Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #655635

Re: Relativistic aberration

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Relativistic aberration
Date 2024-08-08 09:05 +0200
Message-ID <lhj91oFrp53U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <b9f5671b8333de8a8b9f2cfceb69f808@www.novabbs.com> <_fWL1QRNDZJe9YyMRnHwHtpAbvo@jntp> <v8vs8f$2nkf1$10@dont-email.me> <17e976a312238df3$168817$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Am Mittwoch000007, 07.08.2024 um 15:52 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
> W dniu 07.08.2024 o 15:19, Python pisze:
>> Le 07/08/2024 à 15:16, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
>>> [...]
>>> According to Hachel, and always in accordance with logic, with truth, 
>>> and with the equations of Poincaré, who was not weak in mathematics, 
>>> the notion of simultaneity is invariant by change of observer JOINT 
>>> at the moment of measurement, what varies for them is the INTERNAL 
>>> CHRONOTROPY, and not the notion of simultaneity.
>>
>> There is nothing in common between your demented ill-defined
> 
> 
> And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
> to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
> would be, and he has written it clearly
> enough for anyone able to read (even if not
> clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
> 
> 
Actually Poincare did and assumed a four dimensional 'curved' spacetime, 
from which Euclid's three-dimensional space is a 'sub-chapter'.

This euclidean space is kind of projection into the realm of the local 
observer, who 'cuts' spacetime into time and space, simply by being 
somewhere.

This is a very different concept than the usual mainstream 
interpretation and actually different to the interpretation of Einstein 
in his 1905 paper, too.

Poincare's idea was further developed by Hermann Minkowski.

So Poincare's relativity is different to Einstein's, which was mainly 
based on Hendrik Lorentz and his 'Lorentz transform'.

But Poincare regarded this concept of Lorentz as wrong (even if he 
invented the name 'Lorentz transform').


TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Relativistic aberration film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-08-07 10:05 +0000
  Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 12:14 +0200
  Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 13:16 +0000
    Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:19 +0200
      Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 13:37 +0000
        Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:40 +0200
          Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 15:54 +0200
            Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:57 +0200
              Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 16:07 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 16:09 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 16:21 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 16:23 +0200
      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 15:52 +0200
        Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:53 +0200
        Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-08 09:05 +0200
          Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 13:17 +0200
            Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:33 +0000
            Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:38 +0000
              Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 16:40 +0200
            Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:52 +0000
              Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@org.invalid> - 2024-08-08 14:56 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:10 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:12 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:23 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:25 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:37 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:40 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:54 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 16:25 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-11 11:26 +0200
            Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-09 07:35 +0200
              Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-09 10:56 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-09 12:06 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-09 12:41 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-09 15:57 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-09 19:08 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-10 03:27 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-10 05:45 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-10 13:24 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-10 17:35 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-09 17:16 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-08-09 20:44 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-10 10:17 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Blaine Kántor <kndisk@ibgkk.hu> - 2024-08-10 10:40 +0000

csiph-web