Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #653864

Re: New version of my annotations to SRT

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Here is the difference between Einstein's 1905 paper and the 1915 paper...

1905 is without the Gravity

1915 is with the Gravity

1905 is without the Acceleration

1915 is with the Acceleration

1905 is without the rocket coming back

1915 is with the rocket coming back

1905 is with the train going one way

1915 is with the train making a connecting flight on
a rocket in order to come back

1905 is without the bandage

1915 is with the bandage

1905 is without finishing it

1915 is with the finishing

1905 is with the formula for the atomic bomb

1939 is puting the atomic bomb on a boat to
Germany because to too heavy for a plane to carry it.


1905 is without the Gravity but contains the formula
for the atomic bomb and no one notices it.

Conclusion:

The atomic bomb is Real and Gravity is still ...just a theory.






 

 


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Volney wrote:
> > >
> > > On 5/19/2024 2:30 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > JanPB wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Am 12.11.2023 um 19:17 schrieb Frauly Bagaryatsky:
> > > >>>> Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Actually you can read the annotations now online (without downloading
> > > >>>>>>> the file).
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> nonsense, that's completely bullshit. It displays you never been study
> > > >>>>>> at an university with a 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗿.
> > > >>> Most likely a few specialists exist in Germany, who actually know.
> > > >>
> > > >>> I was actually a HYPOTHETICAL professor (in my role as writer of these
> > > >>> annotations).
> > > >>
> > > >>> The method goes like this:
> > > >>
> > > >>> imagine you were a professor and had to write corrections for the
> > > >>> homework of a student (Albert Einstein in this case).
> > > >>
> > > >>> The 'homework' is the text in question ('On the electrodynamics of
> > > >>> moving bodies' in this case).
> > > >>
> > > >>> So my 'duty' would be to write annotations, where I give the student a
> > > >>> few hints, how to avoid errors next time.
> > > >>
> > > >>> I found 428 errors in Einstein's text and therefore wrote so many
> > > >>> annotations.
> > > >>
> > > >> There are no errors in Einstein's paper. There are instances of sloppiness,
> > > >> bending over backwards, inconsequential omissions, and the like, all of which are
> > > >> typical of any science paper.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "inconsequential omissions"???? Like Albert Einstein's 1905 Relativity
> > > > paper NOT neven even mentioning ONCE 'Gravity'.
> > > >
> > > Duh-h-h! That was a paper on special relativity, and special relativity
> > > doesn't involve gravity!
> >
> > Time dilation special relativity 1905 paper is caused by relativity or gravity?
> >
> 
> If you *steal* somebodies homework you liable to make the same mistakes.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: New version of my annotations to SRT film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-05-18 18:41 +0000
  Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-18 21:30 +0200
  Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Badalbeili Turukhin <he@bbbh.ru> - 2024-05-18 22:01 +0000
  Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-18 23:30 -0700
    Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-19 13:42 -0400
      Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-19 12:10 -0700
        Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-19 12:27 -0700
        Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-22 13:57 +0200
        Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Cesario Fehér Buzás <jrs@receofh.hu> - 2024-05-22 15:31 +0000
        Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-22 02:18 -0400
          Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Procoro Cernochova Yang <oopoe@rcocpnc.cz> - 2024-05-24 11:23 +0000
      Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Justin Ali Kokkalis <kksjl@si.gr> - 2024-05-19 19:29 +0000
      Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-19 14:40 -0700
        Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-20 16:33 -0700
          Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-21 09:52 -0700
            Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-21 13:35 -0700
              Re: New version of my annotations to SRT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-22 10:17 -0700

csiph-web