Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #586290
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' |
| Date | 2022-06-02 08:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jfr506Fc3soU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (23 earlier) <t1jgj1$h34$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ja58ifFdcdbU1@mid.individual.net> <t1nqc8$nhk$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jablt6FkjkvU1@mid.individual.net> <t1sc27$17fo$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
Am 28.03.2022 um 15:09 schrieb Odd Bodkin: >>>> I wrote my annotations from the perspective of a hypothetical >>>> professor, who treated the text in question as the homework of a student. >>> >>> A *real* professor, on the other hand, wouldn't bother questioning >>> things that may be difficult or impossible to actually do with a problem >>> like that. As is evident in so many mechanics problems assuming >>> frictionless surfaces or air resistance. >> >> Sure, but still you missed the point, because it was not my aim to >> immitate a real professor. >> >> I pretended to be a professor, what is more like in a role play. >> >> It is actually like this: if you would dress like superman, you >> certainly won't try to fly. > > And if you dress up like a professor, then you’re certainly not going to > find any real mistakes. Of course I don't 'dress up like a professor', nor do I pretend to be one. It is a ficticious background, like in a role play. The role I play is that of a professor, who had to write corrections for the homework of a student. But a specific dress is not required. The errors I find are all real, at least I meant my comments are about real errors. The method is actually a tool for self-education and works quite good, while you apparently do not understand, how that method works. The number of errors I found was just enormous, what came as a surprise for me. But that's a different story. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-27 19:40 +0200
Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-03-28 10:07 +0200
Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-28 13:09 +0000
Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-02 08:51 +0200
csiph-web