Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #568088 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-11-28 12:08 -0800 |
| Last post | 2021-12-01 16:10 -0800 |
| Articles | 8 on this page of 108 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-28 12:08 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 20:26 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-28 12:53 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 14:22 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 18:26 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 03:32 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 03:36 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 19:57 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 20:05 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-29 00:32 -0500
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 14:21 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-11 11:16 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-12 13:48 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Chason Aceta <pipre@cvbe.er> - 2021-11-28 21:57 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-28 16:38 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 17:04 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-28 21:44 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-28 21:04 -0500
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 18:27 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2021-11-29 10:54 +0100
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 14:21 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2021-11-29 15:02 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 14:24 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Chason Aceta <pipre@cvbe.er> - 2021-11-29 22:51 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 23:31 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Chason Aceta <pipre@cvbe.er> - 2021-11-29 23:41 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 15:59 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 16:32 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 17:04 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 17:25 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-29 22:01 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-29 23:53 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 22:35 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2021-11-29 23:17 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 07:42 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-30 10:53 -0500
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 16:22 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-11-30 14:42 -0500
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 14:07 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 22:21 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 00:01 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 10:32 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 20:20 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 19:08 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 10:50 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 10:56 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 19:30 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 11:44 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 20:35 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 12:59 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 21:25 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 14:14 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 15:47 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 14:09 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 16:04 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 21:35 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 15:40 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 11:03 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 20:20 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 13:13 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 21:38 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 21:56 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2021-12-03 22:12 +0100
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 22:20 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 15:29 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-04 17:03 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-04 10:18 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-04 22:08 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-04 17:00 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2021-12-04 17:50 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-05 14:05 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-05 14:18 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-05 17:29 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-05 22:05 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-06 13:22 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2021-12-06 06:01 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-06 15:37 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 14:07 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2021-12-07 09:53 -0500
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 15:10 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 08:27 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 17:09 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 09:31 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 18:02 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 22:20 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-07 22:26 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2021-12-08 11:06 +0100
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 14:19 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 07:29 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 14:19 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2021-12-08 06:42 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 09:42 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-07 21:23 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 14:19 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-08 08:29 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 17:19 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-08 11:13 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-08 20:22 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-10 20:45 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-11 11:27 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 10:16 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 20:15 +0000
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 12:00 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 21:52 -0800
Crank Richard Hertz gets fresh asshole ripped with every post "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2021-11-30 22:25 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 11:22 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-30 22:26 -0800
Re: about The Odd Bodkin The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 16:10 -0800
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-03 10:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61AA5EEE.3768@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #568424 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> > >>>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 4:30:29 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> <snip> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I looked in Wikipedia. There’s a Paul Draper at > >>>>>>>>>>>> Purdue University, not too > >>>>>>>>>>>> far from where you are in Ohio. But he’s a > >>>>>>>>>>>> philosophy professor. He does do > >>>>>>>>>>>> some stuff with philosophy of science. Is that who you think I am? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Paul Draper is a skinny white guy around the age of in his 40's...maybe > >>>>>>>>>>> 39... or late 30's. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Well, that doesn’t seem to fit either. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Wait a minute! You're 42, almost the same age than the other asshole, Dono. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I’m curious how you came up with that age number. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 41 to be exact. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> but i could be ...20 years off. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> more likely off by 24 years. > >>>>> > >>>>> wait a minute...how much is 41 + 24? 4 and 1 is 5 > >>>>> > >>>>> 4 and 2 is 6...65???? > >>>>> > >>>>> how can a person be a carpenter at 65???? > >>>>> > >>>>> and most carpenters don't even have a high school diploma... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> something not adding up here. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Did Lois Lane ever find out Superman's real idenity???? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > >>>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > >>>>>> and challenge > >>>>>> the unchallengeable. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Where on earth did you get 65? > >>> > >>> > >>> BINGO, right? I knew that number 65 would get your attention. > >>> > >>> "Where on earth did you get 65?" > >>> > >>> What you are really asking is is how did I get that number 65? > >>> > >>> So that you can find it on the Internet and take it down. > >>> > >>> You don't want me to answer that question here, do you? > >>> > >>> That would mean 1956. > >>> > >>> September. > >>> > >>> I guess you didn't get this quote: > >>> > >>>> "Why, if a fish came to me, and > >>>> told me he was going on a journey, ... > >>>> I should say, 'With what porpoise?' > >>>> "Don't you mean 'purpose'?" said Alice. > >>>> "I mean what I say," the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone. > >>> > >>> It simply is a quote from Linda Goodman Sun Signs: The Virgo Man > >>> > >>> September. Virgo. > >>> > >>> You tripped up on this thread.. > >>> you made *too much* effort correcting a > >>> misspelling of the word "hardwood" to "heartwood". > >>> > >>> You were too busy 'covering up' your cover. > >>> > >>> > >>> and my little funny math: > >>> -- > >>> wait a minute...how much is 41 + 24? 4 and 1 is 5 > >>> > >>> 4 and 2 is 6...65???? > >>> -- > >>> > >>> was just a trick to see what your response would be > >>> to seeing that number..65. > >>> > >>> AND IT WORKED! > >>> > >>> "Where on earth did you get 65?" > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> BINGO! > >>> > >>> > >>> i watch a lot of Colombo tv shows > >>> like when he put the stolen jewelry under his > >>> own mattress. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Poor confused soul. > > > > the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone... > > > > > > > > "confused"???? What confusion is there? > > > > > > 41 + 24 = 65 > > 41 plus 24 equals 65 > > > > No confusion there... > > > > I even checked with a calculator, I got the same answer 65. > > > > > > So, ...why did you ask "Where on earth did you get 65?"???? > > > > Does the number 65 have any special meaning to you? > > > > > > Not particularly. 41 was someone’s guess for my age, which is wrong. > > You’ve tossed out 65 and September, pulled out from your ass and apparently > meaning nothing. Maybe September 1965, maybe September 65th, maybe 65-9=56, > or 65+9=74. Do these mean something to you, jester? Yes, I wrote September 1956. The month you were born and the year you were born. Your question: "Where on earth did you get 65?" is a specific question you made. You single out one number, 65...because you had a "particularly" special reason for asking. If a woman is trying to hide her age... and one says to her...65.. she will probably get her panties in a knot and exclaim "WHERE ARE EARTH DID YOU GET 65?" What is what you did. You lost contol. You're having a bad day. take it easy..you're eating too much falafels. > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-03 20:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sodts4$j5i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568482 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: >> >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 4:30:29 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked in Wikipedia. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ThereÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂìÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂâs a Paul >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Draper at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Purdue University, not too >>>>>>>>>>>>>> far from where you are in Ohio. But >>>>>>>>>>>>>> heÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂìÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂâs a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> philosophy professor. He does do >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some stuff with philosophy of science. Is that who you think I am? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Draper is a skinny white guy around the age of in his 40's...maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>> 39... or late 30's. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, that doesnÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂt seem to fit either. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wait a minute! You're 42, almost the same age than the other asshole, Dono. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> IÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂm curious how you came up with that age number. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 41 to be exact. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> but i could be ...20 years off. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> more likely off by 24 years. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wait a minute...how much is 41 + 24? 4 and 1 is 5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 4 and 2 is 6...65???? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> how can a person be a carpenter at 65???? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and most carpenters don't even have a high school diploma... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> something not adding up here. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Did Lois Lane ever find out Superman's real idenity???? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>>>>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>>>>>>> and challenge >>>>>>>> the unchallengeable. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Where on earth did you get 65? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> BINGO, right? I knew that number 65 would get your attention. >>>>> >>>>> "Where on earth did you get 65?" >>>>> >>>>> What you are really asking is is how did I get that number 65? >>>>> >>>>> So that you can find it on the Internet and take it down. >>>>> >>>>> You don't want me to answer that question here, do you? >>>>> >>>>> That would mean 1956. >>>>> >>>>> September. >>>>> >>>>> I guess you didn't get this quote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Why, if a fish came to me, and >>>>>> told me he was going on a journey, ... >>>>>> I should say, 'With what porpoise?' >>>>>> "Don't you mean 'purpose'?" said Alice. >>>>>> "I mean what I say," the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone. >>>>> >>>>> It simply is a quote from Linda Goodman Sun Signs: The Virgo Man >>>>> >>>>> September. Virgo. >>>>> >>>>> You tripped up on this thread.. >>>>> you made *too much* effort correcting a >>>>> misspelling of the word "hardwood" to "heartwood". >>>>> >>>>> You were too busy 'covering up' your cover. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and my little funny math: >>>>> -- >>>>> wait a minute...how much is 41 + 24? 4 and 1 is 5 >>>>> >>>>> 4 and 2 is 6...65???? >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> was just a trick to see what your response would be >>>>> to seeing that number..65. >>>>> >>>>> AND IT WORKED! >>>>> >>>>> "Where on earth did you get 65?" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> BINGO! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> i watch a lot of Colombo tv shows >>>>> like when he put the stolen jewelry under his >>>>> own mattress. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Poor confused soul. >>> >>> the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone... >>> >>> >>> >>> "confused"???? What confusion is there? >>> >>> >>> 41 + 24 = 65 >>> 41 plus 24 equals 65 >>> >>> No confusion there... >>> >>> I even checked with a calculator, I got the same answer 65. >>> >>> >>> So, ...why did you ask "Where on earth did you get 65?"???? >>> >>> Does the number 65 have any special meaning to you? >>> >>> >> >> Not particularly. 41 was someoneâs guess for my age, which is wrong. >> >> Youâve tossed out 65 and September, pulled out from your ass and apparently >> meaning nothing. Maybe September 1965, maybe September 65th, maybe 65-9=56, >> or 65+9=74. Do these mean something to you, jester? > > > Yes, I wrote September 1956. > > The month you were born and the year you were born. How on earth did you come up with THAT? I believe you are confused. > > > Your question: "Where on earth did you get 65?" is a specific question you made. > > You single out one number, 65...because you had a "particularly" special reason for asking. > > If a woman is trying to hide her age... > and one says to her...65.. > > she will probably get her panties in a knot and exclaim "WHERE ARE EARTH DID YOU GET 65?" > > > What is what you did. You lost contol. You're having a bad day. take it > easy..you're eating too much falafels. > > > > > >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-30 12:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61A682D8.15C7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #568237 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> > >> Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 3:08:51 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> Let me give you some facts about The Odd Bodkin.. > >>>> > >>>> He's not a Scientist > >>>> > >>>> He's not a Physicists > >>>> > >>>> He's not a Mathematician > >>>> > >>>> He's not a Philosopher > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> He's just in fact... > >>>> > >>>> a woodworker, a carpenter.. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> a maker of fine toys, tools, tables. > >>> > >>> Odd is Paul Draper, a failed physicist. > >> > >> I looked in Wikipedia. There’s a Paul Draper at Purdue University, not too > >> far from where you are in Ohio. But he’s a philosophy professor. He does do > >> some stuff with philosophy of science. Is that who you think I am? > > > > > > Paul Draper is a skinny white guy around the age of in his 40's...maybe > > 39... or late 30's. > > Well, that doesn’t seem to fit either. fit either what? > > > > > > > He's gotta be able to pick up a hammar. > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > >>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > >>>> the unchallengeable. > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-30 21:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <763b85d6-0047-4983-8b26-dbfa70d811fan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #568235 |
On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 3:56:22 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: <snip> > > I looked in Wikipedia. There’s a Paul Draper at Purdue University, not too > > far from where you are in Ohio. But he’s a philosophy professor. He does do > > some stuff with philosophy of science. Is that who you think I am? > Paul Draper is a skinny white guy around the age of in his 40's...maybe > 39... or late 30's. Mmmm....... PD was prone to post the wrong math, the wrong physics and the wrong wording. Bodkin, since his new skin by 2014, has AVOIDED LIKE HELL to post math things or being strong on wrong physics. He's attached to "his 100 books in physics" exclusively, but there is A PATTERN on his wording. Read some PD insights (2013): ********** Feb 24, 2012 It might not look like it to you or me, but it looks enough like science to young and unfamiliar minds that it's important to make the distinction. You don't see people confused about creationism being science? I do. You think that if science teachers never mention creationism, young students will learn that everything that isn't mentioned isn't science? I don't. ********** Feb 24, 2012 The Standard Model of fundamental interactions has evidence and string theory doesn't. Which one is science? Demarcation is NOT as simple as you would like it to be. Creationism *claims* to have evidence (even if it doesn't), and young minds just hear the words at high level. The only way they're going to be assured what the difference is by having a look at the *kind* and *quality* of the evidentiary claims. ********** Dec 22, 2011 Making a statement that is counter to century-old experimental facts and capitalizing it isn't an innovation. It's called making a mistake. ********** Nov 9, 2011 Of course the beautiful thing about the moronity scale is that it has an inversion transform. No doubt you are familiar with it. Under this transformation, someone like you can be faced with something that you don't understand, and invert that condition so that you are the ONLY one that truly understands it. In this way, you become the ONLY one that truly understands Snell's law, the ONLY one that truly understands the Lorentz transform, the ONLY one that understands gravitational lensing. And pretty soon, instead of feeling moronic, you're referring to yourself in the third person with capitalized pronouns. ----------------- I didn't want to post his posts with math, but it may serve as a guide that PD was selected as the Moron of the Year for two consecutive years: 2011 and 2012. After a series of attacks upon PD here, the guy vanished and, few months later, Bodkin did make his entrance in a humble way: "May I chip something in?" and started a new career here, in which we can observe his personal growth as a VERY CAUTIOUS forum member, slowly raising from the "water kid" in 2014 up to the "Supreme Thinker" by 2020. Even when claim having a BsC on math, don't dream to have any answer if you ask him for mathematical proofs or reading him posting things with mathematical content. Isn't it weird? Either you love mathematics or you hate it. Is that Bodkin is a renegade of faith in his mathematics and preferred to rely on the mathematics of the one he worship (Einstein)? At least, Dono fights with mathematics and MATHEMATICA SW, even when he fails doing the first and using the 2nd.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-30 22:25 -0800 |
| Subject | Crank Richard Hertz gets fresh asshole ripped with every post |
| Message-ID | <5fd3a01a-0e0c-4782-af15-fb621aa7fbfcn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #568272 |
On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 9:52:31 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > At least, Dono fights with mathematics ...and you get a fresh asshole ripped every time. Keep it up, dumbestfuck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-30 11:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61A679EF.4F2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #568182 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > > Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 3:08:51 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > >> Let me give you some facts about The Odd Bodkin.. > >> > >> He's not a Scientist > >> > >> He's not a Physicists > >> > >> He's not a Mathematician > >> > >> He's not a Philosopher > >> > >> > >> > >> He's just in fact... > >> > >> a woodworker, a carpenter.. > >> > >> > >> a maker of fine toys, tools, tables. > > > > Odd is Paul Draper, a failed physicist. > > I looked in Wikipedia. There’s a Paul Draper at Purdue University, not too > far from where you are in Ohio. But he’s a philosophy professor. He does do > some stuff with philosophy of science. Is that who you think I am? there are no gods in Ohio... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-30 22:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <v05eqgtpi8pve6nusk6c5uitf7t0c3esma@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #568088 |
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:08:45 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Let me give you some facts about The Odd Bodkin.. > >He's not a Scientist > >He's not a Physicists > >He's not a Mathematician > >He's not a Philosopher > > > >He's just in fact... > >a woodworker, a carpenter.. > > >a maker of fine toys, tools, tables. "Why, if a fish came to me, and told me he was going on a journey, ... I should say, 'With what porpoise?' "Don't you mean 'purpose'?" said Alice. "I mean what I say," the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone. There's a Rainbow around my shoulder And a sky of blue above And I'm shouting so the world will know That I'm in love https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7zMsELU_eM -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-01 16:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <61A80EFE.38F2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #568276 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:08:45 -0800, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >Let me give you some facts about The Odd Bodkin.. > > > >He's not a Scientist > > > >He's not a Physicists > > > >He's not a Mathematician > > > >He's not a Philosopher > > > > > > > >He's just in fact... > > > >a woodworker, a carpenter.. > > > > > >a maker of fine toys, tools, tables. > > "Why, if a fish came to me, and > told me he was going on a journey, ... > I should say, 'With what porpoise?' > "Don't you mean 'purpose'?" said Alice. > "I mean what I say," the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone. There is no way in hell that the odd bodkin would ask "What does that mean?" > > There's a Rainbow around my shoulder > And a sky of blue above > And I'm shouting so the world will know > That I'm in love > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7zMsELU_eM and no way will he ask about this.. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web