Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #579631

Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT'
Date	2022-03-06 21:12 +0100
Message-ID	<j8kitjF9q9oU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(19 earlier) <svqej1$1rbp$1@gioia.aioe.org> <j8dsr3F13bbU1@mid.individual.net> <svt0qk$jte$1@gioia.aioe.org> <j8hsa5Fohu9U1@mid.individual.net> <t029lk$1gv8$2@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Am 06.03.2022 um 13:32 schrieb Odd Bodkin:
> Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
>> Am 04.03.2022 um 13:31 schrieb Odd Bodkin:
>> ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, I would guess, the public side of physics is just a farce for the
>>>> public, which is created by specialists I call 'bullshit artists'.
>>>
>>> Or you are overestimating your own abilities.
>>>
>>
>> Quite a few people think, that common physics is just a farce, while the
>> 'real thing' is carefully hidden and at least thirty years in advance
>> (from what is force feed to the public).
>
> Your conspiraciphilia is showing.


Actually I do NOT love conspiracies.

>>
>>
>> I can only show this in a very few cases.
>>
>> But almost every field of physics has its own dissidents, which
>> violently oppose the mainstream.
>
> As is true in biology, geology, economics, sociology, psychology. What does
> this show?
>

My working hypothesis was, that mainstream science is more or less a 
farce, created to divert the general public from true knowledge.

To find out, how correct scieces would look like is very difficult, 
because you cannot know, what is correct and what is not.

So everything had to be 'reinvented' somehow or at least tested.

That is well beyond the possiblities of a single person.

But a single individual can do some parts of the job, and question a few 
pieces of mainstream physics, for instance.

This could eventually make other individuals do the same and 
subsequently an array is created, where propaganda is replaced by truth.


>> E.g. we had Maxwell, who disliked Heaviside's vector notation.
>>
>> We had Dingle and 'Science at the crossroads'.
>>
>> We had Alexander Franklin Meyer and his book 'Geometry of Time'.
>>
>> We had Neal Adams and his videos about 'Growing Earth'.
>>
>> We had Wilhelm Reich and his 'Cloudbuster'.
>>
>> We had Stanley Mayer, who drove his car around with water in his tank.
>>
>> We had Viktor Schauberger, who wrote about vortices.
>>
>> and this goes on and on and on...
>>
>>
>>
>> I have not really participated, because I didn't know about these conflicts.
>>
>> I have justed invented something, which I though it would be useful.
>
> And you want attention for it. Which you did not get. And so now the plan
> is to degrade what you perceive as competition.

Not quite.

TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-01 08:08 +0100
  Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-01 12:10 +0100
    Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-01 10:44 -0500
      Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-03-01 08:22 -0800
        Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-01 21:51 +0100
          Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-02 08:04 +0100
            Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-03-02 11:04 +0100
              Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-02 11:48 +0100
              Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-03 08:51 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-03-03 09:57 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2022-03-03 02:36 -0800
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-04 08:12 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-03-04 15:23 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-06 10:15 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-03-06 14:07 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-06 21:04 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-03-07 14:45 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-07 18:21 +0100
                Nazi piece of shit Thomas Heger exposed "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-03-07 09:29 -0800
                Re: Nazi piece of shit Thomas Heger exposed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-07 19:39 -0800
                Re: Nazi piece of shit Dontkno exposed Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-08 07:18 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-03 13:07 +0000
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-04 08:19 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-04 12:31 +0000
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-05 20:34 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-06 12:32 +0000
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-06 21:12 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-06 20:43 +0000
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-07 18:32 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-07 18:02 +0000
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-08 07:23 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-08 13:52 +0000
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-08 05:57 -0800
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-03-04 20:34 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-03 15:37 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-05 20:38 +0100
            Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-02 11:48 +0100
              Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-03 09:07 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-03 03:57 -0500
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-04 07:29 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-03 12:08 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-04 07:41 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-04 10:21 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-03-03 06:10 -0800
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-04 07:48 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-03-04 07:53 -0800
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-03-03 15:16 +0100
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-03 06:41 -0800
                Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-04 08:00 +0100
            Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-02 13:21 +0000
        Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-03-11 14:35 -0800
          Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-12 07:58 +0100
      Re: New rewritten version of 'annotated version of SRT' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-01 21:51 +0100

csiph-web