Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #670969

Re: TDS

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics.relativity, talk.politics.misc
Subject Re: TDS
Date 2026-05-24 21:23 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <6A13CED6.1044@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <6A11E931.2E6D@ix.netcom.com> <rmmQR.99617$6t9.41064@fx15.ams4> <6A133DE5.7860@ix.netcom.com> <BkHQR.91607$qu9.7216@fx08.ams4> <6A135810.1181@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Scott Hoge wrote:
> >
> > On 2026-05-24, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Scott Hoge wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 2026-05-23, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> [...]
> > >>>
> > >>> Take all the Dumocrats, put them in a freight train or
> > >>> Amtrack, and isolate them from the rest of the population.
> > >>>
> > >>> Then, EXTERMINATE THEM ALL WITH EXTREME PREDJUICE!
> > >>
> > >> There is no doubt that exterminating people seems at times a
> > >> fun and exhilarating possibility. But that does not, /by
> > >> itself/, imply that such acts are politically justified.
> > >>
> > >> Sadly, some people (in reference to the character Skut Farkus
> > >> from /A Christmas Story/) egg on little Ralphie, waiting for
> > >> Ralphie to throw an outburst so that they can amuse themselves
> > >> at his unrestrained, furious rage.
> > >>
> > >> As much as they are asking for an impotent outburst, can we
> > >> also say that they are asking to be exterminated?
> > >
> > > Is Cancer asking to be ...exterminated????
> > >
> > > To exterminate Cancer, one needs to KILL, shrink, or control
> > > migrating cancer cells.
> > >
> > > TDS (also known as Trump Derangement Syndrome) is in fact a
> > > disease.
> >
> > Since we have such common feelings about exterminating extremely
> > large groups of people, I must ask: What comes to your mind about
> > TDS sufferers and "Dumocrats" immediately before you experience
> > such desires to exterminate them?
> 
> communists.
> 
> >
> > > Why did Albert Einstein made the decision to drop the atomic
> > > bomb on Japan?
> >
> > I am quite familiar with Einstein's writings and I assure you /he
> > did not want to drop the bomb on Japan/.
> >
> > -- Scott Hoge
> 
> Sorry, you are not "quite familiar" with Einstein...
> 
> The Atomic Bomb was dropped on Japan August 6, 1945.
> 
> Albert Einstein was notified on March 25, 1945, ..
> 
> dats around FIVE MONTHS AHEAD OF TIME...
> 
> and there is no record of Albert Einstein *protest* on the
> dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan decision for a whole 5 months.
> Not one word from him. Not One word. Just...silence. He was happy.
> 
> "The world is a dangerous place to live — not because of the people who
> are evil but because of the people who don’t do anything about it." -
> Albert Einstein
> 
> https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1
> 
> https://content.time.com/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> 
> Albert Einstein advocated for an economic boycott of Japan in the 1930s
> as a way to prevent war, believing that pressure from leading Western
> powers would compel Japan to change its aggressive policies in Asia, but
> this proposal didn't gain traction; years later, after the atomic
> bombings, Einstein expressed deep regret over his own role in the
> nuclear arms race
> 
> https://www.nytimes.com/1932/02/28/archives/einstein-advocates-economic-boycott-asks-why-america-england.html
> 
> " Why is that not brought about ? " he asked . " Why must each person
> and each nation tremble for their existence? "
> 
> https://www.nytimes.com/1932/02/28/archives/einstein-advocates-economic-boycott-asks-why-america-england.html
> 
> . Einstein replied on April 26, 1932:
> Your letter of April 20 convinced me that I had misinterpreted your
> telegram and was mistaken about the character of the congress which you
> suggested. I was under the impression that all you intended was to make
> a rather
> impotent protest in the hope of affecting the war policy which Japan is
> pursuing at the moment. I realize now that you are aiming at a much
> larger target: to help create a more effective antiwar movement than has
> thus far existed. In such an endeavor I should be glad to participate as
> fully as possible.
> I am convinced that only one policy will prove effective: All member
> states of the League of Nations and, in addition, the United States must
> accept the unconditional obligation to carry out all decisions of the
> League and the International Court of Arbitration at The Hague.
> If we succeeded in convincing the more educated groups in the various
> countries of the necessity of so far-reaching a renunciation of national
> sovereignty, we would actually be accomplishing something that would be
> useful. Had we been able to accomplish this in the past, Japan's
> insolent action could have been prevented by the imposition of a boycott
> of all Japanese goods and ships.
> During the spring Einstein received a number of messages from Barbusse
> reporting sponsorship by many other prominent persons as well as steady
> progress in the organization of the congress. Attached to a letter dated
> May 18, 1932, was the text of an appeal, to be signed by all the
> sponsors, which was to serve as a public announcement. The appeal
> pointed out that the war unleashed in China by Japan was unmistakably
> directed at the Soviet Union "with the approval and connivance of the
> great imperialistic powers." The thought was particularly emphasized in
> the first paragraph of the appeal: "While the Disarmament Conference is
> in full swing in Geneva, Japan has hurled itself against the Asiatic
> mainland. It has slaughtered countless innocent people in Chapei. It has
> occupied Manchuria. Crudely camouflaged as an independent republic,
> Manchuria is clearly to serve as a strategic base for any war against
> the Soviet Union. For fifteen years the Soviet Union has striven to
> build a new world order based on a co-operative community of workers, a
> reasonable distribution of national income, the pursuit of common
> welfare, and the abolition of exploitation and oppression of man by his
> fellow man: in short, on principles diametrically opposed to the anarchy
> of the capitalist system. The Soviet Union, dedicated to its great task
> of socialist and human construction, has for months heroically resisted
> Japanese provocation..."
> 
> This,  however,  does  not  cause  me  to  consider  the intrigues  of
> Japan and the powers behind her any less damnable than you do.I have on
> various occasions hinted at the possibility of an interna-tional
> economic boycott against Japan, only to find that nothing could be
> achieved, obviously because of the powerful private economic  interests
> that  are  involved!
> 
>  He shared the widespread  view  on  the  left  that  Japan’s attack
> on  Manchuria  was  encouraged  by  those  who  sought to  undermine
> the  Soviet  Union.  To Barbusse he wrote: “Ever since Japan embarked on
> its Manchurian ad-venture, it has been clear to me that it was supported
> by powerful, invisible allies,”  and  he  further  presumed  that
> “they  are  the  same forces which are sabotaging the disarmament
> effort.”
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Most of yous don't know History...but Germany and Japan were allies during the war.


When Albert Einstein sez he was olny trying to protect HIS people...it was JAPAN that were tying to kill HIS people.


That's why he kept quiet, he wanted Japan dead for...decades!



And who was Einstein's people then? RUSSIA!


(einstein talks out of the left side of his mouth)




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

TDS The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-05-23 10:51 -0700
  Re: TDS Scott Hoge <nospam@nospam.com> - 2026-05-23 18:29 +0000
    Re: TDS The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-05-24 11:05 -0700
      Re: TDS David Hartung <junk@LCMS_shitbags.org> - 2026-05-24 11:13 -0700
        Re: TDS The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-05-24 11:45 -0700
          Re: TDS David Hartung <junk@LCMS_shitbags.org> - 2026-05-24 11:56 -0700
            Re: TDS The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-05-24 21:17 -0700
              Re: TDS David Hartung <junk@LCMS_shitbags.org> - 2026-05-24 23:42 -0700
          Re: TDS AlleyCat <al@aohello.con> - 2026-05-24 12:02 -0700
            Re: TDS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-24 12:10 -0700
              Re: TDS AlleyCat <al@aohello.con> - 2026-05-24 14:19 -0700
                Re: TDS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-24 18:36 -0700
                Re: TDS AlleyCat <al@aohello.con> - 2026-05-24 19:40 -0700
                Re: TDS The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-05-24 20:59 -0700
                Re: TDS AlleyCat <al@aohello.con> - 2026-05-24 23:40 -0700
                Re: TDS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-25 08:58 -0700
      Re: TDS Scott Hoge <nospam@nospam.com> - 2026-05-24 18:21 +0000
        Re: TDS The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-05-24 12:57 -0700
          Re: TDS The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-05-24 21:23 -0700
          Re: TDS Scott Hoge <nospam@nospam.com> - 2026-05-26 15:32 +0000
            Re: TDS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-26 10:05 -0700
        Re: TDS "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2026-05-25 02:17 -0700
          Re: TDS Scott Hoge <nospam@nospam.com> - 2026-05-25 11:47 +0000
    Re: TDS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-24 11:35 -0700
      Re: TDS Scott Hoge <nospam@nospam.com> - 2026-05-24 19:07 +0000

csiph-web