Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #610813

Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/14/2023 7:01 PM, Jane wrote:
> On Sat, 13 May 2023 23:02:41 -0500, whodat wrote:
> 
>> On 5/13/2023 9:41 PM, Jane wrote:
> 
>>
>>>> As I have said before, you merely rely on unusual meanings of words
>>>> and then complain about the linguistic confusion. Grow Up!
>>>
>>> No Tommy, I rely on pure Pkysics and the correct meaning of the TWE....
>>> so try to do your homework properly, like a good boy.
>>
>> What is "pure physics" and provide an example as well as compare that to
>> all other kinds of physics.
> 
> Established physics as distinct from Tommy's imaginary version. Being a non
> scientist, you probably don't understand what that implies ...or really
> care.

You keep attacking like there's no tomorrow. Guess what, I am engaged in
this conversation and asked a question based on what you wrote because I
do care and I don't know who the fuck you think you are with the sort of
response you made here. You used "pure physics" as though it were a
distinct field of study and now you have no rational reply in keeping
with what you wrote earlier. Get a grip, if you are able to. Your
behavior in recent times leaves the rational reader wondering what is
wrong with you.

It might behoove you to learn and understand what the term "scientist"
is. By definition, I am a scientist. I will go further and say that I am
not a professional scientist, but then those are in short supply in
these parts and based on your treatment of the subject matter you're
certainly no professional scientist, unless you're willing to admit that
you are in a very low percentile of that realm. You've had numerous
opportunities to explain what you mean when you use certain terms,
especially "frequency" and you have several times failed to define the
terms you are using in any way that could lead to meaningful
conversations. And here we are still attempting to have a discussion
with a party (you) who is thus far reticent to rationality. (I realize
and appreciate the oddness of that construct.)

> As the name suggests, the 'traveling wave equation' describes a sine wave
> that moves (horizontally, say).

Here you use a description that has no meaning, "horizontal." Compared
to???? Actually no matter. Any direction is fine.

> it does not change in any way as it moves.

You say here that a sine wave is created. Now please explain clearly in
physical terms what comprises this sine wave? Is it a string of atoms,
of ions, of photons, of WHAT?

> As it passes a point, (a fixed value of x, in the equation) its amplitudde
> varies sinusoidally.

This is a freshman year high school general science caliber of
explanation so far. Because you fail to provide enough detail it is just
a failed model that only partially explains what a radio wave is like,
in other words, a hamburger bun with no meat. Where's the beef?

> That is the basis of radio broadcasting and the reason why a bouy goes up
> and down as waves pass it. It seems that Tommy, who constantly advises
> other people to learn some basic physics, knows very little himself.

It seems to me, a non-professional seeker of the same truth you profess
to love, that there's a significant dearth of real(tm) understanding in
these parts.

Please explain to me what the sine wave you are talking about above is
composed of and what makes whatever that is maintain its shape as it
travels through space passing by charged and neutral particles and
crosses paths with other sinusoidal type of radio waved without any
alteration in its shape.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 04:56 +0000
  Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 21:59 -0700
  Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-05-10 15:03 +1000
    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 07:09 +0000
      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-05-10 19:25 +1000
        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 23:46 +0000
          Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-11 11:04 -0700
            Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-11 23:23 +0000
              Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-05-11 19:23 -0700
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Domingo Vassilopulos <gdag@iipmugao.op> - 2023-05-12 11:49 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-13 00:20 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-05-12 19:45 -0700
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-14 01:27 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-05-13 10:26 +0200
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-14 01:33 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-05-15 21:07 +0200
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-17 01:51 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-16 21:02 -0700
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-17 23:09 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-05-18 16:02 +0200
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-19 01:50 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-18 22:00 -0500
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-19 07:40 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-19 08:39 -0500
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-20 19:34 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-20 17:57 -0500
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-21 03:37 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-20 23:17 -0500
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-18 22:00 -0700
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-19 07:34 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 12:04 -0700
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-20 00:32 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-23 02:12 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-22 21:15 -0700
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-23 06:31 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-05-17 10:41 -0700
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-05-13 10:39 -0500
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-14 02:41 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-13 23:02 -0500
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-15 00:01 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-14 22:28 -0500
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-16 02:25 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-16 00:52 -0500
        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-15 00:05 +0000
      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-05-10 05:03 -0700
      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-10 08:53 -0700
        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 23:49 +0000
          Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-10 17:46 -0700
    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-15 00:07 +0000
  Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-10 00:39 -0500
    Re: Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 23:32 +0000
      Re: Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-05-11 01:40 +0200
        Re: Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-11 12:41 +0000
  Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-09 23:50 -0700
  Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-05-10 10:07 -0700
  Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2023-05-19 06:57 -0700
    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 07:31 -0700
      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2023-05-19 08:16 -0700
        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-19 10:43 -0500
        Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 09:51 -0700
          Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2023-05-19 11:42 -0700
            Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, *Plonk* Julio Di Egidio is back. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 11:49 -0700
          Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-19 15:34 -0400
            Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 12:44 -0700
              Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2023-05-19 17:31 -0700
            Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. Eusebio Rompa <ebei@aooosree.si> - 2023-05-20 20:44 +0000

csiph-web