Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659895

Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru

Show key headers only | View raw

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am Montag000023, 23.12.2024 um 21:07 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
> > Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Am Donnerstag000019, 19.12.2024 um 08:02 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
> >>>
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> >>> As seen, the definition of second loved so
> >>> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
> >>> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> >>> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> >>> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
> >>>
> >> Look at this:
> >>
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_length_fluctuations#/media/File:Deviation_of
> > _day_length_from_SI_day.svg
> >>
> >> We can see, that length of the solar day is shifting by about 1 ms per
> >> day within a year.
> >>
> >> The length of the day is also about 1 ms longer than 86400 seconds on
> >> average over the entire plot.
> >>
> >> Would we add this 1 ms to the day, we could see, that Earth' rotation is
> >> actually speeding up occasionally, because the delta t value also goes
> >> down in recent years.
> >>
> >> Iow: if delta t is less today than half a century ago and we had already
> >> added one or two ms to the day length, now the Earth would rotate faster
> >> than before.
> >>
> >> This is so because in that case, the cumulative delta t curve would go down.
> >>
> >> Another good question would be:
> >>
> >> what causes this pronounced 1ms shift in the length of day within every
> >> single year.
> >>
> >> This does not sound like much, but actually means, that the Earth
> >> rotation is speeding up and down significantly and with a distinct
> >> measurable pattern of 1ms per day.
> >>
> >> Given the large mass of the Earth this would require a lot of angular
> >> momentum to be lost and gained (every single year).
> >>
> >> Somehow I cannot believe this could happen in reality. So, the only
> >> possible explanation is, that the UTC-time itself is shifting by 1ms per
> >> day within a year (which is colossal number, if you take the assumed
> >> precision of atomic clocks into consideration).
> >
> > Your mistake lies in the assumption that all those short term
> > fluctuations involve a change in angular momentum.
> > Only a part of the long term trend is caused by that,
> 
> Actually I had assumed, that Earth cannot loose angular momentum at all.
> 
> If now a fluctuation in the apparent length of the solar does occurs,
> than something must be wrong.
> 
> The question would be: what is actually wrong, since it is simply
> impossible for the entire Earth rotation to speed up and slow down on an
> annual basis.
> 
> Therefore there must be a reason, which is possibly overlooked, that
> would make the solar day longer over the course of a year and later
> shorter again.
> 
> I personally would guess, that the elliptic form of Earth' orbit around
> the sun is responsible.
> 
> But that would require a reason, which was not yet covered by standard
> cosmology.
> 
> TH

I thought I explained dis all already..

all the above is caused by the gravitional waves from the black hole.

'Earth  loose angular momentum' 

"entire Earth rotation to speed up and slow down"

"the solar day longer over the course of a year and later
shorter again."

'bees fly north instead of south'

'the magnetic north pole is in Brooklyn'


all caused by waves in the ocean of space the earth wobbles in.


The black hole wobbles everything in our solar system.


but don't worry, it is subsiding...



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-12-19 08:02 +0100
  Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-12-22 07:33 +0100
    Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-12-23 21:07 +0100
      Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-12-28 11:54 +0100
        Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot  guru The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-28 11:22 -0800
        Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-12-29 20:36 +0100

csiph-web