Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #598464

Re: "now"

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physic
Subject Re: "now"
Date 2022-12-28 13:32 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <63ACB5E8.5DB7@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <d902f27f-c08e-46c4-9a1b-5ffc7fb181adn@googlegroups.com> <63AA624B.3C13@ix.netcom.com> <k0vcs3F2lphU1@mid.individual.net> <fdf52e96-dc57-4d6e-b539-fe2473065071n@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 9:07:19 PM UTC-8, whodat wrote:
> > On 12/26/2022 9:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > beda pietanza wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The instantaneous "now" passes by in an absolute synchronization all over the universe!!!
> > >> cheers
> > >> beda
> > >
> > > "now" does not passes by...Now doesn't move. It's always Now.
> > >
> > > What time is it now?
> > Please don't be an idiot. Now is a variable.
> 
> There is a now common instant across space since its absolute
> beginning. It took time for the most distant galaxies to get to
> where they are. That time took place after the Big Bang.


I know you scientists don't even bother to Think about things..
but when exactly do you believe Time "took place" AFTER the Big Bang????

Look at your clocks and measure it. 


Or to use your own words...

"That time took place AFTER the Big Bang."


How much After?


Look at your clocks and measure it. 


Or, how long does it take to make a clock?
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=how+long+does+it+take+to+make+a+clock 


Time is what a clock measures.

So, you first have to ...make a clock.

I mean, they didn't have a store like Target then where you can buy
one...


You contruct a clock using...things.


Without things..you cannot measure Time.

So, lets say you want to use a sundial...

don't you need an Earth first? 



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

"now" beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 13:36 -0800
  Re: "now" rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 14:24 -0800
    Re: "now" Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2022-12-26 22:59 +0000
      Re: "now" beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 15:48 -0800
        Re: "now" Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2022-12-26 23:52 +0000
          Re: "now" beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 08:03 -0800
    Re: "now" beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 15:37 -0800
  Re: "now" Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2022-12-26 22:56 +0000
  Re: "now" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 16:54 -0800
  Re: "now" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 19:11 -0800
    Re: "now" whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-26 23:07 -0600
      Re: "now" "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 21:17 -0800
        Re: "now" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-28 13:32 -0800
  Re: "now" beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 05:53 -0800
    Re: "now" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 12:00 -0800

csiph-web