Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #580087 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-03-11 22:20 -0800 |
| Last post | 2022-03-13 14:21 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 97 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-11 22:20 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-03-12 19:44 +1100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 03:48 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-03-13 10:07 +1100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 16:10 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-03-13 16:51 +1100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 22:05 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 13:29 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 06:48 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 13:29 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-12 11:37 +0100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 15:06 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 10:13 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 19:34 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 11:55 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 20:13 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 12:48 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 21:06 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 14:52 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 00:13 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-12 20:59 -0500
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 20:35 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 12:34 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-12 12:07 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-12 22:55 +0100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 22:12 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-12 23:46 +0100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 14:55 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 14:58 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Vaugn Rhea <var@bfrlsr.ni> - 2022-03-12 23:12 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 00:14 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-12 20:41 -0800
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 12:35 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 06:29 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 13:33 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 06:49 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 14:01 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-03-13 16:58 +0100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 09:26 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-03-13 21:17 +0100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 20:51 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 20:57 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 14:09 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-03-13 22:44 +0100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 16:15 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-14 00:06 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 21:15 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-14 02:55 -0400
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-14 00:31 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-03-14 10:45 +0100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-14 10:48 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-14 08:57 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-14 09:39 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-14 17:05 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-14 14:43 -0400
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-14 22:22 +0100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-14 14:26 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-15 00:51 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-14 22:13 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-15 10:36 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-13 11:17 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-14 22:55 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-15 01:08 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-15 11:12 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-16 09:03 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 10:16 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 17:30 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 10:58 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 19:18 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 13:03 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-03-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 14:21 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 21:37 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2022-03-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 22:27 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 16:37 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-03-16 18:34 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 21:58 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-03-17 06:27 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-17 11:12 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-03-17 11:44 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-17 17:22 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz admits he's an asshole "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-03-17 21:26 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz admits he's an asshole Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-17 22:30 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-18 21:21 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-18 21:54 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-18 22:21 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-18 23:10 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-18 23:42 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-19 13:10 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-19 13:50 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-20 12:08 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-21 22:47 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz loves eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 22:04 -0700
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 20:59 +0000
Re: Bodkin physics: Watermelons in free fall and solar radiation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-13 14:21 +0100
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-13 20:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t0llhc$100o$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #580201 |
Paul B. Andersen <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> wrote: > > > Den 13.03.2022 15:01, skrev Odd Bodkin: >> Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 10:33:29 AM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Asshole, you used 9 Kg (mass), which has weight of 90 KgF or 90 N in the formula of KE. >>>> I used 9kg (I.e. the mass) in the calculation of the KE. You going to >>>> apologize now? > >>> >>> Cretin! A 90 KgF watermelon (90 N)? You have no shame! >>> > >> >> If you’re joking now, it’s overworked. If you’re not, it’s pathetic. Either >> way, you’re more willing to say something stupid than to apologize. What >> does that tell you? >> > > He isn't joking. > He actually believes that kilogram force, or kilopond (kp) > is the same as Newton. > > But 1 kp = 9.80665 N (as you know) It kinda doesn’t matter. I referred to a 9 kg watermelon. Not a 9 KgF watermelon, not a 9 N watermelon, not a 9 kp watermelon. If he does not know the size of watermelons or that the SI unit of mass is a kilogram, that’s entirely an idiocy that a man his age should know better than to double down on. > > Richard Hertz, read this: > https://www.sizes.com/units/kilopond.htm > > Richard Hertz will now claim that he was joking or trolling. > He will NOT apologize. > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-13 20:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t0llra$146p$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #580203 |
Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: > Paul B. Andersen <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> wrote: >> >> >> Den 13.03.2022 15:01, skrev Odd Bodkin: >>> Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 10:33:29 AM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Asshole, you used 9 Kg (mass), which has weight of 90 KgF or 90 N in >>>>>> the formula of KE. >>>>> I used 9kg (I.e. the mass) in the >>>>>> calculation of the KE. You going to >>>>> apologize now? >> >>>> >>>> Cretin! A 90 KgF watermelon (90 N)? You have no shame! >>>> >> >>> >>> If you’re joking now, it’s overworked. If you’re not, it’s pathetic. Either >>> way, you’re more willing to say something stupid than to apologize. What >>> does that tell you? >>> >> >> He isn't joking. >> He actually believes that kilogram force, or kilopond (kp) >> is the same as Newton. >> >> But 1 kp = 9.80665 N (as you know) > > It kinda doesn’t matter. I referred to a 9 kg watermelon. Not a 9 KgF > watermelon, not a 9 N watermelon, not a 9 kp watermelon. If he does not > know the size of watermelons or that the SI unit of mass is a kilogram, > that’s entirely an idiocy that a man his age should know better than to > double down on. Now ask yourself. Does an elderly man who has become misanthropic, believes himself to be among the rarified fraction that’s above the rabble, and who can neither confess a mistake not apologize for one — has that man earned your respect? Is he entitled to it anyway? And if he’s not receiving the respect he thinks he’s entitled to, does that have as a byproduct the accentuation of the character flaws mentioned above? Chicken or egg here? > >> >> Richard Hertz, read this: >> https://www.sizes.com/units/kilopond.htm >> >> Richard Hertz will now claim that he was joking or trolling. >> He will NOT apologize. >> > > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-13 14:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0e86aa84-0ea9-4bd5-82e7-106142ab909en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #580204 |
On Sunday, 13 March 2022 at 21:57:17 UTC+1, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > Now ask yourself. Does an elderly man who has become misanthropic, believes > himself to be among the rarified fraction that’s above the rabble, and who > can neither confess a mistake not apologize for one Unlike poor idiot woodworker, of course, who would always gladly confess a mistake - but he can't because he makes no mistakes:(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-13 22:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t0lokl$978$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #580204 |
Op 13-mrt.-2022 om 21:57 schreef Odd Bodkin: > Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: >> Paul B. Andersen <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Den 13.03.2022 15:01, skrev Odd Bodkin: >>>> Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 10:33:29 AM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Asshole, you used 9 Kg (mass), which has weight of 90 KgF or 90 N in >>>>>>> the formula of KE. >>>>>> I used 9kg (I.e. the mass) in the >>>>>>> calculation of the KE. You going to >>>>>> apologize now? >>> >>>>> >>>>> Cretin! A 90 KgF watermelon (90 N)? You have no shame! >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>> If you’re joking now, it’s overworked. If you’re not, it’s pathetic. Either >>>> way, you’re more willing to say something stupid than to apologize. What >>>> does that tell you? >>>> >>> >>> He isn't joking. >>> He actually believes that kilogram force, or kilopond (kp) >>> is the same as Newton. >>> >>> But 1 kp = 9.80665 N (as you know) >> >> It kinda doesn’t matter. I referred to a 9 kg watermelon. Not a 9 KgF >> watermelon, not a 9 N watermelon, not a 9 kp watermelon. If he does not >> know the size of watermelons or that the SI unit of mass is a kilogram, >> that’s entirely an idiocy that a man his age should know better than to >> double down on. > > Now ask yourself. Does an elderly man who has become misanthropic, believes > himself to be among the rarified fraction that’s above the rabble, and who > can neither confess a mistake not apologize for one — has that man earned > your respect? Is he entitled to it anyway? > > And if he’s not receiving the respect he thinks he’s entitled to, does that > have as a byproduct the accentuation of the character flaws mentioned > above? > > Chicken or egg here? No chicken. No egg. Just an old moulded turd. Dirk Vdm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-13 16:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c16be1b7-cf24-444a-8234-5768cae0eca7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #580204 |
On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 5:57:17 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: <snip> > Now ask yourself. Does an elderly man who has become misanthropic, believes > himself to be among the rarified fraction that’s above the rabble, and who > can neither confess a mistake not apologize for one — has that man earned > your respect? Is he entitled to it anyway? > > And if he’s not receiving the respect he thinks he’s entitled to, does that > have as a byproduct the accentuation of the character flaws mentioned > above? > > Chicken or egg here? I repeat part of the OP, from which you try to divert attention: STUPIDITY 1: Energy measured in Watts, asshole. So let's take a watermelon, which has a cross-sectional area of about 0.20 m^2, and we'll drop it from the third story (10 meters up) of a city parking garage. The maximal amount of photonic *********energy********** it can absorb from above is therefore 1370 W/m^2 * 0.2 m^2 = 275 W roughly, certainly no more than ***********300 W.************** STUPIDITY 2: Using WEIGHT instead of MASS. Since the average watermelon is about 20 pounds or 9 kilograms, we can find the speed this 400 Joules could generate: 400 J = (1/2)mv^2 = (1/2)*(9 kg)*v^2 [THIS, ASSHOLE!] so v = 9.4 m/s if ALL of the photonic energy is absorbed and converted into kinetic energy rather than heat or anything else. ******************************** You are writing about a watermelon that register about 90 Kg, as measured by a market scale (or any scale). Fuck Newtons. People in general and any industry or service uses Kg, not Newton, as a default unit of weight. Newton units are correct, but barely used beyond labs. So, don't try to escape with your cheap sophistry and attempts to use straw man arguments. You was AN IDIOT, and still are (only that more cautious as you AGE). And Paul, you was right. But Bodkin, you are a cretin pretender. You used TWO units incorrectly by then. But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No libraries over there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 00:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t0m0un$1539$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #580221 |
Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 5:57:17 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > > <snip> > > > >> Now ask yourself. Does an elderly man who has become misanthropic, believes >> himself to be among the rarified fraction that’s above the rabble, and who >> can neither confess a mistake not apologize for one — has that man earned >> your respect? Is he entitled to it anyway? >> >> And if he’s not receiving the respect he thinks he’s entitled to, does that >> have as a byproduct the accentuation of the character flaws mentioned >> above? >> >> Chicken or egg here? > > I repeat part of the OP, from which you try to divert attention: > > STUPIDITY 1: Energy measured in Watts, asshole. > > So let's take a watermelon, which has a cross-sectional area of about > 0.20 m^2, and we'll drop it from the third story (10 meters up) of a > city parking garage. The maximal amount of photonic *********energy********** it can absorb > from above is therefore 1370 W/m^2 * 0.2 m^2 = 275 W roughly, certainly > no more than ***********300 W.************** > > > STUPIDITY 2: Using WEIGHT instead of MASS. > > Since the average watermelon is about 20 pounds or 9 kilograms, > we can find the speed this 400 Joules could generate: > > 400 J = (1/2)mv^2 = (1/2)*(9 kg)*v^2 [THIS, ASSHOLE!] 9 kg mass. What about this do you not understand? How many pounds would a watermelon of mass 9kg weigh? Can you do that? > > so > v = 9.4 m/s if ALL of the photonic energy is absorbed and converted into > kinetic energy rather than heat or anything else. > > ******************************** > > You are writing about a watermelon that register about 90 Kg, as measured > by a market scale (or any scale). > > Fuck Newtons. Keep digging. SI units. Surely you’ve heard of them. > People in general and any industry or service uses Kg, not Newton, as a > default unit of weight. > Newton units are correct, but barely used beyond labs. > > So, don't try to escape with your cheap sophistry and attempts to use straw man arguments. > > You was AN IDIOT, and still are (only that more cautious as you AGE). > > And Paul, you was right. > > But Bodkin, you are a cretin pretender. You used TWO units incorrectly by then. > > But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No > libraries over there. Plenty of libraries here. And keep guessing. > > > > > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-13 21:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c127f3a6-b4eb-4ec5-9621-4ea4d57b8893n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #580224 |
On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 9:06:50 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: <snip> > > But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No libraries over there. > Plenty of libraries here. And keep guessing. Don't worry. I wasn't guessing. Just posting something that you slipped in your heated, 2000 pages long discussion with Robert Winn about the relationship between sawmills and Lorentz transforms a couple of years ago. Man, you really know your business and the history of sawmills in US and Canada. You impressed me, really. The only thing that doesn't fit in your narrative is that you never used the word "timber" again, not before. Very strange for a committed woodworker that makes tables. Details, Bodkin, details. Like the one that you warped from your previous identity before 2013. Details and patterns. You can't control freudian slips, like a liar can't control subtle body movements when liying. Details.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 02:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <t0motn$1pps$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #580228 |
On 3/14/2022 12:15 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 9:06:50 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: [] > Man, you really know your business and the history of sawmills in US and Canada. You impressed me, really. > > The only thing that doesn't fit in your narrative is that you never used the word "timber" again, not before. > > Very strange for a committed woodworker that makes tables. > Maybe he doesn't cut his own trees for lumber? > Like the one that you warped from your previous identity before 2013. Details and patterns. Which is...? (and evidence of that?) > > You can't control freudian slips, like a liar can't control subtle body movements when liying. Details. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 00:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <230cdc5b-960a-47b6-ae0e-e7db99ce8f1bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #580232 |
On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 3:55:55 AM UTC-3, Michael Moroney wrote: > On 3/14/2022 12:15 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: <snip> > > Very strange for a committed woodworker that makes tables. > > > Maybe he doesn't cut his own trees for lumber? > > Like the one that you warped from your previous identity before 2013. Details and patterns. > Which is...? (and evidence of that?) This is one of the very first posts of Bodkin, while having a couple of days off from his work as graphic designer: Jul 2, 2013, 3:39:14 PM On 7/2/2013 10:02 AM, Y wrote: > Bodkin: Have you ever used CAD ? It's full of motion. I suppose I'm more familiar with 3D animation software, like Maya or Blender or Lightwave. In that software, which does try to capture happenings, there are definitely four dimensions, and you control all of them. Have you used any of these? I am guessing that you are a draftsman in the aerospace industry. Well, anyway, this now seems a bit off point, and *******I've spent my days off ******* now on this newsgroup. ******************************************************** MY NOTE (from the Web): Autodesk Maya :: Computer application Autodesk Maya, commonly shortened to just Maya, is a 3D computer graphics application that runs on Windows, macOS and Linux, originally developed by Alias and currently owned and developed by Autodesk. It is used to create assets for interactive 3D applications, animated films, TV series, and visual effects. Not to mention the stupid posts in the next three or four months, trying to chip in into discussions of whatever. But the seeds of his natural behavior as a deceiver where just right there, when he started as Bodkin. ******************* Y , Jul 10, 2013, 12:44:28 AM If you intend on changing the terms of your argument, fine. I had an issue with your initial claim. Please don't make the same foolish mistake as others in this forum do. This mistake tends to be that a non-specific or unqualified claim is made. It falls under it's own weight. Someone points out the mistake, and the claimer keeps claiming different things until he/she gets it right, or fails. ****************** See? Only an older cretin by now, and with 99 more books. It's interesting how SOME persons evolved with the years (from nothing in the head to a Supreme Thinker, the IKEA man). I bet he posted in alt.computers, alt.politics and alt.religion then or before that year. His needs to be heard and to belong here are pathological, as well his incapacity TO ACCEPT THAT HE'S WRONG (not even 1 mm).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 10:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t0n2sk$35i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #580233 |
Op 14-mrt.-2022 om 08:31 schreef Richard Hertz:
> On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 3:55:55 AM UTC-3, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 3/14/2022 12:15 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> Very strange for a committed woodworker that makes tables.
>>>
>> Maybe he doesn't cut his own trees for lumber?
>>> Like the one that you warped from your previous identity before 2013. Details and patterns.
>> Which is...? (and evidence of that?)
>
> This is one of the very first posts of Bodkin, while having a couple of days off from his work as graphic designer:
>
> Jul 2, 2013, 3:39:14 PM
> On 7/2/2013 10:02 AM, Y wrote:
>> Bodkin: Have you ever used CAD ? It's full of motion.
>
> I suppose I'm more familiar with 3D animation software, like Maya or
> Blender or Lightwave. In that software, which does try to capture
> happenings, there are definitely four dimensions, and you control all of them.
> Have you used any of these?
> I am guessing that you are a draftsman in the aerospace industry. Well,
> anyway, this now seems a bit off point, and *******I've spent my days off *******
> now on this newsgroup.
>
> ********************************************************
> MY NOTE (from the Web):
>
> Autodesk Maya :: Computer application
> Autodesk Maya, commonly shortened to just Maya, is a 3D computer graphics application that runs on Windows, macOS and Linux, originally developed by Alias and currently owned and developed by Autodesk. It is used to create assets for interactive 3D applications, animated films, TV series, and visual effects.
>
> Not to mention the stupid posts in the next three or four months, trying to chip in into discussions of whatever.
> But the seeds of his natural behavior as a deceiver where just right there, when he started as Bodkin.
>
> *******************
> Y , Jul 10, 2013, 12:44:28 AM
>
> If you intend on changing the terms of your argument, fine. I had an issue with your initial claim. Please don't make the same foolish mistake as others in this forum do. This mistake tends to be that a non-specific or unqualified claim is made. It falls under it's own weight. Someone points out the mistake, and the claimer keeps claiming different things until he/she gets it right, or fails.
> ******************
>
>
> See? Only an older cretin by now, and with 99 more books. It's interesting how SOME persons evolved with the years (from nothing
> in the head to a Supreme Thinker, the IKEA man). I bet he posted in alt.computers, alt.politics and alt.religion then or before that year.
> His needs to be heard and to belong here are pathological, as well his incapacity TO ACCEPT THAT HE'S WRONG (not even 1 mm).
>
That's right, Richard, NEVER CONCEDE!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs
Dirk Vdm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 10:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t0n6hb$1lj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #580228 |
Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 9:06:50 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: >> Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: > > <snip> > >>> But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No >>> libraries over there. > >> Plenty of libraries here. And keep guessing. > > Don't worry. I wasn't guessing. Just posting something that you slipped > in your heated, 2000 pages long discussion > with Robert Winn about the relationship between sawmills and Lorentz > transforms a couple of years ago. > > Man, you really know your business and the history of sawmills in US and > Canada. You impressed me, really. > > The only thing that doesn't fit in your narrative is that you never used > the word "timber" again, not before. > > Very strange for a committed woodworker that makes tables. You think so? What do you know about woodworking, engineer? > > Details, Bodkin, details. > > Like the one that you warped from your previous identity before 2013. Details and patterns. > > You can't control freudian slips, like a liar can't control subtle body > movements when liying. Details. > > And you are really good at jumping to slightly off conclusions. Must be a EE thing. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 08:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <622F65DC.1C2E@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #580221 |
Richard Hertz wrote: > But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No libraries over there. KANSAS??? How did you get from Florida to Kansas???? you're all over the place like a chicken without a head. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 09:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3bfcac7b-95ef-411f-ae7b-0d4c8f9a43d3n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #580264 |
On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 12:56:44 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No libraries over there. > KANSAS??? How did you get from Florida to Kansas???? > > you're all over the place > > like a chicken without a head. > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. Have you ever played a game like Battleship? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battleship_(game) It requires patience and guessing. This is my next move (sunk): - Bodkin is a CGI programmer, and work from 9 AM to 5 PM as an employee. - He left his workplace at about 5 PM, and never after 5:30 PM. In the lapse 5:30 PM to 6:00 PM he's going home. - Not a single post exist in such lapse during the last 3 months, to the least. - He invented his Internet persona to misguide everyone, because he posts from his workplace with HIS portable terminal. - He can't be caught or would be kicked in the ass by employers. - He's terrified that someone blow his cover, as he can't justify the time he invest on this forum in working hours. - He was a kid when started here by 2013, just after getting a job as a graphic designer (probable age 23). - He was a total ignorant of physics when he started here, and knew little of math (calculus). But he wanted to learn it, starting with SR. - He has a nasty attitude to challenge his olders (and probably his bosses), because he thinks he smart out anyone. - With time he evolved to this currect cartoon character that he plays here. - He lives in a central state, where the time zone is UTC-6 (winter time). - He's a hobbist with woodworking, but made a living animating Bob Sponge. This frustraed him. - He has serious problems of identity, for which he needs to "exist" in a virtual form, which he composed with 30,000 posts. - He almost has no social life, and he spend here 99% of the time he's awake. - He has religious problems with everything that Einstein embody and people reject. I could tell where he works and his name, but I will NOT go any further. This is only a game for me. I have no interest in really unmask Dono-Adrian-sa_ge or Bodkin OR Moroney (another nutjob). Enought to say that I profiled the three of the relativistic pack, that pollutes this forum for years. No problems with Dono, except his abuses insulting people. No problems with Moroney, except that he's a traitor to every EE for adhering to relativity. Problems with Bodkin, because he's a pretentious cretin and a complete deceiver. He's like NASA (Never A Straight Answer). Capito?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 17:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t0nsjv$1gqb$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #580270 |
Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 12:56:44 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: >> Richard Hertz wrote: >> >>> But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No >>> libraries over there. >> KANSAS??? How did you get from Florida to Kansas???? >> >> you're all over the place >> >> like a chicken without a head. >> -- >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> and challenge >> the unchallengeable. > > Have you ever played a game like Battleship? > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battleship_(game) > > It requires patience and guessing. > > This is my next move (sunk): > > - Bodkin is a CGI programmer, and work from 9 AM to 5 PM as an employee. > - He left his workplace at about 5 PM, and never after 5:30 PM. In the > lapse 5:30 PM to 6:00 PM he's going home. > - Not a single post exist in such lapse during the last 3 months, to the least. > - He invented his Internet persona to misguide everyone, because he posts > from his workplace with HIS portable terminal. > - He can't be caught or would be kicked in the ass by employers. > - He's terrified that someone blow his cover, as he can't justify the > time he invest on this forum in working hours. > - He was a kid when started here by 2013, just after getting a job as a > graphic designer (probable age 23). > - He was a total ignorant of physics when he started here, and knew > little of math (calculus). But he wanted to learn it, starting with SR. > - He has a nasty attitude to challenge his olders (and probably his > bosses), because he thinks he smart out anyone. > - With time he evolved to this currect cartoon character that he plays here. > - He lives in a central state, where the time zone is UTC-6 (winter time). > - He's a hobbist with woodworking, but made a living animating Bob > Sponge. This frustraed him. > - He has serious problems of identity, for which he needs to "exist" in a > virtual form, which he composed with 30,000 posts. > - He almost has no social life, and he spend here 99% of the time he's awake. > - He has religious problems with everything that Einstein embody and people reject. > > I could tell where he works and his name, but I will NOT go any further. No you could not. All of the above was pretty funny. Nothing funnier than Bob Sponge though. > > This is only a game for me. I have no interest in really unmask > Dono-Adrian-sa_ge or Bodkin OR Moroney (another nutjob). > > Enought to say that I profiled the three of the relativistic pack, that > pollutes this forum for years. > > No problems with Dono, except his abuses insulting people. > No problems with Moroney, except that he's a traitor to every EE for > adhering to relativity. > Problems with Bodkin, because he's a > pretentious cretin and a complete deceiver. He's like NASA (Never A Straight Answer). > > Capito? > > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 14:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <t0o2cb$nmr$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #580270 |
On 3/14/2022 12:39 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 12:56:44 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: >> Richard Hertz wrote: >> >>> But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No libraries over there. >> KANSAS??? How did you get from Florida to Kansas???? >> >> you're all over the place >> >> like a chicken without a head. >> -- >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> and challenge >> the unchallengeable. > > Have you ever played a game like Battleship? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battleship_(game) > > It requires patience and guessing. > > This is my next move (sunk): > > - Bodkin is a CGI programmer, and work from 9 AM to 5 PM as an employee. > - He left his workplace at about 5 PM, and never after 5:30 PM. In the lapse 5:30 PM to 6:00 PM he's going home. > - Not a single post exist in such lapse during the last 3 months, to the least. > - He invented his Internet persona to misguide everyone, because he posts from his workplace with HIS portable terminal. > - He can't be caught or would be kicked in the ass by employers. > - He's terrified that someone blow his cover, as he can't justify the time he invest on this forum in working hours. > - He was a kid when started here by 2013, just after getting a job as a graphic designer (probable age 23). > - He was a total ignorant of physics when he started here, and knew little of math (calculus). But he wanted to learn it, starting with SR. > - He has a nasty attitude to challenge his olders (and probably his bosses), because he thinks he smart out anyone. > - With time he evolved to this currect cartoon character that he plays here. > - He lives in a central state, where the time zone is UTC-6 (winter time). > - He's a hobbist with woodworking, but made a living animating Bob Sponge. This frustraed him. > - He has serious problems of identity, for which he needs to "exist" in a virtual form, which he composed with 30,000 posts. > - He almost has no social life, and he spend here 99% of the time he's awake. > - He has religious problems with everything that Einstein embody and people reject. > > I could tell where he works and his name, but I will NOT go any further. It looks like you are playing Battleship by using a random number generator. > > No problems with Moroney, except that he's a traitor to every EE for adhering to relativity. It has been pointed out more than a few times the kꙩꙩkier of the anti-relativity nutcases tend to be retired EEs. Are you trying to tell me I'm a traitor to EEs by *not* being a kꙩꙩk?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 22:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1potuz6.3ffojh1btptqmN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #580280 |
Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote: > On 3/14/2022 12:39 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 12:56:44 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > >> Richard Hertz wrote: > >>> > >>> But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No > >>>libraries over there. > >> KANSAS??? How did you get from Florida to Kansas???? > >> > >> you're all over the place > >> > >> like a chicken without a head. > >> -- > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > >> and challenge > >> the unchallengeable. > > > > Have you ever played a game like Battleship? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battleship_(game) > > > > It requires patience and guessing. > > > > This is my next move (sunk): > > > > - Bodkin is a CGI programmer, and work from 9 AM to 5 PM as an employee. > > - He left his workplace at about 5 PM, and never after 5:30 PM. In the > > - lapse 5:30 PM to 6:00 PM he's going home. Not a single post exist in > > - such lapse during the last 3 months, to the least. He invented his > > - Internet persona to misguide everyone, because he posts from his > > - workplace with HIS portable terminal. He can't be caught or would be > > - kicked in the ass by employers. He's terrified that someone blow his > > - cover, as he can't justify the time he invest on this forum in working > > - hours. He was a kid when started here by 2013, just after getting a > > - job as a graphic designer (probable age 23). He was a total ignorant > > - of physics when he started here, and knew little of math (calculus). > > - But he wanted to learn it, starting with SR. He has a nasty attitude > > - to challenge his olders (and probably his bosses), because he thinks > > - he smart out anyone. With time he evolved to this currect cartoon > > - character that he plays here. He lives in a central state, where the > > - time zone is UTC-6 (winter time). He's a hobbist with woodworking, but > > - made a living animating Bob Sponge. This frustraed him. He has serious > > - problems of identity, for which he needs to "exist" in a virtual form, > > - which he composed with 30,000 posts. He almost has no social life, and > > - he spend here 99% of the time he's awake. He has religious problems > > - with everything that Einstein embody and people reject. > > > > I could tell where he works and his name, but I will NOT go any further. > > It looks like you are playing Battleship by using a random number > generator. > > > > No problems with Moroney, except that he's a traitor to every EE for > > adhering to relativity. > > It has been pointed out more than a few times the k??kier of the > anti-relativity nutcases tend to be retired EEs. Are you trying to tell > me I'm a traitor to EEs by *not* being a k??k? Yes, I don't know what it is with those EEs. They are over-represented among creationist nutters too. A special kind of EE-blinders? Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 14:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <085627e2-fe2b-4c67-a249-0f9eec143d58n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #580280 |
On Monday, 14 March 2022 at 19:43:28 UTC+1, Michael Moroney wrote: > On 3/14/2022 12:39 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 12:56:44 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > >> Richard Hertz wrote: > >> > >>> But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No libraries over there. > >> KANSAS??? How did you get from Florida to Kansas???? > >> > >> you're all over the place > >> > >> like a chicken without a head. > >> -- > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > >> and challenge > >> the unchallengeable. > > > > Have you ever played a game like Battleship? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battleship_(game) > > > > It requires patience and guessing. > > > > This is my next move (sunk): > > > > - Bodkin is a CGI programmer, and work from 9 AM to 5 PM as an employee. > > - He left his workplace at about 5 PM, and never after 5:30 PM. In the lapse 5:30 PM to 6:00 PM he's going home. > > - Not a single post exist in such lapse during the last 3 months, to the least. > > - He invented his Internet persona to misguide everyone, because he posts from his workplace with HIS portable terminal. > > - He can't be caught or would be kicked in the ass by employers. > > - He's terrified that someone blow his cover, as he can't justify the time he invest on this forum in working hours. > > - He was a kid when started here by 2013, just after getting a job as a graphic designer (probable age 23). > > - He was a total ignorant of physics when he started here, and knew little of math (calculus). But he wanted to learn it, starting with SR. > > - He has a nasty attitude to challenge his olders (and probably his bosses), because he thinks he smart out anyone. > > - With time he evolved to this currect cartoon character that he plays here. > > - He lives in a central state, where the time zone is UTC-6 (winter time). > > - He's a hobbist with woodworking, but made a living animating Bob Sponge. This frustraed him. > > - He has serious problems of identity, for which he needs to "exist" in a virtual form, which he composed with 30,000 posts. > > - He almost has no social life, and he spend here 99% of the time he's awake. > > - He has religious problems with everything that Einstein embody and people reject. > > > > I could tell where he works and his name, but I will NOT go any further. > It looks like you are playing Battleship by using a random number generator. > > > > No problems with Moroney, except that he's a traitor to every EE for adhering to relativity. > It has been pointed out more than a few times the kꙩꙩkier of the > anti-relativity nutcases tend to be retired EEs. Are you trying to tell > me I'm a traitor to EEs by *not* being a kꙩꙩk? But you are, stupid Mike.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-15 00:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t0onto$1gc0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #580264 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Richard Hertz wrote: > >> But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No >> libraries over there. > > KANSAS??? How did you get from Florida to Kansas???? > > you're all over the place > > like a chicken without a head. > > > Richard’s hobby is wild guesses. I think recently he has had me as a professor of philosophy of religion, or a graphic artist doing computer work but somehow still has to drive to work during a pandemic, or maybe an unemployed mathematician. I can’t remember which. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-14 22:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <52a27fd7-a637-4264-957c-d81693070b43n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #580299 |
On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 9:51:08 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > >> But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No > >> libraries over there. > > > > KANSAS??? How did you get from Florida to Kansas???? > > > > you're all over the place > > > > like a chicken without a head. > > > > > > > Richard’s hobby is wild guesses. I think recently he has had me as a > professor of philosophy of religion, or a graphic artist doing computer > work but somehow still has to drive to work during a pandemic, or maybe an > unemployed mathematician. I can’t remember which. > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables Don't try to be an smart ass. Your cretinism along with your imbecibility speak by themselves. You was working with CGI software, as an employee, when you started here by mid 2013. And the statistics with the gap of exactly half an hour (5:30 PM to 6:00 PM) correspond to 1,000 posts that you did between Jan and Feb 2022. And software output don't lie. I told you before that I have your function of life, each 30', which is obtained in the easiest way but requires using logic besides math, Some goes for Moroney. I could make a wild guess about when you take a dump or a very accurate average of your sleeping hours, But don't flatter yourself so much, It's only applied data mining, and I can profile you as well as Moroney or Dono. What kills you, Bodkin, is that you are a man of habits, like any regular person with OCD behavior. But man, you're above Monk! Monk, remember the TV series? These statistics unmask you, wether you like or not. And the use of encrypted NNTP server is irrelevant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-03-15 10:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t0pq7l$11ov$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #580302 |
Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 9:51:08 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: >> The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> Richard Hertz wrote: >>> >>>> But, what can you expect from a humble woodworker living in Kansas? No >>>> libraries over there. >>> >>> KANSAS??? How did you get from Florida to Kansas???? >>> >>> you're all over the place >>> >>> like a chicken without a head. >>> >>> >>> >> Richard’s hobby is wild guesses. I think recently he has had me as a >> professor of philosophy of religion, or a graphic artist doing computer >> work but somehow still has to drive to work during a pandemic, or maybe an >> unemployed mathematician. I can’t remember which. >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > Don't try to be an smart ass. Your cretinism along with your imbecibility > speak by themselves. > > You was working with CGI software, as an employee, when you started here by mid 2013. Nope. > > And the statistics with the gap of exactly half an hour (5:30 PM to 6:00 > PM) correspond to 1,000 posts > that you did between Jan and Feb 2022. Ok. What you concluded from that was a wild ass guess that was pretty funny. > And software output don't lie. I told you before that I have your > function of life, each 30', which is obtained in the easiest way but > requires using logic besides math, You have posting data. That’s it. What I’m doing in the background, you only have wild ass guesses. Which you spend a lot of time mulling, it appears. > Some goes for Moroney. > > I could make a wild guess about when you take a dump or a very accurate > average of your sleeping hours, > > But don't flatter yourself so much, It's only applied data mining, and I > can profile you as well as Moroney or Dono. > > What kills you, Bodkin, is that you are a man of habits, like any regular > person with OCD behavior. But man, you're above Monk! > > Monk, remember the TV series? > > These statistics unmask you, wether you like or not. And the use of > encrypted NNTP server is irrelevant. > > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web