Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #583291

Re: General Gravity Equation

Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Date 2022-04-18 12:22 -0700
References (16 earlier) <93085630-edab-49e0-a58a-e4ec29844c7bn@googlegroups.com> <1pqdfk4.15uoprgesu2kuN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <b6bb6a14-db39-4411-9a74-1ed73cbd7343n@googlegroups.com> <t39jto$7ki$5@gioia.aioe.org> <4755e32c-1ab6-480b-a142-5da41248176bn@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <ffcbef4c-5e72-4ec2-bef3-168fa9c905ben@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: General Gravity Equation
From JanPB <filmart@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 12:55:47 PM UTC-7, seto...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 12:59:39 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > > On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 5:15:45 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote: 
> > >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > >> 
> > >>> On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 12:33:09 PM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote: 
> > >>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 8:15:34 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > >>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > >>>>>>> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 5:00:54 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com: 
> > >>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > >>>>>>>>> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:35:01 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney: 
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/2022 5:18 PM, Ken Seto wrote: 
> > >>>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>>>> My theory predicts that the distance between the moon and the 
> > >>>> earth va ries with time > > >>>> Show your formula, and use it to show 
> > >>>> the distance between the earth an d > > >>>> moon for tomorrow, at noon 
> > >>>> UTC. 
> > >>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>> Stupid Moron Mike: Here is my formula: 
> > >>>>>>>>> L_earth and moon=return time/2(Lambda_Na)(f_Na) 
> > >>>>>>>>> Lambda_NaX9nm 
> > >>>>>>>>> f_Na=incoming frequency of Na source on the moon. 
> > >>>>>>>> And use it to get the distance between earth and moon at noon UTC 
> > >>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> Stuthe NSC)The sc 
> > >>> 
> > >>> You guys (science foundaher tion) got all the money....why don't you 
> > >>> release some to me to generate the data. Are you afraid that my twill 
> > >>> refute Einstein's theory so you will never give me the mneyti generate 
> > >>> the data. 
> > >> It is up to you to convince the world 
> > >> that you have something that is worth funding. 
> > >> THE way to do that is to show that you are capable 
> > >> of computing something observable to better precision, 
> > > 
> > > I am 85 years old. I don't have the time to apply for funding and do the experiments. 
> > Then you are done. 
> > 
> > As it is, the work you started is incomplete and nonviable, and you say you 
> > are now past the age to progress it to a viable state. 
> > 
> > A theorist has to be able to show explicitly with examples how calculations 
> > can be done in the theory, and how those can be compared to extant 
> > experimental data. As an example of this, Einstein in a 1905 paper took 
> > existing data from colloidal solutions to calculate the size of atoms in 
> > the Brownian motion paper. If the data do not exist, the physicist has to 
> > devise observations and collect data to use as tests of the idea. Darwin 
> > did that in his journeys on the Beagle. Galileo did it with constructed 
> > experiments with ramps and rolling balls, which he built himself. Kepler 
> > did that by applying for a position in Brahe’s observatory. 
> > 
> > Since you say that all of that is now inaccessible to you, then you’ve 
> > given up on doing the work that would be needed to make it a viable idea.
> EINSTEIN DIDN'T DO ANY CALCULATONS IN HIS SR PAPER. 

Of course he did. Have you read it?

> I think my theory will adversely affect the live of too many scientists., . and thus no chance of being accepted......<sad>

No. Stop fantasising. It's not because of anyone's well-being is being affected that
you get no traction. The real reason is in the nearest mirror.

> > > If you young guys don't want to do it, then I guess we will stay ignorant 
> > > for another 100 years. 

Stop fantasising, it's infantile. What kind of wimp are you that you cannot even
face the simplest facts about yourself?

--
Jan

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: General Gravity Equation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-14 11:15 +0200
  Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 09:33 -0700
    Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 16:59 +0000
      Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 18:02 +0000
      Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 12:55 -0700
        Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 20:07 +0000
          Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-15 15:52 -0700
            Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-15 23:11 +0000
              Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 12:30 -0700
                Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 19:49 +0000
            Re: General Gravity Equation Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-15 23:08 -0400
              Re: General Gravity Equation whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-04-16 00:19 -0500
                Re: General Gravity Equation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-16 11:59 +0200
                Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 16:46 +0000
                Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 12:28 -0700
                Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 19:49 +0000
                Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 10:10 -0700
                Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 17:18 +0000
                Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 17:24 +0000
                Re: General Gravity Equation Troy Matsuda <slzm@iawkluuz.xb> - 2022-04-18 17:34 +0000
                Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-19 14:27 -0700
                Re: General Gravity Equation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-16 23:13 +0200
                Re: General Gravity Equation "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 14:18 -0700
                Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 10:33 -0700
                Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 18:12 +0000
                Re: General Gravity Equation Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 12:04 -0700
                Re: General Gravity Equation nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-18 20:52 +0200
                Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-19 14:29 -0700
              Re: General Gravity Equation Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 12:39 -0700
                Re: General Gravity Equation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-17 02:17 +0000
              Re: General Gravity Equation Emil Imada <irzd@tlqinosm.jt> - 2022-04-17 22:58 +0000
                Re: General Gravity Equation carl eto <carleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2022-04-17 16:24 -0700
        Re: General Gravity Equation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 12:22 -0700

csiph-web