Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #568088 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-11-28 12:08 -0800 |
| Last post | 2021-12-01 16:10 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 108 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-28 12:08 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 20:26 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-28 12:53 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 14:22 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 18:26 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 03:32 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 03:36 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 19:57 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 20:05 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-29 00:32 -0500
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 14:21 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-11 11:16 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-12 13:48 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Chason Aceta <pipre@cvbe.er> - 2021-11-28 21:57 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-28 16:38 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 17:04 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-28 21:44 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-28 21:04 -0500
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 18:27 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2021-11-29 10:54 +0100
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 14:21 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2021-11-29 15:02 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 14:24 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Chason Aceta <pipre@cvbe.er> - 2021-11-29 22:51 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 23:31 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Chason Aceta <pipre@cvbe.er> - 2021-11-29 23:41 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 15:59 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 16:32 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 17:04 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 17:25 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-29 22:01 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-29 23:53 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 22:35 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 23:17 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 07:42 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-30 10:53 -0500
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 16:22 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-30 14:42 -0500
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 14:07 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 22:21 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 00:01 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 10:32 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 20:20 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 19:08 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 10:50 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 10:56 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 19:30 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 11:44 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 20:35 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 12:59 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 21:25 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 14:14 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 15:47 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 14:09 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 16:04 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 21:35 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 15:40 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 11:03 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 20:20 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 13:13 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 21:38 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 21:56 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2021-12-03 22:12 +0100
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 22:20 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 15:29 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-04 17:03 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-04 10:18 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-04 22:08 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-04 17:00 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2021-12-04 17:50 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-05 14:05 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-05 14:18 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-05 17:29 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 22:05 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-06 13:22 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2021-12-06 06:01 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-06 15:37 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 14:07 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-12-07 09:53 -0500
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 15:10 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 08:27 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 17:09 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 09:31 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 18:02 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 22:20 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 22:26 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2021-12-08 11:06 +0100
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 14:19 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 07:29 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 14:19 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2021-12-08 06:42 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 09:42 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-07 21:23 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 14:19 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-08 08:29 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 17:19 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-08 11:13 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 20:22 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-10 20:45 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-11 11:27 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 10:16 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 20:15 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 12:00 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 21:52 -0800
Crank Richard Hertz gets fresh asshole ripped with every post "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 22:25 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 11:22 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 22:26 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 16:10 -0800
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-02 21:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sobebq$b10$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568422 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: >> >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 4:30:29 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I looked in Wikipedia. ThereÃÂââÃÂìâÃÂâs a Paul Draper at >>>>>>>>>>>> Purdue University, not too >>>>>>>>>>>> far from where you are in Ohio. But heÃÂââÃÂìâÃÂâs a >>>>>>>>>>>> philosophy professor. He does do >>>>>>>>>>>> some stuff with philosophy of science. Is that who you think I am? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Paul Draper is a skinny white guy around the age of in his 40's...maybe >>>>>>>>>>> 39... or late 30's. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well, that doesnâÃÂÃÂt seem to fit either. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Wait a minute! You're 42, almost the same age than the other asshole, Dono. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IâÃÂÃÂm curious how you came up with that age number. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 41 to be exact. >>>>>> >>>>>> but i could be ...20 years off. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> more likely off by 24 years. >>>>> >>>>> wait a minute...how much is 41 + 24? 4 and 1 is 5 >>>>> >>>>> 4 and 2 is 6...65???? >>>>> >>>>> how can a person be a carpenter at 65???? >>>>> >>>>> and most carpenters don't even have a high school diploma... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> something not adding up here. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Did Lois Lane ever find out Superman's real idenity???? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>>>>> and challenge >>>>>> the unchallengeable. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Where on earth did you get 65? >>> >>> >>> BINGO, right? I knew that number 65 would get your attention. >>> >>> "Where on earth did you get 65?" >>> >>> What you are really asking is is how did I get that number 65? >>> >>> So that you can find it on the Internet and take it down. >>> >>> You don't want me to answer that question here, do you? >>> >>> That would mean 1956. >>> >>> September. >>> >>> I guess you didn't get this quote: >>> >>>> "Why, if a fish came to me, and >>>> told me he was going on a journey, ... >>>> I should say, 'With what porpoise?' >>>> "Don't you mean 'purpose'?" said Alice. >>>> "I mean what I say," the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone. >>> >>> It simply is a quote from Linda Goodman Sun Signs: The Virgo Man >>> >>> September. Virgo. >>> >>> You tripped up on this thread.. >>> you made *too much* effort correcting a >>> misspelling of the word "hardwood" to "heartwood". >>> >>> You were too busy 'covering up' your cover. >>> >>> >>> and my little funny math: >>> -- >>> wait a minute...how much is 41 + 24? 4 and 1 is 5 >>> >>> 4 and 2 is 6...65???? >>> -- >>> >>> was just a trick to see what your response would be >>> to seeing that number..65. >>> >>> AND IT WORKED! >>> >>> "Where on earth did you get 65?" >>> >>> >>> >>> BINGO! >>> >>> >>> i watch a lot of Colombo tv shows >>> like when he put the stolen jewelry under his >>> own mattress. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Poor confused soul. > > the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone... > > > > "confused"???? What confusion is there? > > > 41 + 24 = 65 > 41 plus 24 equals 65 > > No confusion there... > > I even checked with a calculator, I got the same answer 65. > > > So, ...why did you ask "Where on earth did you get 65?"???? > > Does the number 65 have any special meaning to you? > > Not particularly. 41 was someone’s guess for my age, which is wrong. You’ve tossed out 65 and September, pulled out from your ass and apparently meaning nothing. Maybe September 1965, maybe September 65th, maybe 65-9=56, or 65+9=74. Do these mean something to you, jester? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-02 21:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sobfec$pgj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568424 |
Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> >>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 4:30:29 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked in Wikipedia. ThereÃÂââÃÂìâÃÂâs a Paul Draper at >>>>>>>>>>>>> Purdue University, not too >>>>>>>>>>>>> far from where you are in Ohio. But heÃÂââÃÂìâÃÂâs a >>>>>>>>>>>>> philosophy professor. He does do >>>>>>>>>>>>> some stuff with philosophy of science. Is that who you think I am? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Draper is a skinny white guy around the age of in his 40's...maybe >>>>>>>>>>>> 39... or late 30's. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, that doesnâÃÂÃÂt seem to fit either. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Wait a minute! You're 42, almost the same age than the other asshole, Dono. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> IâÃÂÃÂm curious how you came up with that age number. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 41 to be exact. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> but i could be ...20 years off. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> more likely off by 24 years. >>>>>> >>>>>> wait a minute...how much is 41 + 24? 4 and 1 is 5 >>>>>> >>>>>> 4 and 2 is 6...65???? >>>>>> >>>>>> how can a person be a carpenter at 65???? >>>>>> >>>>>> and most carpenters don't even have a high school diploma... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> something not adding up here. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Did Lois Lane ever find out Superman's real idenity???? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>>>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>>>>>> and challenge >>>>>>> the unchallengeable. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Where on earth did you get 65? >>>> >>>> >>>> BINGO, right? I knew that number 65 would get your attention. >>>> >>>> "Where on earth did you get 65?" >>>> >>>> What you are really asking is is how did I get that number 65? >>>> >>>> So that you can find it on the Internet and take it down. >>>> >>>> You don't want me to answer that question here, do you? >>>> >>>> That would mean 1956. >>>> >>>> September. >>>> >>>> I guess you didn't get this quote: >>>> >>>>> "Why, if a fish came to me, and >>>>> told me he was going on a journey, ... >>>>> I should say, 'With what porpoise?' >>>>> "Don't you mean 'purpose'?" said Alice. >>>>> "I mean what I say," the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone. >>>> >>>> It simply is a quote from Linda Goodman Sun Signs: The Virgo Man >>>> >>>> September. Virgo. >>>> >>>> You tripped up on this thread.. >>>> you made *too much* effort correcting a >>>> misspelling of the word "hardwood" to "heartwood". >>>> >>>> You were too busy 'covering up' your cover. >>>> >>>> >>>> and my little funny math: >>>> -- >>>> wait a minute...how much is 41 + 24? 4 and 1 is 5 >>>> >>>> 4 and 2 is 6...65???? >>>> -- >>>> >>>> was just a trick to see what your response would be >>>> to seeing that number..65. >>>> >>>> AND IT WORKED! >>>> >>>> "Where on earth did you get 65?" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> BINGO! >>>> >>>> >>>> i watch a lot of Colombo tv shows >>>> like when he put the stolen jewelry under his >>>> own mattress. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Poor confused soul. >> >> the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone... >> >> >> >> "confused"???? What confusion is there? >> >> >> 41 + 24 = 65 >> 41 plus 24 equals 65 >> >> No confusion there... >> >> I even checked with a calculator, I got the same answer 65. >> >> >> So, ...why did you ask "Where on earth did you get 65?"???? >> >> Does the number 65 have any special meaning to you? >> >> > > Not particularly. 41 was someone’s guess for my age, which is wrong. > > You’ve tossed out 65 and September, pulled out from your ass and apparently > meaning nothing. Maybe September 1965, maybe September 65th, maybe 65-9=56, > or 65+9=74. Do these mean something to you, jester? > And by the way, your statement about carpenters usually not having a high school diploma is flat wrong, and is certainly not true for woodworkers. There are several tiers of woodworking, ranging from millworks jobs in large plants, through specialty furniture and cabinetmaker shops, down to small businesses at the craftsman end of the spectrum. The educational background of the last is generally higher than of the first, but even the first usually go to 2-3 year trade schools after high school, if for nothing else to learn how to CNC. Craftsmen usually come from family traditions or through an apprenticeship or do what I did, converting a side passion into a career. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-03 22:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1pjms71.b87byt1xs3nm8N@de-ster.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #568426 |
Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: [-] > And by the way, your statement about carpenters usually not having a high > school diploma is flat wrong, and is certainly not true for woodworkers. > There are several tiers of woodworking, ranging from millworks jobs in > large plants, through specialty furniture and cabinetmaker shops, down to > small businesses at the craftsman end of the spectrum. The educational > background of the last is generally higher than of the first, but even the > first usually go to 2-3 year trade schools after high school, if for > nothing else to learn how to CNC. Craftsmen usually come from family > traditions or through an apprenticeship or do what I did, converting a side > passion into a career. Yes, and the 'pecking order' is turning upside down. Good woodworkers are hard to find nowadays, so they are well paid. The one I happen to know has a long waiting list, and he takes only the jobs he likes to do, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-03 22:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <soe57f$1lc4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568511 |
J. J. Lodder <nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: > Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: > [-] >> And by the way, your statement about carpenters usually not having a high >> school diploma is flat wrong, and is certainly not true for woodworkers. >> There are several tiers of woodworking, ranging from millworks jobs in >> large plants, through specialty furniture and cabinetmaker shops, down to >> small businesses at the craftsman end of the spectrum. The educational >> background of the last is generally higher than of the first, but even the >> first usually go to 2-3 year trade schools after high school, if for >> nothing else to learn how to CNC. Craftsmen usually come from family >> traditions or through an apprenticeship or do what I did, converting a side >> passion into a career. > > Yes, and the 'pecking order' is turning upside down. > Good woodworkers are hard to find nowadays, > so they are well paid. > > The one I happen to know has a long waiting list, > and he takes only the jobs he likes to do, > > Jan > That’s what I do. Other than stain under my fingernails and some of my clothes smelling of sawdust, it’s a fine life. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-03 15:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c6d6103c-c2e9-4e2b-8ca3-d078c909a236n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #568512 |
On Friday, December 3, 2021 at 7:20:36 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: <snip> > That’s what I do. Other than stain under my fingernails and some of my > clothes smelling of sawdust, it’s a fine life. > -- > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables I'm sure that you get high with the glue or any other substance around and then you ran to post some idiocies. And about you being 42, these are my estimations: * You got your BsC by 1999/2000, being 22. * A finance company hired you until the subprime crisis, starting in 2007. * By March 2008, at the peak, you was sacked (being around 30). * You struggle and failed to find another job for 1 year, and decided that there was no corporate future for you. * A friend gave you a hand by hiring you to help refurbishing houses returned to banks. * You learned, hands on, how to work as a handy-man and, by 2010, you saw a chance in refurbishing small wood furniture, so you went for it in this branch. * By 2012, you was capable to make small furniture by your own, and make more money. * In the meanwhile, just to use your brain, started to read about physics, as you developed a serious aversion to your major, mathematics. Physics was the field where you could not do wrong and talk a lot as you like. Mathematics is a bitch. * Between 2012 and 2014 you was banned from every physics forum that existed, due to the idiocies that you posted. * Then, in the fall of 2014, you learned about a shitty forum without censorship (almost), and started to try here, where you was severely beaten but no kicked out (not possible). You was around 36 by then. * By 2021, your resilience to dodge bullets plus the 9,000+ posts that you did about ANYTHING, and I mean ANYTHING, convinced you that you are the Supreme Thinker at this stinky place. And you are 42/43 years old by now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-04 17:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sog71m$1bv1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568515 |
Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, December 3, 2021 at 7:20:36 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > > <snip> > >> That’s what I do. Other than stain under my fingernails and some of my >> clothes smelling of sawdust, it’s a fine life. >> -- >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > I'm sure that you get high with the glue or any other substance around > and then you ran to post some idiocies. > > And about you being 42, these are my estimations: > > * You got your BsC by 1999/2000, being 22. I started college at 17. The year is wrong. > * A finance company hired you until the subprime crisis, starting in 2007. No. I did not leave during any financial crisis. I left when markets were good. > * By March 2008, at the peak, you was sacked (being around 30). Wrong age. And I left on my own. I was encouraged by both my boss and her boss to stay. > * You struggle and failed to find another job for 1 year, and decided that > there was no corporate future for you. No that’s wrong too. I moved to where I am now and built a shop. > * A friend gave you a hand by hiring you to help refurbishing houses returned to banks. I’m not a carpenter. I’m not a handyman. > * You learned, hands on, how to work as a handy-man and, by 2010, you saw a chance > in refurbishing small wood furniture, so you went for it in this branch. Completely wrong. I’d been making furniture since high school. > * By 2012, you was capable to make small furniture by your own, and make more money. > * In the meanwhile, just to use your brain, started to read about physics, as you developed > a serious aversion to your major, mathematics. Physics was the field where you could not > do wrong and talk a lot as you like. Mathematics is a bitch. Maybe to you (Mr Excel). Not me so much. > * Between 2012 and 2014 you was banned from every physics forum that existed, due to the > idiocies that you posted. I don’t think it is possible to be banned from an unmoderated Usenet forum. > * Then, in the fall of 2014, you learned about a shitty forum without > censorship (almost), and > started to try here, where you was severely beaten but no kicked out (not possible). > You was around 36 by then. Wrong. > * By 2021, your resilience to dodge bullets plus the 9,000+ posts that > you did about ANYTHING, > and I mean ANYTHING, convinced you that you are the Supreme Thinker at > this stinky place. I think you’ll find that a lot of people have interest in a lot of subjects without needing to be a “supreme thinker”. If you feel competent in only one — engineering — that’s a pity. > And you are 42/43 years old by now. Wrong. > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-04 10:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7b8725db-a836-46de-907a-b8fa4a26110bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #568545 |
On Saturday, December 4, 2021 at 2:03:53 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, December 3, 2021 at 7:20:36 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > >> That’s what I do. Other than stain under my fingernails and some of my > >> clothes smelling of sawdust, it’s a fine life. > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > > I'm sure that you get high with the glue or any other substance around > > and then you ran to post some idiocies. > > > > And about you being 42, these are my estimations: > > > > * You got your BsC by 1999/2000, being 22. > I started college at 17. The year is wrong. > > * A finance company hired you until the subprime crisis, starting in 2007. > No. I did not leave during any financial crisis. I left when markets were > good. > > * By March 2008, at the peak, you was sacked (being around 30). > Wrong age. And I left on my own. I was encouraged by both my boss and her > boss to stay. > > * You struggle and failed to find another job for 1 year, and decided that > > there was no corporate future for you. > No that’s wrong too. I moved to where I am now and built a shop. > > * A friend gave you a hand by hiring you to help refurbishing houses returned to banks. > I’m not a carpenter. I’m not a handyman. > > * You learned, hands on, how to work as a handy-man and, by 2010, you saw a chance > > in refurbishing small wood furniture, so you went for it in this branch. > Completely wrong. I’d been making furniture since high school. > > * By 2012, you was capable to make small furniture by your own, and make more money. > > * In the meanwhile, just to use your brain, started to read about physics, as you developed > > a serious aversion to your major, mathematics. Physics was the field where you could not > > do wrong and talk a lot as you like. Mathematics is a bitch. > Maybe to you (Mr Excel). Not me so much. > > * Between 2012 and 2014 you was banned from every physics forum that existed, due to the > > idiocies that you posted. > I don’t think it is possible to be banned from an unmoderated Usenet forum. > > * Then, in the fall of 2014, you learned about a shitty forum without > > censorship (almost), and > > started to try here, where you was severely beaten but no kicked out (not possible). > > You was around 36 by then. > Wrong. > > * By 2021, your resilience to dodge bullets plus the 9,000+ posts that > > you did about ANYTHING, > > and I mean ANYTHING, convinced you that you are the Supreme Thinker at > > this stinky place. > I think you’ll find that a lot of people have interest in a lot of subjects > without needing to be a “supreme thinker”. If you feel competent in only > one — engineering — that’s a pity. > > And you are 42/43 years old by now. > Wrong. > > > > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables Thanks for the reply. You are between 43 and 46, top. I'm in favor of you being 45.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-04 22:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sogota$11qb$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568546 |
Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, December 4, 2021 at 2:03:53 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: >> Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Friday, December 3, 2021 at 7:20:36 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>> That’s what I do. Other than stain under my fingernails and some of my >>>> clothes smelling of sawdust, it’s a fine life. >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>> >>> I'm sure that you get high with the glue or any other substance around >>> and then you ran to post some idiocies. >>> >>> And about you being 42, these are my estimations: >>> >>> * You got your BsC by 1999/2000, being 22. >> I started college at 17. The year is wrong. >>> * A finance company hired you until the subprime crisis, starting in 2007. >> No. I did not leave during any financial crisis. I left when markets were >> good. >>> * By March 2008, at the peak, you was sacked (being around 30). >> Wrong age. And I left on my own. I was encouraged by both my boss and her >> boss to stay. >>> * You struggle and failed to find another job for 1 year, and decided that >>> there was no corporate future for you. >> No that’s wrong too. I moved to where I am now and built a shop. >>> * A friend gave you a hand by hiring you to help refurbishing houses returned to banks. >> I’m not a carpenter. I’m not a handyman. >>> * You learned, hands on, how to work as a handy-man and, by 2010, you saw a chance >>> in refurbishing small wood furniture, so you went for it in this branch. >> Completely wrong. I’d been making furniture since high school. >>> * By 2012, you was capable to make small furniture by your own, and make more money. >>> * In the meanwhile, just to use your brain, started to read about >>> physics, as you developed >>> a serious aversion to your major, mathematics. Physics was the field where you could not >>> do wrong and talk a lot as you like. Mathematics is a bitch. >> Maybe to you (Mr Excel). Not me so much. >>> * Between 2012 and 2014 you was banned from every physics forum that existed, due to the >>> idiocies that you posted. >> I don’t think it is possible to be banned from an unmoderated Usenet forum. >>> * Then, in the fall of 2014, you learned about a shitty forum without >>> censorship (almost), and >>> started to try here, where you was severely beaten but no kicked out (not possible). >>> You was around 36 by then. >> Wrong. >>> * By 2021, your resilience to dodge bullets plus the 9,000+ posts that >>> you did about ANYTHING, >>> and I mean ANYTHING, convinced you that you are the Supreme Thinker at >>> this stinky place. >> I think you’ll find that a lot of people have interest in a lot of subjects >> without needing to be a “supreme thinker”. If you feel competent in only >> one — engineering — that’s a pity. >>> And you are 42/43 years old by now. >> Wrong. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > Thanks for the reply. You are between 43 and 46, top. > > I'm in favor of you being 45. > > And why would any of this be of interest to you? FYI I started posting here about 8 years ago, after watching for quite a while. I was in my early 30s back then. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-04 17:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <197cf247-5cb5-41eb-aaf3-c85dc1e36d91n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #568553 |
On Saturday, December 4, 2021 at 7:08:49 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, December 4, 2021 at 2:03:53 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Friday, December 3, 2021 at 7:20:36 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> > >>> <snip> > >>> > >>>> That’s what I do. Other than stain under my fingernails and some of my > >>>> clothes smelling of sawdust, it’s a fine life. > >>>> -- > >>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>> > >>> I'm sure that you get high with the glue or any other substance around > >>> and then you ran to post some idiocies. > >>> > >>> And about you being 42, these are my estimations: > >>> > >>> * You got your BsC by 1999/2000, being 22. > >> I started college at 17. The year is wrong. > >>> * A finance company hired you until the subprime crisis, starting in 2007. > >> No. I did not leave during any financial crisis. I left when markets were > >> good. > >>> * By March 2008, at the peak, you was sacked (being around 30). > >> Wrong age. And I left on my own. I was encouraged by both my boss and her > >> boss to stay. > >>> * You struggle and failed to find another job for 1 year, and decided that > >>> there was no corporate future for you. > >> No that’s wrong too. I moved to where I am now and built a shop. > >>> * A friend gave you a hand by hiring you to help refurbishing houses returned to banks. > >> I’m not a carpenter. I’m not a handyman. > >>> * You learned, hands on, how to work as a handy-man and, by 2010, you saw a chance > >>> in refurbishing small wood furniture, so you went for it in this branch. > >> Completely wrong. I’d been making furniture since high school. > >>> * By 2012, you was capable to make small furniture by your own, and make more money. > >>> * In the meanwhile, just to use your brain, started to read about > >>> physics, as you developed > >>> a serious aversion to your major, mathematics. Physics was the field where you could not > >>> do wrong and talk a lot as you like. Mathematics is a bitch. > >> Maybe to you (Mr Excel). Not me so much. > >>> * Between 2012 and 2014 you was banned from every physics forum that existed, due to the > >>> idiocies that you posted. > >> I don’t think it is possible to be banned from an unmoderated Usenet forum. > >>> * Then, in the fall of 2014, you learned about a shitty forum without > >>> censorship (almost), and > >>> started to try here, where you was severely beaten but no kicked out (not possible). > >>> You was around 36 by then. > >> Wrong. > >>> * By 2021, your resilience to dodge bullets plus the 9,000+ posts that > >>> you did about ANYTHING, > >>> and I mean ANYTHING, convinced you that you are the Supreme Thinker at > >>> this stinky place. > >> I think you’ll find that a lot of people have interest in a lot of subjects > >> without needing to be a “supreme thinker”. If you feel competent in only > >> one — engineering — that’s a pity. > >>> And you are 42/43 years old by now. > >> Wrong. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > > Thanks for the reply. You are between 43 and 46, top. > > > > I'm in favor of you being 45. > > > > > And why would any of this be of interest to you? > FYI I started posting here about 8 years ago, after watching for quite a > while. I was in my early 30s back then. > -- > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables It's not important to me, Bodkin. I was just following the Starmaker post that teased you. For me, it's OK if you have 30 or 60. I liked the challenge to reduce margins of what Starmaker did post, just using deduction. Nothing more, nothing else. I let know that I'm 67, and a retired EE. No problem with that also. Just a game.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-04 17:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <915c4b49-9023-47ce-9885-31096bf41d74n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #568563 |
On Saturday, December 4, 2021 at 5:00:43 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: >I let know that I'm 67, and a retired EE. Time when idee fixe sets in. It is fun to notice that reduced you basically to stalking.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-05 14:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61AD3791.79BC@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #568545 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > I started college at 17. Well, that is correct, ...you did started college at 17. (i can verify that) Are you one of those 'professional students' i hear about that spends most of their life in college because they are afraid of going out in the real world and WORK for a living???? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-05 14:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61AD3ABB.6F7B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #568577 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > I started college at 17. > > Well, that is correct, ...you did started college at 17. (i can verify > that) > > Are you one of those 'professional students' i hear about that spends > most of their life in college because > they are afraid of going out in the real world and WORK for a living???? > I guess...if one becomes a professional student..then they are qualified to be a proffesional student educator.. (you're sure read a lot of textbooks.) (you seem to be always 'pushing' textbooks) (i get it, you're a textbook genuis.) I guess all those years in college...you couldn't find a job in...Relativity. Like they say...'Those who can't, Teach.' -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-05 17:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61AD6766.5F5A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #568577 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > I started college at 17. > > Well, that is correct, ...you did started college at 17. (i can verify > that) > > Are you one of those 'professional students' i hear about that spends > most of their life in college because > they are afraid of going out in the real world and WORK for a living???? > Now, i knows yous people are asking the question... How did I verify it was 17 when the odd bodkin entered college? Well, I read what odd wrote: Odd Bodkin wrote: > I started college at 17. And I already knew he first entered college in 1974 So, ...I looked at what 'I' wrote: "Yes, I wrote September 1956. The month you were born and the year you were born." Then it was a simply math to count How many years from 1956 to 1974 and at counted one year up at a time (not knowing how many years it was from 1956 to 1974) (i had to use my fingers to be sure) 57,58,59,60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 and entered college in 1974 while he still was 17 years old. You put that together with what Odd wrote: Odd Bodkin wrote: > I started college at 17. and I have verification. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-05 22:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <adadf4ce-96cd-451c-8bb0-91ac9f2fabeen@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #568580 |
On Sunday, December 5, 2021 at 10:29:13 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > I started college at 17. > > > > Well, that is correct, ...you did started college at 17. (i can verify that) He never wrote that. He was being teased as being Paul Draper. > And I already knew he first entered college in 1974 > So, ...I looked at what 'I' wrote: > > "Yes, I wrote September 1956. > > The month you were born and the year you were born." > Then it was a simply math to count > How many years from 1956 to 1974 > > and at counted one year up at a time > > (not knowing how many years it was from 1956 to 1974) > (i had to use my fingers to be sure) > > 57,58,59,60 > 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 > 71 72 73 and entered college in 1974 while he still was 17 years old. <snip> You are stalking to the poor Bod. However, he wrote once: ****************** On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 10:35:19 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/23/2015 2:08 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote: > PD is now producing textbooks for high school kids. > That's not what it says he does in the profile you posted. I thought you could read. > Hey, who cares except PD, and Odd Bodkin is PD. <shrug> > Well, Resnick and Holiday is still a classic and very much valid. You may mean Halliday and Resnick, of which I have a copy. It might also interest you that it's been Halliday, Resnick, and Walker since the 4th edition copyright 1990. I believe it's now in the 10th edition, which means he has been the lead author for the last 7 editions. At least, according to Jearl Walker's profile at Cleveland State and the Wiley website. ****************** Mmmm............... First edition was a hit, and was published around 1964. Second edition came out around 1971 (I still have my copy, from college). Third edition came around 1981, and fourth around 1990 (with a third author, Walker). Bodkin has a copy of one of the three first editions. I bet that's the 2nd. That put him going to college in the 70's, as I did. Mmmm....... As he lies about age and time, I'd calculate his entrance by 1975 +/- 3 years, and getting his BsC by 1979 +/- 3 years (being 21). So, it narrows his current age to 42 + 21 +/- 3 years: between 60 and 66. Interesting. Plus, he doesn't write as a 41. The burden of life is felt on his pen, I mean his typing. As Dono uses to say, he's an old fart! LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-06 13:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sol2rb$15lf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568583 |
Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, December 5, 2021 at 10:29:13 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> >>> I started college at 17. >>> >>> Well, that is correct, ...you did started college at 17. (i can verify that) > > He never wrote that. He was being teased as being Paul Draper. > >> And I already knew he first entered college in 1974 >> So, ...I looked at what 'I' wrote: >> >> "Yes, I wrote September 1956. >> >> The month you were born and the year you were born." >> Then it was a simply math to count >> How many years from 1956 to 1974 >> >> and at counted one year up at a time >> >> (not knowing how many years it was from 1956 to 1974) >> (i had to use my fingers to be sure) >> >> 57,58,59,60 >> 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 >> 71 72 73 and entered college in 1974 while he still was 17 years old. > > <snip> > > You are stalking to the poor Bod. If I had to guess, he’s probably stalking that Paul Draper guy, what with the LinkedIn profile and publishing and physics prof and stuff. > However, he wrote once: > > ****************** > On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 10:35:19 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/23/2015 2:08 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote: > >> PD is now producing textbooks for high school kids. >> > That's not what it says he does in the profile you posted. I thought you could read. > >> Hey, who cares except PD, and Odd Bodkin is PD. <shrug> >> Well, Resnick and Holiday is still a classic and very much valid. > > You may mean Halliday and Resnick, of which I have a copy. It might also > interest you that it's been Halliday, Resnick, and Walker > since the 4th edition copyright 1990. I believe it's now in the 10th > edition, which means he has been the lead author for the last 7 > editions. At least, according to Jearl Walker's profile at Cleveland > State and the Wiley website. > ****************** > > Mmmm............... > > First edition was a hit, and was published around 1964. Second edition > came out around 1971 (I still have my copy, from college). > Third edition came around 1981, and fourth around 1990 (with a third author, Walker). > > Bodkin has a copy of one of the three first editions. I bet that's the 2nd. > > That put him going to college in the 70's, as I did. Mmmm....... Wrong. In college, the class used Giancoli. I think I mentioned that I did not buy the book required by the professor and only borrowed it to collect homework sets. I think I used Serway mostly, which was in the library. Only years later did I buy Halliday and Resnick 3e. > > As he lies about age and time, I'd calculate his entrance by 1975 +/- 3 > years, and getting his BsC by 1979 +/- 3 years (being 21). > > So, it narrows his current age to 42 + 21 +/- 3 years: between 60 and 66. Interesting. > > Plus, he doesn't write as a 41. The burden of life is felt on his pen, I > mean his typing. As Dono uses to say, he's an old fart! LOL! > Any other foolish guesses? Burden of life. *snort* -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-06 06:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ad235d81-b3c2-48fb-b6b4-26bebb3ea9edn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #568584 |
El lunes, 6 de diciembre de 2021 a las 10:22:55 UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com escribió: > Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Plus, he doesn't write as a 41. The burden of life is felt on his pen, I > > mean his typing. As Dono uses to say, he's an old fart! LOL! > > > Any other foolish guesses? > > Burden of life. *snort* > Above all, what has age, sex, profession, etc, any relevance in discussing Relativity subjects? I have participated in this group since 1998 and many people had come and go. Very few remain (Tom is one of them).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-06 15:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61AE9EA1.1390@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #568584 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > > If I had to guess, he's probably stalking that Paul Draper guy, what with > the LinkedIn profile and publishing and physics prof and stuff. To use your own words... How on earth did you come up with THAT? How on earth did you come up with THAT? How on earth did you come up with THAT? physics prof and stuff? How on earth did you come up with THAT? How on earth did you come up with THAT? How on earth did you come up with THAT? publishing and physics How on earth did you come up with THAT? How on earth did you come up with THAT? How on earth did you come up with THAT? physics prof??? How on earth did you come up with THAT? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-07 14:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sonpqo$r09$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568601 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> >> If I had to guess, he's probably stalking that Paul Draper guy, what with >> the LinkedIn profile and publishing and physics prof and stuff. > > To use your own words... > > How on earth did you come up with THAT? > How on earth did you come up with THAT? > How on earth did you come up with THAT? > > physics prof and stuff? > > > How on earth did you come up with THAT? > How on earth did you come up with THAT? > How on earth did you come up with THAT? > > publishing and physics > > > How on earth did you come up with THAT? > How on earth did you come up with THAT? > How on earth did you come up with THAT? > > > physics prof??? > > > How on earth did you come up with THAT? > Yeah I read his LinkedIn profile when someone put it up a couple days ago. OK, so HE looks to be in the age range you’re talking about. What does that have to do with me? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-07 09:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sonsh8$83f$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568613 |
On 12/7/2021 9:07 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> How on earth did you come up with THAT? (repeated as nauseum) >> > > Yeah I read his LinkedIn profile when someone put it up a couple days ago. > OK, so HE looks to be in the age range you’re talking about. > What does that have to do with me? > Must be yet another instance of crackpots believing every non-crackpot in the sci.* groups is a PD sock. (except me, for some reason. I've been accused of being PD just once)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-07 15:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sontgi$opp$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568626 |
Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote: > On 12/7/2021 9:07 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>> How on earth did you come up with THAT? > (repeated as nauseum) >>> >> >> Yeah I read his LinkedIn profile when someone put it up a couple days ago. >> OK, so HE looks to be in the age range you’re talking about. >> What does that have to do with me? >> > Must be yet another instance of crackpots believing every non-crackpot > in the sci.* groups is a PD sock. > > (except me, for some reason. I've been accused of being PD just once) > It’s actually demeaning to have my identity disregarded and substituted with someone else’s. I notice that no one here responds to a poster by saying, “Hey, I know you. You’re Albert Einstein, really, aren’t you? You’re not dead at all. And here you are, posting a lot on a Usenet forum. Good for you.” -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web