Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #580801

Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'

Show all headers | View raw

Am 22.03.2022 um 10:41 schrieb Odd Bodkin:
> Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
>> Am 21.03.2022 um 23:07 schrieb Odd Bodkin:
>>
>>>>>> But possibly you are right and specialist in e.g. theoretical gravity
>>>>>> cooperate world wide.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But what actually do you want to say with that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly what I said.
>>>>>
>>>>> You fabricate notions to justify yourself, that physicists work as you do,
>>>>> in isolation and with a wide audience. This is what you WANT physics to be.
>>>>> But in fact this is not how physicists really work, nor should they work
>>>>> the way you do.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> fortunately I'm not a physicists. (I have actually never claimed to be one.)
>>>>
>>>> The real physicists may continue to sit in their dusty laboratories and
>>>> wait for gravitons or the apperances of elves, if that is what they want
>>>> to do.
>>>
>>> Well, they ain’t so dusty, and they beat the pretenses of an old man who
>>> dabbles in conspiracy theories on his own.
>>
>>
>> Usually I don't use the word 'conspiracy theory'.
>>
>> What you call so are in most cases actually assumptions about the
>> activities of secret agencies in the past.
>>
>> It is actually history, which is also a science.
>>
>>
>> But you may possibly be able to answer my question:
>>
>> what does a person do, who is a specialist in 'theoretical gravity', in
>> his daily life?
>>
>> 'Sitting in a laboratory and waiting for elves' would be a possibility.
>
> But not a well-informed guess.
>
>>
>> ('elves' could be replaced by: gravitons, gravitational waves, black
>> holes or 'the ghost of Albert Einstein')
>
> Again, not a well-informed guess. Don’t you think it might be of interest
> to you to actually learn what they do, rather than just fringe speculation?


Well, actually yes.

But I've seen an interview with a guy at one of these LIGO experiments 
on tv. He said, he could see nothing, but was still wainting.



TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-15 07:40 +0100
  Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-15 10:36 +0000
    Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-16 20:37 +0100
      Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 21:03 +0000
        Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-17 07:43 +0100
          Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-17 10:07 +0000
            Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-18 06:57 +0100
              Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-18 18:01 +0000
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-19 09:21 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-20 13:10 +0000
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-21 08:20 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-21 12:09 +0000
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-21 20:42 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-21 22:07 +0000
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-22 09:21 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-22 09:41 +0000
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-23 09:17 +0100

csiph-web