Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #601130
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Wavelength of Light Is Constant, Not Variable |
| Date | 2023-02-09 09:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k4jnkiF3e6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <1a7b7d5e-812c-4a8b-97b7-86f03e2fdb2an@googlegroups.com> |
Am 08.02.2023 um 22:35 schrieb Pentcho Valev: > Imagine a scenario in which an observer measures a shift in the frequency of the incoming light. Given the formula > > (frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength), > > we conclude that the frequency shift is caused by > > (a) an inversely proportional wavelength shift. > > (b) a proportional speed-of-light shift. > > The generalization of (a) over all possible scenarios is > > (A) Any frequency shift is caused by an inversely proportional wavelength shift. > > The generalization of (b) over all possible scenarios is > > (B) Any frequency shift is caused by a proportional speed-of-light shift. > > It is easy to see that (A) is logically equivalent to Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate: > > (A') The speed of light is constant. > > Analogously, (B) is logically equivalent to > > (B') The wavelength of light is constant. > > I have been trying, for decades, to show that the fundamental axiom (A') turned out to be a malignancy the metastases of which killed theoretical physics. I'm insecure, what you try to prove. But, anyhow, wavelength of em-waves is not constant upon relative movement. Frequency shift is a well known phenomenon called red-shift or Doppler effect. Now you seem to assume, that different sorts of redshifted light exist, which move at different speeds, while having the same frequency. I would say, that this idea violates simple logic. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The Wavelength of Light Is Constant, Not Variable Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-08 13:35 -0800
Re: The Wavelength of Light Is Constant, Not Variable Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-09 09:02 +0100
Re: The Wavelength of Light Is Constant, Not Variable Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-09 01:34 -0800
Re: The Wavelength of Light Is Constant, Not Variable Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-09 11:49 -0800
Re: The Wavelength of Light Is Constant, Not Variable Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-10 02:01 -0800
Re: The Wavelength of Light Is Constant, Not Variable Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-10 10:56 -0800
Re: The Wavelength of Light Is Constant, Not Variable Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-11 03:28 -0800
Re: The Wavelength of Light Is Constant, Not Variable Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-11 11:14 -0800
Re: The Wavelength of Light Is Constant, Not Variable Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-09 23:13 +0000
csiph-web