Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #653499

Re: Absolute Insanity

From Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Absolute Insanity
Date 2024-05-08 09:50 +0200
Message-ID <la0p5iF1aimU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <2e4cf934a593d0e19854a5da168560c1@www.novabbs.com> <nB7aRJLaUqJ28rWlq1Q30arOW-o@jntp> <9c6465bd694526de59b67b0910ccf4a1@www.novabbs.com> <R0JHJcwGHe9_LJmn8sD9clNY-Rw@jntp> <R6znaLrGLzGFMA_J9zUCgBswivc@jntp>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2024-05-07 21:38:02 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

> Le 07/05/2024 à 23:30, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 07.05.2024 o 22:50, Richard Hachel pisze:
> 
>>> We come back a little to Langevin's traveler,
>>> or other problems of special relativity
>>> that I have been asking for some forty years.
>>> That is to say that communications would be impossible and that we 
>>> could never get around the problem of causality.
>>> 
>>> Thus, an observer could instantly visit one hundred thousand stars, 
>>> without this posing any problems in terms of time (negligible proper 
>>> time).
>>> 
>>> But when he came back to tell us everything he saw in the future of the 
>>> universe, the earth would already have this same information, since it 
>>> itself would have aged a hundred thousand years.
>>> 
>>> Space travel is therefore definitively solved with Dr. Hachel's 
>>> equations. We will be able to reach any star or galaxy instantly or 
>>> almost, why not. But in Earth's frame of reference it will still take 
>>> thousands or billions of years?
>> 
>> And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden
>> by idiots like you "improper and inaccurate" clocks
>> keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks
>> always did.
> 
> Is it true that you are Polish?
> 
> Which region of Poland are you from?
> 
> What are your skills in theoretical physics?

That's easy to answer: he has none.


-- 
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Absolute Insanity patdolan@comcast.net (patdolan) - 2024-05-07 05:07 +0000
  Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-07 12:07 +0000
    Re: Absolute Insanity hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-05-07 18:03 +0000
      Re: Absolute Insanity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-07 22:04 +0200
      Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-07 20:50 +0000
        Re: Absolute Insanity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-07 23:30 +0200
          Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-07 21:38 +0000
            Re: Absolute Insanity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-08 07:03 +0200
              Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-08 12:06 +0000
                Re: Absolute Insanity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-08 15:12 +0200
                Re: Absolute Insanity hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-05-08 19:41 +0000
                Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-08 21:24 +0000
                Re: Absolute Insanity hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-05-09 04:00 +0000
                Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-09 10:32 +0000
            Re: Absolute Insanity Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-05-08 09:50 +0200

csiph-web