Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #653143

Re: The Formula for... The Atomic Bomb

Show all headers | View raw

When I first came to 
sci.physics.relativity
I was dumbfounded 
how was it possible
thet a newsgroup that
calls itself
sci.physics.relativity
had no idea
that Einstein's
(1905)  Formula for... The Atomic Bomb
was based on
(1905) theory of relativity!


"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein


I mean, I can list the components from
(1905) theory of relativity bedsides
the aforementioned

this
"Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium).

and this
e=Mc^2 


Can you????



"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein


Yous wouldn't even What To TEAR UP!!!!







The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
> formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein
> 
>  "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium). -- Albert Einstein (1905)
> 
>    https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol2-trans/188
> 
> 
> 
>   The Atomic Bomb
>    "That weapon has a direct link to Einstein's three-page paper. In a nuclear fission reaction,
> an atomic nucleus splits, resulting in a reduced overall mass of matter, which is emitted in the form of released energy."
> 
> fast forward to year 1939
> 
> "...it may become possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction
> 
> in a large mass of uranium, by which vast amounts of power and large quant-
> 
> ities of new Radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears
> 
> almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.
> 
>       This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
> 
> and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-
> 
> ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed." -Albert Einstein
> 
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

The Formula for... The Atomic Bomb The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-20 12:05 -0700
  Re: The Formula for... The Atomic Bomb The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-27 13:49 -0700
    Re: The Formula for... The Atomic Bomb bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-05-03 01:44 +0000

csiph-web