Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #655635
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Relativistic aberration |
| Date | 2024-08-08 09:05 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <lhj91oFrp53U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <b9f5671b8333de8a8b9f2cfceb69f808@www.novabbs.com> <_fWL1QRNDZJe9YyMRnHwHtpAbvo@jntp> <v8vs8f$2nkf1$10@dont-email.me> <17e976a312238df3$168817$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> |
Am Mittwoch000007, 07.08.2024 um 15:52 schrieb Maciej Wozniak: > W dniu 07.08.2024 o 15:19, Python pisze: >> Le 07/08/2024 à 15:16, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >>> [...] >>> According to Hachel, and always in accordance with logic, with truth, >>> and with the equations of Poincaré, who was not weak in mathematics, >>> the notion of simultaneity is invariant by change of observer JOINT >>> at the moment of measurement, what varies for them is the INTERNAL >>> CHRONOTROPY, and not the notion of simultaneity. >> >> There is nothing in common between your demented ill-defined > > > And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit > to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid > would be, and he has written it clearly > enough for anyone able to read (even if not > clearly enough for you, poor stinker). > > Actually Poincare did and assumed a four dimensional 'curved' spacetime, from which Euclid's three-dimensional space is a 'sub-chapter'. This euclidean space is kind of projection into the realm of the local observer, who 'cuts' spacetime into time and space, simply by being somewhere. This is a very different concept than the usual mainstream interpretation and actually different to the interpretation of Einstein in his 1905 paper, too. Poincare's idea was further developed by Hermann Minkowski. So Poincare's relativity is different to Einstein's, which was mainly based on Hendrik Lorentz and his 'Lorentz transform'. But Poincare regarded this concept of Lorentz as wrong (even if he invented the name 'Lorentz transform'). TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Relativistic aberration film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-08-07 10:05 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 12:14 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 13:16 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:19 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 13:37 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:40 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 15:54 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:57 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 16:07 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 16:09 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 16:21 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 16:23 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 15:52 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:53 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-08 09:05 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 13:17 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:33 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:38 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 16:40 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:52 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@org.invalid> - 2024-08-08 14:56 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:10 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:12 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:23 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:25 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:37 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:40 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:54 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 16:25 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-11 11:26 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-09 07:35 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-09 10:56 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-09 12:06 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-09 12:41 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-09 15:57 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-09 19:08 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-10 03:27 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-10 05:45 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-10 13:24 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-10 17:35 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-09 17:16 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-08-09 20:44 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-10 10:17 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Blaine Kántor <kndisk@ibgkk.hu> - 2024-08-10 10:40 +0000
csiph-web