Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc Subject: Re: 48 Hours Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:33:30 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 156 Message-ID: <69DD0CCA.144E@ix.netcom.com> References: <69D154D7.79D7@ix.netcom.com> <69D52C62.5708@ix.netcom.com> <69DA81B7.40CA@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="63306c76af8dd5048a2a4a4b1f0d8302"; logging-data="3582422"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19hNWoeKx+bd6R+GElgB9TjzBu0B6Rc7aY=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:M1pXCymUN8CEG3Eytsw6rfnBEAY= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 260413-2, 04/13/2026), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:670744 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3028320 talk.politics.misc:1218398 Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am Sonntag000012, 12.04.2026 um 15:28 schrieb Mitchell Holman: > > Thomas Heger wrote in news:n416gcFbhemU1 > > @mid.individual.net: > > > >> Am Samstag000011, 11.04.2026 um 19:15 schrieb The Starmaker: > >>> Come on, let's be real here... > >>> > >>> these ongoing wars between > >>> 'whatever' are > >>> just a bunch of monkeys > >>> and gorillas fighting over > >>> who gets the banana tree. > >>> > >>> > >>> planet of the apes > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Let me put it this way...since.. > >>>> yous don't understand.. > >>>> (and probably never will) > >>>> > >>>> Trump has two hands. > >>>> > >>>> What he wants, he takes. > >>>> > >>>> Trump doesn't like the way > >>>> Iran is running stuff.. > >>>> > >>>> he takes it! > >>>> > >>>> It's his! > >>>> > >>>> It belongs to him. > >>>> > >>>> He OWNS it! > >>>> > >>>> Who owns Veneusula? > >>>> > >>>> Trump owns it! > >>>> > >>>> He took it. > >>>> > >>>> It belongs to him. > >> > >> In Germany, where I live, we have a civil law called 'BGB' (= > >> Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch). > >> > >> It declares, that you cannot acquire ownership, if the possession > >> ('Besitz' in German) is based upon anything illegal. > >> > >> Therefore you cannot own a stolen object, nor sell it or give it to > >> somebody else for free legally, because the stolen object remains > >> stolen, whatever you do with it. > >> > >> In the USA they have different laws, but I don't think, that armed > >> robbery is allowed there. > > > > > > The US has adverse possession laws regarding > > land, but aside from that the law is the same as > > what you describe. Even good faith buyers lose in > > court when the original owner can prove their > > claim. > > > Well, possibly they have. > > But Venezuela does not belong to US-jurisdiction and only international > laws are applicable, besides from the local laws. > > Hence the USA cannot allow themself to capture land, which is not theirs. You obvisouly never heard of The Monroe Doctrine The Monroe Doctrine is a United States foreign policy position that opposes any foreign interference in the Western Hemisphere. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_Doctrine That means anything in out western hemisphere belongs to us...next comes Germany. https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=monroe+doctrine Now called the "Donroe Doctrine" Trump One World Governament means...we govern Germany if we want. We just take it....and your women! i'm gonna make babies with your german women... > > > https://share.america.gov/stolen-paintings-found-at-auction-will-be- > > returned/ > > > > In case of paintings (or any other movable objects) we have a problem: > > only items are returned, which were illegaly removed from the owner. > > But it is very difficult to prove, that the item was removed illegally > from the owner. > > There are many legal methods thinkable, by which a transfer could been made: > > the former owner could have thrown it away > > the owner could have given it to somebody as a gift > > the owner could have sold it > > the owner could have given the item as security for a loan > > the owner could have left it behind, after moving away > > the owner could have used it to pay debts > ... > > If now someone wants his item back, he had to prove, that none of the > above were in fact the case. > > Then we have a term in Germany called 'Verjährung'. > > This means: > > if someone has some object in his posession for more than thirty years > and never had the idea, that thing was stolen, but assumed to have it > legally, the real owner cannot have it back. > > Therefor it is usually impossible to claim ownership after moire than 30 > years in Germany, because it is very difficult to prove, that the person > having the item knew, that it was stolen. > > TH -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.