Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582498
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Annotated version of SRT |
| Date | 2022-04-10 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jbgodkFonfqU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (18 earlier) <jb268qF405U1@mid.individual.net> <t2i00b$e25$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t2rqtm$1ppo$1@gioia.aioe.org> <4766bef9-0064-403b-891e-e2870a63ae76n@googlegroups.com> <1pq65eh.1vccr9ff3kyxpN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
Am 10.04.2022 um 11:54 schrieb J. J. Lodder: >> What does have the right transformation properties is a rank-2 >> tensor (skew-symmetric in fact, so a 2-form) which includes both >> the E and B components in a single package. >> >> When Maxwell's equations are written using this 2-form (call it F), >> they assume a form that's even more succinct than Heaviside's: >> >> dF = 0 >> *d*F = j >> >> ...where j is the source 1-form combining charge and current, >> "d" is the exterior derivative, and "*" is the Hodge star operator >> with the Minkowski space signature. Maxwell used actually quaternions. > To avoid misunderstandings: > there are vectors and vectors. > The E field -is- a vector in 3-space. > It is -not- part of a 4-vector. You can add a time component and get a four-vector from a 3-vector, if you like to do that. In case of the electric field strength vector this would in fact make sense. > For others: In general a vector is defined to be something > that transforms as a vector under a transformation group. > So it isn't an absolute concept. > What is a vector under one group of transformations > need not be a vector under another group, > Well, actually the term 'vector' was coined by Hamillton for the imaginary part of a quaternion, which denotes a direction. The other part was called 'scalar'. I don't think, that group theory was already known in the mid 19th century. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Annotated version of SRT Coke Hishikawa <uhva@blseummh.nm> - 2022-04-09 11:33 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-09 13:08 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-10 11:54 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-10 21:10 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:43 -0700
csiph-web