Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #586178 > unrolled thread

What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 20:27 -0700
    Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 20:41 -0700
      Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 20:53 -0700
        Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 20:55 -0700
        Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 21:02 -0700
      Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 21:21 -0700
        Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 22:43 -0700
        Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 23:02 -0700
          Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 23:29 -0700
        Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-04 08:50 +0200
    Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 23:43 -0700
      Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 10:58 -0700
        Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 11:01 -0700
        Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 11:04 -0700
          Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 11:52 -0700
            Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 16:24 -0700
              Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 16:33 -0700
              Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 20:53 -0700
                Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-01 21:48 -0700
                  Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-01 22:10 -0700
                    Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-01 22:24 -0700
                      Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-05 13:49 -0700
    Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and  else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-31 09:41 +0000
      Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Python <python@invalid> - 2022-05-31 13:51 +0200
        Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and  else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-31 12:17 +0000
          Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-31 17:26 +0200
            Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and  else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-31 15:45 +0000
              Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-31 17:47 +0200
            Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 11:48 -0700
          Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and  else? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-01 16:18 +0300
            Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and   else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-01 14:47 +0000
    Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 11:52 -0700
      Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-02 13:20 -0700
        Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 15:00 -0700
          Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-03 08:39 -0700
            Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 09:06 -0700
            Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-03 10:32 -0700
      Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-02 15:32 -0700
        Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 15:56 -0700
          Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-02 17:52 -0700
          Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-02 22:14 -0500
            Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 22:21 -0700
              Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-03 12:16 -0500
                Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-29 08:56 +0200
                  Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 09:18 -0700
              Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-03 10:35 -0700
              Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-28 09:43 +0200
      Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-02 16:00 -0700
      Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-21 07:46 +0200
        Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 09:51 -0700
          Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 12:08 -0700
            Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 12:28 -0700
              Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 13:37 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 14:41 -0700
          Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-24 09:37 +0200
            Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-24 09:00 -0400
              Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 22:47 -0700
            Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-24 23:01 -0700
              Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-25 10:23 +0200
                Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-25 20:34 -0700
                Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 06:42 +0200
                  Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 22:00 -0700
                    Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-28 09:24 +0200

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

#586285

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 2:57:49 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:27:58 AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > > > This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
> > > > > > > > > uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
> > > > > > > > > his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
> > > > > > > > > Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
> > > > > > > > > manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But,
> > > > > > > > > as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at
> > > > > > > > > Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss
> > > > > > > > > citizenship.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
> > > > > > > > > imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think that I offended some relativists at this forum, due to my excessive use of foul language.
> > > > > > > It's not due to your excessive use of foul language here...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > it's due to you constantly SCREAM TOO LOUD!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Everyone can hear you screaming, and that loud voice of yours
> > > > > > > is distracting other people who cannot concentrate with all
> > > > > > > that loud noise you make.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You need to lower your voice because you are breaking
> > > > > > > everybody's eardrums!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Don't you hear all the noise you're making????
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's not your foul language, you're just a fuckin loudmouth!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Lower your fuckin voice! You're making too much noise.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Did you know in Israel the people make sooo much noise there that the
> > > > > > > Jewish gangsters, (The Kosher Nostra) all want to move out of israel
> > > > > > > just to have some peace and quiet.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You people make too much nosie. (even at the dinner table)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You're becoming a ..pest.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > watamisaying, you're already a pest.
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you implying that I'm related to any of the 12 tribes?
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, since you brought up the 12 tribes...
> > > > >
> > > > > what is wrong with this famous Madison Avenue poster?
> > > > >
> > > > > https://media-assets-02.thedrum.com/cache/images/thedrum-prod/s3-news-tmp-108565-levys--default--991.jpg
> > > >
> > > > I'll be more specific since the question is making you shake in your boots...(like the 3 doors)
> > > >
> > > > What is wrong with this famous Madison Avenue advertising message?
> > > >
> > > > https://media-assets-02.thedrum.com/cache/images/thedrum-prod/s3-news-tmp-108565-levys--default--991.jpg
> > >
> > > Okay, too hard for you. I'll tell you what's wrong with the advertising message...
> > >
> > > The advertising campaign message reads: "You don't have to be Jewish to love Levy's Real Jewish Rye"
> > >
> > > But the picture of the man in the picture is Jewish!
> > >
> > > First step:
> > > https://media-assets-02.thedrum.com/cache/images/thedrum-prod/s3-news-tmp-108565-levys--default--991.jpg
> > >
> > > Second step:
> > >
> > > https://c7.alamy.com/comp/DEMJ03/portrait-of-an-orthodox-religious-jewish-boy-with-red-hair-sidelocks-DEMJ03.jpg
> > > https://media.istockphoto.com/photos/young-hasid-in-a-traditional-hat-and-with-long-payos-picture-id855878710?s=612x612
> > > https://www.brooklynunpluggedtours.com/sites/default/files/yarmulke-shtreimel-hasidic-jews-1-1.jpg
> > > https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61XfOTE008L._AC_UL1316_.jpg
>     https://c7.alamy.com/comp/2GJ1N8K/posed-portrait-of-a-teenage-hasidic-jewish-boy-from-the-satmar-group-on-lee-avenue-in-williamsburg-brooklyn-new-york-2GJ1N
> > >
> > > Third step: I don't think you people can handle the third step.
> >
> > The third step, the American indians are known as "copper colour American Hebrews".
> It gets worse...
> 
> This book
> https://www.amazon.com/American-Holocaust-Conquest-New-World/dp/0195085574
> 
> The discription of the book reads: "...the native population of the Western Hemisphere declined by as many as 100 million people."
> 
> "...historian David E. Stannard argues in this stunning new book, the European and white American destruction of the native peoples of the Americas was the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world."
> 
> Now, do you know the real reason why 100 million American Indian people were killed?
> 


It is documented that one President of the United States named Thomas
 Jefferson wrote a letter
to another President of the United States, John Adams that "*all* the
 Indians of America were descended from the Jews".
 Thomas Jefferson was the third President of the United States, ...then the
Fourth President of the United
 States, James Madison even wrote a book agreeing that he believed that all
 the Indians of America were Jewish.

 and Who do you think told Thomas Jefferson about the indians? Benjamin
 Franklin did!

 who told Franklin?

August 12, 1769. Joseph Galloway wrote a letter recommending James Adair to Benjamin Franklin.

March 25, 1774. Benjamin Franklin wrote a letter recommending James Adair to Charles and Edward Dilly, who would publish his book.


The United States of America systematically killed 8 to 100 million
American Indians simply because they believed all the American Indians were Jewish.





 

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586484

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 2:57:49 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:27:58 AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
> > > > > > > > > > uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
> > > > > > > > > > his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
> > > > > > > > > > Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
> > > > > > > > > > manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But,
> > > > > > > > > > as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at
> > > > > > > > > > Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss
> > > > > > > > > > citizenship.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
> > > > > > > > > > imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I think that I offended some relativists at this forum, due to my excessive use of foul language.
> > > > > > > > It's not due to your excessive use of foul language here...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > it's due to you constantly SCREAM TOO LOUD!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Everyone can hear you screaming, and that loud voice of yours
> > > > > > > > is distracting other people who cannot concentrate with all
> > > > > > > > that loud noise you make.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You need to lower your voice because you are breaking
> > > > > > > > everybody's eardrums!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Don't you hear all the noise you're making????
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It's not your foul language, you're just a fuckin loudmouth!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Lower your fuckin voice! You're making too much noise.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Did you know in Israel the people make sooo much noise there that the
> > > > > > > > Jewish gangsters, (The Kosher Nostra) all want to move out of israel
> > > > > > > > just to have some peace and quiet.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You people make too much nosie. (even at the dinner table)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You're becoming a ..pest.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > watamisaying, you're already a pest.
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > > > > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Are you implying that I'm related to any of the 12 tribes?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, since you brought up the 12 tribes...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > what is wrong with this famous Madison Avenue poster?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://media-assets-02.thedrum.com/cache/images/thedrum-prod/s3-news-tmp-108565-levys--default--991.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll be more specific since the question is making you shake in your boots...(like the 3 doors)
> > > > >
> > > > > What is wrong with this famous Madison Avenue advertising message?
> > > > >
> > > > > https://media-assets-02.thedrum.com/cache/images/thedrum-prod/s3-news-tmp-108565-levys--default--991.jpg
> > > >
> > > > Okay, too hard for you. I'll tell you what's wrong with the advertising message...
> > > >
> > > > The advertising campaign message reads: "You don't have to be Jewish to love Levy's Real Jewish Rye"
> > > >
> > > > But the picture of the man in the picture is Jewish!
> > > >
> > > > First step:
> > > > https://media-assets-02.thedrum.com/cache/images/thedrum-prod/s3-news-tmp-108565-levys--default--991.jpg
> > > >
> > > > Second step:
> > > >
> > > > https://c7.alamy.com/comp/DEMJ03/portrait-of-an-orthodox-religious-jewish-boy-with-red-hair-sidelocks-DEMJ03.jpg
> > > > https://media.istockphoto.com/photos/young-hasid-in-a-traditional-hat-and-with-long-payos-picture-id855878710?s=612x612
> > > > https://www.brooklynunpluggedtours.com/sites/default/files/yarmulke-shtreimel-hasidic-jews-1-1.jpg
> > > > https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61XfOTE008L._AC_UL1316_.jpg
> >     https://c7.alamy.com/comp/2GJ1N8K/posed-portrait-of-a-teenage-hasidic-jewish-boy-from-the-satmar-group-on-lee-avenue-in-williamsburg-brooklyn-new-york-2G
> > > >
> > > > Third step: I don't think you people can handle the third step.
> > >
> > > The third step, the American indians are known as "copper colour American Hebrews".
> > It gets worse...
> >
> > This book
> > https://www.amazon.com/American-Holocaust-Conquest-New-World/dp/0195085574
> >
> > The discription of the book reads: "...the native population of the Western Hemisphere declined by as many as 100 million people."
> >
> > "...historian David E. Stannard argues in this stunning new book, the European and white American destruction of the native peoples of the Americas was the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world."
> >
> > Now, do you know the real reason why 100 million American Indian people were killed?
> >
> 
> It is documented that one President of the United States named Thomas
>  Jefferson wrote a letter
> to another President of the United States, John Adams that "*all* the
>  Indians of America were descended from the Jews".
>  Thomas Jefferson was the third President of the United States, ...then the
> Fourth President of the United
>  States, James Madison even wrote a book agreeing that he believed that all
>  the Indians of America were Jewish.
> 
>  and Who do you think told Thomas Jefferson about the indians? Benjamin
>  Franklin did!
> 
>  who told Franklin?
> 
> August 12, 1769. Joseph Galloway wrote a letter recommending James Adair to Benjamin Franklin.
> 
> March 25, 1774. Benjamin Franklin wrote a letter recommending James Adair to Charles and Edward Dilly, who would publish his book.
> 
> The United States of America systematically killed 8 to 100 million
> American Indians simply because they believed all the American Indians were Jewish.

Of course Thomas Jefferson legalized the genocide with his Indian Removal Act of 1830. (just a land grab)

and if you look at the actual document (Indian Removal Act of 1830)..the word "tribes" have only one meaning...The Twelve Tribes of Israel.


Hell, they even suggested then to send them all back to Israel!


Thomas Jefferaon said if those indians would to even raise one hatchet, they will lose all their land. 


I'm sure most of yous heard AOC claiming she is a native indian...
https://nypost.com/2022/06/04/aoc-had-awakening-about-indigenous-heritage-at-standing-rock-in-2016/


I won't be surprised if AOC will bring up the genocide of "..the native peoples of the Americas was the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world."


Do you think Israel wants their land back? 



















-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586198 — Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else?

Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit :
> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).

The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American 
Einstein the God made man on earth.

It's that simple.

R.H. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586206

Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
> Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit :
>> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
>> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
> 
> The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American 
> Einstein the God made man on earth.

That's quite a delusional claim given that Einstein improved the
work Poincaré dis. It is especially remarkable that Poincaré
and Einstein introduced 100% equivalent synchronization procedures.

Remember, Richard, the very procedure you despise (well, you've never
understand it by the way...)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586207 — Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else?

Le 31/05/2022 à 13:51, Python a écrit :
> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
>> Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit :
>>> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very
>>> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
>> 
>> The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American 
>> Einstein the God made man on earth.
> 
> That's quite a delusional claim given that Einstein improved the
> work Poincaré dis. It is especially remarkable that Poincaré
> and Einstein introduced 100% equivalent synchronization procedures.
> 
> Remember, Richard, the very procedure you despise (well, you've never
> understand it by the way...)

J'ai plutôt l'impression que c'est toi qui est lent de pensée.

Tu n'as toujours pas compris ce que voulait dire le mot "anisochronie"?

Tu n'as toujours pas compris pourquoi je refuse cette procédure de 
synchronisation et pourquoi je dis
qu'il est impossible d'accorder ABSOLUMENT deux montres différentes 
placées en des endroits différents d'un MEME REFERENTIEL"? Ni pourquoi, 
dans le meilleur des cas, chacune avancera sur l'autre d'un temps 
équivalent à ΔT=x/c ?

C'est pas sur les capacités des horloges que je tique. C'est sur la 
réalité physique que les hommes se croient autorisés à concevoir, et 
qui n'existe pas dans la nature.

Il n'y a pas de "plan du temps présent".

C'est un abstrait.

Mais tu m'a beaucoup lu, mon chéri, Jean-Pierre.

Tu le sais, tout ça. 

-----------------------------------------------

I rather have the impression that it is you who is slow in thought.

You still haven't understood what the word "anisochrony" means?

You still don't understand why I refuse this synchronization procedure and 
why I say
that it is ABSOLUTELY impossible to tune two different watches placed in 
different places of the SAME REFERENTIAL"? Nor why, in the best case, each 
will advance on the other by a time equivalent to ΔT=x/c ?

It's not about the capacities of the clocks that I tick. It is on the 
physical reality that men believe they are authorized to conceive, and 
which does not exist in nature.

There is no "present time plan".

It is an abstract.

But you read me a lot, my darling, Jean-Pierre.

You know all that.

R.H.

-- 
"Mais ne nous trompons pas. Il n'y a pas que de la violence 
avec des armes : il y a des situations de violence." 
Abbé Pierre.
<http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=ii0Iru_yqLa0IiHqYGGyXQqWOqU@jntp>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586213

Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
> Le 31/05/2022 à 13:51, Python a écrit :
>> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
>>> Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit :
>>>> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the 
>>>> very
>>>> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
>>>
>>> The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American 
>>> Einstein the God made man on earth.
>>
>> That's quite a delusional claim given that Einstein improved the
>> work Poincaré dis. It is especially remarkable that Poincaré
>> and Einstein introduced 100% equivalent synchronization procedures.
>>
>> Remember, Richard, the very procedure you despise (well, you've never
>> understand it by the way...)

> I rather have the impression that it is you who is slow in thought.

It's difficult to be as slow as you, who after +30 years miserabily
fails on the basic of SR, calculus or algebra.

> You still haven't understood what the word "anisochrony" means?

I understand very well what you claim, and I *know* it is going
NOWHERE, and I know WHY, and I told you why.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586214 — Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else?

Le 31/05/2022 à 17:25, Python a écrit :
> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
>> Le 31/05/2022 à 13:51, Python a écrit :
>>> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
>>>> Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit :
>>>>> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the 
>>>>> very
>>>>> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
>>>>
>>>> The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American 
>>>> Einstein the God made man on earth.
>>>
>>> That's quite a delusional claim given that Einstein improved the
>>> work Poincaré dis. It is especially remarkable that Poincaré
>>> and Einstein introduced 100% equivalent synchronization procedures.
>>>
>>> Remember, Richard, the very procedure you despise (well, you've never
>>> understand it by the way...)
> 
>> I rather have the impression that it is you who is slow in thought.
> 
> It's difficult to be as slow as you, who after +30 years miserabily
> fails on the basic of SR, calculus or algebra.
> 
>> You still haven't understood what the word "anisochrony" means?
> 
> I understand very well what you claim, and I *know* it is going
> NOWHERE, and I know WHY, and I told you why.

The reverse is true.
I understand very well, ME, a simple equation, such as for example the 
notion of contraction of distances.

This is one of the basics.

We put:
L'=L.sqrt(1-v²/c²)

Very simple, right?

But precisely, it's not that I don't understand, I understand MUCH BETTER 
than the others, including you.

And I understand that's not "exactly" how it works.

And that the real equation that should be taught is a little more 
complicated, and even then not much.

L'=L.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosµ.Vo/c)

Don't worry about my cognitive abilities.

Equation moreover, which explains very well WHY in Hachel sauce 
relativity, there is NO parodox.

But we play with the snake that bites its tail, I will be answered 
authoritatively that there is not (and why not never been) a Langevin 
paradox, a train paradox, an Andromeda paradox, nor a paradox of quantum 
transmission.

And there, always, always, always, I will answer that the problem, at this 
level, is no longer scientific.

He is in the pride of "dogmatists" who do not want to lose.

Which is silly when you look at it.

What's the use of their Pyrrhic victory over me?

Pffff....


R.H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586215

Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
> Le 31/05/2022 à 17:25, Python a écrit :
>> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
>>> Le 31/05/2022 à 13:51, Python a écrit :
>>>> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote:
>>>>> Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit :
>>>>>> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and 
>>>>>> the very
>>>>>> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.).
>>>>>
>>>>> The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American 
>>>>> Einstein the God made man on earth.
>>>>
>>>> That's quite a delusional claim given that Einstein improved the
>>>> work Poincaré dis. It is especially remarkable that Poincaré
>>>> and Einstein introduced 100% equivalent synchronization procedures.
>>>>
>>>> Remember, Richard, the very procedure you despise (well, you've never
>>>> understand it by the way...)
>>
>>> I rather have the impression that it is you who is slow in thought.
>>
>> It's difficult to be as slow as you, who after +30 years miserabily
>> fails on the basic of SR, calculus or algebra.
>>
>>> You still haven't understood what the word "anisochrony" means?
>>
>> I understand very well what you claim, and I *know* it is going
>> NOWHERE, and I know WHY, and I told you why.
> 
> The reverse is true.
> I understand very well, ME, a simple equation, such as for example the 
> notion of contraction of distances.
> 
> This is one of the basics.
> 
> We put:
> L'=L.sqrt(1-v²/c²)
> 
> Very simple, right?
> 
> But precisely, it's not that I don't understand, I understand MUCH 
> BETTER than the others, including you.
> 
> And I understand that's not "exactly" how it works.
> 
> And that the real equation that should be taught is a little more 
> complicated, and even then not much.
> 
> L'=L.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosµ.Vo/c)
> 
> Don't worry about my cognitive abilities.
> 
> Equation moreover, which explains very well WHY in Hachel sauce 
> relativity, there is NO parodox.
> 
> But we play with the snake that bites its tail, I will be answered 
> authoritatively that there is not (and why not never been) a Langevin 
> paradox, a train paradox, an Andromeda paradox, nor a paradox of quantum 
> transmission.
> 
> And there, always, always, always, I will answer that the problem, at 
> this level, is no longer scientific.
> 
> He is in the pride of "dogmatists" who do not want to lose.
> 
> Which is silly when you look at it.
> 
> What's the use of their Pyrrhic victory over me?
> 
> Pffff....

This is all delusions on your side Richard, you are mentally ill.

You'll die that way, it doesn't matter.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586229

On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 17:25:59 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote: 
> > Le 31/05/2022 à 13:51, Python a écrit : 
> >> Richard "Hachel" Lengrand (M.D.) wrote: 
> >>> Le 31/05/2022 à 05:27, Richard Hertz a écrit : 
> >>>> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the 
> >>>> very 
> >>>> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.). 
> >>> 
> >>> The Frenchman Henri Poincaré was an idiot, and the German-American 
> >>> Einstein the God made man on earth. 
> >> 
> >> That's quite a delusional claim given that Einstein improved the 
> >> work Poincaré dis. It is especially remarkable that Poincaré 
> >> and Einstein introduced 100% equivalent synchronization procedures. 
> >> 
> >> Remember, Richard, the very procedure you despise (well, you've never 
> >> understand it by the way...)
> > I rather have the impression that it is you who is slow in thought.
> It's difficult to be as slow as you, who after +30 years miserabily 


Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
and trying to pretend he knows something.
Tell me, poor stinker, what is your definition of
a "theory" in the terms of Peano arithmetic?
See: if a theorem is going to be a part of a theory,
it has to be formulable in the language of the
theory. Do you get it? Or are you too stupid even for
that, poor stinker?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586257 — Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else?

On 2022-05-31 12:17:24 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

> Tu n'as toujours pas compris ce que voulait dire le mot "anisochronie"?
> You still haven't understood what the word "anisochrony" means?

Semantics is not physics.

Mikko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586258 — Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else?

Le 01/06/2022 à 15:18, Mikko a écrit :
> On 2022-05-31 12:17:24 +0000, Richard Hachel said:
> 
>> Tu n'as toujours pas compris ce que voulait dire le mot "anisochronie"?
>> You still haven't understood what the word "anisochrony" means?
> 
> Semantics is not physics.
> 
> Mikko

We can also do physics by removing all the words.

We will no longer speak of "gravitation", no more "electricity", no more 
"electromagnetism".

That way everyone will be happy.



On peut aussi faire de la physique en ôtant tous les mots.

On ne parlera plus de "gravitation", plus d'électricité, plus 
d'électromagnétisme. 

Comme ça tout la monde sera content.

Encore, que comme dirait l'autre : "Richard Hachel est un grand génie, il 
est le Fils de Dieu de la physique moderne sur la terre, et étant cela, 
il sait très bien les finalités de tout cela, ce sera d'ôter aussi les 
équations qui dérangent". Ôter le mots "anisochronie" n'est pas le but 
ultime. Le but ultime est d'ôter aussi les équations qui vont avec.
C'est à dire :
To²=Tr²+Et²
L'=L.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosµ.Vo/c)
t'=t(1+cosµ.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
To=Tr.sqrt(1+(1/4)Vr²/c²)
et des tas d'autres.

Le but est surtout là.

Le but est toujours là.

C'est comme la théorie woke. Faut être con pour pas comprendre que le 
but est la déconstruction du monde,
et le retour à l'âge de pierre intellectuel.

Va savoir pourquoi, François.

R.H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586324

On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:27:58 AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:
> This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very 
> uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.). 
> 
> Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year". 
> 
> Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)? 
> 
> Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after 
> his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following 
> Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000 
> manuscripts and documents at Princeton site). 
> 
> But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared. 
> 
> There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But, 
> as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at 
> Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss 
> citizenship. 
> 
> Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened? 
> 
> Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded 
> imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post. 
> 
> Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.

Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, I notice that NOT ONE has really tried
to debunk the fact that young Einstein did burn every trace of the works in the making of his 1905 papers,
which EASILY (and based on anyone's experience in developing mathematical based theories) may amount
to MORE THAN 500 PAGES of manuscripts, support documentation, side notes, etc.

When he started to gain notoriety, around 1907, accusations of PLAGIARISM inundated the physics community
at Germany. Between 1907 and 1912, the famous paper was called "THE LORENTZ-EINSTEIN THEORY".

The fucking fraudster knew, by 1906, that his life was going to be UNDER THE MICROSCOPE of historians of science,
as it happened FOR CENTURIES BEFORE.

The CRETIN get rid of anything that could disprove his assertions in that epoch. INFANTILE, CYNICAL  ASSERTIONS.

- I did't know about the MMX experiment nor I did about Lorentz work, in particular his 1904 paper.
- I didn't know about the work of Poincaré (even when by 1903, at his homo Academia with Solovine, etc., the book
  Science and Hypothesis was widely discussed).
- I didn't know about the works of Heaviside, Larmor and other (Heaviside exploded in anger as his name was used).
- I didn't know about the works of FitzGerald and, in particular Voigt (he used Voigt's notation, but it was a cosmic coincidence).
- I didn't know that a mechanism to use light to synchronize clocks in railway stations was patented around 1900 (EM signaling).
- It's wise to HIDE YOUR SOURCES (1907, to a journalist).
- I didn't know about the work of Dr. Lenard with UV Rays and the photoelectric effect (Mileva worked with him for 6 months by 1903)-

He was a fucking LIAR, DECEIVER, FRAUDSTER, SOCIOPATH who received full support of the Jewish network of power (Cabal).

His lies continued during all his brief career (10 years):

- I never heard of Von Soldner and his 1801 paper on light deflection by gravity.
- I never heard of Gerber and his 1898 paper explaining the advance of the perihelion of Mercury.
- I didn't know that Hilbert had solved the GFE two weeks before I presented mine in Nov. 1915.
- It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Lorentz connected me with Mr. Eddington in 1914 (it would have been TREASON, due to WWI).
- It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Dr. Freundlich helped me in 1915 or that he connected me with Dr. Newcomb (at USA).
- I didn't know about Dr. Schwarzschild until I received his letter in Dec. 1915 (He was PRESENT at his presentation at the PAS in Nov.)

** I never did fundraising for the zionist movement in my travels abroad (the first thing he did at Argentina was to meet zionists at La Plata).

** I didn't know about Eotvos work with gravitational mass before I conceived "the happiest thought of my life".


***************************************  

HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586328

El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 14:53:01 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió:

> 
> HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB?

Do you feel somebody is interested in your nonsense. Einstein has been dead for 67 years.

More interesting are Newton occult studies (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_occult_studies)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586335

On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:20:31 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote:
> El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 14:53:01 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: 
> 
> > 
> > HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB?
> Do you feel somebody is interested in your nonsense. Einstein has been dead for 67 years. 
> 
> More interesting are Newton occult studies (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_occult_studies)

Crimes in science are crimes against the mankind and don't prescribe.

SR & GR are WMD (Weapons of Mind Destruction), and were used relentlessly by the fucking relativists for 100 years.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586371

El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 18:00:57 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió:
> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:20:31 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote: 
> > El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 14:53:01 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: 
> > 
> > > 
> > > HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB? 
> > Do you feel somebody is interested in your nonsense. Einstein has been dead for 67 years. 
> > 
> > More interesting are Newton occult studies (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_occult_studies)
> Crimes in science are crimes against the mankind and don't prescribe. 
> 
> SR & GR are WMD (Weapons of Mind Destruction), and were used relentlessly by the fucking relativists for 100 years.

But the real WMD (weapons of mass destructions) have been and are made by technologist (like engineers). Which of the videos of the Russian invasion of Ucraine shows WMD based on SR & GR?

How many trillions of dollars are being wasted on weapons?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586376

On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 12:39:02 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote:
> El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 18:00:57 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: 
> > On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:20:31 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote: 
> > > El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 14:53:01 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB? 
> > > Do you feel somebody is interested in your nonsense. Einstein has been dead for 67 years. 
> > > 
> > > More interesting are Newton occult studies (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_occult_studies) 
> > Crimes in science are crimes against the mankind and don't prescribe. 
> > 
> > SR & GR are WMD (Weapons of Mind Destruction), and were used relentlessly by the fucking relativists for 100 years.
> But the real WMD (weapons of mass destructions) have been and are made by technologist (like engineers). Which of the videos of the Russian invasion of Ucraine shows WMD based on SR & GR? 
> 
> How many trillions of dollars are being wasted on weapons?

More sad is to understand how many people work in every country MICs. In Russia alone, with his state owned MIC, 1.4 million people.
I think that it's twice that amount in USA and three times in China. These three countries alone amount to about 8 million people working
with jobs directly related to the mass death of others. Double it to cover the whole world and you have 16 million people working in MICs.

Now, double the 1 trillion USD yearly budget allocated to defense in USA to cover NGOs related to war efforts, one way or another ONLY
in the USA. Double it to cover worldwide expenditure related to defense, offense, intelligence, etc.

You got, each year, 16 million people and 2 trillion USD devoted to the actions of killing, surveillance, control and disinformation PER YEAR.

Sad world, isn't it? 

If you want to get a more ominous figure, divide each one of those two figures by the number of people that die or "dissapear" per year.

I know that those numbers are a COLD, CYNICAL representation of world affairs in that matter, but they are TRUE and a good estimate.

Now, imagine what could be done EACH YEAR with such manpower and budget, if it was assigned to the progress of civilization.

Now, calculate the totals for one decade or two.

Now, ELIMINATE greedy bankers and finance people (and drug people). Heaven or hell?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586382

Paparios wrote:
> 
> El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 18:00:57 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió:
> > On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:20:31 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote:
> > > El jueves, 2 de junio de 2022 a las 14:53:01 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB?
> > > Do you feel somebody is interested in your nonsense. Einstein has been dead for 67 years.
> > >
> > > More interesting are Newton occult studies (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_occult_studies)
> > Crimes in science are crimes against the mankind and don't prescribe.
> >
> > SR & GR are WMD (Weapons of Mind Destruction), and were used relentlessly by the fucking relativists for 100 years.
> 
> But the real WMD (weapons of mass destructions) have been and are made by technologist (like engineers). 



Well of course, Albert Einstein *INVENTS* WMD (weapons of mass destructions), but he gets the 'little people' to make them for him.


You cannot build the Empire State Building all by yourself, ...you got to get the 'little people' to make them for you.


War is simply part of nature...ask any ant, or war ant.


There are a lot of people that need to be 'depopulated'...


especially some of yous in the newsgroup.


The Internet used to be so friendly...untill you guys came along and ruin the neighborrhood.






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586336

Richard Hertz wrote:

> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, 


You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of
the 12 tribes?"


I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12
tribes.


and I'm not finished...



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586338

On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:31:30 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> Richard Hertz wrote: 
> 
> > Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing,
> You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of 
> the 12 tribes?" 
> 
> 
> I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12 
> tribes. 
> 
> 
> and I'm not finished...
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> and challenge 
> the unchallengeable.

Which lost tribe invited him to Japan and paid him more than 100,000$ for the inconvenience?

Think thoroughly before you answer any stupid reason.

https://artsandculture.google.com/story/einstein-s-trip-to-the-far-east-and-palestine-einstein-archive/AAWRQlTfnA8A8A?hl=en

WWII was in the making, in slow motion.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586342

Richard Hertz wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:31:30 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > > Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing,
> > You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of
> > the 12 tribes?"
> >
> >
> > I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12
> > tribes.
> >
> >
> > and I'm not finished...
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
> 
> Which lost tribe invited him to Japan and paid him more than 100,000$ for the inconvenience?

You seem to be suffering from some kind of aliment that I cannot put my finger on...

You wrote: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of the 12 tribes?" 

So, how did you mangage to change the word "I'm" to "him"???


Are you aware that you're...incoherent?

unclear, confused, muddled, unintelligible, incomprehensible, hard to follow, disjointed, 
disconnected, unconnected, disordered, mixed up, garbled, jumbled, scrambled, rambling, wandering, discursive, 
disorganized, uncoordinated, illogical, inarticulate, mumbled, muttered, stuttered, stammered, slurred, inchoate
Disorganized or incoherent speech · Confused thinking ·

It's possible that you have FTD, frontotemporal dementia.

You need to go see a doctor...quick.

and then make funeral arrangements...

i give you a couple of weeks..the most.










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web