Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594251
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation |
| Date | 2022-10-27 09:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jruosgF97ugU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ec1e89b4-a2af-a548-43d7-5b150284d6b8@comcast.net> <1q0900q.i0njwcxz60r0N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <42498131-97fe-d112-db75-cd0d1ff1d9d0@comcast.net> <gKOdnWNPQ5Gcncf-nZ2dnZfqlJxg4p2d@giganews.com> <62d62763-2ac1-4a1d-8c41-dcc2ee103479n@googlegroups.com> |
On 2022-10-27 05:46:45 +0000, Maciej Wozniak said: > On Thursday, 27 October 2022 at 05:50:30 UTC+2, Tom Roberts wrote: >> On 10/22/22 4:30 PM, Mike Fontenot wrote: >>> the outcome of the twin paradox is determined purely by the time >>> dilation equation for an inertial observer ... it is strictly a >>> special relativity result ... no general relativity is involved. >> So you are considering a twin scenario in flat spacetime. Presuming that >> the stay-at-home twin is moving inertially, we can use the coordinates >> of their inertial frame to compute the elapsed proper time of each twin: >> T_traveler = \Integral dt sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) >> T_stayathome = \Integral dt >> where t is the time coordinate of that frame, v is the speed of the >> traveling twin relative to that frame (a function of t), and the >> integrals are taken over each twin's path expressed in that inertial >> frame (between their parting and their reunion). > > In the meantime in the real world, of course, forbidden > by your bunch of idiots GPS and TAI keep measuring t'=t > in forbidden by your bunch of idiots old seconds. 530 -- Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2022-10-22 13:16 -0600
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-10-22 22:46 +0200
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2022-10-22 15:30 -0600
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-10-23 15:37 +0200
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-10-23 10:25 -0700
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-10-26 22:50 -0500
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 21:29 -0700
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 21:30 -0700
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-10-26 22:46 -0700
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-27 09:04 +0200
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2022-10-27 10:00 -0700
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-10-22 22:53 -0700
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2022-11-03 12:15 -0600
Re: A Proposed Experimental Test of My Gravitational Time Dilation Equation "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 12:50 -0700
csiph-web