Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #663483

Re: Should we synchronize clocks?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Should we synchronize clocks?
Date	Sat, 10 May 2025 12:54:15 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Lines	41
Message-ID	<681FAEE7.6FA2@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<183e210ee80d1afa$3780437$1799812$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <681F8194.1209@ix.netcom.com> <183e3d3d801921d1$153780$1838875$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Sat, 10 May 2025 21:54:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="febf006b9471557ede6d3fef88282da7"; logging-data="3901437"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PgW1l8wgVceL9NQMm+BvAe4w4OMxSK/4="
Cancel-Lock	sha1:vT7Ogslnqx5QHdP2ChHz/DgITh4=
X-Antivirus	Avast (VPS 250510-2, 05/10/2025), Outbound message
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:663483

Show key headers only | View raw

=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= wrote:
> 
> On 5/10/2025 6:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= wrote:
> >>
> >> Time is what clocks indicate.
> >>
> >> If we synchronize clocks - they're
> >> indicating t'=t; that's what clock
> >> synchronization means.
> >>
> >> We can do it - that  doesn't have to
> >> be obvious or easy, but that's definitely
> >> something we can manage in most
> >> circumstances (with a good accuracy).
> >>
> >> Now should we do it - and make "what
> >> clocks indicate" to be t'=t - or should
> >> we rather give up and obey "Laws of
> >> Nature" announced by a mumbling crazie?
> >> Maybe GPS wouldn't work if we didn't,
> >> but what a magnificient symmetry we
> >> would have instead it.
> >>
> >> That is the question. Isn't it?
> >
> >
> > What do you mean by "synchronize clocks" if i dare to ask?
> 
> By "synchronize clocks" I mean sychronize
> clocks.

Oh, I'm sorry...sychronize??? It dat how the british spel it? 




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Should we synchronize clocks? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-05-10 11:40 +0200
  Re: Should we synchronize clocks? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-05-10 13:23 +0000
    Re: Should we synchronize clocks? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-05-10 17:38 +0200
    Re: Should we synchronize clocks? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-05-11 12:46 +0200
      Re: Should we synchronize clocks? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-05-11 14:05 +0200
  Re: Should we synchronize clocks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-10 09:40 -0700
    Re: Should we synchronize clocks? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-05-10 20:17 +0200
      Re: Should we synchronize clocks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-10 12:54 -0700
        Re: Should we synchronize clocks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-11 10:41 -0700
          Re: Should we synchronize clocks? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-05-11 20:14 +0200
    Re: Should we synchronize clocks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-10 13:03 -0700

csiph-web