Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #653499
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Absolute Insanity |
| Date | 2024-05-08 09:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <la0p5iF1aimU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <2e4cf934a593d0e19854a5da168560c1@www.novabbs.com> <nB7aRJLaUqJ28rWlq1Q30arOW-o@jntp> <9c6465bd694526de59b67b0910ccf4a1@www.novabbs.com> <R0JHJcwGHe9_LJmn8sD9clNY-Rw@jntp> <R6znaLrGLzGFMA_J9zUCgBswivc@jntp> |
On 2024-05-07 21:38:02 +0000, Richard Hachel said: > Le 07/05/2024 à 23:30, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> W dniu 07.05.2024 o 22:50, Richard Hachel pisze: > >>> We come back a little to Langevin's traveler, >>> or other problems of special relativity >>> that I have been asking for some forty years. >>> That is to say that communications would be impossible and that we >>> could never get around the problem of causality. >>> >>> Thus, an observer could instantly visit one hundred thousand stars, >>> without this posing any problems in terms of time (negligible proper >>> time). >>> >>> But when he came back to tell us everything he saw in the future of the >>> universe, the earth would already have this same information, since it >>> itself would have aged a hundred thousand years. >>> >>> Space travel is therefore definitively solved with Dr. Hachel's >>> equations. We will be able to reach any star or galaxy instantly or >>> almost, why not. But in Earth's frame of reference it will still take >>> thousands or billions of years? >> >> And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden >> by idiots like you "improper and inaccurate" clocks >> keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks >> always did. > > Is it true that you are Polish? > > Which region of Poland are you from? > > What are your skills in theoretical physics? That's easy to answer: he has none. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Absolute Insanity patdolan@comcast.net (patdolan) - 2024-05-07 05:07 +0000
Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-07 12:07 +0000
Re: Absolute Insanity hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-05-07 18:03 +0000
Re: Absolute Insanity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-07 22:04 +0200
Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-07 20:50 +0000
Re: Absolute Insanity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-07 23:30 +0200
Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-07 21:38 +0000
Re: Absolute Insanity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-08 07:03 +0200
Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-08 12:06 +0000
Re: Absolute Insanity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-08 15:12 +0200
Re: Absolute Insanity hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-05-08 19:41 +0000
Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-08 21:24 +0000
Re: Absolute Insanity hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-05-09 04:00 +0000
Re: Absolute Insanity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-05-09 10:32 +0000
Re: Absolute Insanity Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-05-08 09:50 +0200
csiph-web