Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #584346

Re: Annotated version of SRT

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Annotated version of SRT
Date 2022-04-28 07:14 +0200
Message-ID <jcum4nFjnusU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (17 earlier) <03cc52d5-9636-485a-a9f3-7c8350619c31n@googlegroups.com> <jcpcmoFj8lpU1@mid.individual.net> <b5b02531-42cc-4714-9799-1043df76199fn@googlegroups.com> <jcr2n2Ftcv2U1@mid.individual.net> <eacd0116-ac91-4cea-bcd2-35aa422bf510n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 27.04.2022 um 02:35 schrieb JanPB:
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 1:24:06 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> Am 26.04.2022 um 08:52 schrieb JanPB:
>>> On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 10:02:19 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>> Am 25.04.2022 um 21:22 schrieb JanPB:
>>>>> On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:52:14 AM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>>> Am 24.04.2022 um 10:52 schrieb JanPB:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But even if so, x' would still be zero.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, you get x' = 0 for the emitter/receiver because its location
>>>>>>> by construction of this experimental setup satisfies x = vt at
>>>>>>> all times t, hence the corresponding x' value is:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> x' = x - vt = 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> throughout.
>>>>>> Here you actually agree, that x'=0 must be true.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the *light source*.
>>>> No, this is wrong because Einstein had a different setting:
>>>>
>>>> [quote]
>>>>
>>>> "From the origin of system k let a ray be emitted at the time τ'along
>>>> the X-axis to x' and at the time τ_1 be reflected thence to the origin of
>>>> the coordinates, ..."
>>>>
>>>> [/quote]
>>>>
>>>> The system k was the moving system, hence Einstein wanted a moving
>>>> emitter and a stationary mirror.
>>>
>>> Both the light source and the mirror are stationary in k because that's how
>>> the (1/2)*(tau_0 +tau_2) = tau_1 criterion has been set up previously (in section 1).
>> The coordinates in k had small Greek letters as names.
>>
>> Therefore x' must be a coordinate from system K.
>
> Yes, it's an expression involving the  K  coordinates.  But keep in mind
> that the following three statements are simultaneously true:
>
> (1) x'  is an expression involving  K  coordinates,
>
> (2) if  x'  denotes the values of this expression for the mirror
> at different times  t,  then  x'  is constant and nonzero,
>
> (3) the mirror is stationary in  k  (the lower-case  k).


You should keep in mind, that it is absolutely impossible, that an 
author requires from the readers, that they would marter their brain to 
develop, what actually the author should have written.

Einstein himself had to write, which coordinate systems were used and 
for which quantities. These quantities need to be defined properly.

But in contrast to common standards, we are now discussing the question, 
whether the mirror moves (or not) in system K.


This is an information, an author needs to provide.


We are now discussing this question on the basis on other constraints 
like other equations or descriptions in the text.

But I have tried hard and found no possible setting, which violated non 
of these constraints somewhere.

Now we had to declare this an error of the text and not ours, because we 
already did, what no author could rightfully demand, and tried to read 
the authors mind from rare hints, but with no success.


...


TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-24 08:07 +0200
  Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-24 01:52 -0700
    Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-25 09:52 +0200
      Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 12:22 -0700
        Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-26 07:02 +0200
          Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 23:52 -0700
            Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-26 22:24 +0200
              Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 17:35 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-27 07:59 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-28 07:14 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 01:45 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Rady Konoe <akde@oakoradn.en> - 2022-04-28 09:03 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-29 08:08 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 20:51 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 21:03 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-30 07:47 +0200
                Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 07:00 -0700
                Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-30 14:44 +0000
                Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 08:19 -0700
                Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-30 15:28 +0000
                Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 15:33 +0000
                Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-30 17:56 +0000
                Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-30 20:15 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 19:02 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-01 10:15 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 00:15 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 00:40 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-03 07:58 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 16:44 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 23:15 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-29 14:30 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 06:45 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-30 19:50 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 21:43 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-29 08:22 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 12:52 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 13:06 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 06:47 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-01 09:59 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-05-01 12:16 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-02 08:03 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-01 23:31 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 08:56 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 02:30 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 00:18 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-04 06:53 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-04 01:02 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-05 09:02 +0200
                Crank Thomas Heger keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 06:38 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 22:17 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 22:34 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-06 08:55 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-06 00:24 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-06 01:15 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-06 01:41 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 11:16 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 04:44 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 12:02 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 05:11 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-03 08:15 +0200

csiph-web