Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #660713

Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet.

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet.
Date	2025-01-22 13:34 -0800
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<67916477.38E9@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <3d134676dad974fcfee511fe7270d781@www.novabbs.com> <67908532.7C80@ix.netcom.com> <19ddbd5db442cdc46b7a062e33fe27db@www.novabbs.com> <679141B8.2909@ix.netcom.com> <56c73153fdcc05ab4bacd54676c3ca39@www.novabbs.com>

Show all headers | View raw

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:06:32 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 5:42:10 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:30:17 +0000, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 17:26:08 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> This is necessary because it claims to have proven the doubling of the
> >>>>>> Newtonian deflection, which involves curved space and parallel lines
> >>>>>> meeting.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You really don't understand any of this.
> >>>> You really don't understand logic, as proven by your failure to answer
> >>>> the criticism directly by resorting to ad hominem. You lose.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Every artist knows parallel lines meet.
> >>>
> >>> If you draw a drawing of a city...the parallel lines meet to a point.
> >>>
> >>> It is the point of perspective.
> >>>
> >>> But it is an illusion.
> >>>
> >>> Parallel lines don't meet before the big bang...
> >>>
> >> Thank you, but the refraction of sunlight that keeps the Sun visible
> >> after astronomical sunset and the bending of starlight during an eclipse
> >> are not perspectival or illusions.
> >
> >
> > Parallel lines don't meet by simple definition otherwise if they
> > met...then they are not parallel lines.
> >
> > parallel lines never meet.
> >
> >
> > Are you saying Einstein said parallel lines meet????  Or some schnook or
> > schmuck?
> >
> Maybe Einstein didn't realize that for space to curve parallel lines
> would have to meet.


There are no lines in ...space.


There are stars in space that used to follow a straight line, but that
was before the big bang. 

The big bang broke all those straight lines...



*      *



*      *



        * 
         

            *


                *



You must be talking about...imaginary lines.


even ants don't walk a straight line.


Straight lines are not of Nature. 


Parallel liness are an invention of man only...


God does not walk a straight line...







   -- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-19 17:26 +0000
  Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-19 23:12 +0000
    Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-20 19:41 +0000
      Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-20 19:43 +0000
  Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2025-01-20 21:30 +0000
    Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-20 21:37 +0000
      Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-20 22:36 +0000
      Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-20 22:54 +0000
        Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-20 22:59 +0000
          Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-20 23:32 +0000
          Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-20 23:39 +0000
          Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-21 05:59 +0100
      Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-21 05:58 +0100
    Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-20 22:39 +0000
      Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-21 21:42 -0800
        Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-22 06:09 +0000
          Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-01-22 15:07 +0100
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-22 15:23 +0000
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-22 16:34 +0000
              Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-01-24 12:36 +0100
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-22 17:30 +0000
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-22 18:04 +0000
          Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-22 11:06 -0800
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-22 19:29 +0000
              Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-22 13:34 -0800
                Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-22 22:20 +0000
          Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-01-24 18:39 +0100
        Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-01-23 21:59 +0100
    Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-20 23:27 +0000
      Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 18:18 +0000
        Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-21 18:50 +0000
          Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-21 19:58 +0100
          Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 19:42 +0000
          Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 19:55 +0000
          Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-01-21 22:18 +0100
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 21:30 +0000
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 21:37 +0000
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 21:39 +0000
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 21:46 +0000
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 21:50 +0000
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 22:03 +0000
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 22:05 +0000
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 22:09 +0000
            Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 22:11 +0000
              Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-21 23:37 +0000
                Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-22 00:07 +0000
                Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-01-22 09:40 +0100
    Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 18:38 +0000
    Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 18:43 +0000
    Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 19:44 +0000
    Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-21 19:46 +0000

csiph-web