Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #588462
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. |
| Date | 2022-07-16 07:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jjf0beF3l5sU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <18e058d3-ab7d-4bbf-a976-92643ae33703n@googlegroups.com> |
Am 14.07.2022 um 03:51 schrieb Richard Hertz: > QUOTE: Wormhole is a special solution of the field equations in German-born > physicist Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity that resembles a tunnel > between two black holes or other points in space-time. Such a tunnel would > provide a shortcut between its end points. I have doubts, that Einstein was born in Germany. His CV contains too many strange things, which do not make sense, if he was in fact German. Einstein became (at least) Swiss citizen, went to school in Switzerland and spoke (most likely) the three main languages of Switzerland. He went to ETH in Zurich and worked for the patent office in Bern. So, most events of his live happend in Switzerland. But his CV told the story, that he was born in Ulm and went with his parents to Munich as an infant. There he stayed until 16, while his parents went to Italy, leaving him alone in Munich for two years. Shortly before he reached the age, which would bring him in danger of German conscription, he went to Pavia, Italy and joined his family again. There he stayed some month without going to school (the Jesuits next door wrote, he lived there several years), went to Switzerland alone and went to school in Aarau. To 'streamline' his CV, we could assume, he was actually born in Aarau (or nearby). That would give a way more convincing CV, but as a Swiss citizen. > Besides providing arguments for about 300 scify movies in the last 40 years, > and thousands of books and articles, this is the result of mathturbation with: > > Do you see this shit? > > Rᵤᵥ - 1/2 R gᵤᵥ = 8πG/c⁴ Tᵤᵥ , Hilbert-Einstein field equation for GR. > > If you are a relativist, you believe that the above FE, which contains more than > 200 non-linear differential equations and HUNDRED OF SOLUTIONS > without ANY physical meaning at all, CAN REPLACE Newton's Universal > Law of Gravitation: I personally think, that tensors are too complicated and not necessary for GR. I would personally promote complex-four-vectors (aka bi-quaternions). I actually think, that relativity is a relatively simple thing, which cannot really be debated. What can debated, however, that are the philosophical foundations and the associated equations of relativistic effects. I would say, that Einstein wrote mainly about the Doppler effect in SRT. And gravity could actually be explained over 'curved spacetime' and GR: Simply imagine, that the local timelines would drop into the inner Earth and time itself would push us down to the ground. (btw: if the local axis of time points downwards on the surface of the Earth, spaceflight would become difficult, because we cannot fly into the past.) > F = G.M.m/r² (Newton Law of Gravitational Force) Newton's gravitation law cannot be the end of the story, because it contains 'action at a distance' - also known as 'gravity'. We need to find a way, which would eliminate such space-filling forces and replace them with local interactions. The requirement is actually difficult to fulfill and an awful lot of attempts have failed. I have actually built an own model, which is in fact based on spacetime of GR and is called 'structured spacetime'. This is based on a local interactions of neighboring 'elements' of spacetime, which interact in a certain way and make certain patterns, which we call 'matter'. I have written this 'book' about this idea some years ago: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing ... TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 18:51 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 22:14 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 12:10 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 12:15 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-07-16 07:24 +0200
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-17 16:49 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 07:47 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 08:15 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 11:18 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 15:35 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-20 07:13 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 11:52 -0700
Crank self hating Jewish kapo Richard Hertz inserts feet in his mouth. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 20:29 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-20 20:48 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 21:07 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-21 16:36 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-21 17:27 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-07-21 19:58 -0500
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-21 18:26 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-21 19:14 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-21 01:37 -0400
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 23:14 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-21 08:56 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 09:51 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 17:11 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Eber Borgogni <robe@ooebrngb.gb> - 2022-07-23 16:32 +0000
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-23 14:03 -0400
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 12:14 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Deane Tanzi <xeuc@ojzoleeb.xq> - 2022-07-30 15:12 +0000
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-07-21 12:33 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 11:25 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 12:37 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 12:58 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 14:19 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 15:32 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 17:34 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 19:07 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz persists in his imbecility "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 20:23 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz persists in his imbecility Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 22:16 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz persists in his imbecility Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 23:54 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz persists in his imbecility Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-24 00:17 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz persists in his imbecility Stan Fultoni <fultonistan@gmail.com> - 2022-07-24 09:58 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz persists in his imbecility "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-07-24 00:25 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz persists in his imbecility Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-24 09:17 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz persists in his imbecility "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-07-24 09:27 -0700
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-24 11:49 +0300
Re: Theoretical wormholes, derived from some solutions of GR. "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 09:39 -0700
csiph-web