Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #626337
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity |
| Date | 2023-12-22 15:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <kumer3F4dnqU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <24950084-2a92-7e26-1b19-0c00c9ad640c@comcast.net> <5882dd82-d22d-4d4c-9cd6-27d981f99ad0n@googlegroups.com> <7qudnXMNOMKeqx74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <b6b1cfa8-af1f-4dc6-05dd-e38f7f7bbf62@comcast.net> <-v2cnYDq0JWmUB74nZ2dnZfqlJ9j4p2d@giganews.com> |
On 12/20/2023 11:29 PM, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 12/20/23 1:06 PM, Mike Fontenot wrote: >> On 12/20/23 11:44 AM, Tom Roberts wrote: >>> Assuming the person on the trailing rocket measures the separation >>> simultaneously in their successive instantaneously co-moving >>> inertial frames, that separation MUST successively increase. >> >> That's NOT the way person on the trailing rocket measures the >> separation! He measures the separation with a tape measure, and >> THAT shows the separation is constant. > > WHAT tape measure? -- none is specified in the problem. > > Add one and you're still wrong: > To qualify as a tape measure, it must execute Born rigid motion, nailed > down only at the trailing rocket -- this makes it always be at rest in > the instantaneously co-moving inertial frame of the trailing rocket, so > this is no different from what I said above. Born rigid motion requires > the leading end of the tape measure to have a smaller proper > acceleration than the trailing rocket, with the difference evenly spread > out along its length. Note the two rockets do not execute Born rigid > motion, because they have equal proper accelerations; the leading rocket > has a larger proper acceleration than the leading end of the tape > measure, and thus pulls away from it. So the tape measure shows the > separation is increasing. This is no different from what I said above. > > I do not know why Fontenot keeps getting this wrong. Or why he keeps > ignoring me when I tell him this. Or why he ignores the voluminous > literature on this. He has been obsessing over this scenario for many > years, gets it wrong, and refuses to THINK about it -- see THINK 1 and > THINK 2 of my previous message for a very simple demonstration of my > claims. > > Tom Roberts Wasting your time. But then it is yours to waste.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-17 17:46 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-18 21:12 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-19 09:06 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-19 16:30 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-12-19 12:25 +0200
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-19 16:46 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Samille Bass <sble@bsslsmaa.ib> - 2023-12-20 01:27 +0000
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-20 12:44 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-20 12:06 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-20 23:29 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-21 12:48 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-23 14:42 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-23 17:13 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-24 11:31 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-24 10:48 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-24 12:03 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-25 00:38 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-26 10:21 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-27 10:20 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-27 12:08 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-30 00:56 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-01-01 14:47 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-01 21:12 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-01-01 22:27 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-01 22:58 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-24 12:14 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-24 15:13 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-25 11:04 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-25 13:38 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-25 13:25 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-25 23:56 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-26 09:52 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-26 15:38 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-26 22:35 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-27 06:51 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-27 06:03 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-12-27 06:26 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-27 06:34 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-12-27 08:39 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-27 07:03 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-27 13:29 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-12-27 21:14 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-30 13:40 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-01-01 17:32 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-01 21:11 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2024-01-02 09:28 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-01-02 13:14 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-01-01 11:42 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2024-01-01 10:58 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-01-01 12:07 -0600
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-28 19:16 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-12-26 13:48 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-12-26 10:12 -0700
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-25 21:41 -0500
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-25 04:32 -0800
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-12-22 16:29 +0200
Re: Separation of Accelerating Observers in Special Relativity whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-12-22 15:53 -0600
csiph-web