Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #586574 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-06-07 23:17 -0700 |
| Last post | 2022-06-28 12:15 +0300 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 199 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 23:17 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:20 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-08 09:56 -0500
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 11:24 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-08 20:12 -0500
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 20:23 -0700
Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 20:59 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 21:01 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 22:57 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 22:57 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-08 18:17 +0300
Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 08:55 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 09:14 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 10:03 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 10:25 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 10:27 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 10:37 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 10:53 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-08 22:21 -0400
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 20:28 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-08 22:31 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-09 08:40 -0400
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 07:36 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 10:30 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 11:13 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 12:37 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 13:02 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-09 16:52 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 17:08 -0700
Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 17:17 -0700
Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 17:59 -0700
Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 18:47 -0700
Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 22:25 -0700
Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 19:17 -0700
Re: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 20:25 -0700
Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 21:20 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 22:10 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 06:21 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 09:40 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 09:47 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 09:51 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 10:05 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 10:40 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 11:26 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 18:06 -0700
Cretin Richard Hertz tries (and fails) to move the goalposts once again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 20:17 -0700
Re: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 21:17 -0700
Rabid nazi bootlicker Richard Hertz frothes at the mouth. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 22:00 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 09:13 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 09:33 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz perseveres Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 10:15 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 11:08 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 14:43 -0700
Nazi bootlicker Richard Hertz at work. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 16:28 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-12 11:23 +0300
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 01:34 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 09:06 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-13 17:37 +0300
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-13 11:59 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-14 12:08 +0300
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-14 10:31 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-15 10:34 +0300
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 09:19 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-16 12:32 +0300
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-15 22:42 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 17:54 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz goes off the deep end "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 19:25 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-16 21:09 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 15:04 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz posts more of his imbecilities "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 15:55 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz posts more of his imbecilities Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 16:22 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz posts more of his imbecilities Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 18:03 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz posts more of his imbecilities "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 19:04 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-17 09:37 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 08:52 -0700
Idiot Richard Hertz comes to terms with the fact he's an idiot "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 09:05 -0700
Re: Idiot Richard Hertz comes to terms with the fact he's an idiot Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 10:18 -0700
Re: Idiot Richard Hertz comes to terms with the fact he's an idiot "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 10:26 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-21 11:58 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-12 21:24 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 12:55 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-13 18:37 +0300
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 13:10 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-13 22:51 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 18:23 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 18:26 -0700
Nurse! crank Richard Hertz needs his antipsychotic meds "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 18:56 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-13 22:50 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-13 14:07 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-14 10:18 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-14 10:05 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-14 20:44 +0200
Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-18 13:10 -0700
Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-19 11:34 -0700
Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 15:39 -0700
Re: Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-19 20:02 -0700
Re: Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 22:41 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz keeps spewing imbecilities "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 07:03 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz keeps spewing imbecilities Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 07:55 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-21 20:41 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-22 15:12 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-23 15:13 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 15:58 -0700
Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 21:31 -0700
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 22:50 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 06:41 -0700
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 06:49 -0700
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 09:09 -0700
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-24 22:52 +0200
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 14:56 -0700
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-25 20:13 +0200
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 11:41 -0700
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-26 21:55 +0200
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-26 13:15 +0000
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-24 23:18 +0000
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-25 19:31 +0200
Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-25 19:52 +0000
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-24 22:52 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 14:59 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-25 20:38 +0200
Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-25 20:38 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-21 22:36 +0200
Crank Dick Hertz comes to grips with the fact that he's a lying imbecile that no one listents to "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 13:40 -0700
Re: Crank Dick Hertz comes to grips with the fact that he's a lying imbecile that no one listents to Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 13:53 -0700
Re: Crank Dick Hertz comes to grips with the fact that he's a lying imbecile that no one listents to "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 15:09 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 00:00 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-15 10:56 +0300
Crank Richard Hertz keeps up the entertainment "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 07:17 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-06-15 11:00 -0500
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 09:26 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 12:07 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 18:51 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-26 21:50 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-26 15:04 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-26 22:13 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 00:05 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-27 15:34 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 06:50 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-27 15:28 +0000
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 08:54 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-27 22:54 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 14:16 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-28 09:26 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-28 13:07 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 11:13 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-28 22:34 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 14:41 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-29 10:04 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 09:27 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-30 00:52 -0400
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 22:30 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-01 19:14 -0400
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 17:17 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-02 12:14 -0400
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-29 15:37 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 09:47 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-29 22:26 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 14:54 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-30 20:26 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-30 12:30 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 12:35 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-01 22:18 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 16:45 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-03 14:13 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 23:59 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-04 21:32 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-04 15:49 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-04 16:39 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-04 23:19 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-06 20:46 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 14:03 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 15:11 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-07 22:00 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 17:43 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-08 22:22 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 16:24 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-09 15:00 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 18:14 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-11 23:01 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 17:10 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-12 15:10 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 13:26 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-13 23:10 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 15:28 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-14 10:06 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 12:01 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-06 20:46 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-06-29 12:11 -0500
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 11:08 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-06-29 15:32 -0500
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 14:32 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-29 20:29 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-30 09:46 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-30 19:44 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-02 12:13 +0200
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-28 16:33 -0500
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 22:41 -0700
Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-28 12:15 +0300
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-08 22:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit |
| Message-ID | <62A185A2.5FC9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #586624 |
Guten Tag. Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 11:21:09 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: > > On 6/8/2022 1:37 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > Asshole! > > > > Good sig line, Richard. > > > Another BURNT MANUSCRIPT (along with everything he generated in 1905). FIRE IS PURIFYING, ISN'T IT? > > I don't know if this will get through your OCD-related hatred for > > Einstein, but consider this, regarding whatever notes Einstein kept of > > his work in the 1920s and earlier. > > > > In 1933, Einstein took a trip to the US (business or pleasure, I don't > > know). While in the US, Hitler took over Germany. Einstein knew he > > could never return to Germany. > > > > Do you think he took all his notes with him for a planned relatively > > short trip to the US? Where do you think they were? > > > > Now, sooner or later (probably sooner), the Nazis raided Einstein's home > > in Germany. Anything of actual value would be confiscated. All the > > "Judenphysik" notes they found would have been burned or otherwise > > destroyed. Anything Einstein gave or lent to German universities would > > have met a similar fate. > > > > So yes, your "conspiracy theory" that Einstein's notes from 1905 were > > burnt is probably quite true. But that was done by a crowd chanting > > "Heil Hitler!". > > Fucking ignorant! Changing your "call sign" don't help with your stupidity, Moroney! > > By 1919, the Big Shot had "contracted" the daughter of his 2nd. wife as a secretary. > > She kept schedules, agenda, correspondence, papers and plagiarized notes (like from de Broglie and from Bose). > > She was instructed about what to do with all the fucking papers of the imbecile. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 08:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit |
| Message-ID | <t7spm8$uq8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #586624 |
On 6/8/2022 11:28 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 at 11:21:09 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: >> On 6/8/2022 1:37 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: >> >>> Asshole! >> >> Good sig line, Richard. >>> Another BURNT MANUSCRIPT (along with everything he generated in 1905). FIRE IS PURIFYING, ISN'T IT? >> I don't know if this will get through your OCD-related hatred for >> Einstein, but consider this, regarding whatever notes Einstein kept of >> his work in the 1920s and earlier. >> >> In 1933, Einstein took a trip to the US (business or pleasure, I don't >> know). While in the US, Hitler took over Germany. Einstein knew he >> could never return to Germany. >> >> Do you think he took all his notes with him for a planned relatively >> short trip to the US? Where do you think they were? >> >> Now, sooner or later (probably sooner), the Nazis raided Einstein's home >> in Germany. Anything of actual value would be confiscated. All the >> "Judenphysik" notes they found would have been burned or otherwise >> destroyed. Anything Einstein gave or lent to German universities would >> have met a similar fate. >> >> So yes, your "conspiracy theory" that Einstein's notes from 1905 were >> burnt is probably quite true. But that was done by a crowd chanting >> "Heil Hitler!". > > Fucking ignorant! Why yes, that describes you perfectly! > By 1919, the Big Shot had "contracted" the daughter of his 2nd. wife as a secretary. Yes, and...? > She kept schedules, agenda, correspondence, papers and plagiarized notes (like from de Broglie and from Bose). And you know this, how? Esp. the part about the plagiarism. > She was instructed about what to do with all the fucking papers of the imbecile. And did she actually do what she was to do? Did she get a chance before the Nazis got there? Did she decide to save more precious items first, before saving old notes from publications already accepted some 18-28 years earlier? Maybe she did save them but the Nazis (or Allied bombings) destroyed them later? And you know these answers, how? Oh I know, they spring from your hateful OCD. Instead of seeking a professional to hopefully treat this hateful mental health conditions of yours which pwns you, you allow it to continue to pwn you, and you waste your life on it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 07:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit |
| Message-ID | <7a148353-3de9-46a0-8b0a-0aeb5cd60c86n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586646 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 5:39:40 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > And you know these answers, how? Oh I > know, they spring from your hateful OCD. Instead of seeking a > professional to hopefully treat this hateful mental health conditions of > yours which pwns you, you allow it to continue to pwn you, and you waste > your life on it. The nazi piece of shit is beyond treatment. He will die of a burst artery caused by his blind hatred. Until then, he's pinned here, for our daily entertainment. Love feeding him shit every time he opens his mouth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 10:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit |
| Message-ID | <61d3b317-51ab-413f-9ecd-fd46575fcc8dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586653 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 11:36:21 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 5:39:40 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
> > And you know these answers, how? Oh I
> > know, they spring from your hateful OCD. Instead of seeking a
> > professional to hopefully treat this hateful mental health conditions of
> > yours which pwns you, you allow it to continue to pwn you, and you waste
> > your life on it.
> The nazi piece of shit is beyond treatment. He will die of a burst artery caused by his blind hatred. Until then, he's pinned here, for our daily entertainment. Love feeding him shit every time he opens his mouth.
Dear fucking retarded Dono and Moroney:
1) While more than 20,000 documents "belonging" to the cretin Einstein were saved and now published by TPTB (mostly Jewish),
the entire personal library of Max Planck was BURNT in Berlin, due to the incendiary bombs of "allies". 60 years of history GONE!
2) Nobody, in the church of the cult of relativity, has ANY DOUBT that those 20,000+ documents BELONGED to Einstein.
For this kind of cretins, like you both, the existence of these documents is accepted as being A TRUTH.
Indoctrinated cretins like you, who worship Einstein (or The Beatles or whatever) ABSOLUTELY BELIEVE that such pile of crap is
ORIGINAL, and was written by the retarded himself.
Not for one second, any of you think about THE ARMY OF GHOSTWRITERS which forged that amount of documents TO FIT THE
NARRATIVE of a proficient, gentle, wise, genial Albert Einstein. Meanwhile, reading IN GERMAN the published material that had
the name of the cretin CLEARLY SHOW that the imbecile had POOR COMMAND of German grammar and rhetoric, and that MOST
of what was published showed a mentally challenged imbecile, not only in mathematics and physics but in grammar too.
3) The portrait of the imbecile as:
- A genius in physics
- A sensible lover
- A wise philosopher
- A "one line" master
- A world class politician
- A forecaster
- A devote husband and father
- A compromized zionist
- A gifted teacher
- Etc, etc, etc.
provided jobs for tens, if not hundred, of ghost writers, documentalists and "historians", who INVENTED a profile of a "Da Vinci"
MF, when actually Einstein was an autistic, babbling, socially akward cretin that WAS SOLD (AND STILL IS SOLD) as REAL.
How many of the 20,000+ documents ACTUALLY belong to him? Well, for sure:
- Einstein-Besso lost 54 pages 1913 manuscript, where the STUPIDITY of both is clearly shown (available on line for you - what remains)
- His college bulletin, with ZERO as a note for his experimental abilities (yet, the cretin was the master of gedankenexperiments).
- His 1914 contract with Mileva, forcing her TO SLAVERY.
- ????
Other people, writing under the command of the cabal, ACTUALLY FORGED most of the manuscripts that are displayed.
Nothing new under the Sun: The fabrication of a legend, so www.jewornotjew.com can brag about him.
The photos showing him LOST, looking sideways, are the most accurate profiling of his persona.
He was a fucking FRAUD! And he was only good making PR (under supervision), because he was not more than a fucking CHARLATAN.
And the SCIENTIFIC LEGACY has been washed out and vanished long time ago, because it had no substance.
What assholes here play with is called LORENTZ LEGACY, MINKOWSKI LEGACY AND SCHWARZSCHILD LEGACY.
Get over with the cretin and let his history vanish. There are more important things in science than the relativity cretinism.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 11:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit |
| Message-ID | <cbf16b27-e562-44ca-9412-37b9ede57dc3n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586657 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 10:30:12 AM UTC-7, odious kapo Richard Hertz talked to himself: > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 11:36:21 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 5:39:40 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > And you know these answers, how? Oh I > > > know, they spring from your hateful OCD. Instead of seeking a > > > professional to hopefully treat this hateful mental health conditions of > > > yours which pwns you, you allow it to continue to pwn you, and you waste > > > your life on it. > > The nazi piece of shit is beyond treatment. He will die of a burst artery caused by his blind hatred. Until then, he's pinned here, for our daily entertainment. Love feeding him shit every time he opens his mouth. > Dear fucking retarded Dick Hertz Still talking to yourself, odious kapo? Every time you attempt to write an equation, I make you eat shit. See above.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 12:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit |
| Message-ID | <a943d6fb-bb37-476e-9edc-a9a02d348976n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586662 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 3:13:19 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: <snip> > Every time you attempt to write an equation, I make you eat shit. See above. Poor romanian-american. I remember, by 2019, when I made you cry foul like a little girl. "He cheated, he cheated. He wrote a transcendent equation!" you screamed when I made you a new orifice. Remember the challenge, fucking ignorant reptilian lifeform? You still are butthurt, I can see. What a piece of work you are, ignorant asshole! All your life cheating, crying foul and then running away like Moroney (call him Volney, the queer queen).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 13:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit |
| Message-ID | <bf58e0f4-ab2f-49c6-a18d-df974b6a0a35n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586667 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 12:37:36 PM UTC-7, crank Richard Hertz ate some extra shit: > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 3:13:19 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > <snip> > > Every time you attempt to write an equation, I make you eat shit. See above. > I am still are butthurt, You sure are, Dick >ignorant asshole! Nice new signature, Dick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 16:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit |
| Message-ID | <62A287D0.367@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #586653 |
Dono. wrote: > > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 5:39:40 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > And you know these answers, how? Oh I > > know, they spring from your hateful OCD. Instead of seeking a > > professional to hopefully treat this hateful mental health conditions of > > yours which pwns you, you allow it to continue to pwn you, and you waste > > your life on it. > > He will die of a burst artery caused by his blind hatred. You forgot to add: He will drink too much castor oil. He will give it all away to doctors. He will laugh with lizards. He will grow a wooden tongue. He will have a large store, and whatever people ask for he shouldn? have, and what he does have shouldn? be requested. He will be transformed into a chandelier, to hang by day and to burn by night. He will get so sick as to cough up his mother? milk. He will see everything, but have no reason (with what) to buy it. The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 17:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit |
| Message-ID | <4e0b1955-bf9a-462e-bd25-d99d731ccfb9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586679 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 8:52:04 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > Dono. wrote: > > He will die of a burst artery caused by his blind hatred. > You forgot to add: > > He will drink too much castor oil. > He will give it all away to doctors. > He will laugh with lizards. > He will grow a wooden tongue. > He will have a large store, and whatever people ask for he shouldn? have, and what he does have shouldn? be requested. > He will be transformed into a chandelier, to hang by day and to burn by night. > He will get so sick as to cough up his mother? milk. > He will see everything, but have no reason (with what) to buy it. Beware of Dono's curses. He descended from Romanian gypsies, who had a long tradition of playing with the occult. Also, he has coprophilia (or scatophilia), and like to play with shit. Probably, he grew eating shit, and like to invite others to do so. Every fucking post of him ends wishing others to eat shit. He's mentally sick beyond any cure. Why do you think he's a relativist? He LIKES EATING, READING AND INVITING WITH SHIT, to follow the tradition of SR and GR (pure shit).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 17:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies |
| Message-ID | <769bada8-dfdb-47e7-8726-a86fb60bf068n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586574 |
On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 11:17:33 PM UTC-7, crank Richard Hertz wrote: > If you are an honest believer in relativity, you will accept that the mass of > the body, BEFORE THE LIGHT WAS TURNED ON, was: > > Mᵢ = M₀ + m > Dumbestfuck All the equations in the Einstein paper are written in terms of total energy, not mass. As pointed out earlier, mass is not additive, total energy is. You cannot disprove what you do not understand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 17:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies |
| Message-ID | <1ece95e1-a14c-48bc-b3b6-f14405c4118fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586681 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 9:18:01 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
<snip>
Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> > If you are an honest believer in relativity, you will accept that the mass of the body, BEFORE THE LIGHT WAS TURNED ON, was:
> > Mᵢ = M₀ + m
> Dumbestfuck
> All the equations in the Einstein paper are written in terms of total energy, not mass. As pointed out earlier, mass is not additive, total energy is. You cannot disprove what you do not understand.
SHUT UP, SHUT UP! Fucking LIAR, DISTORTER, DECEIVER (and mostly IGNORANT)!
I copy&paste (only added capital letters to highlight the existence of MASS in the BODY since the first words:
Here is THE EXACT CONTENT of the paper, starting at the 10th. paragraph since the beginning:
**********************************************************
Thus it is clear that the difference H−E can differ from the KINETIC ENERGY K OF THE BODY,
with respect to the other system (ξ, η, ζ), only by an additive constant C, which
depends on the choice of the arbitrary additive constants of the energies H and E.
Thus we may place
H₀ − E₀ = K₀ + C,
H₁ − E₁ = K₁ + C
since C does not change during the emission of light. So we have
K₀ − K₁ = L {(1/√(1 − v²/c²)− 1)}
The KINETIC ENERGY OF THE BODY with respect to (ξ, η, ζ) diminishes as a result
of the emission of light, and the amount of diminution is independent of the
properties of the body. Moreover, the difference K₀−K₁, like the kinetic energy
of the electron (§ 10), depends on the velocity.
**********************************************************
This is WHY the fucking paper has a circular argument, IMBECILE!
He used a "petitio principii fallacy" to INTRODUCE the loss of mass, which he WAS TRYING TO PROVE, FUCKING ASSHOLE!
I clearly wrote that the CRETIN disguised the CONVERSION OF MASS into ENERGY by using sophistry and fallacies, tools which
are your favorites, CRETIN!
KINETIC ENERGY OF THE BODY? It's the fucking MASS, perceived from the relative moving frame, which he was writing about: MASS!
And he ASSERTED that such perceived KINETIC ENERGY was DIMINISHING as a result of the emission of light (Here is the FALLACY
IN FULL COLORS, at the beginning of the paper!!!!).
Fucking retarded cretin, liar, deceiver, cheater, fraudster (following your pagan god's modus operandi).
You have already enough punishment on Earth, living your fucking life. So, I'll no add any desire of DEATH (as you usually do with me).
But everyone with two neurons here can fact-check what I posted here, and call you what you are: A FUCKING FRAUD!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 18:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies |
| Message-ID | <c23824c4-74f8-400d-8717-f87103f2d606n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586684 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 5:59:05 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 9:18:01 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> <snip>
> Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > > If you are an honest believer in relativity, you will accept that the mass of the body, BEFORE THE LIGHT WAS TURNED ON, was:
> > > Mᵢ = M₀ + m
>
> > Dumbestfuck
> > All the equations in the Einstein paper are written in terms of total energy, not mass. As pointed out earlier, mass is not additive, total energy is. You cannot disprove what you do not understand.
> SHUT UP, SHUT UP! Fucking LIAR, DISTORTER, DECEIVER (and mostly IGNORANT)!
>
> I copy&paste (only added capital letters to highlight the existence of MASS in the BODY since the first words:
> Here is THE EXACT CONTENT of the paper, starting at the 10th. paragraph since the beginning:
>
> **********************************************************
> Thus it is clear that the difference H−E can differ from the KINETIC ENERGY K OF THE BODY,
> with respect to the other system (ξ, η, ζ), only by an additive constant C, which
> depends on the choice of the arbitrary additive constants of the energies H and E.
>
> Thus we may place
>
> H₀ − E₀ = K₀ + C,
> H₁ − E₁ = K₁ + C
>
> since C does not change during the emission of light. So we have
>
> K₀ − K₁ = L {(1/√(1 − v²/c²)− 1)}
>
> The KINETIC ENERGY OF THE BODY with respect to (ξ, η, ζ) diminishes as a result
> of the emission of light, and the amount of diminution is independent of the
> properties of the body. Moreover, the difference K₀−K₁, like the kinetic energy
> of the electron (§ 10), depends on the velocity.
> **********************************************************
>
> This is WHY the fucking paper has a circular argument, IMBECILE!
> He used a "petitio principii fallacy" to INTRODUCE the loss of mass, which he WAS TRYING TO PROVE, FUCKING ASSHOLE!
>
> I clearly wrote that the CRETIN disguised the CONVERSION OF MASS into ENERGY by using sophistry and fallacies, tools which
> are your favorites, CRETIN!
>
> KINETIC ENERGY OF THE BODY? It's the fucking MASS, perceived from the relative moving frame, which he was writing about: MASS!
>
> And he ASSERTED that such perceived KINETIC ENERGY was DIMINISHING as a result of the emission of light (Here is the FALLACY
> IN FULL COLORS, at the beginning of the paper!!!!).
>
> Fucking retarded cretin, liar, deceiver, cheater, fraudster (following your pagan god's modus operandi).
>
> You have already enough punishment on Earth, living your fucking life. So, I'll no add any desire of DEATH (as you usually do with me).
>
> But everyone with two neurons here can fact-check what I posted here, and call you what you are: A FUCKING FRAUD!!
"Someone's had their cage rattled. You're displaying the typical response of a crank whose favoured theory is under serious attack - aggression and insults."
-Sylvia Else
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 22:25 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies |
| Message-ID | <a3cffc0d-df9e-4136-8ce9-5b1529e265c0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586686 |
On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 03:47:58 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 5:59:05 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 9:18:01 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> > <snip>
> > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > >
> > > > If you are an honest believer in relativity, you will accept that the mass of the body, BEFORE THE LIGHT WAS TURNED ON, was:
> > > > Mᵢ = M₀ + m
> >
> > > Dumbestfuck
> > > All the equations in the Einstein paper are written in terms of total energy, not mass. As pointed out earlier, mass is not additive, total energy is. You cannot disprove what you do not understand.
> > SHUT UP, SHUT UP! Fucking LIAR, DISTORTER, DECEIVER (and mostly IGNORANT)!
> >
> > I copy&paste (only added capital letters to highlight the existence of MASS in the BODY since the first words:
> > Here is THE EXACT CONTENT of the paper, starting at the 10th. paragraph since the beginning:
> >
> > **********************************************************
> > Thus it is clear that the difference H−E can differ from the KINETIC ENERGY K OF THE BODY,
> > with respect to the other system (ξ, η, ζ), only by an additive constant C, which
> > depends on the choice of the arbitrary additive constants of the energies H and E.
> >
> > Thus we may place
> >
> > H₀ − E₀ = K₀ + C,
> > H₁ − E₁ = K₁ + C
> >
> > since C does not change during the emission of light. So we have
> >
> > K₀ − K₁ = L {(1/√(1 − v²/c²)− 1)}
> >
> > The KINETIC ENERGY OF THE BODY with respect to (ξ, η, ζ) diminishes as a result
> > of the emission of light, and the amount of diminution is independent of the
> > properties of the body. Moreover, the difference K₀−K₁, like the kinetic energy
> > of the electron (§ 10), depends on the velocity.
> > **********************************************************
> >
> > This is WHY the fucking paper has a circular argument, IMBECILE!
> > He used a "petitio principii fallacy" to INTRODUCE the loss of mass, which he WAS TRYING TO PROVE, FUCKING ASSHOLE!
> >
> > I clearly wrote that the CRETIN disguised the CONVERSION OF MASS into ENERGY by using sophistry and fallacies, tools which
> > are your favorites, CRETIN!
> >
> > KINETIC ENERGY OF THE BODY? It's the fucking MASS, perceived from the relative moving frame, which he was writing about: MASS!
> >
> > And he ASSERTED that such perceived KINETIC ENERGY was DIMINISHING as a result of the emission of light (Here is the FALLACY
> > IN FULL COLORS, at the beginning of the paper!!!!).
> >
> > Fucking retarded cretin, liar, deceiver, cheater, fraudster (following your pagan god's modus operandi).
> >
> > You have already enough punishment on Earth, living your fucking life. So, I'll no add any desire of DEATH (as you usually do with me).
> >
> > But everyone with two neurons here can fact-check what I posted here, and call you what you are: A FUCKING FRAUD!!
> "Someone's had their cage rattled. You're displaying the typical response of a crank whose favoured theory is under serious attack - aggression and insults."
So is Dono. Python. Moroney. Bielawski. Roberts. You.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 19:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies |
| Message-ID | <d77cb4b1-a621-4382-919a-73da43421b32n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586684 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 5:59:05 PM UTC-7, crank Richard Hertz frothed at the mouth: > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 9:18:01 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > <snip> > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > If you are an honest believer in relativity, you will accept that the mass of the body, BEFORE THE LIGHT WAS TURNED ON, was: > > > Mᵢ = M₀ + m > > > Dumbestfuck > > All the equations in the Einstein paper are written in terms of total energy, not mass. As pointed out earlier, mass is not additive, total energy is. You cannot disprove what you do not understand. > SHUT UP, SHUT UP! Fucking LIAR, DISTORTER, DECEIVER (and mostly IGNORANT)! Talking to the mirror again, Dick? > > I copy&paste (only added capital letters to highlight the existence of MASS in the BODY since the first words: > Here is THE EXACT CONTENT of the paper, starting at the 10th. paragraph since the beginning: > There is no "mass", dumbestfuck. You get to eat shit. Once again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 20:25 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: |
| Message-ID | <2c409870-6d61-4f17-af12-bc246e9c61a9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586689 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 11:17:52 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: <snip> > There is no "mass", dumbestfuck. You get to eat shit. Once again. Poor cretin in full denial. I quote "The KINETIC ENERGY OF THE BODY with respect to (ξ, η, ζ) diminishes as a result of the emission of light". And right at the beginning of the paper (10th. paragraph): The "perceived" KE of the body (a BODY HAVING THE UNMENTIONED MASS) diminishes as a result of the emission of light! He couldn't have written more explicitly, fucking retarded (the other, Paul, doesn't even exist). He wrote, in his fraudulent style: LOOK! I have Mᵢ = M₀ + m, but m is going to be transformed IN LIGHT with energy L. So, after "evaporating" the amount m=L/c² in the form of twin light beams, the initial KE OF THE BODY (Einstein's words) diminishes by 1/2 (L/c²) v², resulting into a final KE = 1/2 M₀ v², as PERCEIVED from (ξ, η, ζ) frame. The tiny amount m went PUFF into light. THEREFORE I, Einstein The Fraudster, declare that what happened in the PUFF was the conversion m=L/c². Of course, it was REJECTED by Planck in 1906 as a fallacy based on A CIRCULAR ARGUMENT. The CRETIN invested 37 years in six attempts to PROVE IT, until 1942, when he gave up. ************************** I can't waste my INTELLECT in "persons?" with the intellect of a fucking ant, Dono-sa_ge-Adrian. I can't keep interacting with the genetic garbage that you are. A very lesser and ungifted mind. Try to keep what you did in the last months: KEEP YOUR DISGUSTING, INFERIOR MIND in suspended state. So, shut the fuck up, disgraceful being. I have no use for you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 21:20 -0700 |
| Subject | Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying |
| Message-ID | <08630968-3d9f-48f0-aad7-77ae3524df15n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586691 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 8:25:34 PM UTC-7, crank Richard Hertz kept on lying: > He wrote, in his fraudulent style: LOOK! I have Mᵢ = M₀ + m, No, he didn't, it is YOU who keeps posting this imbecility.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-09 22:10 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying |
| Message-ID | <b3ed066a-6331-4e30-83af-fea8c33b43b1n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586693 |
On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 1:21:02 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 8:25:34 PM UTC-7, crank Richard Hertz kept on lying: > > He wrote, in his fraudulent style: LOOK! I have Mᵢ = M₀ + m, > No, he didn't, it is YOU who keeps posting this imbecility. Fucking intellectual ANT: I'm TRANSLATING, in a didactic way, what the fucking CRETIN wrote in that short paper. I started this thread by affirming that the CRETIN never mentioned MASS or INERTIA until just THE END OF THE PAPER. Two or three posts above this one, I translated his ASSERTION "The KINETIC ENERGY OF THE BODY with respect to (ξ, η, ζ) diminishes as a result of the emission of light" (right at the beginning of the paper, 10th. paragraph) into an ANALOG EXPRESSION, which helps to show the circular thought, which INVALIDATES the paper because IS FULL OF FALLACIES. Remember: He NEVER COULD PROVE his derivation. Now, if you want to play hide and seek WITH THE TRUTH that's burning your fucking eyes, because you PREFER TO DIE before concede, then do it. For me, it was CRYSTAL CLEAR the first time I read the paper. I even read it in ORIGINAL GERMAN to check if something was lost in the translation German-English. Dono, I'm sorry being MUCH MORE intelligent than you. IQ is a gift of nature. Blame nature if you are so mad about me calling Einstein A FUCKING FRAUD. And, as I did a couple of times in a very detailed way, I could repeat what I proved about THE CRETIN any time I want. Because I CAN. I don't look for fame or being known, because (and get this very well) I consider that, in this ROTTEN WORLD, any effort is worthless. So, I don't give a flying fuck about Einstein with the exception of writing AGAINST THE CRETIN here since 2018. And that's all what the cretin worth for me: Posting against that scumbag in this SHITHOLE. Capito, Adrian?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-10 06:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying |
| Message-ID | <4a3753bc-90e0-45c8-9212-86e0e0def2e6n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586696 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 10:10:29 PM UTC-7, crank Richard Hertz wrote: > On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 1:21:02 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 8:25:34 PM UTC-7, crank Richard Hertz kept on lying: > > > He wrote, in his fraudulent style: LOOK! I have Mᵢ = M₀ + m, > > No, he didn't, it is YOU who keeps posting this imbecility. > Fucking intellectual ANT: > That your new signature, Dick? > I'm TRANSLATING, You mean, you are lying. You are projecting your imbecility on Einstein. Keep it up, dumbestfuck. > in this SHITHOLE. > This shithole was created to keep cretins like you pinned. And it is working beautifully.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-10 09:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying |
| Message-ID | <a766b3f5-2dfb-4818-b296-139184093ef8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586717 |
On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 10:21:20 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 10:10:29 PM UTC-7, crank Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 1:21:02 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 8:25:34 PM UTC-7, crank Richard Hertz kept on lying: > > > > He wrote, in his fraudulent style: LOOK! I have Mᵢ = M₀ + m, > > > No, he didn't, it is YOU who keeps posting this imbecility. > > Fucking intellectual ANT: > > > That your new signature, Dick? > > > I'm TRANSLATING, > > You mean, you are lying. You are projecting your imbecility on Einstein. Keep it up, dumbestfuck. > > > in this SHITHOLE. > > > This shithole was created to keep cretins like you pinned. And it is working beautifully. Dono, what is the mathematical expression of: "The KINETIC ENERGY OF THE BODY with respect to (ξ, η, ζ) diminishes as a result of the emission of light" (right at the beginning of the paper, 10th. paragraph)? Answer that, cretin ex-pat. 1) KINETIC ENERGY OF THE BODY (WITH MASS M): KE = 1/2 M v². 2) KE diminishes as the result of the emission of light: KE(final) = 1/2 (M-L/c²) v². 3) The BODY loss mass m, which was converted into energy: m = L/c². 4) Mass-Energy conversion, because of INERTIAL MOTION: M(final) = M(initial) - L/c². And THE 4 POINTS FROM ABOVE were introduced PRIOR to any demonstration, because the CRETIN SAID SO (Petitio Principii Fallacy). To HIDE the fallacies (not for Planck), he ARTIFICIALLY ADDED a mathematical nuisance: The STUPID emission of the twin beams at an ANGLE from the x-axis, over the xy plane. This was absolutely UNNECESSARY, as the result is INVARIANT with the angle, because the momentum of both beam lights CANCEL at whichever the angle be. So, shooting along the x axis was enough (0°). So, ignorant ANT. Stop defending this shit. Try, instead, to defend satanism. Maybe you'll be finally lucky, worshiper.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-10 09:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying |
| Message-ID | <171fd831-8036-4866-ba99-de3ad28b54aan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586720 |
On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 9:27:43 AM UTC-7, odious kapo Richard Hertz kept eating shit: > On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 10:21:20 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 10:10:29 PM UTC-7, crank Richard Hertz wrote: > > > On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 1:21:02 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > > > On Thursday, June 9, 2022 at 8:25:34 PM UTC-7, crank Richard Hertz kept on lying: > > > > > He wrote, in his fraudulent style: LOOK! I have Mᵢ = M₀ + m, > > > > No, he didn't, it is YOU who keeps posting this imbecility. > > > Fucking intellectual ANT: > > > > > That your new signature, Dick? > > > > > I'm TRANSLATING, > > > > You mean, you are lying. You are projecting your imbecility on Einstein. Keep it up, dumbestfuck. > > > > > in this SHITHOLE. > > > > > This shithole was created to keep cretins like you pinned. And it is working beautifully. Enjoy the shithole, crank. > the twin beams > at an ANGLE from the x-axis, over the xy plane. This was absolutely UNNECESSARY, as the result is INVARIANT with the angle, because > the momentum of both beam lights CANCEL at whichever the angle be. So, shooting along the x axis was enough (0°). The two beams are essential to the proof, enjoy your residence in the shithole created specifically for you , crank.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web