Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #583291
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-04-18 12:22 -0700 |
| References | (16 earlier) <93085630-edab-49e0-a58a-e4ec29844c7bn@googlegroups.com> <1pqdfk4.15uoprgesu2kuN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <b6bb6a14-db39-4411-9a74-1ed73cbd7343n@googlegroups.com> <t39jto$7ki$5@gioia.aioe.org> <4755e32c-1ab6-480b-a142-5da41248176bn@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <ffcbef4c-5e72-4ec2-bef3-168fa9c905ben@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: General Gravity Equation |
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 12:55:47 PM UTC-7, seto...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 12:59:39 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > > Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 5:15:45 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 12:33:09 PM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > >>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 8:15:34 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: > > >>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 5:00:54 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com: > > >>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:35:01 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney: > > >>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/2022 5:18 PM, Ken Seto wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> My theory predicts that the distance between the moon and the > > >>>> earth va ries with time > > >>>> Show your formula, and use it to show > > >>>> the distance between the earth an d > > >>>> moon for tomorrow, at noon > > >>>> UTC. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Stupid Moron Mike: Here is my formula: > > >>>>>>>>> L_earth and moon=return time/2(Lambda_Na)(f_Na) > > >>>>>>>>> Lambda_NaX9nm > > >>>>>>>>> f_Na=incoming frequency of Na source on the moon. > > >>>>>>>> And use it to get the distance between earth and moon at noon UTC > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Stuthe NSC)The sc > > >>> > > >>> You guys (science foundaher tion) got all the money....why don't you > > >>> release some to me to generate the data. Are you afraid that my twill > > >>> refute Einstein's theory so you will never give me the mneyti generate > > >>> the data. > > >> It is up to you to convince the world > > >> that you have something that is worth funding. > > >> THE way to do that is to show that you are capable > > >> of computing something observable to better precision, > > > > > > I am 85 years old. I don't have the time to apply for funding and do the experiments. > > Then you are done. > > > > As it is, the work you started is incomplete and nonviable, and you say you > > are now past the age to progress it to a viable state. > > > > A theorist has to be able to show explicitly with examples how calculations > > can be done in the theory, and how those can be compared to extant > > experimental data. As an example of this, Einstein in a 1905 paper took > > existing data from colloidal solutions to calculate the size of atoms in > > the Brownian motion paper. If the data do not exist, the physicist has to > > devise observations and collect data to use as tests of the idea. Darwin > > did that in his journeys on the Beagle. Galileo did it with constructed > > experiments with ramps and rolling balls, which he built himself. Kepler > > did that by applying for a position in Brahe’s observatory. > > > > Since you say that all of that is now inaccessible to you, then you’ve > > given up on doing the work that would be needed to make it a viable idea. > EINSTEIN DIDN'T DO ANY CALCULATONS IN HIS SR PAPER. Of course he did. Have you read it? > I think my theory will adversely affect the live of too many scientists., . and thus no chance of being accepted......<sad> No. Stop fantasising. It's not because of anyone's well-being is being affected that you get no traction. The real reason is in the nearest mirror. > > > If you young guys don't want to do it, then I guess we will stay ignorant > > > for another 100 years. Stop fantasising, it's infantile. What kind of wimp are you that you cannot even face the simplest facts about yourself? -- Jan
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: General Gravity Equation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-14 11:15 +0200
Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 09:33 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 16:59 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 18:02 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 12:55 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 20:07 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-15 15:52 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-15 23:11 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 12:30 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 19:49 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-15 23:08 -0400
Re: General Gravity Equation whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-04-16 00:19 -0500
Re: General Gravity Equation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-16 11:59 +0200
Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 16:46 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 12:28 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 19:49 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 10:10 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 17:18 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 17:24 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Troy Matsuda <slzm@iawkluuz.xb> - 2022-04-18 17:34 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-19 14:27 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-16 23:13 +0200
Re: General Gravity Equation "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 14:18 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 10:33 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 18:12 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 12:04 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-18 20:52 +0200
Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-19 14:29 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-17 02:17 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation Emil Imada <irzd@tlqinosm.jt> - 2022-04-17 22:58 +0000
Re: General Gravity Equation carl eto <carleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2022-04-17 16:24 -0700
Re: General Gravity Equation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 12:22 -0700
csiph-web