Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #598464
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physic |
| Subject | Re: "now" |
| Date | 2022-12-28 13:32 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <63ACB5E8.5DB7@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <d902f27f-c08e-46c4-9a1b-5ffc7fb181adn@googlegroups.com> <63AA624B.3C13@ix.netcom.com> <k0vcs3F2lphU1@mid.individual.net> <fdf52e96-dc57-4d6e-b539-fe2473065071n@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 9:07:19 PM UTC-8, whodat wrote: > > On 12/26/2022 9:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > beda pietanza wrote: > > >> > > >> The instantaneous "now" passes by in an absolute synchronization all over the universe!!! > > >> cheers > > >> beda > > > > > > "now" does not passes by...Now doesn't move. It's always Now. > > > > > > What time is it now? > > Please don't be an idiot. Now is a variable. > > There is a now common instant across space since its absolute > beginning. It took time for the most distant galaxies to get to > where they are. That time took place after the Big Bang. I know you scientists don't even bother to Think about things.. but when exactly do you believe Time "took place" AFTER the Big Bang???? Look at your clocks and measure it. Or to use your own words... "That time took place AFTER the Big Bang." How much After? Look at your clocks and measure it. Or, how long does it take to make a clock? https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=how+long+does+it+take+to+make+a+clock Time is what a clock measures. So, you first have to ...make a clock. I mean, they didn't have a store like Target then where you can buy one... You contruct a clock using...things. Without things..you cannot measure Time. So, lets say you want to use a sundial... don't you need an Earth first? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"now" beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 13:36 -0800
Re: "now" rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 14:24 -0800
Re: "now" Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2022-12-26 22:59 +0000
Re: "now" beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 15:48 -0800
Re: "now" Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2022-12-26 23:52 +0000
Re: "now" beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 08:03 -0800
Re: "now" beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 15:37 -0800
Re: "now" Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2022-12-26 22:56 +0000
Re: "now" "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 16:54 -0800
Re: "now" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-26 19:11 -0800
Re: "now" whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-26 23:07 -0600
Re: "now" "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-12-26 21:17 -0800
Re: "now" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-28 13:32 -0800
Re: "now" beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 05:53 -0800
Re: "now" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 12:00 -0800
csiph-web