is "engineer", an 
inanely limited person by definition. Journalist is not a first rate 
writer. Has never been. The two are two very different stocks of people.

Ok guys. Hopefully next week.


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587244 — The critic trolls (wqas Re: whodat, Volney and others...)

Uncle Al had the right designation for people like you, Critic Troll.
You never post about science or math because you don't have any
knowledge. Time to do as promised, you are now in the bozo bin here as
well.


On 6/19/2022 4:02 PM, the BOZO calling himself Clutterfreak expressed
himself

> On 6/19/2022 1:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/18/2022 3:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     I don't see any difference between
>>>>>>     Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
>>>>>>     whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>>>>>
>>>>> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> who is he impostering???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> He's faking a physics background.
>>>
>>> I bet he took one, at most two, courses in a humanities dept at some
>>> college then dropped out.
>>
>> Maybe he got a diploma from Wikipedia..
>>
>> he should be a professor by now.
>>
>>
>> I see others here struggling to get a diploma from Wikipedia.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> Hehe :) They may be, and that disqualifies them as arbiters of any 
> discussion in sci.physics.
> 
> Wikipedia compilations fit well with journalists' recount of scientific 
> facts for laymen and mediocre journalistic levels of history data, 
> biographies, etc, anywhere that having colossal shortcomings is not in 
> the way of being "better than nothing." It fails in science and in art. 
> Won't work there.
> 
> "Engineers" don't understand the above cause they are journalists 
> compared to scientists. Hence their stupid and often ugly presence in 
> this forum. Thanks to myself, I made them a bit aware of what they are 
> in the past two years that I had time, but "engineer" is "engineer", an 
> inanely limited person by definition. Journalist is not a first rate 
> writer. Has never been. The two are two very different stocks of people.
> 
> Ok guys. Hopefully next week.
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587260 — Re: The critic trolls (wqas Re: whodat, Volney and others...)

On Monday, 20 June 2022 at 00:07:55 UTC+2, whodat wrote:
> Uncle Al had the right designation for people like you, Critic Troll. 
> You never post about science or math because 

Speaking of math, it's always good to remind that
your bunch of halfbrains had to announce its oldest
part false, as it didn't want to fit the Holy Postulates
of your idiot guru.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587229

On 6/19/2022 9:13 AM, the BOZO calling itself Clutterfreak wrote:

> On 6/18/2022 3:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Clutterfreak wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/14/2022 12:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> whodat, Volney and others...are nothing more than Chatbots.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    I don't see any difference between
>>>>    Chatbos Bots like LaMDA, and
>>>>    whodat, Volney and others...do you????
>>>
>>> Whodat everybody knows is an imposter.
>>
>>
>> who is he impostering???
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> He's faking a physics background.
> 
> I bet he took one, at most two, courses in a humanities dept at some 
> college then dropped out. Now comes here acting like he knows what he's 
> talking about. I hate these guys. They read a layman's tale of some 
> subject in physics in a soft-cover pocketbook then come here trying to 
> engage with those who have had the education, even attempting to correct 
> them!
> 
> Did I explain it enough to you, Starmaker?
> 
> It's obvious you don't know jack in physics. But you don't pretend. So 
> you haven't been in my kill-file. But that sob Whodat will never see 
> anything coming from me by my own intention.


What you've done is what we call "acting out." Feel all better now?

Writing to my audience again:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acting_out

You're in my bozo box in the physics newsgroup, well earned there
earlier, and now here as well. I never saw an actual physics posting
from you, ever.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web