Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #661352

Re: 1905

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > > >
> > > > W dniu 20.02.2025 o 17:55, The Starmaker pisze:
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> In Albert Einstein's 1905 paper,  he didn't even 'mentioned' Gravity once.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Why do you suppose that was????
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> The answer is very simple...
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Albert Einstein HATED Isaac Newton with a PASSION!
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> (including all his friends)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> You know how these religious gangsters behave, they got together and
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> said..."LET'S FUCK UP THIS NEWTON MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> So, In Albert Einstein's 1905 paper,  he didn't even 'mentioned' Gravity once...not even once!
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> But the PASSION continued...
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Albert Einstein created a new theory of relativity that all it did was contained Gravity, with one little
> > > > >>>> difference...the goal only was to FUCK UP DAT NEWTON GUY!!!
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Albert Einstein spent 10 years tearing everything he could to fuck up Isaac Newton gravity.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> (and all his religious gangster friends backed him up to this day)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> anti-Newtonianism they all were...
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> For only one reason...Isaac Newton was a CHRISTIAN with a IQ of 190...
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> and Einstein IQ was 160.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> His religious gangster community want Einstein on top of the totem pole..
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> goal, to knock off Isaac Newton.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> and the beat goes on...
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Not only is there no MENTION on Gravity in Albert's Einstien's 1905 paper, but no one gives
> > > > >>> any explaination...WHY!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The Answer IS, they didn't want to give Newton the time of day. He wasn't Jewish! They blackballed him!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> You know how these religious gangsters are...religious fanatics.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The WORD was out! Don't even mention Newton's name...
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> But, how could Abert Einstein continue on...
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> so he struggled for ten years to come out with a complete opposite
> > > > >>> of Newton's Gravity, and called it General Relativity!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> It's all about Gravity but you're not suppose to say that.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> General Relativity is just an anti-Newtonian paper.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> 1905 paper, 1915 paper are both anti-Newtonian.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> One doesn't mention anything at all, and they other he tore his ass apart!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> DESPICABLE!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> So, Albert Einstein put a Secret Code in General Relativity...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> General
> > > > >> Gravity
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Both contain 7 letters
> > > > >>
> > > > >> General=Gravity
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Both start with the letter G
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Both have 4 consonants
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Both have 4 vowels
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > WAIT A MINUTE!!! Don'ts tells mes yous alls   believe these similarities
> > > > > are just a...COINCIDENCE????
> > > >
> > > > As he thaught and wrote German - rather yes.
> > >
> > > Okay, you need more insight...
> > >
> > > "Newton's law of universal gravitation states that all objects in the
> > > universe attract each other due to gravity."
> > >
> > > Look closely at these two words (just as albert einstein did)
> > >
> > > "universal gravitation"
> > >
> > > The word "universal" in German is...general.
> > >
> > > Universal Gravity
> > > General Gravity
> > > General Relativity is all about...Gravity.
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein STOLED the title idea from Isacc Newton!
> > >
> > > Is it still just a...COINCIDENCE????
> > >
> > > 'none are so blind as those who refuse to see'
> > >
> >
> > The word "general" translates to German is allgemein , and
> >
> > the German word allgemein translates to "universal" in English.
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=what+does+general+translate+in+German+mean+universally
> >
> >  Universal Gravity
> >  General Gravity
> >  General Relativity is all about...Gravity.
> >
> > General Relativity means universal gravity
> >
> >  "Newton's law of universal gravitation..
> 
> general
> 'jen(?)r?l
> allgemein
> 
> Translations of general
> noun
> der General
> general
> der Heerführer
> army commander, general
> adjective
> allgemein
> general, common, universal, overall, public, broad
> 
> adjective
> allgemein
> general, common, universal, overall, public, broad



Now class, let's go back to the year 1905...


In Albert Einstein's 1905 paper,  he didn't even 'mentioned' Gravity
once.

What do you suppose was the reason????







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-19 09:42 -0800
  Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-19 10:24 -0800
    Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-19 22:49 -0800
      Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 08:37 -0800
      Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 08:55 -0800
        Re: 1905 Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-20 18:14 +0100
          Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 10:21 -0800
            Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 14:56 -0800
              Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 21:13 -0800
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 21:17 -0800
                Re: 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-21 09:35 +0100
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-21 10:59 -0800
                Re: 1905 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-02-21 23:39 +0000
                Re: 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-21 09:33 +0100
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-21 10:42 -0800
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-21 23:11 -0800
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-22 10:57 -0800
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-22 11:11 -0800
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-23 12:15 -0800
  Re: 1905 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-02-21 09:23 +0000

csiph-web