Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #670744

Re: 48 Hours

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am Sonntag000012, 12.04.2026 um 15:28 schrieb Mitchell Holman:
> > Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in news:n416gcFbhemU1
> > @mid.individual.net:
> >
> >> Am Samstag000011, 11.04.2026 um 19:15 schrieb The Starmaker:
> >>> Come on, let's be real here...
> >>>
> >>> these ongoing wars between
> >>> 'whatever' are
> >>> just a bunch of monkeys
> >>> and gorillas fighting over
> >>> who gets the banana tree.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> planet of the apes
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Let me put it this way...since..
> >>>> yous don't understand..
> >>>> (and probably never will)
> >>>>
> >>>> Trump has two hands.
> >>>>
> >>>> What he wants, he takes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Trump doesn't like the way
> >>>> Iran is running stuff..
> >>>>
> >>>> he takes it!
> >>>>
> >>>> It's his!
> >>>>
> >>>> It belongs to him.
> >>>>
> >>>> He OWNS it!
> >>>>
> >>>> Who owns Veneusula?
> >>>>
> >>>> Trump owns it!
> >>>>
> >>>> He took it.
> >>>>
> >>>> It belongs to him.
> >>
> >> In Germany, where I live, we have a civil law called 'BGB' (=
> >> Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch).
> >>
> >> It declares, that you cannot acquire ownership, if the possession
> >> ('Besitz' in German) is based upon anything illegal.
> >>
> >> Therefore you cannot own a stolen object, nor sell it or give it to
> >> somebody else for free legally, because the stolen object remains
> >> stolen, whatever you do with it.
> >>
> >> In the USA they have different laws, but I don't think, that armed
> >> robbery is allowed there.
> >
> >
> >      The US has adverse possession laws regarding
> > land, but aside from that the law is the same as
> > what you describe. Even good faith buyers lose in
> > court when the original owner can prove their
> > claim.
> >
> Well, possibly they have.
> 
> But Venezuela does not belong to US-jurisdiction and only international
> laws are applicable, besides from the local laws.
> 
> Hence the USA cannot allow themself to capture land, which is not theirs.

You obvisouly never heard of The Monroe Doctrine

The Monroe Doctrine is a United States foreign policy position that
opposes any foreign interference in the Western Hemisphere. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_Doctrine

That means anything in out western hemisphere belongs to us...next comes
Germany.

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=monroe+doctrine


Now called the "Donroe Doctrine"


Trump One World Governament means...we govern Germany if we want. We
just take it....and your women!


i'm gonna make babies with your german women...










> 
> > https://share.america.gov/stolen-paintings-found-at-auction-will-be-
> > returned/
> >
> 
> In case of paintings (or any other movable objects) we have a problem:
> 
> only items are returned, which were illegaly removed from the owner.
> 
> But it is very difficult to prove, that the item was removed illegally
> from the owner.
> 
> There are many legal methods thinkable, by which a transfer could been made:
> 
> the former owner could have thrown it away
> 
> the owner could have given it to somebody as a gift
> 
> the owner could have sold it
> 
> the owner could have given the item as security for a loan
> 
> the owner could have left it behind, after moving away
> 
> the owner could have used it to pay debts
> ...
> 
> If now someone wants his item back, he had to prove, that none of the
> above were in fact the case.
> 
> Then we have a term in Germany called 'Verjährung'.
> 
> This means:
> 
> if someone has some object in his posession for more than thirty years
> and never had the idea, that thing was stolen, but assumed to have it
> legally, the real owner cannot have it back.
> 
> Therefor it is usually impossible to claim ownership after moire than 30
> years in Germany, because it is very difficult to prove, that the person
> having the item knew, that it was stolen.
> 
> TH

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

48 Hours The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-04 11:13 -0700
  Re: 48 Hours Taft Resident <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> - 2026-04-05 01:42 +0000
    Re: 48 Hours marika <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2026-04-05 03:28 +0000
  Re: 48 Hours Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-04 20:47 -0700
  Re: 48 Hours The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-07 09:10 -0700
    Re: 48 Hours The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-11 10:15 -0700
      Re: 48 Hours marika <marika5000@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 19:39 +0000
        Re: 48 Hours Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-04-13 03:07 +0200
      Re: 48 Hours Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-12 11:30 +0200
        Re: 48 Hours Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-04-12 13:28 +0000
          Re: 48 Hours Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-13 09:39 +0200
            Re: 48 Hours The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-13 08:33 -0700
        Re: 48 Hours The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-12 11:18 -0700
          Re: 48 Hours Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-13 09:47 +0200
            Re: 48 Hours The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-13 08:48 -0700
              Re: 48 Hours Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-17 09:00 +0200
      Re: 48 Hours x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-18 13:35 -0700
      Re: 48 Hours The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-23 23:24 -0700
        Re: 48 Hours The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-24 14:51 -0700

csiph-web