Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #663404

1905

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	1905
Date	Wed, 07 May 2025 00:21:11 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Lines	15
Message-ID	<681B09E7.2D9F@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Wed, 07 May 2025 09:20:47 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="7e82c554d37e5fe6ba973c632510a6c9"; logging-data="938846"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18yeIHnc4uBLfTS12W3fv5XCUTqUdARPZ8="
Cancel-Lock	sha1:E8njjTAHoYtp8HMeDIUSQiEztZg=
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus	Avast (VPS 250507-0, 05/06/2025), Outbound message
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:663404

Show key headers only | View raw

Not only was there no mention
of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..

there was no mention of...acceleration either.

dat means the twin never came back!

did the clock got older and died?



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-07 00:21 -0700
  Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-07 09:16 -0700
    Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-08 12:19 -0700
      Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-13 15:15 -0700
        Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-13 15:38 -0700

csiph-web